PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   QF Group possible Redundancy Numbers/Packages (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/633072-qf-group-possible-redundancy-numbers-packages.html)

C441 30th Jun 2020 23:44


Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist (Post 10825250)
from the EBA:
“…….other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible...”

I have to disagree. If there aren’t enough bookings once borders are open, that’s a business / commercial problem.

Otherwise, why would ANY company ever pay VR / CR if they could just stand down the employee indefinitely?

Again I hope you're right but the company will argue that demand has collapsed because of C-19 and thus they "cannot be held responsible".
The opening of borders may not be the trigger to relax stand-downs I'm afraid.

dr dre 1st Jul 2020 00:13


Originally Posted by C441 (Post 10825890)
Again I hope you're right but the company will argue that demand has collapsed because of C-19 and thus they "cannot be held responsible".
The opening of borders may not be the trigger to relax stand-downs I'm afraid.

There’s a lot of ground between the current state of Australians borders being closed to all, and the 2019 state of being open.

When the borders go back to 2019 levels it won’t be done all at once. It’ll be a few neighbouring nations in travel bubbles first, then later other nations which have handled the outbreak well. Nations which haven’t done well at handling the outbreak (US, Brazil for example) will be delayed even further. And even when citizens of those nations are allowed to enter there could be conditions attached. An antibody test, a statement of vaccination, caps on flights and pax numbers from certain countries, a quarantine until a rapid test is performed, limits on the entry of aged or vulnerable populations, limitations on those travellers entering remote and indigenous communities. It may be years until full and free unrestricted travel is back.

crosscutter 1st Jul 2020 01:12

The border argument can be summarised by the domestic situation. When all domestic borders are opened unrestricted, will all domestic pilots be stood up? I think not.

NSW and VIC borders are open unrestricted. Does that mean all domestic SYD and MEL based pilots have been stood up? No.

Hoping the situation will be different with International is Illogical.


Callsign Please 1st Jul 2020 01:31

There’s a whole prop fleet stood down in SYD and BNE while the more expensive fleet is gaining routes.

I haven’t yet heard where the extended govt subsidies are being used, but that plus jobkeeper doesn’t make it hard to keep people stood down.

What-ho Squiffy! 6th Jul 2020 05:40


Originally Posted by ExtraShot (Post 10804410)
Erm. If you aren’t into speculation or the circulation of rumors I think you’re on the wrong website.

Every time I come back in for a look, people have to be reminded....

wheels_down 6th Jul 2020 06:20

They are using larger aircraft because they get a larger government subsidy.

Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne. What a waste of taxpayer dollars. I mean just charter a freighter for the supplies.

Ken Borough 6th Jul 2020 07:00


Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne.
Extraordinary! Seems very odd to me. How many punters were on the outbound flight?

C441 6th Jul 2020 21:31


Originally Posted by wheels_down (Post 10830088)
They are using larger aircraft because they get a larger government subsidy.

Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne. What a waste of taxpayer dollars. I mean just charter a freighter for the supplies.

Didn't the government subsidies cease a few weeks ago?

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 6th Jul 2020 21:44


Canberra extends aid to support airlines for domestic flights

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/...4f5d?width=650The extension of federal government aid will help keep Virgin Australia flying till it completes a sale. Picture: AFPThe federal government has extended its financial assistance to the aviation industry for up to six months in a move that will help keep Virgin Australia in the air until a sale is finalised.

Taxpayer-subsidised flights will continue to the end of September on key domestic routes, and until the end of the year for regional airlines.

Announcing the extension of aviation network support, Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack said the funding would not only prop up airlines but protect regional communities.

READ NEXT

“We don’t want airlines to be flying to various destinations and losing money so what we want to make sure is if we need to ferry around personal protective equipment, face masks and vital medical personnel then there’s the opportunity to do so,” Mr McCormack said.

“What we’re also doing is making sure the airlines have the capacity to do it, keeping jobs in those airlines and giving them hope coming out the back of COVID-19 that there will be a viable aviation industry.”

