PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Iran (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/586655-iran.html)

Winemaker 24th April 2026 17:40


Originally Posted by artee (Post 12075477)
I think he means paying people to die so the US Forces don't have to. Maybe Wagner Group would be interested.

Of course I understood that. My point was it would take a very large mercenary force to have more effect than the current U.S. attacks; the United States has not signed the 1989 United Nations Mercenary Convention.

fdr 24th April 2026 18:28

As long as there is still a sense of humour, perhaps things are not so bad... :}


Recc 24th April 2026 19:15


Originally Posted by Hangarless (Post 12075817)
The drug runners in the Caribbean ,who the media like to refer to as "poor fisherman" have found out that disguising themselves by using a fishing boats does not end well for them.

Completely different. Drug-runners are easy to distinguish from fishing fleets from patterns of movement. Littoral fishing vessels do not cover huge distances and tend to spend a lot of time at very low speed, very much like small mine laying craft.

larssnowpharter 24th April 2026 22:11

The USA military logistics effort in this war is staggering. I've worked within the system and, while I have seen faults, am sometimes in awe at its almost unstoppable capability.

As Napoleon Bonaparte said:
"The amateurs discuss tactics - the professionals discuss logistics."

Here's the latest from Sam discussing the USN logistics effort in the Gulf and Indian Ocean. Someone who knows what he is talking about and well worth a watch.


Lonewolf_50 24th April 2026 22:31

I can't believe we only have two fast combat stores ships. We used to have amost a dozen.
lars, that's a great video. Thanks.
Sal gets maritime logistics.

Like Sal, some years ago I submitted an essay to USNI and it was rejected. :p

larssnowpharter 24th April 2026 22:52

You think that's bad; back in the early 80s I submitted an article for RUSI predicting the collapse of the Soviet Union. Yes, it was rejected!
I turned my focus to the Punic Wars and the transition of Rome from a Republic.

Lonewolf_50 24th April 2026 23:00


Originally Posted by lars
back in the early 80s I submitted an article for RUSI predicting the collapse of the Soviet Union. Yes, it was rejected!

Too bad there wasn't an internet betting site for you to post a wager upon! :eek:

gums 24th April 2026 23:12

Salute!

Yep Lars and Wolf, et al, the big tail truly wags the dog.

Besides super fying my last two or three years, I was the ops plan weenie, DOX, for my wing and worked closely with LGX, the logistics plan toad down the hall. Learned a lot as we both had to work with the base folks as we were a tenant unit and ops-oriented, while they were a huge logistics/depot level maintenance center. If you guessed Hill, free beer at my patio one day.

The U.S. developed a super logistics infrastructure simply cause we were a coupla thousand miles from the wars! Duuhhhh. Hell, the Limey dudes paddle thirty miles to the enemy for two world wars plus several in the 18th century. That factor also helped us being fairly isolationistic until after the secon" od big one. Anyway, by the time of Korea we had developed a very effective, competent logistic capability. It was magnified during the cold war as most of our units in the states were subject to "mobility" tasking. My job and my cohort's was to get 24 jets ready to launch in 24 hours for a cross the pond flight to Norway.

So no wonder, Lars. And we are still that prepared.

Gums sends...

GlobalNav 24th April 2026 23:53


Originally Posted by Hangarless (Post 12075839)
He said this morning, I do believe ,that the small fast boats in the Strait will be getting the same treatment that is given in the Caribbean.

Who really knows what surveillance ability and intelligence gathering is available to the US but my bet is that it is quite substantial.

