Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Merged: QANTAS/ALAEA EBA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Dec 2008, 08:28
  #4421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Happy news today. Best news post PIA. Human Refuse people manager with no Style has moved on. Much cheering in Syd.
Nepotisim is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 09:21
  #4422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hooray !

If it's the jackbooted style one I am thinking of good riddens to bad rubbish !
QF22 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 06:26
  #4423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
nepotism

If its the one I'm thinking of and perhaps the one you are alluding to.
yeehaa!!
He made my life particularly miserable during the dispute and would like to offer him some sex and travel advice.
ampclamp is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2008, 10:09
  #4424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, congrats to the ALAEA and Tamworth LAMEs on reaching an IPA.

Is there a more humane (and sensible) approach being pursued by QE management with it's coalface?

How timely.
Clipped is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2008, 06:11
  #4425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Downunder
Age: 74
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that's different .....

CNN.com

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In the midst of a recession, job cut announcements have become a daily occurrence. But some employers have promised no pink slips, and are sticking to it.........

But even as the number of unemployed grows, some companies say their workers have nothing to fear. "I have never in my 13 years [at the company] felt that my job is in jeopardy due to the economy," said Jill Kronman, a flight attendant for Southwest Airlines (LUV, Fortune 500).That's because Southwest is committed to avoiding layoffs at all costs - and they're not alone................


SpannerTwister
SpannerTwister is offline  
Old 27th Dec 2008, 11:53
  #4426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Re
Happy news today.
A positive step in the right direction. Keeping people who have caused so much damage in the past is like trying to live with an ex-wife.

Now if only we could find some managers who are familiar/experienced with airworthiness requirements, local area procedures, etc...


PS, Anything positive from the meeting between LAMEs and the Manager of Engineering in Sydney the other week?

Last edited by Ngineer; 28th Dec 2008 at 11:13. Reason: PS
Ngineer is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2008, 01:47
  #4427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer Airlines

Has Qantas Engineering started doing customer contracts again?
If not, why not ?
QF22 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2008, 10:06
  #4428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mostly NOT.

Why?

Firstly avoid those nasty customer payments, in the future.

Secondly, in my opinion, to bring in the new players on the tarmac, to dilute our effectiveness in the future so they are never again exposed as with the recent PIA.

Of course management will counter with a number of more 'valid' reasons - ALL lies.
Clipped is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2008, 13:43
  #4429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I'll be buggered

Thanx clipped ! Sounds like the buggery campaign is alive and well !
Happy New Year to all !
Cheers !
QF22 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2009, 14:07
  #4430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer Contracts

Just out of interest due my limited experience, can anyone comment from other parts of the world, re airlines who refuse to take up customer contracts?
Places I have worked in the past and present snap up customer work as it pays the bills and is money in pocket.
Would be interested to know other operations who knock back customer work,and reasons why?
Thanx in advance.
QF22 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2009, 21:59
  #4431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer Contracts

Yes QF22 most airlines do take up customer work at the first opportunity, Cathay and British Airways are prime examples, of doing there own aeroplanes in ports they fly, then supplement the expenses of self manning stations by doing customer work, thus allowing them to keep there own quality control of doing there own aeroplanes at effectively no expense to the company. British Airways even have a dedicated customer operation at LHR which is based out of terminal 3 i believe and those guys don't even go near British Airways aeroplanes..... anyone else feel free to comment.
chksatis is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 01:33
  #4432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer Contracts

Thx chksatis.
SIA also has a dedicated customer group which handles all customers in S'pore.
It seems VERY odd that QF used to handle the majority of customers in Oz, and now their new boss, who used to handle those contracts, doesn't want to do any !????
In some ports QF aircraft were basically done at no cost to QF, because the revenue from customer work paid all the bills !
So how is the new boss going? It would seem not too well if he can't even get back the customer work that he used to control?
I am sure there is a hidden agenda, but buggered if I know what it is !
Maybe he is just a puppet on a string for DC, or just doesn't have a clue?
QF22 is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2009, 23:41
  #4433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sydney
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Jetstar Int is a customer. But that is scraping the bottom of the barrel
another superlame is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 01:09
  #4434 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer contracts

Thanx ASL.
I cannot fathom how a supposedly competant management, can cancel contracts due to industrial action (primarily brought on by themselves).
Then when the PIA is finished months ago, fail to honour those contracts, and reap the revenue from them.
Did QF have to pay penalties to the customers for not fullfilling contractual obligations?
Are the tail payments still being paid, or have they been cancelled?
Surely the revenue would exceed the tail payments?
Is this mismanagement deliberate, or incompetant?
QF22 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 04:28
  #4435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christmas Island
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I understand, the customers have been given a "phased" timetable on when they will be planned to return (if they have not already got the sh**s and moved on). The tail payments will still be paid and have been paid all this time because the contracts have not been cancelled. The ones who have officially cancelled the contract, that attract a tail payment, will have the tail payment removed.

