Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

RAF announces Puma Replacement plan

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

RAF announces Puma Replacement plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th July 2022 | 20:26
  #221 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 142
From: Warrington, UK
Hmmm. Not the ideal place for the gun.


MightyGem is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2022 | 20:48
  #222 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 18
Likes: 1
From: uk
Originally Posted by MightyGem
Hmmm. Not the ideal place for the gun.

How does it compare to H175 or Blackhawk?
collectivethrust is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2022 | 20:56
  #223 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,100
Likes: 321
From: east ESSEX
Looks like the air vent on the door opens outwards...?
sycamore is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2022 | 22:50
  #224 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 320
Likes: 56
From: On land
Originally Posted by sycamore
Looks like the air vent on the door opens outwards...?

The standard AW139 window hatch opens inwards, but there is a 25kt restriction on use. It’s not really designed for use as a vent because the A/con is excellent.

Last edited by Nescafe; 27th July 2022 at 23:31.
Nescafe is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 02:09
  #225 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 444
Likes: 83
From: Alles Über
Originally Posted by Nescafe
The standard AW139 window hatch opens inwards, but there is a 25kt restriction on use. It’s not really designed for use as a vent because the A/con is excellent.
No doubt we will pay extra to have the Aircon removed
trim it out is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 08:33
  #226 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Significant difference with the types shown ? - the stuff you see strapped to the Black Hawk - they're not for 'show' - they have already gone through extensive trials and approvals and in current use with fellow operators on the battlefield. The other guys? - If they ever get near a battlefield - they'll be on their own.....and late.
EESDL is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 14:22
  #227 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 165
From: Hobe Sound, Florida
Might have mentioned this previously, but with the new blades I inquired as to whether the 23mm ballistic tests were repeated and they were.Same test requirement since the A model. Also for instance had to build a drop test structure for the main fuel tank. Had to have all the structure surrounding the tank. Fill up the tank. Get a crane and lift the whole thing to 65 ft and drop it. No leaks allowed.
These design features are just two of a long list.

JohnDixson is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 14:28
  #228 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Originally Posted by sycamore
Looks like the air vent on the door opens outwards...?
Is that not a Direct Vision ( DV) window, not an air vent?, in case the windscreens get obscured for any reason, birdstrikes, oil, shattered screen, smoke etc, to aid in getting it down onto the ground, low enough not to cover the pilots face in say oil or whatever is obscuring his vision, while still allowing him to visually look out.
I would also say it has folded inwards, the reflection is over the seal area, if it had folded out the seal would not have a reflection across it.

Good to see they are still following in the tradition of putting the bloody flag on the wrong way round!


..

Last edited by NutLoose; 28th July 2022 at 14:43.
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 15:44
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Hants
I take it the AW149 can accommodate a load hatch / pole?
OldFairy HeHimTiger is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 15:57
  #230 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 605
Likes: 12
From: UK
Originally Posted by melmothtw
The UK element of the H175M would be full up production for the UK and exports on the only H175M line in the world.
As of now this is PR hot air as no countries (notably not France) have ordered any H175M helicopters.

For another stat, Airbus have not yet delivered 50 H175s, Leonardo have delivered more 120 AW149/189s and Sikorsky over 5000 Blackhawks
helihub is offline  
Reply
Old 28th July 2022 | 16:43
  #231 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by helihub
As of now this is PR hot air as no countries (notably not France) have ordered any H175M helicopters.

For another stat, Airbus have not yet delivered 50 H175s, Leonardo have delivered more 120 AW149/189s and Sikorsky over 5000 Blackhawks
I assume the GFS 175s are Ms in all but name?
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 29th July 2022 | 08:30
  #232 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Originally Posted by 212man
I assume the GFS 175s are Ms in all but name?
hell - I hope not!!
If they are then that will explain why no other military has purchased them.
EESDL is offline  
Reply
Old 29th July 2022 | 08:46
  #233 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 37
From: N/A
Originally Posted by helihub
As of now this is PR hot air as no countries (notably not France) have ordered any H175M helicopters.

