Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Oxford Air Training

Old 25th Aug 2005, 07:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Aluminium Tube of Doom
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget that after Oxford you may still have to pay for your own type rating and/or be bonded to the company you eventually go to.
FliegerTiger is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2005, 07:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: England
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seem to be a fair few differences between Oxford and CTC, Oxford certainly has the prestige and recognition that probably beats ctc in the aviation world but CTC is becoming increasingly recognised as a top training school. Both OAT and CTC have excellent groundtraininig and flying training scores and both a well respected as schools who will produce top quality pilots. The selectino process for CTC is more difficult and competitive than the process to get into OAT but this is largely to do with the financing of the CTC scheme. Rather than getting the £50000 secured loan you need to get into OAT, CTC has a sceme whereby you do need a £60000 loan but it's unsecured and the airline eventually pays it back to you at £1000 a month for 7 years as has already been mentioned. This does mean you're bonded to an airline for 7 years but 7 years isn't that long and if you're wanting to be a pilot then I don't see what's wrong with being bonded for that period of time. Both OAT and CTC seem to help find their cadets jobs though they do it in different ways. It's blatantly in the best interest of the school to get their pilots into jobs as being able to say 'we have a 98% success rate' is going to convince more people to apply. I hope this is a more balanced arguement than madmandan's 'oxford are the one and only' approach. However, I would like to say that Oxford's food is disgusting!

Chocky
chocky is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2005, 15:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dustbowl
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to OAT to do the pre APP integrated course and it was really very good. I finished and went off to CTC to do a 737 type rating and it was also very good.
Point of this post.....both schools are really good and it dosen't really matter where you do your training just so long as you manage to get yourself a job at the end.
superstall is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2005, 15:29
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very Interesting topic!

I know this thread was specifically for CTC and OAT. However, i am surprised FTE didn't crop up into it at any point.

What's the census on them in comparison to OAT?

Any opinions?
jam123 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2005, 16:15
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as a graduated CTC cadet, I am now working alongside OAT guys in my job and the CTC/Oxford banter goes back and forth. At the end of the day, and as most people on this thread realise, they are very similar courses in terms of quality of training (at least that is the feedback we have from line trainers).

The two schemes are also similar in that the FTO take ~£60k of your money over a year or so, and the selection processes ensure that only candidates who are likely to succeed will be taken on - in my view this disregards the 'Oxford only want your money' view to a certain extent. The CTC bond is also quite tax-efficient in that only the interest on the loan is taxable.

With regards to a job at the other end, I know my OAT colleague was kinda in the right place at the right time but some of his course-mates are still looking for employment. Whereas at CTC, they only receive a fee for the training when employment is secured so it's in their interests to find you a job.

And lastly, CTC have placed several cadets with BA this year.

I hope this is useful to those looking to make a decision.

Last edited by gliding777; 25th Aug 2005 at 19:33.
gliding777 is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2005, 18:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both come with a huge health warning.

CTC are now demonstrating that they consider themselves to be the abettors for the industry. What they say goes and if they do not like you as a candidate that precludes you from a great many jobs. The reality is that they cannot be impartial and the legality/morality of their position wrt judging "the best candidate" is shakey.

Several of the CTC candidates in my airline are considered to be jumped up little S/O's that need to learn a thing or two. Arrogance/confidence without experience is lethal. Most learn the hard way.

Given the state of play wrt terms and conditions vs costs of training, etc. you would need to have your head examined to get into flying.

Ask the EPST guys whom owe £90K!
Globalwarning is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2005, 19:32
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry did not mean to "bum you guys out". Just information really.
Globalwarning is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2005, 13:41
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Pub
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went to CTC for the 737 type rating not by choice but because that's where my airline sends it's people for type ratings.

I have done 3 type ratings and found CTC totally appalling, the CBT is so out of date and incorrect to the aircraft you will be doing the exam on and the attitude of some of the instructors sucks, I had many run-ins with them over the standard of the course.

I felt sorry for the cadets with only 250 hours going from a Kartana to a 737, they were getting totally lost in the sim and a few of them struggled with the line training and were chopped and why because none of the sim instructors have any standard way of operating, we had 15 different ways of rotaing and landing the aircraft and you very rarely had the same instructors and some would scream at you for doing something wrong which was correct the previous day with a different instructor. Several times I asked them to stop the sim and either change their attitude or get me another instructor because I would not put up with it .

Take my advise avoid this place if you can!

And that's the bottom line coz Stone Cold said so!
Stone Cold is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2005, 17:32
  #29 (permalink)  
AMiller
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Stone Cold, you've just got to smallow that treatment mate. It's not right but it happens. I've spent 4 years with the RAF and its just the same.
 
Old 29th Aug 2005, 18:10
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMiller

"Stone Cold, you've just got to smallow that treatment mate"

What exactly is smallow? And what other B.S do you have to spill? The gulf of difference between the RAF or CTC is plain, as Mr Stone Cold points out, CTC is generally gash. And in the RAF, the queen and I pick up the tab.
Globalwarning is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2005, 19:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Pub
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'm taking a hit in salary on one of these TRSS schemes in other words I'm paying for it, why should I put up with being spoken and shouted at and such poor teaching ability. I'm a paying customer and if I'm not happy I'll bloody tell them.

I was a instructor for a couple of years teaching people to fly and I was a Captain within a regional airline and I would never dream of talking to any of my students, first officers, cabin crew or even the cleaners the way I got talked to at CTC.

The cadets who were on my course seemed to be in some form of fear that if they spoke up CTC could finish their career but i'm not a cadet i've been flying for 10 years and will not lay down for CTC's huge ego they have devolped.

