Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

MK Airlines banned from movements Filton

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

MK Airlines banned from movements Filton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2010, 21:08
  #261 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: area 51
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wish for the best outcome

well tomorrow is decission time for mka.let the staff and crew be treated honourably by the management.
MIGHTY8 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2010, 22:56
  #262 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ostend
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What tomorrow? Finally a final announcement? Or just a (keep-everybody-every-time-on-hold-and-happy)rumour? This thread is becoming a Gabriel Marquez magic realistic soap: "The chronicle of death foretold" or "An announced final announcement", subtitle: "The mystery of a voluntarily returned licence to temporarily avoid an in depth overseas investigation and other theories".
In the mean time Icelandic, they also employed a very expensive volcanolagist, is flying MK' s routes, for ex. JNB - ZAZ, so I read.
Rumour has it that crew is now on water and bread and losing a lot of weight as to save more fuel in case of a fresh white wrapped Saudi Arabian Prince appears with a few spare bucks to restart the flying fish flower and money circus, efficiency efficiency... very very clever indeed.
hydroplane is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 05:41
  #263 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: area 51
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
star trek episode 3 the final of final statements

if this company was an aircraft ,this holding fuel required is quite simply magical.they crashed long ago! the whole thing is a farce and all we are seeing are holograms,beam me up scottie! receiver on the starboard bow! scrape them off mike! i think it's dead mike! dead, mike! it's an airline mike ,not as you know it,not as you would know it!
MIGHTY8 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 07:28
  #264 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dunstable, Beds UK
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Towerman

He has an office there
GotTheTshirt is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 09:20
  #265 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got the Shirt - thanks. What company, Begbies?
Towerman is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 11:40
  #266 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: bristol
Age: 53
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don,t know how true this is but i have just heard through the grapevine that mk airlines have informed filton/airbus that mk airlines is officially no more and have gone out of business, had a call from someone who works onsite to let me know, because obviously mk haven,t told there staff so no change there then.
storesman is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 19:19
  #267 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Birchington, Kent, England
Age: 82
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Operating Licence

CAA Licencing Notices today states:

MK Airlines Limited - The Operating Licence has been voluntarily suspended with effect from 12 April 2010.

P
Paradism is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2010, 22:28
  #268 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: FL410
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear they will go into administration again this Thursday. Crew have been told their services are no longer required. Time to give up. Sadly.
Cheekyflyboy is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2010, 21:09
  #269 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: BlueYonder
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how is it that this long well established airline ends up in a heap like this? yes usually because its supporting the oppulent lifestyles of the ones at the top. Why not lookk at serious investors of the Branson-esque know how-to-run-an-airline-type instead of going east and getting burned
skyshark is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 01:44
  #270 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no knowledge of MK airlines or how it was operated. However, if the international freight business is anything like domestic Australia then it would have been run on knife edge margins, clients whose only loyalty is to the cheapest price and absolutely no long term commitment.

That an independent operator is able to make a go of such a mess is a testament to good skills and fortune. I doubt that there was ever a lot of opulent lifestyle opportunities but then, as I said, I have no direct knowledge of the airline or its owner.

Good fortune to the staff in the future.
PLovett is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 06:02
  #271 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I have no knowledge of MK airlines or how it was operated. However, if the international freight business is anything like domestic Australia then it would have been run on knife edge margins, clients whose only loyalty is to the cheapest price and absolutely no long term commitment.

That an independent operator is able to make a go of such a mess is a testament to good skills and fortune. I doubt that there was ever a lot of opulent lifestyle opportunities but then, as I said, I have no direct knowledge of the airline or its owner."


Plovett, unfortunately you are wrong in that assumption. The Managing Director lived an opulent lifestyle with a personal Robinson R44 to fly around in. The "investor" forced the company to purchase a Grumman Gulfstream G-1 and not one, but two 727's for his personal transport. Monies that would have paid crews and employees for months, pissed away. The staff and crews, many of whom are friends, took TWO pay reductions in order to make comfortable those who mismanaged.

