There is one keyword not to be forgotten in this all subject. The outcome of the process is, at the of the day, 'discretionary'.
Therefore, technically speaking, it can depend on the altimeter setting of the day in Dallas ... Before going into the advanced rocket sciences certificates, or degrees, it might be appropriate to think of more mundane details. Me109 mentioned that he was approved. His data mentiones him as being 44 years old. Would say that that's about the limit for a successful outcome. Younger than that is likely to be better. Older than that it might be a no go. Other stuff like being married with children might cause one to be regarded as a responsible candidate. Being single could be a deal breaker. |
Originally Posted by cbr58
(Post 11457158)
Can you tell more about when you say you were just about your highest degree?
I have two aviation management certificates but I am still one exam to go and the dissertation before i get my master’s degree. I was just wondering if that would be enough to apply according to your experience. |
Sorry 737pilotguy , not intending to seem like correcting homework:ugh:
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
I'd suggest contacting some lawyers to evaluate your suitability if you are serious about pursuing this option, don't only ask on forums.
(My opinion, is to find the right lawyer ($8-10k?: we are talking about time & seniority, so it will pay back in time.)
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
Pilots rarely make the best "experts," despite what they'll tell you...
And we are not always good about decisions outside the cockpit.
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
An advanced degree does NOT necessarily mean a degree higher than a bachelors.
Note also about the link to the 'professions' for EB2-NIW.
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
Experience can give substantial merit to your case and USCIS is very clear on that.
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
Furthermore, your success at USCIS will depend on the presentation of your case, your credentials
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
(it doesn't hurt to have any non-US degrees evaluated to US equivalency), your experience, and the case officer reviewing your petition.
Originally Posted by 737pilotguy
(Post 11459422)
They have alot of discretion in their determination.
Your lawyer should make sure that little is left to discretion. Good luck everyone. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/...rt-f-chapter-5 |
Originally Posted by awair
(Post 11459472)
They have to follow US law, and be convinced that your application 'ticks the boxes'.
Your lawyer should make sure that little is left to discretion. I speculate that there is lobbying behind closed doors trying to minimize the EB2 NIW for pilots. Good luck to all! |
Originally Posted by JoseLeon
(Post 11467583)
Unfortunately, this is not a box checking exercise and it's not as black and white as we would like it to be. Even with all the boxes checked, there's still a discretionary component based on the totality of the circumstances. There have been a substantial amount of RFE's and denials coming down in the last few months. In addition to attacking the exceptional abilities of pilots, there are also plenty of denials attacking the proposed endeavors and national importance of it.
I speculate that there is lobbying behind closed doors trying to minimize the EB2 NIW for pilots. Good luck to all! With the above in mind - how is the current retrogression of the EB2 going to affect things? Are those that are a month or two behind the current priority date going to wait an extra month or 2 or longer or years? What is the current time frame clients are being told from start to finish if all goes well? All seems to becoming a very very long process even if you are not turned down by the USCIS. Thank you |
Originally Posted by Commuting101
(Post 11468123)
how is the current retrogression of the EB2 going to affect things? Are those that are a month or two behind the current priority date going to wait an extra month or 2 or longer or years? What is the current time frame clients are being told from start to finish if all goes well? Also, due to the retrogression, I’m not recommending premium processing. |
Originally Posted by JoseLeon
(Post 11467583)
I speculate that there is lobbying behind closed doors trying to minimize the EB2 NIW for pilots.
|
Originally Posted by JoseLeon
(Post 11468213)
If you are a month or two from the priority date, then you are almost there. You also have to consider the consulate’s processing delays (they are all different). I’m telling my clients to plan on approximately two years from the moment they hire me.
Also, due to the retrogression, I’m not recommending premium processing. Are you expecting the retrogression to worsen or to continue to move forward towards current as it has in the latest bulletin? I’m struggling to understand how this works as from what I read, there is more supply than demand, particularly with the new fiscal year from October? Last thing you’d want is for it to worsen after applying as this pilot shortage and requirement for foreigners won’t last very long. |
Originally Posted by Commuting101
(Post 11476969)
I understand. Thanks.