Since late March, close to $365m had been spent on subsidising domestic and regional flights and Mr McCormack’s office would not say how much had been budgeted for the extension.

Mr McCormack said the latest commitment would take the total funding for the aviation industry to more than $1.2bn across a range of measures designed to lessen the financial impact of crippling COVID-19 travel restrictions.

“I’ve been monitoring the aviation sector on almost an hourly basis, not a daily basis. It’s been something that’s occupied much of my waking hours over recent months and so far so good,” he said.

“Without this assistance, many of those aviation routes would not have seen services and many of the 250,000 people who work in aviation would’ve been out of work with the potential to never go back.”

Qantas and Virgin Australia welcomed the extended support for a minimum domestic network, saying it would allow them to continue to fly to destinations that would otherwise be unviable.

The support was also expected to help cash-strapped Virgin Australia remain in operation until the sale of the airline was finalised. The carrier went into administration on April 21 with debts of $6.8bn and administrators Deloitte have worked hard to find cash to keep Virgin Australia flying.

It’s understood they now have just over $100m, which is expected to see the airline’s bare bones operation through to the end of August.

US companies Bain and Cyrus Capital are vying to buy Virgin Australia for as much as $4bn with final bids due by June 22.

Mr McCormack, who has been under fire from unions for not bailing out Virgin, revealed he was following the administration closely.

“We have two firm bidders in Cyrus and Bain and I’m confident we can come out of this with two commercially viable airlines,” said Mr McCormack.

“I’m certainly confident that our regional airways will be as good as they can be coming out of the back of COVID-19.”

A Virgin Australia spokeswoman said the government’s support for minimal domestic network would allow the airline to increase its network reach and cities served.

“Pleasingly, the extension of the minimal network allows us to keep some team members working throughout the crisis and continue to keep Australia connected during this time,” she said.

“We remain in discussions with the government and hope to have a new contract finalised soon.”

Qantas announced a significant increase in domestic flying last week, coinciding with school holidays and a gradual easing of travel restrictions.

Services will increase from just over 100 return flights a week to more than 300 weekly return flights from June 22, with a further jump in capacity expected in July.

Despite the additional services, a Qantas spokeswoman said the subsidised flights would allow them to conduct interstate and regional services to areas where travel restrictions meant passenger numbers were limited.

ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE 6th Jul 2020 21:47

The government subsidised domestic minimum viable network was extended in June till September, not sure what routes it covers though

ozbiggles 10th Jul 2020 05:02

Just saw a 380 full noise departures early right turn over the Harbour Bridge bound for the desert I guess...this ain’t over yet is it🙁

normanton 10th Jul 2020 08:17

VR package is out:

> 15 years service 12 months base pay
> 5 years service 9 months base pay
< 5 years service 6 months base pay

Take LWOP and you will be skipped over if CR is required.


CaptainInsaneO 10th Jul 2020 08:26

Which group has this been offered to?

And how long is the LWOP period?

Sparrows. 10th Jul 2020 08:30


Originally Posted by CaptainInsaneO (Post 10833604)
Which group has this been offered to?

And how long is the LWOP period?

All long haul pilots.

As little or as long as you’d like, all assessed on an individual basis. HOBO has seen LWOP over his time approved up to about 5 years.
But the question I think you’re getting at, as per the EBA, minimum 12 months LWOP to be passed over for CR.

maggot 10th Jul 2020 09:33


Originally Posted by normanton (Post 10833596)
VR package is out:

> 15 years service 12 months base pay
> 5 years service 9 months base pay
< 5 years service 6 months base pay

Take LWOP and you will be skipped over if CR is required.

more than a years pay when taxed accordingly afaik

buT tHe hOstIeS gEt 14 mOntHs

Angle of Attack 10th Jul 2020 09:44

No problem swap your 12 months VR with a 14 month Flight attendant payout. It’s not about weeks or months, it’s about the payout, and it’s entirely up to the Company what they offer, anyone saying anything else is full of it. Take it or leave it, it’s pretty bloody simple.

normanton 10th Jul 2020 09:49

The FA's have it documented in the EBA what a VR payout is.

