Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Don't fly over my house...

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Don't fly over my house...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:17
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
airborne_artist - thanks ever so much for the excellent likeness and for the excellent advice - however I am not a troll, I am a resident concerned for the safety of our town, and other towns, and also concerned for rafat's hitherto excellent reputation.

ShyTorque (avoid imitations) - I'm really confused, you are phonetically identical to Shytehawk. I sent him a pm to ask if you are he, or vice versa or not. Apologies for the misunderstanding about pay, Exascot says he didn't expect his remark to be taken seriously. But I stand my ground on the other points.

Ij101 - better than that, I have a copy of the waiver signed by Rear Admiral Simon Charlier FRAeS, kindly provided by MoD under Freedom of Information.
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:21
  #142 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
I have absolutely no connection with any phonetically similar posters. I stand by what I wrote.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:22
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike

So they had permission? What's your point?
lj101 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:25
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exocet - bit difficult for a mere civilian to take on the massed forces single-handed.


sadist - a person who takes great pleasure in being kind to a masochist
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:31
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ij101 - permission based on their representations which are in turn based on airshow regulations and would imply rear entry over the line formed by a consenting crowd rather than low-level overflight of an entire town.
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:37
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts




Luvvit! Thanks Airborne!

mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:40
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know what, he's right!

I just watched this thing on the telly where they flew all over london!

Evil dangerous hooray henrys!
Tourist is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:44
  #148 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exocet sic- bit difficult for a mere civilian to take on the massed forces single-handed.
Suggest you take your argument elsewhere then old boy.

Last edited by Exascot; 22nd Sep 2012 at 19:10. Reason: addition of 'full stop' to say: 'used to suggest that there is nothing more to say on a topic'
Exascot is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 18:55
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exascot - yes, just giving you guys a chance before making a good case to send to "the respective event Flying Display Director" if I can find out who (s)he is, probably one of the civilian family who own the Grand Pier. After that it is onward and upward, to the Military Aviation Authority. But I shan't neglect you, please feel free to go on trolling...
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 19:57
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ij101 - Thanks for CAP403, just found it in my download folder. This is the CAA document applicable to civil aircraft. For military aircraft appearing at civil displays you need to consult RA 2335 - Flying Displays and Special Events, as modified by any appropriate waivers. My copy came from MoD under foi. It is my understanding that RA 2335 complies with European Law and that RAFAT have negotiated waivers with some but not all European countries to permit rear entry.
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 20:06
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pleasure - easily found with a google search:


As is this

http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/0C569...itialIssue.pdf

The book you wrote with ref to Military Research Aircraft, who published it?

Last edited by lj101; 22nd Sep 2012 at 20:30. Reason: Add doc ref
lj101 is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 20:45
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find this thread a little bizarre as between the CAA - MAA - EAC - BADA the Rules and to a small degree, self regulation of air show participants makes anything vaquely dangerous virtually impossible. Ramstein and Haddon-Cave between them have sorted the fun flying out. Gone are the days of post show departures being the best part of the show for exmple, and Crowd rear arrivals require a specific and written document of authorisation and few air show participants have it. RAFAT do, as do BBMF and I believe the Blades do but very few others.

The comments concerning perception od what servicemen get cost free is many years out of date and suggests a crevace on a shoulder never mind a chip.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 21:04
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ij101
Thanks for your kind interest
ISBN 0-85429-675-1
VTOL Military Research Aircraft
M J Rogers 1989
Foulis Aviation
Haynes Publishing Group

Tigermate
As explained I took a post by the venerable and highly respected Mr Exascot as the literal truth instead of a wry in-joke. I apologised before and I apologise again now.
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 21:16
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Amazon.co.uk
14 used from £0.01

I see his book is priced as highly as his insightful forum bilge.

Seriously, do you not know when you have become a laughing stock?
Stuff is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 21:48
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
I think I ought to divert some of the attention in the laughing-stock stakes.

Took me half this thread to work out what rafat meant

(In my defence, maybe RAFAT might have been clearer)
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 21:55
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stuff - Wow, 34 pounds new and average around twenty quid second-hand! Price new was £17.95 Thanks for drawing my attention to that.

Tanker - Sorry, was trying not to be a media magnet.

Last edited by mike-wsm; 22nd Sep 2012 at 22:09. Reason: typo
mike-wsm is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 22:25
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Is this thread for real? Please tell me that you're all in a conspiracy to astonish us all. Mike, I have never seen such ill-informed ranting (even here on PPRuNe!). Just think, every light aircraft that overflies your town at medium level, every airliner that overflies your town at high level and every rafat a/c that passes by has a chance of falling on your house - because that's what aircraft keep doing.

Although, I'm sure you're right, civilian aircraft are designed to crash much less often than military ones. I'm sure another FOI request will reveal to you the design requirements for the Hawk which was: must crash slightly more often than airliners.

I'm going back to my parallel universe now. Bye.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 23rd Sep 2012 at 10:49.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 23:07
  #158 (permalink)  

Uncle Pete
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Frodsham Cheshire
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I only thought most aircraft crashed once!

This thead had has been a real revelation.

Keep it going chaps!!

MP
MaximumPete is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 23:07
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Away from home Rat
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noisy military aeroplanes flying over my house?? I don't mind it, when they are transiting from were they need to go to / come from and I have owned houses in the flight path of Stations (my present house is on an airport approach, does it bother me ? No!). I do mind it when the idiot yanks from Suffolk decide that a bounce / 1 vis 1 is going to be planned over my house (2 miles from a city that is also getting the full effects) with burners at after 10 pm at night.. absolutely no justification to do it then at that time.. I was going to complain, but others did before me.. Not happened since..

Alber Ratman is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2012, 23:12
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: on the beach
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Courtney,

We have airliners flying over at reasonable altitude many times a day, we have helicopters, including Elfan's lovely Brantley, and we have three guys who buzz over suspended from parafoils. No problems with any of those.

We used to have Helidays with civil and military helicopters flying in off the sea to land on the sea-front, and a coincidental simultaneous departure on Sunday afternoon, glorious sight and sound, no probs there.

What I object to is the use of a waiver intended I think for conventional airfield displays being used as an excuse to fly FJs at 300ft eyeball MSD for two miles over a built up area.

Could you edit your post to say rafat, please? Thanks! Avoids attracting the news media when they google.
mike-wsm is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.