'The U.S.A has your back'...what does that mean?
Thread Starter
'The U.S.A has your back'...what does that mean?
Like so many on this forum, I am watching the events unfolding in Afghanistan with incredulity, frustration and anger. However, rather than go over the causes for and consequences of the hasty withdrawal of Coalition forces, I wanted to get your view on a slightly different question.
What do members think will be the view of both the USA's allies and 'enemies' in light of their decision to cut-'n-run from Afghanistan. They US governement are now openly refusing entry to the airport of those who aided their forces (confirmed by multiple news outlets), despite promising them they would be kept safe. The world is watching, and what is the world going to take away from this? What does a US 'guarantee' now mean - will anyone believe them - is it worth the paper it is written on?
For example, the US repeatedly says it will defent Taiwan militarily if China decides to invade. Has the import of that statement just changed? Will China be emboldened, and will Taiwan now be nervous? Or, will the removal of forces from the 'stan now allow Biden to pivot to Asia and will China now be worried?
The UK integrated review looked at the shape of our defence moving forwards, and was done in the light of the world's most powerful military being behind us at all times. Can we still count on the US as an unwavering partner? Recent events would clearly seem to indicate that we cannot. Is the review now fit for purpose?
I would love to hear your views.
What do members think will be the view of both the USA's allies and 'enemies' in light of their decision to cut-'n-run from Afghanistan. They US governement are now openly refusing entry to the airport of those who aided their forces (confirmed by multiple news outlets), despite promising them they would be kept safe. The world is watching, and what is the world going to take away from this? What does a US 'guarantee' now mean - will anyone believe them - is it worth the paper it is written on?
For example, the US repeatedly says it will defent Taiwan militarily if China decides to invade. Has the import of that statement just changed? Will China be emboldened, and will Taiwan now be nervous? Or, will the removal of forces from the 'stan now allow Biden to pivot to Asia and will China now be worried?
The UK integrated review looked at the shape of our defence moving forwards, and was done in the light of the world's most powerful military being behind us at all times. Can we still count on the US as an unwavering partner? Recent events would clearly seem to indicate that we cannot. Is the review now fit for purpose?
I would love to hear your views.
Meant in the nicest possible way, I would suggest South Korea and Taiwan have some things that the US would consider more immediately worth fighting for compared to Afghanistan - considering development of minerals extraction in Afghan hasn't seemed to have progressed far.
I'd be more concerned if there were a conflict over Taiwan (and likely South Korea at the same time) that Russia would decide that it's a great time to take some of its former states back into the fold and marched West a bit. In that case I suspect that the UK and Europeans may well get told that they were mostly on their own.
I'd be more concerned if there were a conflict over Taiwan (and likely South Korea at the same time) that Russia would decide that it's a great time to take some of its former states back into the fold and marched West a bit. In that case I suspect that the UK and Europeans may well get told that they were mostly on their own.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
7 Posts
I would be very cautious about assuming anything based on Afghanistan, The US has been a proven, and I hope appreciated ally, to the UK and other nations.
Places like Beirut, Somalia and Afghanistan do not equate to other relationships and strategic interests. They painfully and hopefully serve as reminders that's its not wise to get into certain places.
Places like Beirut, Somalia and Afghanistan do not equate to other relationships and strategic interests. They painfully and hopefully serve as reminders that's its not wise to get into certain places.
I would be very cautious about assuming anything based on Afghanistan, The US has been a proven, and I hope appreciated ally, to the UK and other nations.
Places like Beirut, Somalia and Afghanistan do not equate to other relationships and strategic interests. They painfully and hopefully serve as reminders that's its not wise to get into certain places.
Places like Beirut, Somalia and Afghanistan do not equate to other relationships and strategic interests. They painfully and hopefully serve as reminders that's its not wise to get into certain places.
The problem is having decided they were leaving, the USA more less threw those “allies” under the bus, that is the problem the USA now face.
In fact they are still in a way doing it as we all try to get our people out of Country we are being blindsided by the USA deciding when they have enough of their people out and they will then leave whether others have completed their missions or not. .