If you wanted the same amount of weeks that they got you should have negotiated it into EBA 10.

It's a stupid argument when your wage is xxx higher.

JamieMaree 10th Jul 2020 10:37


Originally Posted by normanton (Post 10833651)
The FA's have it documented in the EBA what a VR payout is.

If you wanted the same amount of weeks that they got you should have negotiated it into EBA 10.

It's a stupid argument when your wage is xxx higher.


QF pilots didn’t have any redundancy provisions until the CWD.
If it is voluntary it is voluntary. Stop whinging if the bait is not attractive enough.
I’d be happy if it was good enough to get angryrat, going boeing, Vjet, et al.
More to the point, if they are as unhappy as they portray, they should do the honourable thing and resign.

dr dre 10th Jul 2020 12:42


Originally Posted by Angle of Attack (Post 10833645)
No problem swap your 12 months VR with a 14 month Flight attendant payout. It’s not about weeks or months, it’s about the payout, and it’s entirely up to the Company what they offer, anyone saying anything else is full of it. Take it or leave it, it’s pretty bloody simple.

In 2014 the Union thought the Company’s offer was far less than what was needed to entice enough pilots to take it. They were wrong. And that was when there was an option to keep flying and earning a wage for those targeted for VR. Now there’s stand downs:


polling had found Qantas needed to offer a base salary figure of closer to 24 months - with 18 months as a minimum - to address its concerns of having surplus pilots.
Pilots not happy with Qantas redundancy offer

SandyPalms 10th Jul 2020 12:54

They will have no trouble getting enough takers. I predict it will be oversubscribed. As dr Dre says, they had enough when there was flying to be done.

Once those eligible make peace with the fact that it’s not a reflection of what QF think you are worth, and simply a number QF think you will take, they will reflect on the alternative, and take what’s on offer. It’s a no brainer.

Keg 10th Jul 2020 13:29


Originally Posted by dr dre (Post 10833767)
In 2014 the Union thought the Company’s offer was far less than what was needed to entice enough pilots to take it. They were wrong. And that was when there was an option to keep flying and earning a wage for those targeted for VR. Now there’s stand downs:



Pilots not happy with Qantas redundancy offer

AIPA was correct on that one. They reckoned it needed to be higher to get 100 applicants for VR. Qantas only received about 52 applications for that one. They still seemed happy with the outcome though. I suspect they’ll be happy with this one too whether the number is 100 or 200.

Those over 63.5 will get an offer soon I suspect. An ‘early retirement’ is taxed slightly differently to VR but still better than marginal tax rates- the ATO guidance on this is appalling! Even if the offer was for the leave they accrue between now and 65 and bundled in with their accrued leave (if they have any) they’re still likely to be better off than remaining on stand down between now and 65th birthday.

TimmyTee 11th Jul 2020 00:51

So, if you take the 12 month LWOP to avoid being made redundant, what happens if after the 12 months you come back, intl is still dead in the water, and the company a month later makes you redundant “due to new review on impact of the virus” or whatever.. How long does the ‘amnesty’ on redundancy for those who take the LWOP option legally last? Anything other than a legal clarification surely wouldn’t be acceptable to opt into it?

normanton 11th Jul 2020 01:00


Originally Posted by TimmyTee (Post 10834236)
So, if you take the 12 month LWOP to avoid being made redundant, what happens if after the 12 months you come back, intl is still dead in the water, and the company a month later makes you redundant “due to new review on impact of the virus” or whatever.. How long does the ‘amnesty’ on redundancy for those who take the LWOP option legally last? Anything other than a legal clarification surely wouldn’t be acceptable to opt into it?

Then you get made redundant when you come back from LWOP.

I hope the company is prepared for the onslaught of LWOP applications they are about to receive!

PPRuNeUser0184 11th Jul 2020 01:14

What is the benefit of taking LWOP? Why not just stay stood down and accrue leave and get JK?


