Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

When to give up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Sep 2006, 00:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hellfire Corner
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Always, always heed what J.A.F.O. advises above: Whirly's right.
I have nothing wise to add to that already said, but would like to add my 2d's worth anyway. Since you've indicated you've always wanted to fly, I think that once you get past the feeling that in four hours you haven't learnt anything, you'll probably become so absorbed you just won't notice that it gets into the blood and under the fingernails and - oops - there you are - totally addicted.
Few of us can afford it. We just find ways of doing it. Gliding, motor gliding, shares in a Permit aeroplane, microlights...exploiting new friends (yes, they come with the package and they're free) are but a few examples that come to mind. It might not be easy if you have family commitments, but casual conversations with colleagues at work suggest that we all have different perceptions of what is necessary for the soul once the body is supported - and what we are prepared to pay. Those with a passion, whether it be for fishing, golf or jet skiing, seem to do more on less and are happier for it. Unscientific and simplistic, I know, but I suspect you're already headed in this direction and you know it.
It took me about forty glider flights to acquire four hours and I had a wide selction of instructors to boot. I was probably too stupid to analyse it, but if I had, I'd have not reached a more settled learning phase which led, over the years, to where I am now: plenty of time logged and still as daft as a brush, but with fond memories of each phase of my flying. It all just grew, like Topsy.
What's a little odd is that when I began, I coudn't really afford the gliding lessons. Now I can't really afford the Avgas. Curious, 'cos I've been flying throughout.
Please spend a bit more money then come back to us.
ChampChump is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 02:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know where you are based (your profile says "London") but if you fancy a flight from North London you're welcome to come along with me for free when I am not doing anything more specific. Don't know if it'll help much, though at least you can practise flying straight and level for free. I do have an autopilot but it isn't voice activated.

Put another way, if you decide to give it all up at least you can get airborne and if you decide to keep going I can at least show you an easy way to get Notams...
drauk is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 04:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
skills and coordination?

I have found in my (so far) short flying career, that when a specific skill has been difficult to master, it's because I have not grasped, or am not using a fundamental concept.

For example:

taxiing - looking towards the horizon, rather than straight in front of the aircraft

turning accurately in the circuit - picking my horizon reference point on the wing before I commence the turn

bouncing on take off (tailwheel) - getting the stick forward before opening the throttle!

losing directional control on landing (tailwheel) - keep that stick right back!!!!

PFL's - getting and keeping the 30-45° view to the landing point

X-wind landings - know and understand (and don't forget!) what each of the controls really does for you on finals.

etc.

I'm sure some people's description of the 'key skill' will be different, but if you are struggling with something, then recognise that you have missed a key element, try to find out what it is and then focus on that element for a couple of tries - even if your instructor is helping with some of the other tasks.

As an example, my confidence in X-wind landings got a huge boost when my tailwheel check pilot took me to one of his mate's strip that had a 20-25 knot X-wind and made me approach and fly down the strip without landing. We probably could never have landed the thing without a ground loop at the end, but the exageration of all the control inputs required really helped drive home what everything was for.

Last of all - dream through each skill in your idle moments! Even virtual practice makes perfect (I think! - I'll tell you if I get there! )

Don't give up!

A
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 06:07
  #24 (permalink)  

The Original Whirly
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mad bear,

As an aside, it was the introduction of the NPPL licence scheme that set me off thinking that flying might be something I could just about afford. If one can get and maintain a licence in 32 hours or so training plus six hours a year, that is something that even I could afford. But I now know that virtually nobody could learn to fly competently in 32 hours; and I suspect that one couldn't maintain competence in six hours a year. So why are these hours stipulated??
OK, now I know where you're coming from.

