Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Poseidon - Not too long to wait?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Poseidon - Not too long to wait?

Old 5th Feb 2020, 16:18
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
A C-17 with a probe? That's news to me - you have a link or an image of that?
I suspect Davef68 is referring to the fact that the RAF's E-3s have both a probe and receptacle, not that any of the C-17s had a probe...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 17:08
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: London
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pr00ne
cessnapete,

The RAF Nimrod MR force managed perfectly well with no AAR capability up until 1982 when it had to go a little further south. How often does a MR aircraft need to refuel in mid air?
Yes, but we had around 35 MR2 airframes in 5 Squadrons compared with just the 9 airframes of the Poseidon. So if you want to keep a permanent watch on station during a heightened alert then you are quickly going to run out of aircraft if you cannot do AAR. Out of 9 airframes you will probably lose at least 3 to serviceability issues and scheduled maintenance.
cashash is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 20:43
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 511
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This is a 737-800 ish' Airframe and Engines combo. As long as the engineers don't keep pulling it apart to see if it is working' OK , should attain almost airline servicebility'.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 21:31
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 65
Posts: 7,372
Received 565 Likes on 355 Posts
Originally Posted by Lyneham Lad
They decided to hang Harpoons on P-3s in the 80's, so why not hang a missile or two on the next MPA aircraft?
Seems a rational option to want to have.
NAVAIR is also interested in outfitting the maritime patrol aircraft with 500lb to 2,000lb-class bombs fitted with Joint Direct Attack Munition guidance kits, Mk62/63/65 Quickstrike sea mines, Raytheon’s gliding Small Diameter Bomb, as well as Miniature Air Launched Decoys, according to a notice posted online 28 January.
And why not? It is a war plane.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 00:15
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,319
Received 615 Likes on 259 Posts
Russian Sub activity in the Atlantic on the increase?

East Coast USA no longer a safe haven for US Ships and Subs due to new Russian capabilities?

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...o-russian-subs
SASless is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 07:18
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,912
Received 443 Likes on 269 Posts
How many active Subs do the Russians have?

The last numbers I saw were 12 SSBN's - but only 3 of those are post 1985 & around 16 SSN/SSGN - only 1 of which is post 1986 & 21 SSK only one of which is a post 1981 boat

They have 4 SSBN & 4 SSN on order - these are delivered spasmodically and spend a long time working up

They are spread across the Atlantic and the Pacific navies

Hardly a vast fleet knocking on the door TBH
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 07:49
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by cessnapete
So the RAF Voyager cannot refuel an RAF P8? So who refuels it on a mission if required?
They would contract it out. Anyway, even if it could. You only have Voyager every other Tuesday, as it off doing private work. Your decision makers are so clever.
golder is online now  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 08:02
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56
How many active Subs do the Russians have?

The last numbers I saw were 12 SSBN's - but only 3 of those are post 1985 & around 16 SSN/SSGN - only 1 of which is post 1986 & 21 SSK only one of which is a post 1981 boat

They have 4 SSBN & 4 SSN on order - these are delivered spasmodically and spend a long time working up

They are spread across the Atlantic and the Pacific navies

Hardly a vast fleet knocking on the door TBH
A few nations aren't Russian centric. They have the economy of Italy. What they do have is the corrupt practice with western corps and politicians. That magnifies their power.. Trump isn't the only one they own.
golder is online now  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 08:20
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 837
Received 119 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by golder
They would contract it out. Anyway, even if it could. You only have Voyager every other Tuesday, as it off doing private work. Your decision makers are so clever.
I am no great fan of the PFI model either, but that is not quite how it works!
Timelord is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 09:16
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 434
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
I am no great fan of the PFI model either, but that is not quite how it works!
Aussies are clever too. We sold Omega our B707's, contracting them to refuel us.
golder is online now  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 10:20
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Does this 'new' Boeing machine have to be MCAS enabled ?
Capt Kremmen is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 10:40
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Capt Kremmen
Does this 'new' Boeing machine have to be MCAS enabled ?
No MCAS in this model, according to earlier discussions here.
AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 10:49
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Anglian. Thank you.
Capt Kremmen is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 12:15
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great to see our MPRA capability coming back to life. Bit ironic but fitting that Kinloss welcomed it home. Best wishes CXX, I'm sure AAR is fairly low on your list of priorities!
Captain Radar.... is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 12:49
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Beyond the M25
Posts: 536
Received 62 Likes on 32 Posts
I'm sure AAR is fairly low on your list of priorities!
Indeed, because they don't have it. If they had it, imagine it would be a bit further up the list.
Mil-26Man is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 12:59
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 837
Received 119 Likes on 53 Posts
Originally Posted by Mil-26Man
Indeed, because they don't have it. If they had it, imagine it would be a bit further up the list.
Good question actually. Are the crews trained in boom AAR?
Timelord is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 13:22
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 192
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by golder
Aussies are clever too. We sold Omega our B707's, contracting them to refuel us.
FWIU a lot was paid for in penalty clauses by EADS because of late MRTT delivery.
flighthappens is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 17:04
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,730
Received 44 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Rhino power
I suspect Davef68 is referring to the fact that the RAF's E-3s have both a probe and receptacle, not that any of the C-17s had a probe...

-RP
Indeed, all for a lack of a parenthesis!!
Davef68 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 19:14
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They would contract it out. Anyway, even if it could. You only have Voyager every other Tuesday, as it off doing private work. Your decision makers are so clever.
you clearly have absolutely no idea about the RAF AAR capability/tasking/availability and actually how the PFI works
Door Slider is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2020, 19:57
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: London
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aw ditor
This is a 737-800 ish' Airframe and Engines combo. As long as the engineers don't keep pulling it apart to see if it is working' OK , should attain almost airline servicebility'.
To get airline levels of serviceability would require airline levels of spares availability - in my experience (9 years) the RAF that we all know and love is never going to have this. Only having 9 airframes also leads to another related issue, you will not have any spare airframes. to rob for spares.

Of course this is all moot if there is never a requirement for long-term remaining on station, so hopefully we will be OK or at least be in a situation where the Yanks could assist.
cashash is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.