It seems incredible that the fast boats were not detected before they took action against the ships. Why were they allowed to do what they did? Why aren’t the IRGC crews feeding the fishes right now?

fdr 25th April 2026 00:53

Seems the WH can at least turn to Mr T's make Vlad for assistance, after all, he has been invited by the incumbent in the WH to Miami for the G-20 meet later this year, the administrations position on an indicted war criminal seems to be pretty flakey. Flicking a middle finger at the ICC is a routine occurrence, and to be expected, but it does look pretty odd when for the last 10 years Mr T has been actively working against NATO, EU, UK, and various other democracies, the same ones that are being cajoled for being rather reticent in sending boots and boats and planes to the GoH to assist in the unscrambling of the expedition that the Benny and Don show put on for the global economy.

Thank goodness that Mr T won on day one, which does make it curious as to why there is a need for anything else to be done.

The Stop/Go signs on the status of the Straits, negotiations, cease fire, etc may need to carry a flicker vertigo warning.

So, hopefully Mr T and Mr P's warm fuzzies for each other will at least cure the issue, will be a blast to see Russia resurrect their fleet from the bottom of the Black Sea, scrape off the barnacles and join the USN in doing the business in great (read: Iranian, Omani, UAE) waters.

LW50; bet ya didn't think the day would come when your Prez had more time for the would be Tzar than NATO. Can't say it makes me overly happy.


https://www.tickcounter.com/countup/...nvaded-ukraine

petit plateau 25th April 2026 06:47


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 12075762)
Ceasefire or basically screwed.. the US appear to be running low on weapons.



https://x.com/CSIS/status/2046944043226018068

Trump is certainly making sure the next US president has fewer options.

(And that the Europeans will definitely be buying closer to home)

ORAC 25th April 2026 09:35

ISW report:

Iran Update:

Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Commander Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi and his inner circle have repeatedly blocked attempts by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and other “pragmatist” officials to push the regime toward a more flexible negotiating position. Vahidi appears to have prevailed in this internal power struggle and will likely shape the regime’s approach toward negotiations and the war with a maximalist and uncompromising stance.

Ghalibaf likely lacks the leverage to alter this trajectory in a meaningful way at this time. Recent reports that Ghalibaf may resign from being a member of the negotiating team are consistent with ISW-CTP’s assessment that Vahidi has emerged as the winner of the intra-regime rivalry.

Sources told Western media that Ghalibaf has grown frustrated with internal divisions and has considered resigning from the negotiating delegation, while some outlets have claimed that Ghalibaf has already resigned from the negotiating team due to disagreements over nuclear concessions.


“Pragmatist” officials may continue to advocate for a more flexible approach, but their efforts are unlikely to meaningfully shape regime decision-making in the near term.

Vahidi’s apparent victory will likely have significant implications for potential future US-Iran negotiations. Vahidi has also shown greater willingness than “pragmatist” officials to accept the risk of renewed conflict with the United States.


Wyntor 25th April 2026 15:11

BBC reporting that senior Iranian MP has stated that if US attacks Iranian infrastructure then Iran will do likewise other regional countries.

Leaves the US in an interesting position. Stand fast the obvious that anyone attacking civil infrastructure such as water supplies or electricity would be committing a war crime - it sets out a tricky conundrum. If US attacks Iran as per No 47's approach it could result in UAE or Qatar or other allies losing their water supplies.

Who would want to be trying to square that circle?

Who would want to be the general dancing on the head of a pin trying to justify that orders, received or given, were actually legal?


T28B 25th April 2026 15:29


Originally Posted by fdr (Post 12075997)
LW50; bet ya didn't think the day would come when your Prez had more time for the would be Tzar than NATO. Can't say it makes me overly happy.

While this was not directed to me, I believe that I can speak on behalf of everyone who posts on the PPRuNe Military Aviation subforum and say that it makes none of us happy.

Winemaker 25th April 2026 16:36

From the New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/25/u...n-nuclear.html


As nuclear talks restart in Pakistan this weekend, President Trump will confront the complicated legacy of his own decision, eight years ago, to cancel what he has called “a horrible, one-sided deal.”

That Obama-era agreement suffered from flaws and omissions. It would have expired after 15 years, leaving Iran free after 2030 to make as much nuclear fuel as it wanted. But once Mr. Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018, the Iranians went on an enrichment spree much sooner, leaving them closer to a bomb than ever before.