I feel terrible for the crews, office staff and support personnel but believe that "management" reaped what they sowed. A sad day in British aviation.
Lamb Shank is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 06:31
  #272 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A G1 and two B727!

What was he doing, starting an aviation museum?

Thanks for that Lamb Shank, yes it would seem that some inappropriate decisions were taken at the upper level.

My only knowledge of the company is from the YouTube videos and it is a sorry day when crews (and the support staff) are shafted by management.
PLovett is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 11:23
  #273 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Perhaps their business model was past its useful life. Are the days of the cowboy (four major accidents and enough anecdotal evidence from other threads justify this description) freight operators drawing to a close.

Maybe the future of freight is with the likes of Cargolux and Aerologic. Well capitalized professionally run operations with modern fuel efficient aircraft as opposed to shoestring, rule benders with thirty year old junk.

Obviously with hindsight we can point to things which should have been done differently and the global financial crisis coming on top of record oil prices may have been the last straw. If the Halifax crash hadn't happened, if oil hadn't hit $140+, if Lehman Brothers hadn't collapsed, if B767 freighters had replaced the DC8s and B742s, who knows ?
Metro man is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 12:18
  #274 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Close to space
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Metro Man, calling us cowboys.........badge of honour
helldog is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 12:25
  #275 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B747F

Metro Man - the future of airfreight with the 777F ? - if you can afford the $200 million price tag and make them pay then I agree. As to the 30 year junk.....what rubbish !Nothing wrong with 30+ year old B747F-200 - it all depends on how well they are maintained. Fuel is of course the issue. Do the maths. A well maintained B747F-200 $10 million for a good one versus $200 Million 777F. Similar payload. Even factoring in the extra bounces a 742F has to do in comparison and add the extra fuel burn.....a B742F will still pay its way and for a number of years to come especially in the current climate. AF could`nt - the 777F was dumped or they did not take delivery. Wake Up !
Need to Know Basis is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 13:17
  #276 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nothing wrong with 30+ year old B747F-200 - it all depends on how well they are maintained.
If you have the capacity to adequately maintain an aging aircraft fine, Fedex use some older types but their maintenance facilities are a lot better than MKs.

Plenty of B744, B767, B757 and MD11 freighters in my part of the world. The older B742s and B727s, still a few around but definitely on their way out. Haven't seen a DC8 in years.

Airbus have brought out the A330 freighter. Perhaps the geriatric types will do for a few more years in Africa and South America.

Older 742s starting to be affected by noise regulations in Europe.

If I was looking for work at the moment I'd rather have a A320/330 or B738/777 on my licence than anything else.
Metro man is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 15:01
  #277 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gangster Paradise, RSA
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Originally Posted by Metro man
Plenty of B744, B767, B757 and MD11 freighters in my part of the world. The older B742s and B727s, still a few around but definitely on their way out. Haven't seen a DC8 in years.


Older 742s starting to be affected by noise regulations in Europe.
What planet are you from??? Want to see DC-8's? Go to Ostend, plenty of them around. Noise regulations affecting the 742's in what way? They are stageIII.....Even my 30+ year old 727 is stageIII....No noise problems. I think your comment about MK being cowboys is out of place, especially now that the airline is shutting down. You my friend, make me

Oh and before you go on about me working for MK, let me put the record straight, I never worked for MK. Just know some of their crews and mechanics, great bunch of guys!
Maurice Chavez is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 17:28
  #278 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Under a Rock
Age: 54
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Administration or just closure?

Does anyone know if an Administrator has been appointed yet?
Wickerbill is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 17:49
  #279 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noise regulations affecting the 742's in what way? They are stageIII.....Even my 30+ year old 727 is stageIII....No noise problems
Many 747-200s are Stage III certified with MTOW/flaps limitations, some are what is called marginal Stage III. Night time restrictions and/or extra surcharges in many airports.
CargoOne is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2010, 21:00
  #280 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Gangster Paradise, RSA
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You mean StageIII compliant, sort of like the Diezel 8 hushkits...
Maurice Chavez is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.