Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Aviation History and Nostalgia
Reload this Page >

European and UK Dakota passenger flights under threat!

Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

European and UK Dakota passenger flights under threat!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Feb 2008, 16:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry European and UK Dakota passenger flights under threat!

Michael Collett has already stated Air Atlantique will stop operating DC-3 flights after July 16...
See
http://www.aeroplanemonthly.com/news...ws_176506.html
for

"EU rules threaten DC-3 passengers
January 30, 2008

When new European EU-OPS regulations come into force on July 16, it is anticipated that Douglas DC-3 public transport pleasure flights will become a thing of the past. EU-OPS requires all aircraft operated on Commercial Air Transport flights, regardless of age or historic value, to comply with requirements including lockable flightdeck doors and escape slides.

This is just a taster - see March's Aeroplane magazine for the full story and pictures."

for

Last edited by Stratofreighter; 7th Feb 2008 at 17:06.
Stratofreighter is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 18:01
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 85
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When new European EU-OPS regulations come into force on July 16, it is anticipated that Douglas DC-3 public transport pleasure flights will become a thing of the past. EU-OPS requires all aircraft operated on Commercial Air Transport flights, regardless of age or historic value, to comply with requirements including lockable flightdeck doors and escape slides.
So why should that stop the "Dak". It shouldn't be a problem putting a bolt on the cockpit door and as for a slide one could safely jump from the cabin door to the ground.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 18:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The full report in 'Aeroplane' mentions more than doors and slides. To comply with EU-OPS also requires the installation of Wx radar, cockpit voice recorder, emergency lighting and crew protective breathing equipment.

As for jumping out of the emergency exit, apparently the sill height is 4 inches higher than regulations permit!
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 19:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nottingham UK
Age: 85
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
spekesoftly. Thanks for that, please forgive my blase attitude,I just find it incredible that the EU can kill off the commercial use of an aeroplane that has been flying for some 60+ years. I just think that people should be given the choice to make their own decision whether they fly in an aircraft that was not designed to met the current evacuation regulations.
MReyn24050 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 20:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
MReyn24050. Thank you for your kind reply, but there's nothing to forgive. I very much share your sentiments, and only mentioned the additional items to illustrate the extent of the problem facing Air Atlantique.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 21:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other ac affected

I think there are also a couple of DH Dragons still operating pleasure flights (and appearing in Torchwood)
Mycroft is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 21:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
Good one EU!!!!
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 21:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 74
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So this new directive will kill off flights in passenger aircraft built before what date - 1960's?

Am I right in thinking that for some of these venerable old machines money earned from passenger flights is a major source of income to help keep them in an airworthy condition? It seems that the EU will ground a number of aircraft.

Will air displays be affected also?

Last edited by S'land; 7th Feb 2008 at 21:56. Reason: typographical
S'land is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 21:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
Perhaps they could also ban historic cars that don't comply with EU motoring regulations such as no seat-belts, no airbags, cross-ply tyres, drum brakes, no GPS navigation system etc.

Then they could also ban steam trains for rail enthusiasts as their must be a 101 rules that a 1930's steam locomotive wouldn't comply with, lets see OH&S for the driver and fireman, the list goes on!!!

Why have Communism when the EU can be so much more restrictive in life's pleasures!
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 21:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Eastbourne
Age: 69
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don,t worry they have already been having in depth discusion regarding the matter of older vehicles for anumber of years now, the upsetting news of the new regulations on aircraft has been a long time comming but they were determined to get there way on this one.....
Cypherus is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 22:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,670
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
THE ONLY ANSWER ,CHAPS(ESSES) IS TO GET HOLD OF YOUR MEP AND give him an earful; and if I knew how to I would. Who is the MEP for Transport? Is it that twit Kinnock? We(Pprune ) got them (Govnmt) to allow a VC to come here,now it`s time to kick the Euro pean b%$$£$s into submission.`They` ,of course, don`t have long memories/history/want to forget there ever was a WW2, be huggy-huggy and forget the part that Daks/DC-4 played in setting Europe free...just so they could instigate stupid regulations, based on false suppositions, about aircraft that fly primarily VFR,FOR PLEASURE, HISTORY, and should in no way be classified alongside your modern pay -as-you-go, cram -them in ,bucket-and -spade brigade.......I`ll calm down now-has there been any consultation over this? how long for ? usually a few days ? just so no-one can organise a defence....or should I mention the War.. France,Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark...How long before they gave in...history repeats !! Anyone care to take up the Cudgels...even to kick them where it hurts ?
sycamore is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 22:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: heathrow
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was brought up to believe we won the war in Europe, what a mistake!
llanfairpg is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 23:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 2,217
Received 71 Likes on 38 Posts
I thought the Allies won the last war, but the EU wants to rule the world or at least Europe.

Next they will start on the BBMF Lancaster.
Stationair8 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2008, 23:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I think there are also a couple of DH Dragons still operating pleasure flights
Shouldn't be affected (for now!). Only applies to aircraft configured for more than 19 pax.

Will air displays be affected also?
The new rules only apply to public transport flights. After July 16 Air Atlantique will continue to use their DC-3s on other aerial work such as survey flights and air displays.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 04:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some how I feel the best route is for all those who wish to fly on these acft, should become members of the 'Supporters Club' Thus fly for free as 'team members' and not fare paying pax. No 'Hire & Reward' rules apply.

Am I being thick here, or just overly simple? I don't doubt that Mike C. has already thought this one out.
merlinxx is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 07:08
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
"Only applies to aircraft configured for more than 19 pax."

So that means Lufthansa's Ju52 won't be affected then.

Funny, that.....
BEagle is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 19:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
configured for more than 19 pax."

Fit 19 seats.
forget is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 20:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Sorry, my brevity has misled. The actual wording should be:

"Aircraft having a maximum approved seating configuration of more than 19 passengers"

I don't think you can simply install fewer seats to comply.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 20:25
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Aircraft having a maximum approved seating configuration of more than 19 passengers"

Pity... Indeed it would have been far more easier to just "chuck out" some seats...

We will hear more from Michael Collett on his plans for Classic Flight/Air Atlantique on or after next Tuesday, see
http://www.skycontrol.net/history/la...test-airliner/ ...

"Although the regulations also affect other classic aircraft in the Air Atlantique fleet, including he de Havilland Dragon Rapide and Scottish Aviation Twin Pioneer, because they are significantly smaller than the DC-3, the regulations which they must meet are far less onerous. These aircraft can be expected to continue to fly on."

Last edited by Stratofreighter; 9th Feb 2008 at 20:31. Reason: just adding more and more information...
Stratofreighter is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2008, 01:46
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When Reg Ansett was trying to get his airline off the ground (so to speak) no one was permitted to run a transport service in opposition to the railways. He got around the problem by taking out a green grocers licence and sold oranges. For each orange you got a free trip to the capital city - oranges were a might expensive tho. More than one way to skin a cat.
Brian Abraham is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.