For another stat, Airbus have not yet delivered 50 H175s, Leonardo have delivered more 120 AW149/189s and Sikorsky over 5000 Blackhawks
That is also because Airbus never have offered the 175M up till now. The 5000 blackhawks tells you it is a good but very old military helicopter…😉
casper64 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th July 2022 | 08:51
  #234 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 79
Likes: 41
From: UK
Originally Posted by MightyGem
Hmmm. Not the ideal place for the gun.

Keeps the door clear for entry/egress.
TUPE is online now  
Reply
Old 29th July 2022 | 18:30
  #235 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 20
From: The 4th dimentia.....
Originally Posted by chinook240
Perhaps more qualified door gunners could comment on the effect on aiming when your whole body is out of the side door at 120 kts? Never mind windchill, rain, snow, etc. Most of our current types site the gunner inboard. What arc of fire forward would the gunner have?

Nobody will know until the government have rammed it down the crews necks and the back or neck injury claims start coming in. The only 139's out there with similarly positioned weapons restrict crew to inside but I would view window size the same.

Interesting point re a 50 year old type in the Blackhawk. Surely that is not an issue given sales backlog in USA, and comparing F15, C130 and CH47 all selling whilst being as old or older. Is it a bad thing?
Northernstar is offline  
Reply
Old 29th July 2022 | 19:43
  #236 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 79
Likes: 41
From: UK
Originally Posted by chinook240
Perhaps more qualified door gunners could comment on the effect on aiming when your whole body is out of the side door at 120 kts? Never mind windchill, rain, snow, etc. Most of our current types site the gunner inboard. What arc of fire forward would the gunner have?
‘aiming’ 😂
Thanks for that, not laughed so much in ages 🤗
TUPE is online now  
Reply
Old 30th July 2022 | 14:37
  #237 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: UK
Have Leonardos actually got the people to design and build the AW149? I’m told that the technical team at Yeovil have been loosing a lot of staff due to other companies in the south west offering higher salaries and the lack of career development of engineers. If this is true then this must be a major risk to them achieving the IOC, etc?
ZH844 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2022 | 00:34
  #238 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,563
Likes: 952
From: Aus
Perhaps more qualified door gunners could comment on the effect on aiming when your whole body is out of the side door at 120 kts
Huey gunners had no problems what so ever, mind you it was tropical weather. The set up photographed above is not fit for purpose, I'm inclined to say it's a joke introduced to impress those who have absolutely no idea, look it's got a gun. Not going to be feeding a new belt in in a hurry.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2022 | 12:24
  #239 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 21
From: Used to be God's own County
Originally Posted by Northernstar
Nobody will know until the government have rammed it down the crews necks and the back or neck injury claims start coming in. The only 139's out there with similarly positioned weapons restrict crew to inside but I would view window size the same.

Interesting point re a 50 year old type in the Blackhawk. Surely that is not an issue given sales backlog in USA, and comparing F15, C130 and CH47 all selling whilst being as old or older. Is it a bad thing?
....and younger than the F-16 ;-)
Generally age is not an issue with a chopper unless you have some 'lifed' carbon composite components in the airframe.
As the Black Hawk and Chinook are proving on a daily basis - a purpose-built, proven military design, with updated avionics, DAS etc has so much more to offer the operator - including benefits of 'economies of scale' and supportability with similar types in the field.
EESDL is offline  
Reply
Old 1st August 2022 | 18:29
  #240 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Originally Posted by chinook240
... ... comment on the effect on aiming when your whole body is out of the side door at 120 kts? Never mind windchill, rain, snow, etc. Most of our current types site the gunner inboard. What arc of fire forward would the gunner have?
USAF 56 Rescue used to share our hangar on visits so I got many chances to look at their Pavehawks. The gunner works from a seat inside the aircraft. The aircraft has a two-part sliding door that moves forward to provide a slightly wider and much deeper opening than shown on this 149. The gun pivot, on which several weapon types can be fitted, is closer to the fuselage than shown on this 149. M2 was usually fitted on the Pavehawks I was in or up close to. In most of their arcs no more than the Gunner's forearms would be outside the aircraft. Might need to lean out to fire forward. There are also quite a few videos on youtube of H-60 gunnery. What's this about aiming?

Overall, that AW149 set-up looks like the result of, "Oh sh1t, we need a gun on it. If I can find a gun can you mount it on there by tomorrow lunchtime?"
jimf671 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.