Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

VISION THREAD (other than colour vision)

Wikiposts
Search
Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

VISION THREAD (other than colour vision)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Dec 2006, 03:18
  #401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so ive just been accepted into a flight program at a college on the condition that i pass an FAA class 2 physical, which im recently doubting i can do. ive always had horrible vision but i assumed it was fully corrected by my contacts. on a recent visit to the doc to renew my contacts i told him about wanted to fly and he crushed my dreams. the best he can get my vision is 20/30.

so now i dont know what to do. is there any chance i can pass the physical? im guessing the answer is no, but can i get any exceptions, or limitations? i wont be flying any time soon, or at least nothing that requires a class 2. i just need it for school.
davidgq is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2006, 13:36
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
David, I ve read on one US website (i cant remeber it) that there are waivers, who have vision corrected to 20/80 and still can fly.
I dont thing that 20/30 will be a big problem.
world is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2006, 15:22
  #403 (permalink)  
G/A
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi whitelabel,

I made an appointment for next tuesday, so weŽll see if it works. I hope so! Anyway thanks for the advise.

regards
G/A
G/A is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 12:11
  #404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2close
Therefore, the JAA is operating a prescribed medical test which is not in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
In fact, are there any legal experts out there with knowledge of the aviation industry who would like to comment on this?

I know my solicitor's opinions but I would rather refrain from commenting at this point as I wouldn't wish to prejudice another's comments.

2close
2close is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2006, 14:55
  #405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't "come here often" but it's an interesting thread. The colour vision testing business is a farce. I almost totally fail the Isihara plates but passed the H-W lantern test 100%.

I take it you have all read John Pape's paper.
IO540 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2006, 00:31
  #406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G/A Did you take the test on the tuesday ?
Did you Pass?
davidd is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2007, 15:09
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beyne lantern...

Hi All

Having had an extensive read back through pretty much all the colour vision threads on PPRuNe over the christmas break, I picked up on the Beyne lantern test, something I somehow missed before. General opinion seems to be this is the easiest of the lanterns. Its also the only one I've not attempted, so I've booked in to take it at Gatwick next week.

Anyone got any advice on this test, how it is run, what should the conditions be and any tips to maximise my chances of passing...?

Still haven't quite given up the Class 1 dream

thanks
east_sider is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2007, 21:37
  #408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
East-Sider,

You will be informed that you will see ONE light at a time, and that each light will be either RED, GREEN, WHITE, YELLOW or BLUE (I think).

You will sit opposite a mirror and the light is projected from the lantern onto the mirror. The effective distance is either 5 or 6 metres for the Beynes test, the other distance being applied to the H-W test.

The test is conducted in a darkened room, lit artificially with a lamp which is projected onto the wall at the side of the mirror.

HTH and Good Luck.

2close
2close is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2007, 23:52
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good Luck East Sider, let us know how you get on.
davidd is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2007, 18:00
  #410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks both I will let you know how I go.

Its white and green I struggle with, on the holmes wright I tried to look at the "rays" of light coming out from the dot...... if you imagine how you would draw a cartoon sun, a circle with lines coming out from it.... I was trying to use those. My theory being for the white light those lines would be longer, on the green light they would be shorter.... it didn't seem to work though!!

Anyone else tried something like that successfully, either on HW or Beyene lantern?

cheers
ES
east_sider is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2007, 19:29
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried a similar thing too, and it doesn't work.

When they show you the demo lights they only show you two lights at a high intensity, they then say this is red and this is green Okay? Only it isn't!!!!! What is the point of demonstrating the lights when the lights used in the actual test have a different luminence etc. Talk about leading you down the garden path!!

Does anyone know what lanterns the Irish CAA in Dublin use if any?
biggles7374 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2007, 22:28
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi there, I have a few questions about the UK Initial Class 1.

Would it be advised to wait until the new colour vision testing in implemented, it said somewhere here around March 2007 maybe. Also, is there presently both the Beynes and the H-W test? Do you get a choice of which test?

Also, if you fail, and they then bring out new testing equipment, would you be allowed another attempt?

