Originally Posted by Wingspar
(Post 10942054)
And AJ celebrating Qantas’ 100 years, most of the VR/ER have been there for a third of that 100 years!
Now that is a contribution to Qantas! |
Originally Posted by wombat watcher
(Post 10941445)
It is a stupid argument.
individuals who make senior partner have little chance of becoming an A380 captain and individuals who make A380 captains have little chance of becoming a decent lawyer let alone senior partner. They are completely different skill sets and different personalities. I won’t even introduce the discussion about lifestyles. |
Great idea to have another degree or skill.There are a few practicing barristers as you rightly mention.
I know there are a few conveyancing solicitors that used to do work on the side that are now full time given that Qantas has cast them aside on long term stand down.Those that had a plan b did not get caught out.A stark warning for the future for those reliant only on flying. It is a great opportunity with years off on unpaid stand down to get another string to the bow. Given Qantas care so little for those stood down I think it is not only wise for the future but essential now.You can’t pay your mortgage on Jobkeeper and that is from the government not Qantas.Qantas are not paying anyone a cent.Glad to hear Joyce got $9 million dollars in share options. All the executives are now back on full time pay doing their bit to help out. |
Originally Posted by FightDeck
(Post 10944735)
Great idea to have another degree or skill.There are a few practicing barristers as you rightly mention.
I know there are a few conveyancing solicitors that used to do work on the side that are now full time given that Qantas has cast them aside on long term stand down.Those that had a plan b did not get caught out.A stark warning for the future for those reliant only on flying. It is a great opportunity with years off on unpaid stand down to get another string to the bow. Given Qantas care so little for those stood down I think it is not only wise for the future but essential now.You can’t pay your mortgage on Jobkeeper and that is from the government not Qantas.Qantas are not paying anyone a cent.Glad to hear Joyce got $9 million dollars in share options. All the executives are now back on full time pay doing their bit to help out. |
Originally Posted by blubak
(Post 10944786)
Oh yeh,theyre doing a great job too,at least they wont be shy on telling you that.
|
Why would you bother to listen to a dial in?All bull**** from managers and executives that are all on full pay and don’t know anything anyway.
Until borders open nothing is happening Internationally.Domestic is close to back to normal.Apart from that who gives a toss. If your stood down you are not getting paid.Go do something useful like read the paper on the crapper if you are bored. |
Originally Posted by knobbycobby
(Post 10944870)
Why would you bother to listen to a dial in?All bull**** from managers and executives that are all on full pay and don’t know anything anyway.
Until borders open nothing is happening Internationally.Domestic is close to back to normal.Apart from that who gives a toss. If your stood down you are not getting paid.Go do something useful like read the paper on the crapper if you are bored. FUD |
They may have been on full pay, if management were paid any bonuses they will have to pay JK back, audit announced on large companies which received job keeper payments.
|
Originally Posted by Ragnor
(Post 10945944)
They may have been on full pay, if management were paid any bonuses they will have to pay JK back, audit announced on large companies which received job keeper payments.
A quick read of certain public companies reports can shed the appropriate light. Probably needs it’s own thread? |
Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
(Post 10945974)
Yep, read that this morning.
A quick read of certain public companies reports can shed the appropriate light. Probably needs it’s own thread? |
Originally Posted by Street garbage
(Post 10945460)
...How else will Management feed the gullible their narrative so that Pilots can continually kick own goals in Public Forums....
FUD |
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 10945998)
Can you share the link?
|
Originally Posted by Ladloy
(Post 10945998)
Can you share the link?
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/fede...12-p56my4.html |
Yes but Alan got 1,700,000 share options. So it’s not a “bonus” but It’s an awful lot of awarded shares.
must be worth at today’s value? 9 million? |
December 8 article about vaccine rollout in the UK;
“Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: "I don't think people should expect anything over the next few days because the reality is, as I said, that for the vast, vast, vast majority of people this will be done in January, February, March.” https://www.express.co.uk/life-style...e-order-uk-evg So if the ‘vast’ bulk of the UK is vaccinated by March and I’m assuming the reproduction number and active case would be significantly reduced by then what is stopping QF reactivating PER-LHR after that time? |
Originally Posted by Wingspar
(Post 10946737)
So if the ‘vast’ bulk of the UK is vaccinated by March and I’m assuming the reproduction number and active case would be significantly reduced by then what is stopping QF reactivating PER-LHR after that time?
|
Classic!😂
Actually if he does object then I hope QF do LHR-DRW with connections to other states. More direct route for east coast pax. |
It's actually a really interesting question.