Now, Mr. Trump’s negotiators are dealing with the consequences of that decision, which he made over the objections of many of his national security advisers at the time.

Much recent attention has focused on Iran’s half ton of uranium that has been enriched to a level just shy of what is typically used in atom bombs. The majority of it is thought to be buried in a tunnel complex that Mr. Trump bombed last June. But those 970 pounds of potential bomb fuel represent only a small fraction of the problem.

Today, international inspectors say, Iran has a total of 11 tons of uranium, at various enrichment levels. With further purification, that is enough to build up to 100 nuclear weapons — more than the estimated size of Israel’s arsenal.

Virtually all of that cache accumulated in the years after Mr. Trump abandoned the Obama-era deal. That is because Tehran lived up to its pledge to ship to Russia 12.5 tons of its overall stockpile, about 97 percent. Iran’s weapon designers were left with too little nuclear fuel to build a single bomb.

Sobelena 25th April 2026 17:15

BBC reporting that Trump has now cancelled Witkoff and Kushner's trip to Pakistan.

What an absolute circus the Trump administration is. Just how long is this dismal clown act going to go on for?

Wyntor 25th April 2026 18:13


Originally Posted by Sobelena (Post 12076358)
BBC reporting that Trump has now cancelled Witkoff and Kushner's trip to Pakistan.

What an absolute circus the Trump administration is. Just how long is this dismal clown act going to go on for?

If it wasn't so serious, it would be funny watching the White House clown show getting handed their backside by the Iranians.

I have no idea how they get out this cluster, other than declaring victory, going home and starting some other crisis somewhere to deflect.

As far as I can see there are no good military options that result in anything that looks like a victory.

DogTailRed2 25th April 2026 18:24

What happens if the Strait never opens? We just run out of oil?

Less Hair 25th April 2026 19:21

China might come to open it? It needs that oil the most urgent.

Bfah 25th April 2026 19:24


Originally Posted by Sobelena (Post 12076358)
BBC reporting that Trump has now cancelled Witkoff and Kushner's trip to Pakistan.

Could be linked to what ORAC posted in 5532 about confusion in the ranks of who has the authority to talk.

'...Sources told Western media that Ghalibaf has grown frustrated with internal divisions and has considered resigning from the negotiating delegation, while some outlets have claimed that Ghalibaf has already resigned from the negotiating team due to disagreements over nuclear concessions....'.

Trump on his social media saying stuff like, that no one is in charge and no one knows who is in charge, so no point going to the ceasefire negotiations.

GlobalNav 25th April 2026 19:59


Originally Posted by Bfah (Post 12076401)
Could be linked to what ORAC posted in 5532 about confusion in the ranks of who has the authority to talk.

'...Sources told Western media that Ghalibaf has grown frustrated with internal divisions and has considered resigning from the negotiating delegation, while some outlets have claimed that Ghalibaf has already resigned from the negotiating team due to disagreements over nuclear concessions....'.

Trump on his social media saying stuff like, that no one is in charge and no one knows who is in charge, so no point going to the ceasefire negotiations.

The Iranians may have come to the same conclusion with regard to those they would negotiate with.

fdr 25th April 2026 20:50


Originally Posted by petit plateau (Post 12076044)
Trump is certainly making sure the next US president has fewer options.

(And that the Europeans will definitely be buying closer to home)

A contrarian position would be that the next Prez will have a simpler problem to deal with, as the US will be regressing to the defensive perimeter that ICE and TSA can maintain, with no allies, other than Putin (seriously... that remains hard to even write) a Canada that is aligned with Europe, Australia aligning with Canada and Europe, and the new paradigm of FMS to... Burundi, and other similarly minded states. India is stepping out rather well in their own independent weapon system designs, although they have seen the Russian systems remain no better than the Soviet ones and so they are focused towards EUR systems. China, gets a free pass as it stands, which is only a problem if you consider that is a problem. Japan has to amend their constitution, (thanks, Don) and consider reliable allies, as will South Korea, which in spite of their historical issues, have common aims and are able to be effective allies.

