Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Challenge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th March 2012 | 15:29
  #1861 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham UK
This aircraft was produced in numbers and certainly saw Squadron service.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2012 | 15:32
  #1862 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
French....?
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2012 | 15:48
  #1863 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham UK
This one was not from France.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2012 | 20:23
  #1864 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,283
Likes: 26
From: New South Wales
Evening Mel.

Quick punt...the North American Savage? Can't find any decent rear shots of it, must have been a shy creature.

(Yes Mel - unfortunately I typed Boeing XF7B-1 )
Noyade is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2012 | 22:59
  #1865 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham UK
Well Graeme for a quick punt, it was a very good punt as it is the North American Savage AJ-1
The date of its design inception was a time (late 1940s) where the US Navy was faced with procuring the nascent jet engine, while still having to rely upon the simple yet well proven reciprocating engine. Jets at this time were unreliable and used large quantities of fuel; however, once they were developed, they produced performance that no piston engine could ever provide. A compromise was made to include in the Savage two Pratt & Whitney R-2800 piston engines, with a large turbocharger fitted inside each engine nacelle. This combination made it possible for the R-2800 engines to produce rated power (2,500 hp/1,864 kW) up to 42,000 ft (12,802 m) altitude. An Allison J33 turbojet was fitted in the rear fuselage. Interestingly, both engine types used the same fuel. The piston-turbojet arrangement was intended to give added power on take-off and extra dash speed while in combat. At high altitude, this "boxy" looking (but aerodynamically very clean) airplane was remarkably fast, reaching more than 460 mph (740 km/h), when the jets of that era were not very much faster.

You have control.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 04:41
  #1866 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,283
Likes: 26
From: New South Wales
Thanks Mel. I'll only be on sporadically for the next week, so open house.
Noyade is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 13:54
  #1867 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
Too long at OH...

Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 18:16
  #1868 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
How about the Northrop Snark?
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 19:03
  #1869 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
How about the Northrop Snark?
Go back to search mode mate.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2012 | 20:02
  #1870 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
The more I look the more closely it appears to resemble a turboprop intake.
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 07:18
  #1871 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
Not a turboprop mate.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 10:30
  #1872 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: dorset
With the lack of "warning jet intake" and the fact it is not a turbo prop, could this simply be a piston engine? Secondly, the trim markings look simply 'civilian'. Lastly. Is that a landing gear I spy in the back ground and if so, does it suggest more than one engine?! Hope I haven't tried to winkle too many clues!
trucky04 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 10:38
  #1873 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
It's a jet engine trucky.

Not strictly military, and yes, you do see part of the landing gear.

Wannanuther clue?
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:17
  #1874 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: dorset
With the square shape intake it suggests under wing mounted? Also, was this primarily civilian/biz jet with the exception of a few going to the likes of coast guard etc?
trucky04 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:20
  #1875 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
The intake is under the front fuselage.

Not a civilian/biz jet - not coast guard.

Try NASA.
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:36
  #1876 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham UK
NASA Dryden's F-16XL-1 perhaps?
MReyn24050 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:39
  #1877 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,226
Likes: 2
From: down south
Sorry Mel but no.

Would you like another clue in view of your generous one on What Cockpit?
Lightning Mate is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:50
  #1878 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham UK
NASA Himat perhaps. I gave the generous clue on Cockpit because it was dragging on a bit and it was going to be a case of attrition for every Heinkel produced pre WWII.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:54
  #1879 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: dorset
Its the NASA experimental HiMAT aircraft. OPEN HOUSE if correct
trucky04 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2012 | 13:55
  #1880 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: dorset
I should F5 more often!!!
trucky04 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.