Why would any self respecting Country support or be caught in the same situation again where the USA want a coalition to go into any Country where there are problems.
Remember it’s not just Afghanistan, the U.K. supported the USA in Kuwait, Iraq, Libya etc… I feel this has become a game changer the world will not forget if called upon again.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
17 Posts
The problem is having decided they were leaving, the USA more less threw those “allies” under the bus, that is the problem the USA now face.
In fact they are still in a way doing it as we all try to get our people out of Country we are being blindsided by the USA deciding when they have enough of their people out and they will then leave whether others have completed their missions or not.
Why would any self respecting Country support or be caught in the same situation again where the USA want a coalition to go into any Country where there are problems.
Remember it’s not just Afghanistan, the U.K. supported the USA in Kuwait, Iraq, Libya etc
I feel this has become a game changer the world will not forget if called upon again.
The US had no treaty commitment to Afghanistan (in fact, through the Doha agreement it had more of a commitment to the Taliban). It has treaty commitments to NATO in the North Atlantic region, to Japan, and to South Korea. It has no treaty commitment to Taiwan but has wisely maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity over whether it would intervene there. It shows no sign of backing away from any of those positions, and now has more resource available with which to uphold them.
Ultimately POTUS answers to the US electorate. We Europeans should beware of complaining unreasonably about their democratic wishes finally being listened to, because we increase the risk of the very rupture we profess to be so alarmed about. Calm heads need to prevail.
Last edited by Easy Street; 23rd Aug 2021 at 20:03.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
17 Posts
Easy Street - don't think I've ever been so much in agreement with a fellow contributor to PPRuNe but absolutely 100% spot on with the above. Just to add though that 9/11 was seen by many (myself included), that an attack on one NATO member should be considered as an attack on all. Therefore, having identified the bad guys as AQ with a powerbase in the Stan, it should have been unquestionable for any NATO partner not to offer full support in dealing with the threat. There has been too much negative media commentary over recent days questioning why we were ever involved in the first place but I haven't seen anyone mention the NATO angle. Of course, the nation building element that followed on from the destruction of AQ is worthy of debate but this should not be confused with the initial action.
Secondly, you quite rightly mention the democratic wishes of the American people. Some early news comments were suggesting that 70% of the US population were fully supportive of Biden's actions. This is a huge level of support if accurate although he is now being painted as a senile clown! Whilst it's just possible that none of our leaders could have predicted the speed of the Taliban takeover (although I'm sure it's no surprise to many of our Armed Forces members), I haven't seen any MP provide a cogent argument as to why we did absolutely nothing with 18 months notice of the US departure. Perhaps there was too much focus on Love Island?
Secondly, you quite rightly mention the democratic wishes of the American people. Some early news comments were suggesting that 70% of the US population were fully supportive of Biden's actions. This is a huge level of support if accurate although he is now being painted as a senile clown! Whilst it's just possible that none of our leaders could have predicted the speed of the Taliban takeover (although I'm sure it's no surprise to many of our Armed Forces members), I haven't seen any MP provide a cogent argument as to why we did absolutely nothing with 18 months notice of the US departure. Perhaps there was too much focus on Love Island?
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Scotland
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Easy Street
Are you Jon Sopel in disguise?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-58300984
A short extract to get you in the mood:
...I could list countless other examples where America has ridden roughshod over British sensibilities. In the seven years I have been in Washington I have watched it up close - and it doesn't matter whether the president in the White House is Republican or Democrat: how much the British spend on defence as a proportion of GDP, whether we buy technology from Chinese telecommunications firms, what the Trump administration is going to do about Iran - and on and on...
I agree with PA, I think you have it pretty much covered.
Are you Jon Sopel in disguise?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-58300984
A short extract to get you in the mood:
...I could list countless other examples where America has ridden roughshod over British sensibilities. In the seven years I have been in Washington I have watched it up close - and it doesn't matter whether the president in the White House is Republican or Democrat: how much the British spend on defence as a proportion of GDP, whether we buy technology from Chinese telecommunications firms, what the Trump administration is going to do about Iran - and on and on...
