Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Cumbria Helicopter crash discussion

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Cumbria Helicopter crash discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Oct 2011, 10:40
  #161 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Silsoesid..
Quote:
His comments and attitude about risk....sums it all up really !
Christ man you still at it???....leave the guy in peace FFS!!
On this thread Yes!
If you want tributes and condolences may I suggest you post on the relevant thread.

http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/445...ndolences.html

As I said earlier on this thread "It's a real shame that Mark had to die to enable such a huge discussion about Flight Safety and I'm sure all our thoughts are with his family and friends."
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2012, 23:15
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At last...
toptobottom is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 11:07
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For all our regulations, we have a system which is flawed and must be corrected. The facts in the AAIB report speak for themselves. If this aircraft had killed and injured people other than the pilot, the CAA would have a severe public problem on their hands.
I think what I'm saying is that aircraft based in EASA land must be maintained in EASA land. And maybe the same should apply to pilots.
JimBall is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 11:11
  #164 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
It's difficult to know what to say to that AAIB report....except that there is more to being a good pilot than stick and rudder skills. In aviation, the rules are usually there for a reason.

Appalling!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 11:33
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Escrick York england
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jim ball

I think what I'm saying is that aircraft based in EASA land must be maintained in EASA land. And maybe the same should apply to pilots.
i dont understand your comment above the pilot had a licence [uk] from easa land as you put it, and the aircraft was from easa land and maintained in easa land ?
md 600 driver is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 12:00
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,266
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Depends on how you interpret 'maintained!' Timexed components and falsified Form 1s don't really count! Neither does flying outside of your licence priviliges count as using a UK/JAR licence.

Last edited by 212man; 11th Oct 2012 at 12:00.
212man is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 12:07
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the pilot had a licence [uk]
So he was flying a hungarian registered heli with a uk licence?
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 12:16
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
It's like a flag of convenience on a merchant vessel designed to get around safety regulations in one country by registering it in another.

Darwinian selection in action I'm afraid - and not for the first time

As shy says it is not all about stick and rudder skills - a mil pilot with 2-3 years operational experience would not have just jumped into the air and cuffed it like that.

Last edited by [email protected]; 11th Oct 2012 at 12:18.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 13:08
  #169 (permalink)  
TRC
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So he was flying a hungarian registered heli with a uk licence?

From the AAIB report:

He held a crew member certificate issued by the Hungarian Civil Aviation Administration which validated his PPL for flight in Hungarian-registered aircraft.

TRC is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 13:15
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
md 600: I stand corrected. Hungary joined the EU in 2004.
But still the system is flawed. And I honestly don't know how we can guard against faked papers and wrong components and pilots with the wrong records & qualifications.
All I know is that if this type of event kills innocents, things will change rapidly.
Making all UK-based aircraft use approved UK maintenance organisations would at least help to stop the rot. And if the "flag of convenience" doesn't like it - then the aircraft cannot be based here.
JimBall is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 13:54
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Moo moo land
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The level of disregard of regulations from the pilot reminds me of the Mccrae crash.

Perhaps the nanny state should prohibit ALL private helicopters!
lowfat is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 14:08
  #172 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 425 Likes on 224 Posts
Perhaps the nanny state should prohibit ALL private helicopters!
No, many PPLH holders are very conscientious and rule abiding. Also, many privately owned helicopters are flown by professional licence holders.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 14:10
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Age: 71
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A tragic loss of life, and so unnecessary.

It is tempting to respond to any tragedy by contemplating new regulation. Usually what happens is that those who abide by the regulations end up having to jump through more, higher hoops and do more admin, and incur extra cost (and do less flying). Sadly, those who choose to ignore rules (generally created at least partly for their own benefit) will choose not to join (the rule following club), and at intervals will have "accidents".

There is a steady trickle of these accidents involving pilots (usually PPLs) who know better. The nature of helicopter flying is likely to attract them, because of the freedom associated with this sort of flying. It is the same thing that attracts us. Classic, almost archetypal examples of a pilot type, for CRM study consideration.