This leads Israel in the business of bouncing rubble in Gaza and Lebanon, presumably a reasonable response to the begetting and begatting of violence that arises when 2 groups are sitting in the same sand box and there is no intent to remove the t1Rds from the kitty litter of 70 years of intolerance.

Is this a good thing? Depends. Taking out heads of state such as Maduro, as much as he was odious doesn't increase stability, nor does zapping fizz boats in the waters of other nations, but it is just another day ending in Y today. That the relative ease of removing a head of state from Venezuela set the expectations of a quick and gratifying removal of Irans head shed probably will look less glorious in the cold light of day.

We are getting a global reset, possibly on the order of the dinosaurs after Chicxulub, and maybe, that is what comes from the indifference that passes for civics in the west today.

What is curious is that China is not going to be happy with the changes, it forces their hands if this continues; it doesn't help India, although the consequence of famine there will certainly increase the opportunities for co-generation from funeral pyres, which seems to be a neat efficiency step. Taiwan will not be happy, but then they will be irrelevant in the biggly scheme of things, they are incidental to the problems of China other than being a political rallying point for a panda coming towards the natural end of his reversion to the gang of 4, the one thing that the CCP vowed never to repeat. Mexico will have a great opportunity to continue supporting the USA, but only as guest workers and imports. The need for guest workers will be dependent on the amount of potash that gets sent south from Canada, but DJT can always get it instead from Belarus and Russia, from the US's new allies.

All up, it seems that the opportunity for opportunity is quite large, for those that don't get planted in the dirt on the way through. The biggly, niggly bit is, Dale Carnegie would probably disagree with the strategy of making long term protagonists as a strategy.
Spoiler
 

fdr 25th April 2026 21:01


Originally Posted by Hot 'n' High (Post 12076429)
Sadly, the same thoughts were voiced re a certain perpetrator of a SMO............. :hmm:

I would suggest that Vlad the Impalers problems came from his megalomaniac tendencies mixed with paranoia. Vlad wants to be remembered as Vlad the Great... Fair enough. To achieve that, he had to have external threats that were existential, and he made that up in the caucuses, then Ukraine, to magically concentrate the public interest to other than the corruption and graft of his government. In DJTs case, he is not a megalomaniac as far as I can see, he presents generally as a sociopathic narcissist, who cannot balance a cheque book, and is adept at avoiding consequences as much as the original "teflon Don" did. Right now, John Giotti would be pretty annoyed at being left in the dust by the efforts of POTUS to extend his history of wreckage of commercial enterprises to include the USA, and much if not all of the world. That is far outside of the capacity of Vlad, so, to that end, kudos to DJT, well played.

NutLoose 25th April 2026 21:25

So much for Trumps rhetoric about destroying all of Irans airforce.


albatross 26th April 2026 01:57

The latest Shipping News
Sal comments on the efficacy of the US Blockade against Iran in the Gulf of Oman, the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf.




DogTailRed2 26th April 2026 07:35


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 12076445)
So much for Trumps rhetoric about destroying all of Irans airforce.

https://x.com/clashreport/status/2044463655140393124

Is it true that the Iranian Air Force Museum are annoyed and want it back?

mahogany bob 26th April 2026 08:15

It now appears that ‘peace’ in Iran and restarting normal traffic through the strait is weeks /months away
So where do we ( plus the EU ) get oil to survive ?

Is it THAT critical ?? We don’t appear to panicking with rationing etc yet.

The longer the strait is closed the more cost effective / likely do overland pipelines become.

Iran had better be careful it doesn’t hold all the cards !

Question : how quickly can pipelines be built in an emergency which this now is ?

