Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: QANTAS/ALAEA EBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2008, 07:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Merged: QANTAS/ALAEA EBA

All is quiet on the western front with the ALAEA PIA.
Have they accepted the 3% pay rise and are now off to convince their followers to accept it?
Headcone is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 09:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time will tell as to weather the hold fire order was a stroke of genius, or the bend over before the reaming. The time line now puts any possible action at earliest the 7th Feb, after the 380 announcement............
This could be the one defining decision in this whole campaign.
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 09:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hate to burst your bubble Mendaero, but from what I've heard there is no agreement on anything of substance. It looks like even a meagre 3% is going to cost, in kind.
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 09:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definition of an employee (written by the ALAEA),
This clause has to go. It doesn't matter who wrote it, It will always be twisted out of context and used used against us. As for 3%, I would only accept that if the board accepted it for themselves. The people on the coal face make the company what it is, not the board.
sky rocket is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 09:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1st Feb is a Friday and you must give 3 clear "working days" notice, that puts a notice served on Friday the 1st for action as of one minute past midnight Thursday morning the 7th Feb.

As far as any "creative pay deals" don't hold your breath. There is only one way we are going to advance our claims and that is through action.

Members must not fall into a false sense of security, we are no closer now than we were two weeks ago. Steel yourselves.
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 10:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why cant we give notice before the 1st?
Because we agreed not to in the comission.
Redstone is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 19:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Change expected soon
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who's bent over what?

Whether the 1st or 7th for PIA to start, bring it on.
However, I disagree with the view that management have us bent over anything. It's their strategy that is failing. Bloomburg's study that found we are 10% more productive than Singapore; The blocking of their attempt to bring in foreign labour; The lack of scabs that have been willing to sign up; The awareness by the public of a management culture of staff shortages across the entire business; The commissioning of market research into the public attitude towards management.
It's the above, combined with a share price that is beating the market down even though they have announced higher record profits, that has management concerned. They are trying to make sure that we are not in a position to bend them over anything.
Good work so far ALAEA Exec, don't take a backward step!
PIOT Bord is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2008, 22:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Notice should be given to start PIA on the 1st Feb.

We have given Qantas enough time to negotiate a deal if they had wanted one. Don't forget, "The EBA has to be concluded by February because QE has important decisions to be made re A380 and A330". Or was that statement just as valid as "This deal looks like a good deal to me"? (MH, KM and co)
Millet Fanger is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 09:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good work so far ALAEA Exec, don't take a backward step!
Is this the same executive?
http://www.cnet.com.au/wireless/0,23...9285323,00.htm

God help us...
Oh Please is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 10:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: s
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MMM, Bring down the red Q!!! Make them beg.
Hit them hard. Now it's our turn to to show them.
upsidefront is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 10:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F**k the 380, f**k the 330, f**k it all. Long live the legacy fleet.
Bush Pig is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 13:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gentlemen, i hope we settle this

i am reliably imformed that if we do not, things will never be the same again, i am asking all like members to be aware.....i am not a troll....i implore the ALAEA to be vigilant, please do not stuff up
wingers is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 14:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: n.s.w
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am reliably imformed that if we do not, things will never be the same again
In what way? What have you been told?
company_spy is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 19:45
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
i am reliably imformed


He is just spreading fear uncertainty and doubt like he always does. Same handiwork visible on the A380 thread.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 20:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am reliably imformed that if we do not, things will never be the same again
Yes, thats true, for the first time in a long time LAME's will have proven they have a backbone, and the company better take notice. Bring it on, I am sick of my inflation/efficiency payrise paying managers bonus's and undeserved mega payrises.

I'd be happy with 1/6th of Cox's payrise and no bonus on my pidly income! But the again I not a greedy psychopath.
rudderless1 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 21:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oz
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gentlemen, i hope we settle this

i am reliably imformed that if we do not, things will never be the same again, i am asking all like members to be aware.....i am not a troll....i implore the ALAEA to be vigilant, please do not stuff up
If we let this EBA get rammed through in it's current wording then I am telling you now, things will definatly never be the same again for Qantas LAMEs, and it's not good. Now if you are in fact an operational LAME you should understand this and be outraged at the audacity of those who seek to impose such conditions. If you are infact an agent provocateur or a company stooge then you allready know this and are by association in agreeance to all the claims made by the company.

"The ALAEA" is the sum total of ALL it's members. Hold fast, suck it up and don't shoot untill you see the whites of their eyes.
Redstone is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 00:35
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is all smoke and mirrors. QF are just buying time it is a favourite tactic of theirs. The ALAEA might have one agenda but they haven't consulted the troops. I have said before if you want to be successful in this EBA keep focused on what you are fighting for and don't let the company or ALAEA cloud your vision.
I don't think the union is being as transparent as you think they are.

As for Wingers he must be a stooge,or he has other agendas himself
another superlame is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 01:19
  #18 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quoting Mr. Purvinas:
"In this case, we're talking both engines carking it at same time. At that stage the aircraft is tilted at a certain altitude so when the fuel moves back into the tanks, it may expose the fuel pumps to water which is contained in the tanks," he said.

A small amount of water is not uncommon in fuel, Purvinas said.

"When you're putting in a hundred thousand kilos of fuel, there is a small component of water but if that all rises to the top of the fuel tank is exposed to the fuel-pump intakes at same time, that is when you may have a problem at the same time on both engines," he said.
Well I guess Mr. Purvinas with 20 years of avionic experience does not need to have any knowledge of the rules of gravity and the S.G. of fuel.
HotDog is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 01:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And being Mr Purvinas who are we mere mortals to question his comments
another superlame is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2008, 04:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: sydney
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink ever considered it being mis quoted?

if the water "could" float to the top it would not have been sucked in by the pumps would it! How often do we argue the accuracy of news reports on this forum? How often are pumps installed at the top of tanks?
I am sure over the 20 years he worked on the ramp and seen or done fuel checks he would know where to look for the fuel.

Hotdog, maybe you should learn where it is sucked from and why the attitude of the aircraft could play a roll after fuel had settled for some time and not so quickly take news reports as gospel.

Jet pumps should remove water as it settles though. Once again I am sure there is many slices of swiss that would have to line up for this theory to be right!
rudderless1 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.