Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Poseidon - Not too long to wait?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Poseidon - Not too long to wait?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Feb 2023, 05:53
  #481 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 160
Received 91 Likes on 47 Posts
Best wishes and good luck to everyone on the Poseidon definitely the best job in the RAF! ( or it was on the Nimrod ! )

Just wondered if long debriefs are still held in the scruffs bar ?
In the old days all the best lessons were learnt there!

(In the old MCT (simulator ) every time we killed a sub our crew used to stand up and sing ‘rule Britannia ‘ - not universally approved as we received criticism for ‘not taking it seriously ‘! )

SLAMs don’t sound very good news!

Is discussion on operating at medium altitudes still discouraged ?To me it’s not really fun if you are not racking the aircraft round at 200ft, MAD traps at night in bad weather was interesting !( I know that you don’t have MAD ! )

One point on operating at medium level to avoid weather - I always thought that it was a lot more comfortable flying ‘below’ the weather - which can be very nasty and turbulent around the UK ( and the med in the winter and changing seasons) at medium level?
mahogany bob is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2023, 11:08
  #482 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 392
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
The RAF is buying Mk 54 torpedoes to avoid the need for integration of Stingray onto P-8A and to maintain commonality with the USN and Norway.

It could therefore also buy the HAAWC kits.
It makes sense for the UK to keep it common. It will work out cheaper in the long run.

Last edited by golder; 12th Feb 2023 at 06:34.
golder is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2023, 22:56
  #483 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,590 Likes on 727 Posts
same thing that’s happened with Abrams, F-16, F-18 etc etc…

SCOOP: Boeing is quietly asking lawmakers to buy P-8A Poseidon spy planes in FY-24 that the Navy has not asked for so that the manufacturing line remains primed for future foreign military sales.

https://t.co/yyN7CKgMeS
ORAC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Apr 2023, 18:37
  #484 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,289
Received 512 Likes on 214 Posts
It makes sense for the UK to keep it common. It will work out cheaper in the long run.
Since when has that ever been a consideration by MoD?

Shall we resurrect old discussions about Chinook procurements?
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2023, 20:12
  #485 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Frensham
Posts: 846
Received 90 Likes on 48 Posts
Something to practice against:

Argentina in talks with Naval Group, ThyssenKrupp for three submarines

https://www.defensenews.com/naval/20...mpaign=dfn-dnr
Wokkafans is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2023, 01:45
  #486 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,346
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
We were also the first Nimrod crew ‘on scene’ during the Fastnet race drama on 14 August 1979.
​​​​​​​I'm pretty sure we took over from you as dawn broke MB...
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2023, 20:16
  #487 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,590 Likes on 727 Posts
Haven’t seen this mentioned here - 9th of September.

A great day out to College Hall Cranwell for the reactivation ceremony of the 42(TB) Sqn Standard.






ORAC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 30th Nov 2023, 13:51
  #488 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
RAF P-8A to be capable of carrying Sting Ray Mod 1 as well as US Mk 54 torpedo

RAF chooses UK manufactured Sting Ray Torpedo for Poseidon fleet | Royal Air Force (mod.uk)
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 14:55
  #489 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Wiltshire, UK
Age: 71
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
RAF P-8A to be capable of carrying Sting Ray Mod 1 as well as US Mk 54 torpedo

RAF chooses UK manufactured Sting Ray Torpedo for Poseidon fleet | Royal Air Force (mod.uk)

Small historical note about the length of time kit stays in service. One of a young VP959's first jobs was FIAM development and carriage and release trials for NASR 7511, which became Sting Ray. That was in 1976 . . .
VP959 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 15:04
  #490 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,449
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
What altitude do they plan on dropping Stingrays from P-8As... given that the intention appears to be to conduct ASW at high level.
Biggus is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 15:12
  #491 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Wiltshire, UK
Age: 71
Posts: 429
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Biggus
What altitude do they plan on dropping Stingrays from P-8As...
It'll be low level. Near-impossible to drop them from anything above a couple of thousand feet and still get an accurate prediction of the splash point from the release point (due to the vagaries in measuring the wind speed and direction profile). I can't remember how high we went during release trials, my (somewhat fading) memory suggests the max was 1,500ft ASL. Best accuracy was lower, 400ft sticks in my memory (and I could well be wrong). The parachute opens very quickly (about 0.8s after release) and so the thing slows quickly to TV, and TV is relatively slow (hence the problem with drift from higher release height).
VP959 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 18:23
  #492 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
Now Canada buying 16 x P-8A - UK should have bought more!

Canada Selects Boeing P-8A Poseidon as CMMA | Joint Forces News (joint-forces.com)
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 18:46
  #493 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Herefordshire
Posts: 768
Received 552 Likes on 200 Posts
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
Now Canada buying 16 x P-8A - UK should have bought more!
What for? Canada has ordered less than twice as many to patrol an area hundreds of times times bigger than that of the UK.
Video Mixdown is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2023, 19:26
  #494 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
But Canada doesn’t have a 24/7/365 CASD to protect and nor is it located at a vital strategic choke point!
Party Animal is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 3rd Dec 2023, 05:45
  #495 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: australia
Posts: 392
Received 28 Likes on 17 Posts
US navy, UK, Australia will test AI system to help crews track chinese submarines in the Pacific

The three powers said they would deploy advanced artificial intelligence algorithms on multiple systems, including the P-8A Poseidon aircraft to process data from each nation’s sonobuoys, underwater detection devices.

Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/world/u...acific-2793879
golder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.