I think what you're doing is putting extraordinary pressure on yourself to do the PPL in minimum hours because you can't really afford it. I really, really wish people didn't have to do that, and many do. You can't relax because you're worrying about all the money you're burning.....and guess what, you can't learn to fly unless you relax!

mad bear, you just have to take the pressure off yourself. I wrote what I did yesterday after a hard day's instructing, and I was really too tired to think clearly. Although I meant most of it, it was a little too black and white. Don't, whatever you do, believe those who say you should always listen to Whirly!!!!!! But as you'll hopefully have realised by now, four hours isn't enough to know how long it'll take you to get your PPL. OK, maybe it'll take you the UK average of 60-70 hours, or maybe more; it took me 90 hours to get my PPL(A).

Option 1. Chill out. Enjoy the flying. When you run out of money, go away and save some more. You're young - people learn to fly in their 50s, 60s, and 70s. What's the rush?

Option 2. Switch to gliders or microlights, which are a bit cheaper.

Option 3. Borrow the money to get your PPL(A), then get a share in a permit aircraft, or switch to microlights then, or ask on here about all the other cheaper ways to fly.

Option 4. Buy lots of lottery tickets.

I suspect others will give you more options.

As for the minimum hours requirement, remember it's a legal minimum. Some of those people will have flown other types of machines, or be ex-military, or been flying as passengers in parents' aircraft since they were born or something. You're got to have a legal minimum somewhere. Though many agree with you that 32 hours is ridiculous. And the six hours a year? Again, you've got to have a legal minimum. As a helicopter pilot, I reckon I can just about maintain my fixed-wing currency to fly non-demanding aircraft in nice weather on about a hour every couple of months, so long as I realise my limitations. Why should I have to do more because some other people need to? The problem is that people perceive the legal minimum as what everyone can do, and they're very different.

OH, just BTW, people do occasionally win the lottery and learn to fly. One of my helicopter students won a cool million and a half. And there's penniless little me (all my dosh went on helicopter training) giving him advice on what helicopter to buy!
Whirlybird is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 06:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton, East Sussex, UK
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some have hinted on it, but I would take some time and really think about doing a NPPL on fixed wing microlight.

Plus points are:

1. You can get a licence in 25 hours (most people do it in 30).
2. The theory is a lot simpler.
3. Lessons are cheaper.
4. You can buy a fixed wing microlight from £3500! And if you train in your own aircraft the lessons are usually £45 per hour.
5. You can buy into schemes where for a small cash investment, you can hire a decent 4 stroke microlight for £30 per hour wet!
6. You can fold the wings up, put it on a trailer and keep it at home, or pay less for hangerage.
7. Running cost is small (I use 14lph in the cruise at maximum weight).
8. Landing fees are cheaper (Sandown is £6).
9. Modern Microlights can cruise at 140kts, and have more room than a 152.
10. You can maintain it yourself.

Negative points:

1. Microlights can only take 2 people.
2. You are restricted to Daytime VFR flying.
3. Weight can be an issue in some Microlights (my Rans S6 can carry 30 stone of occupants and 3 hours of fuel).
4. As it's a permit aircraft (and an NPPL-M licence ), you will need to get written permission to fly abroad (I’m off to Africa next year).

Running costs based on my Rans S6ES 582.

Fuel/oil = £14 per hour.
Permit = £180 PA
Insurance = £622 PA
Maintenance = average £130 PA
Costs of keeping it at a small strip can range between £30 - £150 per month.


So for £6,000 you could have a licence and your own plane! It might not be the prettiest or fastest thing at the airfield, but it gets you in the air, and really thats all that matters

Rans,
www.FlightForLife.co.uk
Rans Flyer is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 08:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All brilliant advice, esp Rans flyer's bit. Mind you you could do the same with motor gliders or for slightly more by buying your own PFA type and training in it (but that's probably a step too far in most cases).

It does worry me though, that we all seem to think that you have to have money to continue flying after you gain your PPL and that if you don't that you shouldn't bother. Rubbish! Like Paris Dakar say's, so what if there are periods that you can't afford it? Or even if you never fly again! I know at least one person who learned to fly because he saw it a challenge, gained a lot from the experience but was happy to walk away at the end and never fly again. We all have different motivations and we all have our own minds, so take all the advice and cherry pick the bits that suit your situation.

Have fun and don't beat yourself up if progress seems slow at times.

