Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

BA Strike - Your Thoughts & Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2010, 11:14
  #1561 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
It appears I shall now be flying into LGW tomorrow, so no worries there: the usual good and efficient crew.

I wonder who will be crewing the LHR-IAD on Wednesday? Non-strikers, of course, but how many of those will be unhappy BASSA supporters? Any VCC, I wonder? As Diplome noted, there are many factors involved in the potentially volatile Crew mix, and that will not enhance safety or the customer experience.

Nothing head from the Court yet ... an "interesting" day ahead!
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 12:01
  #1562 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting comment from Tony Woodley in The Telegraph:

The leader of the cabin crew accused the airline of being ''vindictive'' as he claimed the cost-cutting row which sparked strikes had now been settled.

Tony Woodley, joint leader of Unite, said an agreement had been reached in principle on a deal which would resolve the original dispute over pay, jobs and working practices, including staffing levels on flights. The dispute was being prolonged because BA was refusing to fully restore travel concessions to staff who went on strike in March, and over the suspension and sacking of over 50 cabin crew, said Mr Woodley.
So the strike is now solely about restoring ST and cancelling disciplinaries. I wonder if CC have been informed of this?
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 13:41
  #1563 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA chief dents hopes of strike talks breakthrough

Originally Posted by Mariner9
So the strike is now solely about restoring ST and cancelling disciplinaries. I wonder if CC have been informed of this?
They will if they read The Indie online:

Mr Walsh said he did not expect progress to made during talks between the two sides later today at the conciliation service Acas.
Mr Walsh said there was "absolutely no way" he would intervene in disciplinary cases which the union said were now holding up the prospect of a deal.

"British Airways has very clear policies on dealing with bullying, harassment and intimidation. Any respectable trade union would expect me to deal with that in a fair and proper way."

Last edited by PaddyMiguel; 17th May 2010 at 13:43. Reason: My BOLD
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 14:09
  #1564 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting quotes Paddy.

BA seems quite clear today in its highlighting of the difference between Unite and the "dysfunctional" BASSA.

From Sky News:

Mr Walsh suggested that Unite would be willing to accept the offer, the branch of the union that represents the cabin crew, BASSA, was taking a hardline approach.
He said: "...while Tony Woodley, general secretary of Unite, is stating publicly that we have "agreement in principle" on all the important elements of the deal, BASSA continues to rubbish the offer we have made."
BA does not seem to be giving messages that indicate that they are wishing to placate the militant BASSA adherents.
Diplome is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 14:34
  #1565 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diplome
Interesting quotes Paddy.

BA does not seem to be giving messages that indicate that they are wishing to placate the militant BASSA adherents.
And there's the rub, Diplome. According to a post (#2788) on the 'other' forum there are some 5750 crew supporting BASSA. A few are diehard militants who have posted here that they would rather see BA go down than lose their T&Cs. The remainder, IMHO, prefer to trust BASSA rather than their employer and are going with the flow.

That situation indicates serious management problems for BA once this IA is all over. How to win back that trust? How was it lost in the first place? Those 5000+ crew aren't all dinosaurs, surely? So what makes a perfectly decent people-person, who no doubt whooped with joy on receiving their acceptance letter from BA, turn into one of the jeering, chanting mob seen on those videos?

We've read dozens of posts claiming BA management are liars, bullies and untrustworthy but not one shred of evidence to back up those accusations.

This tough management style may be foreign to those who were used to the 'softly, softly' approach of Mike Street and Joy Hordern but it ain't going away.

The only thing for it is to get rid of the people who don't want to work for their current employer.
PaddyMiguel is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 14:49
  #1566 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
That sums up their logic processes ...
A few are diehard militants who have posted here that they would rather see BA go down than lose their T&Cs.
What T&Cs do they have when the company goes down? A nice shiny P45 [ignored, because it was issued by BA]?
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 15:11
  #1567 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SALISBURY
Age: 76
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High Court result

Sky is reporting that the result will be announced at 1700 BST.
fincastle84 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:08
  #1568 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Injunction granted to BA. Unite to appeal.
Airclues is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:10
  #1569 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Oh dear, how sad
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:16
  #1570 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That may well bugger a few striking commuters who had an early report tomorow..?
Dont spose they are in the UK are they.
Snas is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:26
  #1571 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the ballot has been ruled unlawful the strikes were therefore illegal and so BA will have a claim against Unite for the costs of the strikes.

Does anyone know how much Unite have in the bank?
Airclues is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:27
  #1572 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its a real imposition that BASSA have to obey the law of the land in their attempts to wreck BA
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:35
  #1573 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
@ Airclues ... not enough!!

The process would make a few lawyers VERY rich, though!
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:38
  #1574 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or does it now put WW in the position of saying to Unite, "sort your branches (BASSA & CC89) out or we'll cripple you financially"?
west lakes is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 17:51
  #1575 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The process would make a few lawyers VERY rich, though!
But doesn't the loser pay the costs? From past history it would seem that the BA lawyers are rather more switched on than those of Unite.

Or does it now put WW in the position of saying to Unite, "sort your branches (BASSA & CC89) out or we'll cripple you financially"?
I believe that WW used this tactic on BALPA after the Open Skies case. BALPA had to agree to be nice, in exchange for WW calling off the lawyers.
Airclues is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 18:00
  #1576 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've copied this from the CC thread before it disappears

I don't have any vested interest in this particular dispute but the courts are starting to set a very anti-union precedent. At the end of the day, these workers voted to strike (rightly or wrongly) and the court has told them that they cannot because of a highly technical and completely irrelevant detail that is so obscure none of us know precisely what it is.

If we want to create a situation where workers in any industry just walk out unplanned and with no notice then this is how to get it.

I don't work for BA - I don't work within the airline industry - I could not care less about this particular dispute. But I do believe that the right to strike action is an important democratic right that we all should have. It would appear that the courts have begun to erode this right and that is not a good step.
Interestingly the union I am a member of has recognised the implications and is making sure that all the "ts" are crossed and all the "is" dotted.
west lakes is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 18:04
  #1577 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
West Lakes ... just read that myself.

I have no problem with "the democratic rights of the workers".

I do have a problem when "the democratic rights of the Public to be protected from incompetent and questionable Industrial Action" are ignored.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 18:09
  #1578 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cardiff, UK
Age: 62
Posts: 1,214
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite frankly, any Union, particularly one as large and powerful as Unite, should make every effort to ensure that they fully comply with the law in all respects when considering industrial action. If they don't they are not properly protecting their members who they lead into such action. Unite have been shown to have been very lax in this regard. No doubt they will once again seek to blame BA &/or the Judiciary for their failings
Mariner9 is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 18:58
  #1579 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Age: 56
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this mean we will be stuck with the strikers on flights over this period? Or will these idiots still strike anyway? I think I'd prefer them to do so leaving their places to be filled by non-strikers and volunteers.
pj67coll is offline  
Old 17th May 2010, 19:21
  #1580 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Basque Country
Age: 75
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
High Stakes

You can bet your bottom dollar that WW et al have known since March that the ballot (and thus the strike) was illegal due to Unite's failure to correctly notify members of the outcome. Holding off an injunction until the day before yet another stoppage is part of a carefully thought out plan (ie not similar in any way to BASSA's knee jerk guerilla warfare)

The judge has refused permission to appeal.

UNITE/BASSA your call....................
PaddyMiguel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.