ORAC 26th April 2026 08:32

Large fire at a US commissary building on the outskirts of RAF Fairford. Sabotage?

Video

​​​​​​​Major fire reported at RAF Fairford overnight, a British airbase hosting a sizeable forward-deployed contingent of USAF bombers for Iran strikes. The fire reportedly gutted a commissary building.

​​​​​​​The fire occurred at a building on the base perimeter, reportedly US-run. Location (51.699665, -1.773780)

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....b1f71cbf89.png


​​​​​​​From local news source @Wiltshire999s on Facebook, the fire has been put out.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....52abf42d1a.png
​​​​​​​

ORAC 26th April 2026 08:40

Sal Mercogliano:

If you want to understand the US blockade, understand the takedowns of the Tifani and Majestic X (ex-Phonix).

The US waited for these ships to get out of territorial waters - specifically away from Sri Lanka and before hitting the Malacca Strait.

The takedowns were executed in the
@INDOPACOM area from the USS Miguel Keith, a @MSCSealift Expeditionary Support Base.

With regards to Iranian ships, besides Touska, the US is diverting these ships back to Iran or they are using the territorial waters of Pakistan and India to evade.

My video this evening covers this in more details.


https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....ed760094af.png

larssnowpharter 26th April 2026 09:12


Originally Posted by mahogany bob (Post 12076600)
It now appears that ‘peace’ in Iran and restarting normal traffic through the strait is weeks /months away
So where do we ( plus the EU ) get oil to survive ?

Is it THAT critical ?? We don’t appear to panicking with rationing etc yet.

The longer the strait is closed the more cost effective / likely do overland pipelines become.

Iran had better be careful it doesn’t hold all the cards !

Question : how quickly can pipelines be built in an emergency which this now is ?

To answer your question - at least partially - pipelines themselves are relatively quick and easy to construct. I once project managed an Ethylene pipeline 120 km long from concept to conclusion in 9 months. But that's a diddy little thing with low viscosity fluid compared to what is needed here. I would imagine the limiting factor is the equipment needed for the pumping stations. Pumps are powered by electrical or turbines often generating multi megawatts. This kit has multi year lead times and ain't sitting on a shelf at your local DIY store!
Many different pipeline projects have been proposed around the Middle East but almost all come up against political and geographic constraints. The market has effectively chosen the flexibility of using VLCCs to transport oil and petroleum products.

Biggus 26th April 2026 12:44


Originally Posted by larssnowpharter (Post 12076640)
The market has effectively chosen the flexibility of using VLCCs to transport oil and petroleum products.

Given the geography of the region, with Iran always having the capability to close the Straits of Hormuz at will, perhaps the market needs to/will have a rethink


T28B 26th April 2026 12:59

From a purely aviation perspective, nice to see the Phantoms still flying.

larssnowpharter 26th April 2026 13:26


Originally Posted by Biggus (Post 12076732)
Given the geography of the region, with Iran always having the capability to close the Straits of Hormuz at will, perhaps the market needs to/will have a rethink

The Saudis built the East - West pipeline specifically to cover risk of the SoH closing. It has a plate capacity of 7million bbl however, the load capacity is, as I understand it, lim about 5 million. Iran attacked and damaged the pipeline but I now understand it has been repaired.

Canary Boy 26th April 2026 13:57


Originally Posted by T28B (Post 12076736)
From a purely aviation perspective, nice to see the Phantoms still flying.

Interesting to note that they are estimated to have approximately 60 F4s in service (early 2026) of which, presumably, a number will have been destroyed. As 40 - 60 year old cabs, their serviceability is questionable, with them often referred-to as Frankenstein jets following much cannibalisation. Those that have received avionic upgrades are capable of carrying anti-ship missiles (Chinese C802?) Not sure I would fancy launching in one for an attack on shipping however!

skua 26th April 2026 15:18

Re the Fairford blaze, I wonder if it is just a coincidence that this was organised for yesterday? I picked up the leaflet in Green leaning
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....234e57acfc.jpg
Stroud last week.