The only good thing about this event was that there were no passengers.
Helinut is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 16:10
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lowfat - what are you drinking? Get a grip, man!

Some motorcyclists crash for stupid reasons = do you want a ban?
Some swimmers drown for stupid reasons = do you want a ban?
Some horse riders die for sor stupid reasons = do you want a ban?


I have a PPL(H).
I have 2 aircraft - maintained in the UK to full commercial standard.
I have not crashed, busted airspace, bent an airframe, come close to bending an airframe

Why do you tar me with the same brush?

Go through the whole of the AAIB reports (over a period, I did read all of them to see what I could learn). Commercial operators sometimes do stupid things too, and sometimes they die. Do you propose to ban all Private and all commercial pilots?

John R81 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 17:28
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, so wrong paperwork and poor maintenance. The crash was not related to either of these.
This was pilot error, pure and simple.
Nothing to do with where it was registered or maintained.
chopjock is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 17:30
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Moo moo land
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But you are not in the news are you? John

The Law abiding are always punished because of the :-

reckless

Arrogant

Cheapskates

At least commercial operators are regularly audited by both the feds and customers . If this helicopter had been audited by the feds (as they can audit any craft in the uk) perhaps this chancer would still be alive.Not flying but still alive.

Last edited by lowfat; 11th Oct 2012 at 17:31.
lowfat is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 18:03
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UKdom
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Chopjock - the keyword is 'attitude'.

What's my attitude towards flying?

What's your attitude towards flying?

If we don't know each other we can only make assessments from evidence out there. We may get things wrong. We may occasionally break/push the rule book. Does that make us bad people or pilots? Habitually breaking, flaunting and ignoring rules does make us bad pilots because as a pilot we are the captain and we are duty bound to conduct ourselves in an appropriate manner - captaincy and airmanship includes a wide range of things that clearly, from the report were either missed or ignored by the pilot concerned.

Complacency is one of the biggest killers!
misterbonkers is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 18:07
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near the bottom
Posts: 1,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Finding a legal 'loophole' like this is one thing. Not being diligent and conscientious when it comes to maintenance and administration is another.

Neither of these things necessarily kills people, as pointed out in the AAIB report. However, if this behaviour is symptomatic of an attitude that also reflects a lack of respect for those things that do kill people, then the issue is in a different category altogether.

Once again (as is so often the case), ego got in the way of common sense and ability. It sounds very much as though the screen misted up and/or Mark went IMC. I know the crash site quite well and without moonlight, it's absolutely pitch black at night. Add high winds, heavy rain, an unqualified pilot for whom 'no' isn't an option, and the cast is set for an inevitable outcome. He isn't the first and he won't be the last.

PS When Mark bought HA-LFB, he tried to sell me his previous Gazelle. Insurance through the UK was prohibitive and so the full details of the license/insurance 'loophole' and the availability of cheap spares, was explained. I didn't buy the aircraft. There are a few PPRuNers who know far more about this than me, including md 600 driver, who is probably the most knowledgable.

PPS I saw HA-LFB in the black hangar at Farnborough while the investigation was being conducted. It looked like a car that had been through a crushing machine. The AAIB has done a great job reconstructing the last movements with the limited available evidence.
toptobottom is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 19:10
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 616
Received 61 Likes on 35 Posts
The pilot completed a licence proficiency check with a freelance examiner, formerly a British military pilot, in July 2010. The examiner stated that he had conducted a number of proficiency checks with the pilot in recent years and considered him to be of above average flying ability, adding that his skill level was similar to that of a British military helicopter pilot of two or three years operational experience.
This is reminiscent of the comments made by the examiner following Paul Spencer's death. That was also a PPL(H) Gazelle accident. Any connection here?

TT
Torquetalk is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 07:28
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Notrh East, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TT, Mark Weir an experienced pilot with a lot of hours & very capable of flying a Gazelle, Paul Spencer freshly qualified very low hours.
I cant see any conection other than same ship ??

Last edited by jetbox 21; 12th Oct 2012 at 10:27.
jetbox 21 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.