Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK Police helicopter budget cuts

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK Police helicopter budget cuts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2011, 15:38
  #1921 (permalink)  
morris1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Wonder how many more dominos will topple now!!
 
Old 23rd Sep 2011, 18:51
  #1922 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought from earlier posts that if the forces authorities rejected the plot it would be forced through. Can either side actually do this???????
B.U.D.G.I.E is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2011, 20:19
  #1923 (permalink)  
morris1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Last I heard, the government had washed their hands of it.

Having read the "tweets" from police authority it sounds like a lively meeting.!
Quote "very tense meeting".

Would seem the Pol Auth saw through the financial holes in the NPAS plan.
I love the bit where the annual invoice to SYP was to be £1,012,000 or so "saving £600k".
But then there's the £300k extra, added on for future procurement.!
Ah. So it's not £600k saving !! lol.
Was that in the small print then ???

Wonder what else is in the pipeline. Admin charges-£750,000. ??
 
Old 23rd Sep 2011, 20:25
  #1924 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 3nm SE of TNT, UK
Posts: 472
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
SYP ASU

Now on the BBC:
BBC News - South Yorkshire Police to keep force helicopter
Fortyodd2 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2011, 20:30
  #1925 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Well done and good luck SY, it will be interesting to see what the Home Secretary will say to this.

Time to reinstate the old motto "JUSTICE WITH COURAGE"?





South Yorkshire Police to keep force helicopter

South Yorkshire Police is to keep its own helicopter instead of signing up to a new national scheme.

South Yorkshire Police Authority announced it would opt out of the planned National Police Air Service which is due to launch in April 2012.

Opponents had warned the national scheme could mean a trebling of response times.

The decision makes South Yorkshire the first police force in England to opt out.

Charles Perryman, chairman of South Yorkshire Police Authority, said the decision was only made after a "long debate".

He said: "The National Police Air Service representatives were unable to assure us that we could get the level of cover we require for our communities.

"The balance of risk was that we were better off with our own helicopter based in South Yorkshire, so it could reach all parts of the county in a faster time than we would get from using neighbouring bases."

Neil Bowles, from the South Yorkshire Police Federation, said figures produced by the National Police Air Service "weren't convincing".

"They didn't take into account the capital costs of replacing the helicopter and I don't know whether they included the cost of our staff," he said.

South Yorkshire Police had earlier said the removal of the force's helicopter service would save £668,000 per year.

The police authority said it would now have to consider "implications to the budget" as a result of its decision to keep the force's own helicopter.

BBC News - South Yorkshire Police to keep force helicopter
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 11:06
  #1926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and the floodgates are opened.

You would like to think if the whole thing falls on it's ar@e then merseyside should get there chopper back then????
B.U.D.G.I.E is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 11:44
  #1927 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes on 225 Posts
Very glad to hear this outcome (the only sensible one); it was discussed at some length on local radio yesterday. Everyone agreed it would be a negative thing to remove the local ASU cover.

Not that anyone needed convincing except those trying to make a career out of the new proposal.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 12:34
  #1928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Raining on the Parade

I don't want to dampen down the chorus of triumph.

I would hesitate to suggest that most would agree that the aspirations of NPAS - to join up etc - was a good thing, needed to face the difficult times ahead and long overdue.

BUT not for the helicopter losses - which is a separate issue driven by the Bankers raiding taxpayers money.

So - time for reality check - SYP will simply have to make the savings (cuts) elsewhere in force and, now, I wonder how many other ASUs will now be threatened with closure if NPAS folds.

The "I'm all right Jack" that is faintly heard from Sheffield can be seen in a different twilight. But of course, that is for the real world.
berty is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 16:40
  #1929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In a world of my own!
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "I'm all right Jack" that is faintly heard from Sheffield can be seen in a different twilight. But of course, that is for the real world.
Well said Berty, no doubt somewhere in SYP there is/are department/s that are now on their own specialised forum bemoaning the cuts that are about to come down upon them because SYP PA have decided to 'save' their aircraft. So before the gloating and backslapping starts perhaps we should think about those people, unless we are all NIMBY's that is?
Wagging Finger is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 17:59
  #1930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I missing something??? SYP would save £668k approx? However would then have to pay £300k approx for future aircraft procurement and continue to pay the wages of their staff £500k approx... Would that with their subscription of £1.1m equal £1.9m approx???? It seems on the face of it SYP, by keeping their aircraft are actually saving their authority over £200k approx.... As next years budget as quoted by their Cheif Pilot is £1.67m approx. Looks like this is the way forward to making those national savings. Let's set up a NNPAS... (Non National Police Air Service)...
Final Flare is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 19:36
  #1931 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
The most interesting thing I find when reading the news about the recent meeting is;
Representatives from NPAS attended the meeting, but authority chairman Charles Perryman said members had “not been reassured” by their arguments and decided to opt out of the national arrangement.
Hard landing for changes to police helicopter strategy - Main Section - Yorkshire Post

Will other meetings such as this now be taking place around the country?


Further into the article I notice;
It is understood that to date only 10 of the 43 forces in England and Wales have formally accepted the scheme.
How long until April?
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 20:19
  #1932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foolishness

FF

Maths is obviously not your strong point, or perhaps you just need to think a little more. Manpower 'savings' would be made through putting officers back to force and not recruiting more - its notthat difficult to grasp.

And who is going to pay for the next aircraft. You cannot compare the £1.67m 'running' cost of the SY ASU and not include the cost of its eventual replacement, and then count both for the NPAS costs. You are either stoopid or misleading by not comparing like with like. And of course it will cost SYP much more without a central grant.