SS
shortstripper is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 10:26
  #27 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,234
Received 52 Likes on 28 Posts
Yes, I think that Ransflyer is right.

Microlighting is often misunderstood. Many people think it's dangerous (only if you are), about flying the lightest thing possible (only if you want to), or about flying the simplest rag-and-tube aeroplanes (it can be, but needn't).

Microlight flying is about flying as cheaply as possible, with the minimum restrictions on you - if budget is limited, you've no intention to become an airline pilot, and you just want to have as much fun as possible airborne, then flying a microlight is the way ahead.

I'm not going to provide anybody with free advertising, but I just looked up the website of a well know microlight school an hour's drive from London. It's helpfully very detailed about costs, although I suspect not the cheapest.

Full training, club, equipment, examination etc. : this comes out at £3,447 for a full licence course.

£1,777-£3,650k buys you a share in an aeroplane looked after by them + £20/month syndicate costs once you've got you licence, + £39/hr for your flying.

So, going for the cheaper aeroplane (a Cyclone AX3 - slow and ugly, but easy and pleasant to fly), your £6k would cover your licence course (okay, assuming you do it in minimum hours), a share in an aeroplane, another year of fixed running costs on the aeroplane, and another 13 flying hours.



Add £2k, and you can either have your own aeroplane outright, or buy a share in something that'll probably outperform what you've been learning on so far...




Or you could, with care, go a few grand cheaper - learning and continuing to fly something older and more basic (but I hasten to add, equally safe) and spend what's left over on even more flying.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 11:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jesus I have 2000hrs and cant fly straight and level........


Dont despair, it will click and you will stop worrying. Flying is about the challenge and expanding your personal envelope. Keep working it at and you will become as hooked as the rest of us!!!
S-Works is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 11:20
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to everybody for the advice, which is much appreciated.

I did consider microlights, etc., but I suspect I'm too tall, to wide, and too heavy. I'm 6'5'' tall, 3 feet wide, and weight about 19st In a Cessna 172, with the seat wound right down and pushed right back, I can just about get in, with about an inch clearance over my head. Quite honestly, I would be happy to fly anything. But I've got to be able to fit in it.
mad_bear is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 13:37
  #30 (permalink)  
Spoon PPRuNerist & Mad Inistrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Twickenham, home of rugby
Posts: 7,418
Received 282 Likes on 180 Posts
Just back from the Gat Bash, so rather woozy -

Best thing I was told at the initial stages (and later as well) is that the aeroplane is designed to fly straight and level - let it! It requires a certain "leap of faith", but literally letting go of the controls entirely and allowing the aeroplane to fly itself usually works out much better than pushing and pulling it all over the sky! (Subject to caveats about trim, turbulence, & rudder trim etc.)

The trick is finding out how little you have to do, not how much.

Also, as an observation, not a criticism, you seem to be mentally preparing yourself for failure, rather than success!

SD
Saab Dastard is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 14:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm 66, started 2 months ago, so far after 16 hrs, went solo on Friday.
last week at 14 hrs I was still landing way left of centreline, drifting, nose wheel first etc, even nearly stalled on climbout, 55 kt, then it all seemed to click.
Stick with it, don't get disheartened this early. As for the budget Iv'e put 4K down but I don't think I'll make that, your 6K looks more possible.
Good luck

Trevor
Crash one is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 17:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: South Norfolk, England
Age: 58
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm 66, started 2 months ago, so far after 16 hrs, went solo on Friday.
last week at 14 hrs I was still landing way left of centreline, drifting, nose wheel first etc, even nearly stalled on climbout, 55 kt, then it all seemed to click.
Brilliant Crash! well done you!

I remember learning to waterski! I just couldn't get it ... then one day everything just clicked? still don't know what it was but it all came together!

SS
shortstripper is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2006, 19:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 84
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shortstripper
Brilliant Crash! well done you!

I remember learning to waterski! I just couldn't get it ... then one day everything just clicked? still don't know what it was but it all came together!

