Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

Gulf Air Developments

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

Gulf Air Developments

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th August 2009 | 13:27
  #1001 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Flying into a war zone

Most govts right around the world are advising against all travel to Iraq for the obvious reasons.

I don't think it's fair on pilots with families to be flying into a war zone, and I hope nobody is bullied into doing so against their wishes. Any take ups should be completely voluntary.
Mike.Park is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 15:16
  #1002 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: neverland
we officially work for an airline that does not give 2 !!!!s about our well being!!i am amazed at the total lack of respect for us! we are basically workers to them and that is how we are being treated!
DesertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 15:29
  #1003 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
I might have to eat my words some day, but . . .

This may be one of those very rare instances of where the Government of Bahrain and Gulf Air were able to get traffic rights and set up operations before the regional competition. The rebuilding of Iraq will be the next gold mine. Check out the fares on the Gulf Air website-- they are anything but a give-away.

The guinea pigs, Royal Jordanian and Turkish have already been doing Iraq operations for a while. I also remember with some misgivings the pictures of the DHL Airbus A300 with the wingtip blown off. However, this was over 4 years ago, and the situation has changed in Iraq over those years. For sure, I prefer Bangkok over Baghdad as my holiday destination, but there is demand for service. As for a war zone, I am increasingly starting to wonder about some of the "friendly" places we fly to, like Peshawar, Lahore and Islamabad. I certainly don't want to go into town at any of these places either and the same would hold true for any of the new "exciting" destinations.

In any case, I suspect that within the year Bahrain Air, Emirates and possibly Qatar Airways and Etihad tails will also be present at the Baghdad International Airport and other airports in the country. On the upside of the equation, air transportation plays a positive roll in the development of a country. As commerce increases, Iraq will continue to stabilize. Hopefully Gulf Air will make some good revenue along the way.

The challenge at the moment, it would seem, is for Gulf Air to not ignore its crews which will operate into Iraq and to positively address their legitimate concerns.
Panama Jack is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 18:45
  #1004 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: Havana
PJ

This may be one of those very rare instances of where the Government of Bahrain and Gulf Air were able to get traffic rights and set up operations before the regional competition
Surely you don't think that the regional competition could not have also got these traffic rights if they had wanted to? I am absolutely certain that the Iraqi government would roll out the red carpet for anybody at all who wants to go there.

Remember, Iraq is still considered a war zone by the majority of responsible governments in the world. Perhaps the regional competition is being careful not to rely on information from private US 'security contractors' like Sabre.

No, I don't think this some kind of coup or one up on the competition, this is a very serious issue and the decision should not be taken lightly. Yes, it is possible that nothing will happen, on the other hand...
By the way, does your Life Insurance and your mortagage insurance cover allow you to go to a war-zone, mine does not.

Cheers and good luck
Che Guevara is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 19:01
  #1005 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: neverland
well stated Che, guys lets be honest the real problem is no one can ensure anything in Iraq. And that is a FACT. just open the paper look at some things going on and it is obvious that Iraq is still a rapidly changing environment that is not secure. Also if we do end up flying there is GF capable of canceling flights and making adjustments on a daily basis due to ever changing safety risks? I really hope that I am wrong but this has a horrible stench about it especially with the Americans leaving now and increased risks in my opinion. I may be wrong, but I am not testing my theory personally guaranteed!
DesertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 20:59
  #1006 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Always in the air
Che, you wrote:
"Remember, Iraq is still considered a war zone by the majority of responsible governments in the world. Perhaps the regional competition is being careful not to rely on information from private US 'security contractors' like Sabre."

I tried very hard to resist to post a message in this thread.
But, reading the post above, I am wondering about what "responsible governments" means!
My interpretation of resposible governments is that, yes they are responsible for all this mess in the area!. So they are the last to talk about security and safety in the area.
Said that, I am not keen to go there, but I believe that since there are commercial airlines going already there, we will not the first to set foot in Bagdad.
daidalos is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 22:52
  #1007 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: neverland
"My interpretation of resposible governments is that, yes they are responsible for all this mess in the area!"

to be honest this is not a political site who really cares why, i am more interested in SAFETY and that is my concern. The facts speak for themselves. Almost all governments say do not travel and some specifically state the airport is a target. So i guess GF safety audit team are real safety experts that outweigh most governments
DesertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 7th August 2009 | 23:56
  #1008 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: 39000 FT
Amazing

As per all other GF routes, as soon as the local competition starts the Baghdad run GF will fade into half hearted loads because of its crap aircraft and service. GF will have a short lived monopoly from the gulf -12 months at best. Better than nothing.

