Robinson R44
A Raven II will easily do 110kts especially if you push through the bow wave and hold it there steady i.e. level off within 5 minutes on take-off rating and allow A/C accelerate, then gently reduce power to max cont - you'll find she'll cruise a tad faster (extra 5-10kts) but the trick is to hold her steady otherwise you'll lose the advantage as the bow wave builds back up. I was was introduced to the technique by a fixed wing bod.
On my own (I'm only a lightweight) I can get 115-120kts cruise out of a good clean Raven II.
As for APS - 1520lb is about right for Raven IIs with night kit, 1460lb for Raven I and Astros.
On my own (I'm only a lightweight) I can get 115-120kts cruise out of a good clean Raven II.
As for APS - 1520lb is about right for Raven IIs with night kit, 1460lb for Raven I and Astros.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth/Inverness
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'Bump' in flight
We have had a bump/bang reported on an R44 during flight, no associated feedback or vibration felt through airframe or controls, no evidence of birdstrike, extensive engineering checks revealed no abnormalities with the aircraft, the freewheel checks iaw R44 SL-33 check out fine on rundown, also during auto's & recovery.
The aircraft is used in a training environment, so the freewheel is 'exercised' more frequently than during normal use.
We can reproduce a similar sound by flexing the side panels.
Any thoughts?
The aircraft is used in a training environment, so the freewheel is 'exercised' more frequently than during normal use.
We can reproduce a similar sound by flexing the side panels.
Any thoughts?
Better red than ...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard the two rear removable panels bang occasionally (cooling down on a hot day) but not sure you would hear it in flight?? Also maybe the fuel tank if the cap was tight and loosened up a bit allowing pressure out?
Bumps and Bangz and quite different things - which was it?
Bumps and Bangz and quite different things - which was it?
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Close to the hangar, UK.
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 44 occasionally makes a noise during the transition as one of the panels "pops" due to pressure differentials. Only ever does it the once and never in the transition back to the hover.
My friend once had the pilots door on his R44 pop in flight, and although it seemed closed at the latch beside the handle, he discovered the latch at the top of the door was outside the door frame when he landed. He hadn't realised the door latched at the top also. Closed normally on the ground and never happened again, just a thought.
R
R
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: England & Scotland
Age: 63
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bondu121
And you have already read / considered posts 1229 onward (see last page)?
A "bump" like a bird strike (no bird) with no loss of power or vibration was exactly what this felt like in the early stages. Did not show up in the run-down freewheel checks and only when the sprag clutch was removed and tested was it found.
John
And you have already read / considered posts 1229 onward (see last page)?
A "bump" like a bird strike (no bird) with no loss of power or vibration was exactly what this felt like in the early stages. Did not show up in the run-down freewheel checks and only when the sprag clutch was removed and tested was it found.
John
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Deep inth Norhtern Hills
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
44
You mentioned that your machine is used for training, if in the previous lesson the guy has been doing some run on landings, this usually leads to the side panels getting a bit distorted, seen by the bowing of the panels between the screws.
Could have been the panels springing back in to shape once in the air.
PB
Could have been the panels springing back in to shape once in the air.
PB
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: US
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A Raven II will easily do 110kts especially if you push through the bow wave and hold it there steady i.e. level off within 5 minutes on take-off rating and allow A/C accelerate, then gently reduce power to max cont - you'll find she'll cruise a tad faster (extra 5-10kts) but the trick is to hold her steady otherwise you'll lose the advantage as the bow wave builds back up. I was was introduced to the technique by a fixed wing bod.
Refer to page 2-1 in your POH. If you are using the five minute take-off rating to accelerate over 100 KIAS, you are exceeding a limitation.
"Do not exceed 100 KIAS when operating at power above MCP."
Also refer to SN-37, at the bottom of the page.
"The most damaging conditions occur when flying or maneuvering at high airspeeds combined with high power settings."
Passion Flying Hobby Science Sponsor Work
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Power setting
R44guy
fully agree on limitations. Imho such power settings are also not really usefull.