It's become apparent Australia's politicians won't accept any cases of community transmission. If Australia's vaccine of choice (Oxford/ Astra Zeneca) is 70-90% effective, seemingly dependent upon the final dosage regime, some might get sick, some might die if they come in to contact with a COVID case. The politicians are still going to have to make some decisions around the risk they're willing to accept and how that's going to translate when it comes to opening up the international borders. |
There's significant information suggesting that the vaccine does not stop you spreading the virus - rather it stops you getting sick.
In that light, don't expect borders to open quickly until most o the population has received the vaccine. |
By the time everyone is vaccinated in overseas destinations and here at home,I think it is fair to assume there will not be significant International travel until start of 2022 at the earliest.With the exemption of a very small number of travel bubbles.
The Government is not going to risk a domestic consumer boom given no COVID cases.Shopping centres are packed.Restaurants full. 2021 will be closed off whilst until vaccinations take place.They have said late 2021 but I think start 2022 or mid 2022 is realistic. |
Originally Posted by compressor stall
(Post 10946774)
There's significant information suggesting that the vaccine does not stop you spreading the virus - rather it stops you getting sick.
In that light, don't expect borders to open quickly until most o the population has received the vaccine. If we find that the vaccines are highly effective at preventing infection, a combination of vaccines and rapid testing technology could lead to significant non-quarantine travel just months into 2021. What’s more concerning is questions about which vaccine is acceptable/approved and how it’s documented. If Australia approves oxford and is satisfied that it prevents infection, would we let in someone who’s received Pfizer if Aus isn’t satisfied about its effectiveness yet? |
Currently there is a difference between the designs of the stage 3 trials of the three leading vaccines.
The two messenger RNA vaccines were only evaluated by symptoms, not actual testing for the virus. The results are in the 90+% range. The Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine trial involved testing each participant weekly. The results are in the 70% range. Because the trials were designed differently, the old apples/oranges comparisons are at work. And because of the different trial protocols, we don’t know really anything about if or for how long a vaccinated person may eventually become infectious without themselves ever getting sick. Eventually these unknowns may prompt a rethink at the national level about compelling people to get vaccinated. Currently about 70% of people aim to get vaccinated. If the vaccine is 70% effective at preventing infections, that still leaves about 50% of the population at risk, although with a reduced infection rate owing to at least partial herd immunity. |
Annoyingly the spam folder missed David Andrew’s or it is Andrew David’s BS email about the Quaintarse family.
The rhetoric about a Qantas being a family is unrealistic. Parents don't fire or stand down their children without pay to cut costs. Hope he’s enjoying his share options and a return to full pay.Meanwhile the stood down staff scrape by below the poverty line. Unpaid by Quaintarse and in government minimums. Abusive family more like it. |
Originally Posted by knobbycobby
(Post 10948698)
Annoyingly the spam folder missed David Andrew’s or it is Andrew David’s BS email about the Quaintarse family.
The rhetoric about a Qantas being a family is unrealistic. Parents don't fire or stand down their children without pay to cut costs. Hope he’s enjoying his share options and a return to full pay.Meanwhile the stood down staff scrape by below the poverty line. Unpaid by Quaintarse and in government minimums. Abusive family more like it. He doesnt care about anyone,fits in perfectly with the rest of his smiling assasin executive team or whatever label they put on themselves. Trouble is there are still people who believe what they say & think they care. |
Trouble is there are still people who believe what they say & think they care. |
The war room must be busy, not even a happy new yr email or a rundown of the last 12 months, not that we want to be reminded.
|
Originally Posted by Ragnor
(Post 10958074)
The war room must be busy, not even a happy new yr email or a rundown of the last 12 months, not that we want to be reminded.
|
So now that it looks like domestic crew will be going back to the stand up/stand down merry-go-round again, what’s going to happen once jobkeeper finishes in March? Will everyone have to down tools to go find a job that pays consistently?
|
Originally Posted by Fonz121
(Post 10958174)
... what’s going to happen once jobkeeper finishes in March?
|
The newly announced PPP (Pilot Preservation Program) must surely be in doubt now with hard border closures all over the country. I note that attendance is compulsory.