Blackhead06

I would guess that the pressure to achieve savings rests far higher than the NPAS team. Oh, and how did we get ourselves in such a big mess anyway - so many types of helicopter, not flying over the border.
berty is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2011, 20:46
  #1933 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
FF
Maths is obviously not your strong point, or perhaps you just need to think a little more. Manpower 'savings' would be made through putting officers back to force and not recruiting more - its notthat difficult to grasp.
Which of course would make sense if SY were recruiting !

Published on Thursday 21 October 2010 08:11

NO new police officers are to be recruited by South Yorkshire Police for the foreseeable future in a bid to save £10 million, the Cheif Constable has revealed.

Med Hughes said the current recruitment freeze for officers and civilians will remain in place long-term following the Government's announcement that police force budgets are to reduce by four per cent year on year.
Recruitment freeze for cops - News - The Star
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 08:26
  #1934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deep Sigh

SS

Its because SY are filling gaps by redeploying existing officers that they can get away with not recruiting. Is this really the level of debate?
berty is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 08:45
  #1935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Life on Planet PPRrunia

Blackhead06 (now forming into Zit01)

I realise now my error, sorry about that. But here on planet Earth we have a few minor difficulties regarding finances. It is well and good talking about operational effectiveness, and you should, but it can't be disconnected from the scarcity of money. It's ok for the those in the grey retired brigade to shout from the sidelines its not like it was my day - because its not. If you dont know of any instances when the border has come into play then you should get out more. You say you support the idea of a national air wing and yet bemoan the npas team for having to give it a go in what is now very difficult times. And, why didn't you give it a go in your day? And that would have been without the need to save 20% over the next 2 years in air support. So here's a challenge for you - come up with some useful ideas to save money - not like the pointless part of this thread about wine costs etc. Or are you content to sit in your own happy little world and fire the odd misguided rocket off now and again.



Remember 20%, next 2 years, from air support - transmission ends. I hope this message doesn't get lost down your blackhole.
berty is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 09:03
  #1936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
Age: 77
Posts: 1,174
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Although some aspects of the SYP thinking can be seen to have flaws - including the one that assumes a cost of a typical police role equipped light twin helicopter as being £5M in 2017 [£1.5M trade in + £3.5M for a new role equipped machine] - there are signs that a healthy rethink is underway. Add the fixed wing for Dyfed into that little pot.

Somehow I doubt this is more than a bargaining point .... the expectation that NPAS would retain the SYP base at Sheffield as a FOB is wierd.... what is that going to cost?

The NPAS house of cards is not going to tumble over this, after all the CC always said he was against it but he is off shortly and influences may well soften after he has left the big house.

The report associated with this decision clearly shows that some are not happy losing their unimportant associated air support activities.... football.... photography ... PR... It may be that others have not actually considered these losses. Air support is not only about 999 calls and it is that element that NPAS currently concentrates on.
PANews is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 10:00
  #1937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
including the one that assumes a cost of a typical police role equipped light twin helicopter as being £5M in 2017 [£1.5M trade in + £3.5M for a new role equipped machine]
I think they need to wake up and smell the coffee if they think there gonna get a new machine out of ECUK for that price.
B.U.D.G.I.E is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 11:32
  #1938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: kent
Age: 70
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Police Authority member changes?

Looking at the broader picture on government changes in police forces, which also includes police authority members.

Will any of the current police authority members be around to oppose any NPAS changes after 2012?

I only ask this after reading these published articles. The government are commited to changing everything on decision making at a local level so what will happen when 2013 arrives?

APA commits to successful transition to Elected Police Commissioners

Avon and Somerset Police Authority
Blue Thunder is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 11:34
  #1939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peace breaks out - the boil is lanced

Far from being conflictory, I think we might actually be on the same side in the we both think some form of joining up of police air support is needed. I think where we differ is that I fear that NPAS might not happen because of a number of issues, and the consequences will be far more damaging. Perhaps the team has gone back and sought some deferment, I dont know but I can imagine in the current financial climate that being frowned upon. Perhaps there will be a second round, but time clicks on and budgets have already been cut for the years ahead.

For info, I have nothing to do with police - rather a different organisation that has things that go bang. Many years ago we embarked on bringing the different colours of the organisation together - plagued with protectionsism and self-interest. In fact the resistance to change was legionary and we failed to achieve what we might have done, the budget increasingly went pear-shaped and the price (subsequently) had to be paid. So, yes I have some sympathy where perhaps you do not but then you perhaps have not encountered how difficult all this is, which of course is not your fault. So sorry, it is an issue close to my heart but for historical reasons.

I was always facsinated by the police having so many different empires, with different equipment and all doing pretty much the same thing. I think it can be made much slicker & cheaper - if it had been done so a few years ago then the current situation might be different - but you are not even on the starting line yet and the longer you leave it, the race might just get cancelled.

And with that, I will return once again to the Shadowlands.
berty is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2011, 14:54
  #1940 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes on 225 Posts
Regarding "cross border ops". We used to routinely do this. The only time a cost issue came into it was when a neighbouring force with no air support of their own asked for air support for a pre-planned operation, as they would for any other form of assistance from another force.

One point that seems to have been swept under the carpet so far. Helicopters sometimes get involved with long distance chases. Spreading resources more thinly (as per NPAS) will surely result in some vehicles / runners escaping simply because the helicopter needs to leave the pursuit to refuel.

It's actually very efficient for a helicopter reaching the edge of its normal operating area to pass on the job to the next ASU, who have arrived freshly refuelled and have the local knowledge required for many more difficult jobs.

In a national system the aircraft are likely to become stretched in terms of both fuel endurance and a lack of local knowledge of the crew.
ShyTorque is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.