Misterbonkers
A well tuned R44-II should achieve those speeds well below max continuous. I don't know about bow-waves etc other than with boats that sail on a boundary surface between two media, but I would call it fine tuning.
My personal experience and my computer models show that 2 POB gives a higher max speed than 1 POB. A possible explanation is that if it is too light, drag may be bigger because of a more forward tilt of rotor disk, thus higher induction. Any body with similar experiences/thoughts on that paradox ?
d3
fully agree on limitations. Imho such power settings are also not really usefull.
Misterbonkers
A well tuned R44-II should achieve those speeds well below max continuous. I don't know about bow-waves etc other than with boats that sail on a boundary surface between two media, but I would call it fine tuning.
My personal experience and my computer models show that 2 POB gives a higher max speed than 1 POB. A possible explanation is that if it is too light, drag may be bigger because of a more forward tilt of rotor disk, thus higher induction. Any body with similar experiences/thoughts on that paradox ?
d3
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Perth/Inverness
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sprag clutch
The sprag clutch was in several parts when investigated, very worrying that all the recommended checks do not show up a failing clutch.
When removed from the aircraft the sprag felt a little rough, when dismantled it was obviously not far off complete failure.
A new design clutch is now in use - C188-3 Rev H.
Be wary of writing off bangs in flight as panel flexing.
MOR raised & RHC notified.
When removed from the aircraft the sprag felt a little rough, when dismantled it was obviously not far off complete failure.
A new design clutch is now in use - C188-3 Rev H.
Be wary of writing off bangs in flight as panel flexing.
MOR raised & RHC notified.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: AUSTRALIA
Age: 55
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After 25 years and 14 Robinson aircraft I would like to make a couple of observations, limited to the R44
Most cost effective helicopter available, as long as you sell before the 2200hr
Only helicopter I know that if you U/S one blade you have to do both
In the highest speed to lowest fuel burn ratio they are tops
Safe within limitations
The only aircraft I know of with in built recurring corrosion problems
Robinson should at least offer them without paint so the buyer can get a decent job done, including undercoat.
A pleasant aircraft to fly, maintain and store, no fuss operation with great dependability.
Most cost effective helicopter available, as long as you sell before the 2200hr
Only helicopter I know that if you U/S one blade you have to do both
In the highest speed to lowest fuel burn ratio they are tops
Safe within limitations
The only aircraft I know of with in built recurring corrosion problems
Robinson should at least offer them without paint so the buyer can get a decent job done, including undercoat.
A pleasant aircraft to fly, maintain and store, no fuss operation with great dependability.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Robinson Paint
Do Robinson supply touch up kits for their machines. Just had mine back from its annual and would like to touch up all the screw heads etc to make it look presentable again.
Thanks
Thanks
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: here and there
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont think so VG, if you ask your maint. outfit they may have the right colour Robbo paint (and activator) that they can let you have a small jar of. Depending on how big they are they may not though because its expensive (not so much the paint, getting it here).
Failing that with new machines there is/should be a bag of spare screws that could be used if no paint is available. It should be in the RHC under seat bag with all the other goodies they give you.
Failing that with new machines there is/should be a bag of spare screws that could be used if no paint is available. It should be in the RHC under seat bag with all the other goodies they give you.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It should be in the RHC under seat bag with all the other goodies they give you.
good luck ha ha.
tet
If you have painted fuel caps take one off and head down to a paint shop and they can make up a small can for you. We used to do that and it worked really well on small areas like screw heads.
TiP
TiP
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The IO540 manual from Lycoming has some specific advice (from memory), including removing the plugs to squirt in some kind of corrosion inhibitor.
Robinson customer service would, I'm sure, provide some advice too.
I would personally prefer going to the trouble of turning it over at least once a month and ground/hover running to keep all the seals well lubricated. Then the hassle of protecting the cylinders is unnecessary.
Lafite
Robinson customer service would, I'm sure, provide some advice too.
I would personally prefer going to the trouble of turning it over at least once a month and ground/hover running to keep all the seals well lubricated. Then the hassle of protecting the cylinders is unnecessary.
Lafite