SS
I wouldn't like to take credit unduly, I did fly gliders 20+ yrs ago & took 4 hrs power at that time inc ex 14, so I was a bit miffed at myself for "losing" it & taking so long to get it back.
Instructor said it was quite normal but then when I did it the first time he was barely on solids which I also find embarrassing. However, done now & chuffed to bits.

Trevor
Crash one is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 06:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brighton, East Sussex, UK
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mad_bear
I did consider microlights, etc., but I suspect I'm too tall, to wide, and too heavy. I'm 6'5'' tall, 3 feet wide, and weight about 19st
My old 503 powerd Rans (stacks of head room) could haul 31 stone with full fuel. You just need to find a 12stone instructor!

I'm not sure about other types, but there's 4 thrusters for sale on www.afors.co.uk for less than £5K (2 of 'em are £4K ono), thats cheep flying.

Rans,
www.FlightForLife.co.uk
Rans Flyer is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 07:06
  #35 (permalink)  

The Original Whirly
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Belper, Derbyshire, UK
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mad bear,

Don't make assumptions about microlights; do some research. There's another 6ft 5in microlight flyer around that I keep hearing about. I believe Genghis knows him and could confirm this, and also tell you loads more about microlights...where is he when he's needed?!!!!!!
Whirlybird is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 07:46
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 10 west
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mad bear

like everybody tells you...at four hours you are not in a position to make any judgements about you flying...thats the function of your instructor.

you are being too hard on yourself and it will reflect in your flying.

lighten up and stop expecting too much too soon.put your faith in your instructor/s.

in my experience...the older you are the longer it takes to acquire the skill but you will get there and in the end remember that even if it takes a little longer it still adds to your experience.

enjoy what you are doing....your flying will be better for it.

good straight and level is one of the most difficult things to do properly.you will get a lot of fun out of the challange and your flying long term will be the better for it.

do'nt forget good straight and level is achieved by having your eyes outside the cockpit 8 out of every 10 seconds and 2 checking the dashboard...and most importent...trim it out .

as one contribitor said...the aircraft was built to fly..( if you were you would have feathers ). it knows how to do it..so do'nt overcontrol it...just control it.feel what the aircraft is telling you but do'nt allow it to do what it wants.

so take it slow and leave the worrying to your instructor|s...if they feel you are wasting your money i am sure they will tell you but even for them its too soon...so how could you possibly make a meaningful decision at this stage.

good luck and do'nt worry...
the dean is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 08:13
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the clag EGKA
Posts: 1,028
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Training: are you having fun? If yes then continue and enjoy it, if no then stop. Try different types and clubs. Go to Cambidge Flying Group for a trial lesson. You'll get the best part of an hour for a ton in a Tiger Moth. Even if you don't qualify you will have a ball. My mate had ten types in his log book and forty ours before he soloed. He still hasn't qualified for medical reasons but he gets about ten hours a year dual.

Cost: Slingsby, find a gliding club with one. It will cost you a couple of hundred a year membership but flying will cost you about sixty per hour. This will usually include instruction.
effortless is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 08:43
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 53
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couple of different ways of looking at it.

Yes, money is an issue, it always will be as, let's be honest, this is not the worlds cheapest hobby. What has been said before is true, budget to fly an amount of hours every year, either training or post training. It doesn't matter if it takes you 10 years to pass a skills test, the end result is still the same. The only thing to take into account is do you like flying?? If the answer to this is yes, and trust me it gets more addictive the more you do, then carry on. No-one cares how many hours you take to get your ppl, and those that do fall into the "bold pilot" category. Law of the playground, my bike's better than yours sort of thing. Who cares, both bikes do the same job. Forget the legal mins, that is what they are, a minimum. Put this way, it is possible to turn up at a driving test centre on your 17th birthday and pass a driving test, not really plausible, but possible. Who is the better driver, the lad who did that, or the guy that had 25 hours training before test?