Can the company force the program onto us? I gather that we will be stood up for maybe just a week or so. The ramifications for many people are huge if forced to isolate and therefore jeopardise their secondary employment. These secondary jobs are what is keeping food on the table and roofs over heads - not the paltry JobKeeper payments. Many people I speak to are extremely grateful for the lifeline handed to them by other companies, and won’t want to risk that. These such scenarios will continue to arise as flying increases and/or restrictions come and go and Qantas wants more and more flexibilities but doesn’t seem to want to pay for it. I’m very happy there is finally recognition that we need to maintain our skills but at what point do we need to say enough is enough...we aren’t casual workers! Does AIPA have an opinion? |
Originally Posted by Transition Layer
(Post 10958196)
The newly announced PPP (Pilot Preservation Program) must surely be in doubt now with hard border closures all over the country. I note that attendance is compulsory.
Can the company force the program onto us? I note that we will be stood up for maybe just a week or so. The ramifications for many people are huge if forced to isolate and therefore jeopardise their secondary employment. These secondary jobs are what is keeping food on the table and roofs over heads - not the paltry JobKeeper payments. Many people I speak to are extremely grateful for the lifeline handed to them by other companies, and won’t want to risk that. These such scenarios will continue to arise as flying increases and/or restrictions come and go and Qantas wants more and more flexibilities but doesn’t seem to want to pay for it. I’m very happy there is finally recognition that we need to maintain our skills but at what point do we need to say enough is enough...we aren’t casual workers! Does AIPA have an opinion? I suspect that if people are unable to SU and participate in the PPP due to secondary employment then they will have to take LWOP This may well be a tactic to force more onto LWOP. Remember, Stand Down costs the company money (AL and LSL accrual). |
Where/when was this PPP thing announced?
|
Originally Posted by KZ Kiwi
(Post 10958208)
I am in this position you talk about. I have a full time job. I cannot jeopardise this and can’t just take a weeks leave every 3 months because Qantas want to stand me up for 4 days every 90.
I suspect that if people are unable to SU and participate in the PPP due to secondary employment then they will have to take LWOP This may well be a tactic to force more onto LWOP. Remember, Stand Down costs the company money (AL and LSL accrual). |
I think the ball is in the company’s court while Jobkeeper is still going.
|
Originally Posted by Tucknroll
(Post 10958218)
Where/when was this PPP thing announced?
I hasn’t even considered that it was a ploy to force more onto LWOP. :bored: |
First of heard of this PPP. There is no requirement to check company emails or documents whilst stood down so how would you know unless you were being advised you were being stood up first?
On another note, its a shame Australia continues to flounder in and out of lockdowns for very small cases, massive over reaction that is costing individuals untold stress and companies millions of dollars. And now it appears we have a Prime minister who either due to his religious beliefs is dragging the chain on the vaccine or alternately have been caught out with his pants down and hadn't ordered enough vaccines as they were hoping the UQ vaccine was going to be a cheaper option. Agree or disagree about vaccinations, one thing that is certain is it's the only thing now that will save Australia from the current stupidity and allow the borders to remain open. |
I would be surprised if the PPP went ahead for those subject to border restrictions. They would have to pay you an extra 2wks for isolation and I think forcing you to go to a state with community transmission could create a legal minefield.
|
Originally Posted by Potsie Weber
(Post 10958281)
I would be surprised if the PPP went ahead for those subject to border restrictions. They would have to pay you an extra 2wks for isolation and I think forcing you to go to a state with community transmission could create a legal minefield.
|
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 10958289)
They’ve done it for LH and SH training when required.
|
Originally Posted by Potsie Weber
(Post 10958295)
When required to keep the operation going is likely a bit different. Forcing people to stand up, go interstate to do unnecessary training and then isolate for 2wks?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:47. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.