I have complained to my current airline about the poor quality of training and they are aware of the situation and are not to happy with the quality themselves.
Stone Cold is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2005, 10:04
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this has really thrown the cats amongst the pigeons!

It seems strange that there should be such a negative attittude after all the good things we have heard so far.

Its like two opposite ends of the scale.

I can't imagine that it is as bad as it is made out to sound. I'm sure not every cadet that goes in there gets talked to like a piece of crap. Surely we would have heard about it on some topics on here.
davepearsall is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2005, 14:35
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Pub
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not so much with the ground instructors (you never really see them), it is mainly the sim instructors with a attitude problem not all of them but most of them, all but 1 on my course don't know about the Airbus guys they may be different.

I understand that CTC was a good training company years ago but I think it's all gone to their head!

Another thing that would make some of us experienced guys laugh was the school report since we are treated like children, regardless of the performance of the cadet he would always generally get a glowing report with good progress ticked despite taking 30 minutes to get a GPWS recovery correct because they kept overstressing the aircraft or landing to the side of the runway and this was generally withheld from the report, where as the experienced guys regardless of their performance would only get a normal progress at best with lots of things written up in the report saying this was wrong that was wrong despite how insignificant it was. I know that CTC would prefer the cadets and I understand why they always had glowing reports it's because the cadets are a product of CTC.

After CTC the cadet will feel on top of the world, he/she has had a excellent report and praise from the instructors. Then they go to the airline for base training just before the line training and that's when the problems start. All of a sudden the cadet realises things are not going well when they are on their 14th circuit and they should have finished by their 8th circuit, some don't even complete the base training because the training capatin needs to get other guys through and they are sent back to the sim for further training, their confidence has taking a bit of a hit and they struggle through the line training and again sent back to the sim for more training and eventually some of them were chopped with the cadet wondering what went wrong since they had such good reports from CTC.

Another thing that amazed me was that smoke in the cockpit was not taught in the sim only discussed which is not good enough. Smoke in the cockpit is one of the most scariest things that can happen, it was ok for me I have seen it and practiced it many times in the sim from my previous company but when I asked why it was not being shown to the cadets because I thought it was vital for them to go through the excercise to see what it's like and how difficult it is to see the instruments I was given a totally lame excuse that if they did it would set off the fire alarms in the building what total bo!!ocks. If this happens in real life and the cadets are inexpericened then the captain will feel very alone in dealing with the situation. As many captains that I know will always say "cadets are good at pushing buttons but when the sh!t hits the fan and they are knocked of the rails a little bit you can find yourself on your own".

I don't blame the cadets and I'm not having a go at them they were good guys and girls on my course but I think it is in the interest of the cadet that the training provider should pracitce has many types of emergencies as possible to prepare the inexpericend cadet to be able to deal with potential emergencies that may appear on the line and that the sim instructors started teaching to operate the aircraft in a standard way rather than have their own way of doing it.

Very poor in my opinion!
Stone Cold is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 09:11
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norwich
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stonecold,

Are you sure your not a bit bitter because maybe you didn't get such a glowing report?

Are you sure your not a bit annoyed at the fact a cadet with 250 hours on the "kartana" did a bit better than you in the sim?

You paint a picture that every cadet goes to an airline and gets completely out of his/her depth, put back in the sim and even chopped.

This is obviously not true, so there must be some reason for your outburst.
Mooney12 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 09:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't want to be rude,

but where you getting 60 grand from for Oxford?
Ridgerunner is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 10:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Stone colds views are not unique to pilots within established airlines. CTC seems to have lost its way and are starting to be a liability to the industry, particularly to pilots. Got to say if I went down there for a type change etc and they started pratting about, I'd read them the news in English.

Legally and morally they are on very thin ice.
Globalwarning is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 17:05
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: EGYD
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm glad to see Oxford's marketing department has got a real tight grip on madmandan1. So much so he's blinkered to the rest of the world
BigGrecian is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 17:57
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Pub
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mooney12 I'm not bitter about a stupid report, I have to much experience to care less, I know my ability.

With regards to the cadet doing better than me in the sim re-read my post and you will find the cadet was struggling not by their own fault just the poor teaching practices at CTC, this is my point CTC leave a lot of things out which are very important for a INEXPERIENCED cadet to learn and practice, it seemed regardless of the performance of the cadet they would get a excellent report which was given to the airline and why? I will say it again, the cadet is a product of CTC, if CTC was to send cadets to airline with reports of a few problems encountered in the sim that airlines may take it's business elsewhere.

For your information on several occasions in a 4 hour sim slot I only got a hour and the cadet got the rest because they were having a few problems! not their fault just not taught very well because the instructors don't stick to SOP's they teach things their way and on one occasion I had to give the cadet some guidence because they were getting rattled by the instructor who was loosing patience with them.

And yes all cadets on my course went back to the sim for some additonal training and some were chopped!.

Mooney12 if you are or were a cadet take my advice you don't know it all, I have been flying for over 10 years and I still have lots to learn. Don't be arrogant you have 2 cups one filled with luck and the other one is empty on experience and what you need to do is fill up the cup of experience before the cup of luck runs out.

And that's the bottom line coz Stone Cold said so!
Stone Cold is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 18:13
  #39 (permalink)  
doo
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a word of caution, at the Airline I work for I don't know of anyone lucky enough to go "back to the sim" if they didn't make the grade by the end of line training.
doo is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2005, 20:45
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is all very intresting but a little one sided with respect to CTCs type rating training. If they are any Wings Cadets out there like "no sponcer" who are going through sim training, have completed line training and have been placed with an airline their comments would be useful

Any offers????????????????????????
chris2005 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.