Bell 407
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
an Enstrom 480 is a rich boys toy
Last edited by EN48; 19th Apr 2009 at 15:57.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sh*t Im lost again!!!
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to me reading your user name, I am wondering if you are on a crusade for the Enstrom 480......
Maybe you should have looked at all mechanical failures in the helicopter industry, I am sure if you looked at that you might of taken up cycling instead (although, I am sure there are plenty of mechanical failures there too, ask the guy trying to break the land speed record).
When you are talking about engine failures I think you should look more at the engine itself, as far as manufacturer of the engine not aircraft.
The 407 is definitely a work horse. Usauly operated at high gross weights and in all types of environments, not just a toy or running around doing law enforcement, usually carrying two people, gear/equipment and fuel.... full gross weight??? (No offense to all you deputy dogs.)
I am not saying the 407 is a better machine but I find statistics can be made to say what ever the person making a case wants. There are so many variables.
My suggestion to you is get checked out on the bicycle, less fatilties..... or is there No one said flying helicopters was safe.
DT
Maybe you should have looked at all mechanical failures in the helicopter industry, I am sure if you looked at that you might of taken up cycling instead (although, I am sure there are plenty of mechanical failures there too, ask the guy trying to break the land speed record).
When you are talking about engine failures I think you should look more at the engine itself, as far as manufacturer of the engine not aircraft.
The 407 is definitely a work horse. Usauly operated at high gross weights and in all types of environments, not just a toy or running around doing law enforcement, usually carrying two people, gear/equipment and fuel.... full gross weight??? (No offense to all you deputy dogs.)
I am not saying the 407 is a better machine but I find statistics can be made to say what ever the person making a case wants. There are so many variables.
My suggestion to you is get checked out on the bicycle, less fatilties..... or is there No one said flying helicopters was safe.
DT
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Florida
Age: 59
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really don't think you can draw any conclusions from the information. There really isn't much there. Have you flown the 407 yet? You'll probably forget all
about trying to split hairs with statistics when you do.
about trying to split hairs with statistics when you do.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am wondering if you are on a crusade for the Enstrom 480
I think you should look more at the engine itself,
Maybe you should have looked at all mechanical failures in the helicopter industry, I am sure if you looked at that you might of taken up cycling instead
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you flown the 407 yet? You'll probably forget all
about trying to split hairs with statistics when you do.
about trying to split hairs with statistics when you do.
If 46% of accidents are due to mechanical malfunctions, this doesnt seem like splitting hairs if an accurate reflection of real world experience.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What ,in your opinion, are the 'significant issues' with the Astar? I would not venture an opinion about a 407 if I have no time in it and I see you do not have time in an Astar.
If you are going purely by folklore, then I can say that an Astar with Arriel engines has a sterling record as far as engine failures go.To me, the Astar is a superior machine in every way.But then I am biased towards European and Sikorsky products and underwhelmed with the current line up Bell has to offer. But I will not make that a blanket judgement until I fly the 407/212/412/205/206.
Alt3.
If you are going purely by folklore, then I can say that an Astar with Arriel engines has a sterling record as far as engine failures go.To me, the Astar is a superior machine in every way.But then I am biased towards European and Sikorsky products and underwhelmed with the current line up Bell has to offer. But I will not make that a blanket judgement until I fly the 407/212/412/205/206.
Alt3.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What ,in your opinion, are the 'significant issues' with the Astar?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Those mechanical failure figures are far higher than most accepted numbers. Most OEMs (Agusta, Bell, Eurocopter) quote Human Factors as being accountable for ~75% of causes, with inherent mechanical failures being attributable for less than 10% (if memory serves). We should see some definitive figures from the Joint Helicopter Safety Analysis Team (JHSAT) before too long.
The C47B has suffered from a couple of major design problems, including third stage turbine failures and FADEC failures (which led to a fleet stand-down and development of the reversionary governor after the tragic loss of a USFS 407 during the Challenger debris recovery effort in 2003).
I/C
Originally Posted by EN48
And while the 407 engine is a 250 series, it is quite different from the C20. I am wondering if the the C47B has a siginificantly different pattern of failures?
I/C
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those mechanical failure figures are far higher than most accepted numbers. Most OEMs (Agusta, Bell, Eurocopter) quote Human Factors as being accountable for ~75% of causes, with inherent mechanical failures being attributable for less than 10% (if memory serves
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the hills of halton
Age: 71
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you figures I show 16 of the reported accidents as engine related.