To make this understandable to you, lets look at something everyone knows about, driving. Lesson1, controls. Student goes nowhere. Lesson2, straight line driving and simple turns. It's all the student can do to change one gear. That would account for, in todays learning enviroment, for about 3 hours. You are at a similar stage in learning to fly. Straight and level, like all exercises will come with practice. That said pilot induced oscilation happens to all of us, those approaching test like me, or 2000 hour pilots. Don't worry about it, honestly! It is a known fact that your age does play a part in training hours. Driving instructors use the 1 hour for each year principal. a teenager will go through test in about 20 hours, a 40 year old is looking at 35 - 40 hours. Nothing against your age, it is a simple fact of nature, and different people learn different skills at different rates.

I was at about 22 hours before I went solo. I know a guy who was solo at 15 hours. He has so far spent 10 hours on dual nav training and still doesn't get it. My instructor is happy to send me off on solo nav after about 5 hours at it dual. All horses for courses.

The are a few things to remember. Don't count the money, if you can't afford it wait until you can, even if that means a couple of hours a year. You will learn at your pace, and everyone gets hung up on something. Normally landing or nav, maybe your hang up is S&L and you will whizz (notice I didn't say fly) through the rest of it! This hobby is more addictive and more expensive than any drug, once bitten you will never let go. I took my first lesson in 1990. I came back to flying in 2000. I ran out of money again in 2002. I have just come back to it on a limited budget like you. I am prepared to stop flying after I qualify, and just do what little I can.

Now a question, how often are you actually getting airboune? Curreny is the key, if you go up every week, there will be less skills to brush up before the next topic. Fly once a month and you will spend a great deal of that lesson covering and refreshing what has gone before. There comes a point when the S&L will be second nature, and something else will take your attnetion.

Above anything else, do it for fun, if it isn't fun why do it? If that means never getting a licence and flying with an instructor twice a year, then accept that as your version of aviating, I know people that do that.

Good luck

Last edited by cessna l plate; 25th Sep 2006 at 08:59.
cessna l plate is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 11:50
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bear, check your PM's.

As an addition, vulcanpilot's early experience sounds v. similar to my own now. Have to disagree with Whirly's comments about the 6K though. Even if you blew that amount and couldn't afford it afterwards, it'd still be the most enjoyable 6 grand you could've blown.

But given you're a fairly successful businessman in your forties, you can afford it.

Can't say I'm successful at my age but I still manage it somehow!
Nil Flaps is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2006, 13:07
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nil Flaps
But given you're a fairly successful businessman in your forties, you can afford it.
I wish Like most people my age, I have substantial outgoings -- the mortgage company takes most of my earnings and the kids (bless 'em) take the rest. All my expenditure has to be approved by the domestic financial planning committee, i.e., my wife. I'm not short of money, despite the mortgage, etc., but my family all have ideas how it should be deployed -- dull things that don't involve flying, like holidays, school trips, extensions to the house, saving for university fees, the usual stuff.

I have negotiated the expenditure of 6,000 pounds on flying over the next 12 months. Taking out the cost of equipment, examination fees, insurance, books, etc., leaves me with enough for about 40 hours of Cessna172+instructor time. I'll probably be able to get, say, 1,000 pounds per year after that.

My original plan was to spend the six grand all at once on lessons -- at least two a week -- in the hope of qualifying for a PPL before it ran out, and accept that I might then not be able to fly again for a year. But from what other people have said, that increasingly sounds like a bad plan. I've been quite surprised, from the preceeding posts, how long most people take to get to qualifiying standard. Even if I were more-than-usually competent, and I have no reason to think I am, it seems that hoping to qualify in 40 hrs is optimistic. In any event, combined with my work obligations and decreasing hours of daylight, the crappy weather at the moment is limiting me to one flight a week.

I'm coming around to the idea that spreading my expenditure over a longer period of time is more sensible. I could certainly afford one hour's flying every 2-3 weeks for the foreseeable future, but that means it would be several years at least before I got to PPL qualifying standard, if I ever did; and being the driven, goal-directed kind of person I am, that's a hard nut to swallow.

But life is about compromises, I guess.
mad_bear is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.