I agree with PA, I think you have it pretty much covered.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes
on
17 Posts
Salute!
Thank you Easy and Party.
We colonists are still crude, coarse ill-mannered folks that mostly came from Great Britain and other places in Europe. That being easily admitted, and our proud attitude that irritates many of the more "civil", but less free folks, I am ashamed of what this new, clueless administration has done in just a half a year.
I flew with, instructed and was instructed by aviators and educational folks from many countries for over 20 years. So before the mods delete or move this, I shall apologize for the idiots we now have that have undone many aspects of America policy and support for other nations besides the treatment and actions we are now seeing in the 'stan. The withdrawal was not planned and advertised in a vacuum, and there was knowledge of such by our Allies and others. Some details were likely coordinated with some of our allies. But the new guys could not bear to follow any plan that was developed and being implemented by " orange man bad" and the allies
Some help to others? Two instances come to mind..... and I avoid the years I spent between 1967 and 1975 for another venue/instance.
Ask Mogli about the Aim-9 Lima for the Sea Harrier in the Falklands. Ask my Israeli students from the first and only Viper checkout class if we helped them in Yom Kippur.
Gotta go, and see ya on JB, likely.
Gums sends...
Thank you Easy and Party.
We colonists are still crude, coarse ill-mannered folks that mostly came from Great Britain and other places in Europe. That being easily admitted, and our proud attitude that irritates many of the more "civil", but less free folks, I am ashamed of what this new, clueless administration has done in just a half a year.
I flew with, instructed and was instructed by aviators and educational folks from many countries for over 20 years. So before the mods delete or move this, I shall apologize for the idiots we now have that have undone many aspects of America policy and support for other nations besides the treatment and actions we are now seeing in the 'stan. The withdrawal was not planned and advertised in a vacuum, and there was knowledge of such by our Allies and others. Some details were likely coordinated with some of our allies. But the new guys could not bear to follow any plan that was developed and being implemented by " orange man bad" and the allies
Some help to others? Two instances come to mind..... and I avoid the years I spent between 1967 and 1975 for another venue/instance.
Ask Mogli about the Aim-9 Lima for the Sea Harrier in the Falklands. Ask my Israeli students from the first and only Viper checkout class if we helped them in Yom Kippur.
Gotta go, and see ya on JB, likely.
Gums sends...
The world is watching, and what is the world going to take away from this? What does a US 'guarantee' now mean - will anyone believe them - is it worth the paper it is written on?
The one principal difference I would suggest is the time frame the US uses for determining the benefits of a relationship with foreign countries. For example the Marshall plan was eventually highly beneficial to the US, but required a huge up front investment that took a significant period of time to pay off. That kind of vision seems unimaginable now no matter what party is in power.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nippi
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AMONGST BRIGALOW SUCKERS
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
“America is harmless as an enemy but treacherous as a friend.” ― Bernard Lewis
Pretty Sure that is the view of the Taliban right now, and would apply as well to the other nations involved in the Afghanistan shit show.
Pretty Sure that is the view of the Taliban right now, and would apply as well to the other nations involved in the Afghanistan shit show.
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Under a tree in the NT
Posts: 148
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
26 Posts
Not much being said about the Afghan army, and the speed with which it collapsed.
Multiple countries sent trainers there to teach the army how to conduct its operations, spending years and squillions of dollars on the effort and armament. Comes the time to remove the trainer wheels and see how much they have learned, they drop the bike and run.
What more can we do, other than stay and take the place of their own army, which didn't want to defend its own country? And standing in for them is one thing that is unlikely to happen. The warring tribes and ancient hatreds have returned.
Stand clear and see what happens after the dust settles.
Multiple countries sent trainers there to teach the army how to conduct its operations, spending years and squillions of dollars on the effort and armament. Comes the time to remove the trainer wheels and see how much they have learned, they drop the bike and run.
What more can we do, other than stay and take the place of their own army, which didn't want to defend its own country? And standing in for them is one thing that is unlikely to happen. The warring tribes and ancient hatreds have returned.
Stand clear and see what happens after the dust settles.