Any advice would be appreciated
benwizz is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 10:45
  #413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: essex
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bealzebub

While no one denies that they are rather good eggs the fact is that they are working to some very unfair and outdated rules and nobody at Gatwick medical department seems able to change things and make it more sensible and fair.

We don't want them to fudge their unrealistic tests because no amount of fudging will make you see colours if you can't see them

What I for one want is a regulatory body that looks at things sensibly and has rules that are based on facts and safety and take into account safety data (which FAA have lots of).

Come on how many people in the UK have crashed through traffic lights because they can't "see" the red light -

CAA Medical stop being good eggs and make a difference by modernising this nonsense.
unfazed is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 11:43
  #414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am thinking of booking a Beyne Lantern Test at AEC in Hoofdorp, does anyone know what their protocol is for conducting the test and whether this is different from the protocol used by the CAA?

Do they demonstrate the colours prior to the test?

I ask this because I read an article written by the bods at City university that stated that many people fail the bayne because the first light should be read as white, but the colour displayed is a yellowish orange (ie not white) so many people call this as yellow (oops test failed!!!)

Any response would be appreciated.
biggles7374 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 11:51
  #415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by benwizz

Also, if you fail, and they then bring out new testing equipment, would you be allowed another attempt?

Any advice would be appreciated
Benwizz, as of today at CAA Gatwick you can do any/all of isihara plates, HW lantern, Beyne lantern, you only have to pass one once and your ok. If you fail and a new test was introduced I'm not sure if you could take it again, hopefully so.

But if you are 16 as your profile says maybe wait a little while, presumably you are finishing school and maybe considering uni or a gap year before starting commercial training?

I've taken part in the trials for the new "PAPI simulator" colour test which will likely be introduced sometime in 2007-08 and from my experience its no easier than HW or any of the others....

Actually maybe you'd be better to have a go at HW or Beyne in case they scrap those when the PAPI comes in!

Might be worth giving the medical division at Gatwick a call at some point, I've found them helpful and interested in giving me the best chance to pass so far.

All the best
east_sider is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 12:54
  #416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks east_sider. My test is booked for feb when I'll be 17, just to see if I can get the medical before making any decisions about university etc.

Thanks again for your help
benwizz is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 12:59
  #417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bealzebub
"true when they lower the intensity of the lantern, instead of bright and intense colours... you'll see fake colours!!! a greenish red, a reddish green and so on.... I'm really thinking that the CAA tries to stop or fail you whenever they can... very sad... "
What an absolutely ridiculous comment that the CAA try to fail you whenever they can. I have had many involved dealings with the medical division of the CAA over the last 25 years and they have always, always been professional and helpful. There has never been any doubt at all that they will bend over backwards to ensure you retain the medical wherever that is possible. You need to remember that the division is comprised of medical professionals with a great deal of experience in their respective fields and who naturally have a particular focus on its application to the specific field of aviation medicine.
.
Well said - they are professional and know their stuff. They are charged with implementing the rules as they stand and will try to help wherever possible. It is the rules that need to change and not the people.....although their charges could be a little less painful...
gijoe is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 14:35
  #418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: York, UK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stereovision

Hello all,

I'm currently facing an infuriating situation involving my eyes . Having gone through the laborious process of applying to the RAF as a pilot assuming that eyesight would be the least of my worries (I'm pushing 6 foot five at 17), I was shocked to receive the reply stereovision is below the required standard for this branch.

I contacted the (private) optician who had tested me, and she reckoned that my result of 240 seconds of arc was pretty normal.

I was just wondering if anyone happened to know what a standard stereopsis test should be. As a dedicated cross-country runner I was more than a bit miffed to be told the standards of medical fitness required by the RAF are necessarily high...

Thanks,

Proctor
proctor is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2007, 19:39
  #419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the RAF have their own medical. 240 s/arc are not normal. Normal is about 40- 60. But anyway, following the Jar-Fcl, there is no sterovision required. you must have 2 working eyes, and sufficient fusional reserves to prevent doublevision.
DuffyDuck is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2007, 09:51
  #420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: York, UK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, thanks for that. It's funny, I'm absolutly unaware of any problem (having tried several quick tests on the internet, and never having had so much as an incling of eye problems before). Looks like I'll have to leave the RAF idea well and truely behind .
proctor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.