Only bright spot is they have reduced in recent years , 6 of the accidents were in 2003.
Only bright spot is they have reduced in recent years , 6 of the accidents were in 2003.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Homer, Alaska
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You might review, for example, the last three years of 407 accidents and incidents, and redo your analysis to determine what the current statistics say, now that the 407 is mature, as opposed to its introduction as a new product. I took a quick look of reports in the NTSB data base since 2005, and saw 22 reports. While there were engine failures, you didn't see the type of events experienced early in the 407's history.
One can also make the argument, that in a perfect world, the only accidents would be mechanical problems, with pilot training reducing the human error accidents to almost zero. Since you have trained at Bell, you know how great their 407 training is.
I don't think comparing the 480 to the 407 is an apples to apples comparison, when you look at the number of 407s in the fleet and the number of hours flown by the 407 each year. Wouldn't the 407 fleet fly 100 times the annual hours flown by the 480 fleet?
In the last ten days, I flew a 407 from CO to AK, and a L4 from AK to CO. Two and a half days up in the 407, and four days down in the L4. Along the way, I stopped in Penticton and did two days of mountain training in the 407 with Canadian Helicopters. Previously I have made that trip from the lower 48 to Alaska, and also trained with Canadian Helicopters in the Jet Ranger, L4, and 530F. The 407 runs circles around all those other ships both in the mountain environment as well as on a long cross country flight.
While there are always opportunities for pilots to screw things up, the 407 makes the flying part a lot easier between its great power, the responsiveness of the rotor system, the tail rotor authority, and the ability to do slopes. Several months ago in the 407, we needed to climb high to cross a high mountain pass in Colorado with a bunch of wind and turbulence, and easily climbed to 15,500 feet where we were still climbing 700 fpm. If you mated an L4 with a high altitude tail rotor with a 530F, took their best attributes, and added in a bunch of attributes neither ship has, you end up with a 407.
One can also make the argument, that in a perfect world, the only accidents would be mechanical problems, with pilot training reducing the human error accidents to almost zero. Since you have trained at Bell, you know how great their 407 training is.
I don't think comparing the 480 to the 407 is an apples to apples comparison, when you look at the number of 407s in the fleet and the number of hours flown by the 407 each year. Wouldn't the 407 fleet fly 100 times the annual hours flown by the 480 fleet?
In the last ten days, I flew a 407 from CO to AK, and a L4 from AK to CO. Two and a half days up in the 407, and four days down in the L4. Along the way, I stopped in Penticton and did two days of mountain training in the 407 with Canadian Helicopters. Previously I have made that trip from the lower 48 to Alaska, and also trained with Canadian Helicopters in the Jet Ranger, L4, and 530F. The 407 runs circles around all those other ships both in the mountain environment as well as on a long cross country flight.
While there are always opportunities for pilots to screw things up, the 407 makes the flying part a lot easier between its great power, the responsiveness of the rotor system, the tail rotor authority, and the ability to do slopes. Several months ago in the 407, we needed to climb high to cross a high mountain pass in Colorado with a bunch of wind and turbulence, and easily climbed to 15,500 feet where we were still climbing 700 fpm. If you mated an L4 with a high altitude tail rotor with a 530F, took their best attributes, and added in a bunch of attributes neither ship has, you end up with a 407.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you didn't see the type of events experienced early in the 407's history.
I don't think comparing the 480 to the 407 is an apples to apples comparison
I am planning to do the Penticton mountain flying course in the near future. Keep hearing rave reviews.
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Germany
Age: 53
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bell 407 statistics
Maybe I'm wrong or missing something but I think the statistic is wrong.
I assume the entire fleet of Bell 407 is flying far more hours a day then the entire fleet of 480 does in a month.
I assume the entire fleet of Bell 407 is flying far more hours a day then the entire fleet of 480 does in a month.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to all who responded to my post. As a result of my post being merged with a larger 407 thread which I was not previously aware of, I have carefuly reviewed 12 pages of posts on the 407 dating to 2001 and now have a much better understanding of the issues I was inquiring about.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And your conclusion was???
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
do you consider FADEC manual to be an emergency or abnormal?
Reading between your lines however, the accident I made reference to in my previous post was not a simple FADEC failure with a reversion to manual (and perhaps not a FADEC failure at all) as the engine either rolled back to idle or quit according to some close to the situation. From what I understand, no amount of throttle manipulation would have restored power (and the pilot is said to be very experienced overall and in the 407).