"Beggers (read GF) can't be choosers"

Maybe they can fly their old A340's into Iraq have them blown up and claim insurance and thus renew their fleet
Oddy
ODMEA is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 00:30
  #1009 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Australia
I'll have to agree with Panama Jack on this one. Apart from a buck to be made, servicing Iraq will be an integral part of the regions recovery and is most certainly a catalyst for Iraq's security and economic recovery.
Here is an important point worth pondering. What if GF and RJ were the only carriers granted air services exclusivity as just reward for operating there? Then it becomes a bit of a gold mine. I know, wishful thinking but these things tend to happen around this part of the world.
The key problem remains. Is it safe 'enough' to operate there? How was this decided? What individuals (names, ranks, departments) are involved with this safety audit team that made the safety assessment? Let no one 'hide' as this is a most serious matter for pilots, especially those whose own personal insurances are null and void should they operate to 'war zone' classified places. Will pilots be asked to volunteer? Or will they simply be suspended or sacked for refusing?
Sal-e is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 00:58
  #1010 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Always in the air
Desert:
"So i guess GF safety audit team are real safety experts that outweigh most governments"

My post was political, and yours is not?

Most governments?
Hmmmm
The ones that ...etc etc ?
wow.
And read the rest of my post, please ...
daidalos is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 02:23
  #1011 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: neverland
daidalos:

this is not a slam but look at it from a different perspective. by most governments i mean most governments. i am not sure what u are getting at? Iraq civilian operations are dangerous. So does not matter about "The ones that ...etc etc ?". This is entirely a different issue. Safety in Airline Operations in a war zone is the issue and to me it is obvious that this poses risks.
DesertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 04:38
  #1012 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: Havana
daidolos

My interpretation of resposible governments is that, yes they are responsible for all this mess in the area!. So they are the last to talk about security and safety in the area.
My interpretation is obviously quite different to yours, in fact it is not even close. Some of us come from countries that take the safety and security of their citizens seriously and yes, act responsibly in providing accurate and up to date travel advisories etc.

You of course are free to ignore your own and others if you feel that they do not paint an accurate picture.

Good luck in choosing.

Last edited by Che Guevara; 8th August 2009 at 04:49.
Che Guevara is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 04:57
  #1013 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Motown
Guys, the turks would get a extra salary everymonth if they flew to Irag. Hint Hint, negociate guys, the who will go, should get paid doulble,
Fubaliera is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 07:49
  #1014 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Asia
As Fubaliera pointed out, negociate for a better deal but also don't forget the approach is to Baghdad is terrible and will require very sharp manoeuvring (Screw driver) which is going to be fun I guess!

Good Luck
Radar Contact is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 15:55
  #1015 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Fantasy Island
I think the Safety Audit Team did a great job, they are sending the A320 to Iraq................makes for a smaller target
Capt Hair Y Balls is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 16:09
  #1016 (permalink)  
Duh
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: In Limbo
Does the "Y" stand for AND, as in the Spanish language. Or are you just referring to fuzzy nutz?
Duh is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 18:55
  #1017 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
nice points guys.Maybe GF (as well as bahrain) have some kind of a deal with the US army to keep the planes flying there to be safe? the airline which has more than 50 years of experience could not make an immature decisione like that.
tristarfivestar is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 20:01
  #1018 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Oh no, UglyRaed is back..
Mike.Park is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2009 | 20:02
  #1019 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Asia
nice points guys.Maybe GF (as well as bahrain) have some kind of a deal with the US army to keep the planes flying there to be safe? the airline which has more than 50 years of experience could not make an immature decisione like that.
The same airline that ditched overflying Iraq after one of their A340 was seconds close to collide with a US Army aircraft ? SURE.

Sorry mate but you speak like UglyRaedIIII (RELOADED)!
Radar Contact is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2009 | 00:25
  #1020 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
best solution is let gf roster only locals to iraq.
brassplate is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.