Lonewolf_50 26th April 2026 19:33


Originally Posted by Canary Boy (Post 12076761)
Interesting to note that they are estimated to have approximately 60 F4s in service (early 2026) of which, presumably, a number will have been destroyed. As 40 - 60 year old cabs, their serviceability is questionable, with them often referred-to as Frankenstein jets following much cannibalisation. Those that have received avionic upgrades are capable of carrying anti-ship missiles (Chinese C802?) Not sure I would fancy launching in one for an attack on shipping however!

Based on some of my experiences in aircraft maintenance, and some with overhaul, I tip my cap to the mechanics and engineers who keep those Phantoms flying. Getting, and reverse engineering, parts for those birds takes a bit of talent.

Originally Posted by skua (Post 12076796)
Re the Fairford blaze, I wonder if it is just a coincidence that this was organised for yesterday?

I doubt it. (But perhaps it was an accident...)

albatross 26th April 2026 20:45


Originally Posted by Originally Posted by skua
Re the Fairford blaze, I wonder if it is just a coincidence that this was organised for yesterday?


Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
I doubt it. (But perhaps it was an accident...)

Someone plug a US appliance into British mains power?

”What’s that smell?…… Is that smoke? …..Is that flame!?
”Fire! Fire! Fire! Help! Help! Help!”


Lonewolf_50 27th April 2026 01:17

When I was about 11, I forgot to plug one of my electronic games (electric football) into a transformer before plutting it into a 220 VAC outlet in Germany.
Smoked it, ruined it, and got a right arse chewing from my father.

ORAC 27th April 2026 06:45

Morale seems OK.....


​​​​​​​Picture of a whiteboard seen recently onboard the USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), currently positioned in the Red Sea having been deployed now for over 300 days, originally leaving Naval Station Norfolk on June 24, 2025, participating in operations against both Venezuela in the Caribbean and Iran in the Eastern Mediterranean:

GQ (General Quarters) Counter: 3
Longest GQ: 26 hrs Closest Missile: 15 NM
Closest Drone: 5 NM
Fleets Entered: 3
Presidents Kidnapped: 1
Supreme Leaders killed: 1
Countries Bombed: 2
Oil Tankers Stolen: 5


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....adb90d2e48.png
​​​​​​​

ORAC 27th April 2026 06:57

COMSEC in the era of international commercial LEO satellite constellations with AI intelligence analysis and distribution.....

6 decimal places in digital Lat & Long is an accuracy of 0.1M (4 inches....)


MizarVision satellite-analysis report identifies a U.S. Navy vessel concentration in the northern Arabian Sea, roughly 300–400 nautical miles from the Strait of Hormuz, amid heightened Middle East tensions in April 2026. The report links the activity to U.S.-led maritime interdiction against Iranian oil trade and sea supply routes, alongside “Economic Fury” and “Operation Epic Fury” military deployments.

At 14:43 on April 26, several vessels were detected inside the same sea area: 60.37°–61.31°E and 21.01°–22.24°N. The formation appears northwest–southeast aligned and consistent with a carrier strike group pattern. Identified positions include multiple Arleigh Burke-class destroyers around the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier, with one destroyer ahead as a screening unit and others positioned near the carrier for air-defense, missile-defense, anti-submarine and escort roles.

USS Abraham Lincoln was assessed near 61.060488°E, 22.128991°N as the formation’s core vessel, with Carrier Air Wing 9 providing air blockade and reconnaissance coverage.

The report also links USS Tripoli to the wider interdiction posture. USS Tripoli was placed near 60.373842°E, 21.011538°N, close to a Burke-class destroyer and carrying the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.

The report assesses the group as a compact operational formation moving toward the Hormuz direction.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....06ebbefee9.png


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.