Looking at whats left to come back, I dont think SIT has the ability to handle some of the exotics that fly the 777/A340/A320 anymore. A lot of people have gone to the 380 and MCC and taken a lot of licence coverage with them.

There would need to be a huge investment in training to adequately cover this, which I dont see happening. The only training I would speculate is on the 330, primarily to cover the Jetstar ops.

The last lot of management really dropped the ball on this one and it has opened the door to the other smaller players to muscle in.

CEG groups work very well for other airlines who usually use their minimum skilled workforce to handle clients. The cream is in the ground equipment hire, non routine work, off sched flights, towing, pumping up a few tyres etc. If the contract includes certification, the dollars are a fair bit more.

At Qantas stations, in a CEG context, we are very inefficient and make no where near what we should. As a provider of maintenance and quality work, we are amongst the worlds best.

If management would only get the balance right and invest in the CEG side of things (not to forget the red tail side as well) it would be a very profitable outcome.
hadagutfull is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 04:47
  #4436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customer Contracts

Yes i agree HAGF!!!

You are right there, the SIT and BIT with all the redundancies and people movements over the last couple of years has left us prob a bit short to take all the customer work back anyway, once the A380 crew is dispersed and the SIT start handling the A380 thats prob going to put even more pressure on manpower and i would say they will prob never employ at the SIT for at least the next 5 years.

The way the CEG contracts were managed, were inefficient to say the least (especially at the SIT), probably there needs to be a project team set up to try and effectively run them better, but that would need to be done by people on the floor rather than management. BIT is a problem as there station was effectively run by CEG contracts as they only have 5-6 QF flights a day, so what is going to happen there....who knows.

But there are still some contracts heading back and i'm sure once things return to normal we will start seeing some of the others returning, it's a new year and will bring so new suprises i'm sure.
chksatis is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 05:31
  #4437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chksatis , funny you saying that there needs to be a project team put together to get customer work back..Sorry i find that fu..ing funny, this is the reason QF is where it is now..committees for everything..
lordofthewings is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 05:37
  #4438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: OZ
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thx HAGF n Chksatis

Thx guys it's interesting to hear whats going on.
The question begs, why is it taking so long, and is it deliberate mis-management, or incompetance?
Yes Happy New Year to all. Hopefully things will improve for us all in 2009.
Time will tell.
Cheers
QF22 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 07:50
  #4439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
is it deliberate mis-management, or incompetance
QF22, I would think it is both.

This seems obvious to those watching on. I have also heard, though not sure if is true, that the SIT is slowly being modelled on the SDT in order to cater for core aircraft only. (ie, Qantas & Jetstar), with token customer work likely to be ditched in the future - except for jetstar (if you could consider Jetstar - part of the Qantas group - as a "Customer", personally I do not and refuse to speak this utter crap) and lots of single man lines. I guess when SNR LAME and Supervisor positions come up in the future we will all see.

In the meantime we will continue to loose millions in revenue in order to save a few bucks, but whats new? As long as we have inexperienced people running the joint it will continue. It should be a bl*#dy no-brainer. Pay me 1/4 of their wages and I bet I could make 3 times as much money!

Enough said.

And yes, other operators across Europe are trying to snag as much customer work as possible. Just ask them. They went through this years ago.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2009, 10:34
  #4440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skating away on the thin ice of a new day.
Posts: 1,116
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
qf22

qantas were so far behind in their maint it was getting very serious.Still behind and if the work schedules are anything to go by that'd be right.Lucky flying has stalled to some extent.
I think casa may have had an indirect hand in the contract work restart as the maint backlog was such, that, extra work may not have been possible (or wise in the eyes of the regulator) over and above what was called up on qantas A/C.
Hold items seem to have decreased as does the flow (flood ) of ATP's to keep things afloat so that seems to be getting better.

It should never have got to that stage of course and a number of those responsible for running an ill advised/planned counter to the ALAEA campaign have decided to seek other goals.
So yes incompetence to start with and maybe some now, but I do know they are under pressure to get the fleet serviceable. The mess left by some of the former masters will take some time to clean up.

Adding to the already top heavy supervisory structure prob wasnt the best move GH has made but getting some tech folks in supervisory roles was a good move.Just needs a bit of thinning out now.Depending on where you work I think there maybe 9 to 11 layers from AME to A Joyce.Could be wrong there but its a jungle of supervision.
Coming from geoffstar he must scratch his head wondering WTF they really do, and, do we really need them to do whatever that is???
I know I do.
ampclamp is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.