Are you expecting the retrogression to worsen or to continue to move forward towards current as it has in the latest bulletin? I’m struggling to understand how this works as from what I read, there is more supply than demand, particularly with the new fiscal year from October? Last thing you’d want is for it to worsen after applying as this pilot shortage and requirement for foreigners won’t last very long. I don’t have any expectations. As long as you are approved, then it’s an exercise in having tactical patience. Any change in the pilot shortage will not have any bearing on your ability to adjust. Regardless, the pilot shortage is not going anywhere. I’m an AA pilot and last I checked we are losing around 800-900 a year. Unless WWIII kicks off, the pilot shortage is not going anywhere anytime soon. |
Hi, can you dilate upon the chances of obtaining EB2 NIW specifically with regard to establishing the fact that proposed endeavour is of national interest,
Is it not in the national interest to help in easing shortage by becoming an airline pilot in US because in my opinion this is the best an experience pilot can offer. what can be other option ( except for test pilot) which can make ones proposed endeavour and case stronger with high probability of success. |
Originally Posted by Kakar khan
(Post 11478183)
Hi, can you dilate upon the chances of obtaining EB2 NIW specifically with regard to establishing the fact that proposed endeavour is of national interest,
Unfortunately, this is entirely subjective. I have seen RFEs that more or less attack everything, to include the that the proposed endeavor is not of national importance. Is it not in the national interest to help in easing shortage by becoming an airline pilot in US because in my opinion this is the best an experience pilot can offer. It is. However, they seem to be leaning towards unique pilot profiles. Being an average airline pilot may not be sufficient to some examiners anymore. what can be other option ( except for test pilot) which can make ones proposed endeavour and case stronger with high probability of success. |
Originally Posted by JoseLeon
(Post 11478222)
The strongest case is that of an advanced degree to bypass the whole exceptional abilities argument.
Does it make a difference in what academic discipline the degree was earned ? An advanced degree in underwater basket weaving would suffice for an aviation applicant ? |
Originally Posted by bafanguy
(Post 11478357)
Does it make a difference in what academic discipline the degree was earned ? An advanced degree in underwater basket weaving would suffice for an aviation applicant ?
|
Originally Posted by JoseLeon
(Post 11478222)
The strongest case is that of an advanced degree to bypass the whole exceptional abilities argument.
The three prongs of the NIW still need to be argued, particularly how to show that one’s own endeavours (not the aviation industry as a whole) are in the national interest? I had an RFE on this very point, despite having advanced degree and 19 years in the industry. My lawyer and I did what we could with an expanded personal plan and an expert opinion letter, now I’m waiting for the answer from USCIS. |
Originally Posted by flyer4life
(Post 11478753)
Hi, agreed but isn’t that regarding the EB2 requirements?
The three prongs of the NIW still need to be argued, particularly how to show that one’s own endeavours (not the aviation industry as a whole) are in the national interest? I had an RFE on this very point, despite having advanced degree and 19 years in the industry. My lawyer and I did what we could with an expanded personal plan and an expert opinion letter, now I’m waiting for the answer from USCIS. |
By the sound of it, it's all about convincing the person reviewing the case that you are exceptional, possibly someone with little aviation knowledge. British self depreciation and subtlety does not work with Americans, and an ATPLwith 20+ years of not crashing does not make you exceptional, you literally have to tell them that you invented TCAS...
|
Originally Posted by rudestuff
(Post 11478791)
By the sound of it, it's all about convincing the person reviewing the case that you are exceptional, possibly someone with little aviation knowledge. British self depreciation and subtlety does not work with Americans, and an ATPLwith 20+ years of not crashing does not make you exceptional, you literally have to tell them that you invented TCAS...
Correct. It's not the time to be humble. |
Petition Denied
Well that's my EB2 NIW petition denied due to failing to prove my endeavors were in the national interest (prong 1) and that it is beneficial for US to waive labor certification requirement (prong 3). I initially had an RFE on those same points; I submitted a hugely expanded personal plan (which was mostly ignored by USCIS) and added a further detailed expert opinion letter arguing why I met the NIW requirements. I had a lawyer throughout the process who feels the USCIS is now being unfairly tough on pilot petitioners.
The EB2 part was accepted (with advanced degree) and NIW prong 2 (petitioner is well-positioned to advance proposed endeavor) was accepted. I've got over 10k hours (mostly medium turbine P1), FAA and EASA ATPs, and nearly 20 years in the industry working at well-respected European airlines. The sticking point seems to be how you can argue that your individual endeavors will have a national impact; it's no good talking about the pilot shortage and the national importance of the industry as a whole. It's about what you, personally, will do to have national impact. Simply being an airline pilot isn't enough. |
Sadly, that makes sense…..I always imagined these visas were to attract experts in such things as AI and data mining, etc rather than filling a labour shortage?
|
I applied for EB2 NIW (self petition) and had a RFE stating that although I had easily met EB criteria, I had not proved the three prongs of the NIW, particularly how to show that one’s own endeavours (not the aviation industry as a whole) are in the national interest. Have a Masters in Economics (aviation management), captain over 19 years 14k hours all jet (Boeing/Airbus), Airbus TRI 9+ years and had a letter of recommendation from head of training Airbus (friend of mine). I considered hiring Harvey Law Group lawyer (12k cost USD) after RFE request but ultimately withdrew my application as looking at the US airlines terms and conditions, despite the recent salary raises, it's just not worth it to me to make the move, especially at 50+ years starting as a junior pilot again. If you are 30-35 years old and are willing to put up with being junior and all its drawbacks (low starting salaries, potential commuting, terrible bid lines, little vacation, demotion to F/O etc etc) go for it. It all depends on which USCIS officer received your file, so you also need some luck. Age may have been a consideration, although the Harvey laywer mentioned that she recognized the USCIS officer ID nr and he had a reputation for being difficult.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:22. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.