SandyPalms 11th Jul 2020 01:31

For the “super junior” in either LH or SH, taking LWOP will protect you from being made redundant. i think the way they have set this up is smart (from the company’s side). They will surely get hundreds of the senior guys to take VR, while at the same time, scaring juniour blokes into taking LWOP to try and not be made compulsorily redundant.

No Idea Either 11th Jul 2020 01:31

JK will not last forever KZK. If it’s extended, probably only another 3-6 months. After that standown is standown, ie, no useful work no pay. Bit different here than ENZED I believe. You could be stood-down for three years with no pay, but you will retain your spot in the list and accrue benefits such as annual, long service and personal leave. Still have the curly one of exactly how long can you be stood down.........3 months, 6 months......3 years!!!!! Surely someone would challenge it if it just goes on and on.

Genuine question people........how does the amnesty clause fit in with your EA??

cloudsurfng 11th Jul 2020 01:54


Originally Posted by SandyPalms (Post 10834252)
For the “super junior” in either LH or SH, taking LWOP will protect you from being made redundant. i think the way they have set this up is smart (from the company’s side). They will surely get hundreds of the senior guys to take VR, while at the same time, scaring juniour blokes into taking LWOP to try and not be made compulsorily redundant.

why would a junior SH pilot be made redundant? QF have stated there is no forecast surplus in SH....what am I missing?

SandyPalms 11th Jul 2020 02:00

Don't know surfer dude. I think the jury is still out on what happens in seniority when we get to a CR. Not tying to be alarmist, but have they said that they will not use the seniority list for CR? What does a "forecast surplus" mean with regard to CR?

cloudsurfng 11th Jul 2020 02:05

Ah ok. In a webinair it was touched on, but QF consider LH and SH completely separate for redundancy. The integration agreement just says ‘new hire’ pilots go first in accordance with the Pilots Agreement (ie where the surplus is). I haven’t read the A/Q stuff in great detail but I believe the ‘Y’ starts somewhere around seniority 600....if it gets that far I’d say it’s game over anyway! Of course, I’d expect this to be challenged.

hopefully we never have to find out.

ruprecht 11th Jul 2020 02:08

You have less than 4 weeks to be on LWOP to avoid inclusion in a potential CR:


The win for the company is you no longer accrue leave. I’m still unsure if you can get jobkeeper when on LWOP.

Good luck out there...

ROH111 11th Jul 2020 02:08

Are you guys (and girls) saying that:

If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant?


Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you?

ruprecht 11th Jul 2020 02:13


Originally Posted by ROH111 (Post 10834268)
Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you?

I imagine your LWOP extension would have to be approved.

ruprecht 11th Jul 2020 02:16


Originally Posted by ROH111 (Post 10834268)
Are you guys (and girls) saying that:


If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant?

From our email:

To provide you with further clarity regarding the LWOP offering, I can confirm that we will exercise our discretion to pass over any pilot on LWOP should it become necessary to enact a CR program, subject to the following conditions:
  • LWOP application must be submitted on or after 31 March 2020;
  • LWOP to commence no later than 7 August 2020;
  • LWOP application is for a period greater than 12 months; and
  • The pilot is on this period of LWOP at the time that CRs are notified.

SandyPalms 11th Jul 2020 02:36


Originally Posted by ROH111 (Post 10834268)
Are you guys (and girls) saying that:

If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant?


Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you?

Yes. The intention presumably is to get Junior folk to go on LWOP indefinitely (obviously the longer the better to avoid the possibility of coming off LWOP just to be made redundant on your return) until there is work for them, which stops the accrual of leave entitlements and I'd suspect simplifies to operation. How much is 6 weeks of leave a year worth, compared to the possibility of CR? I don't know. The 7th of August is the same day the VR applications close, so we won't know how many have taken it when we are supposed to already be on LWOP to avoid CR. You have to admit, it's industrially brilliant.
Forewarned is forearmed, as they say.

ROH111 11th Jul 2020 02:39

Is that a company email? I haven’t seen it

SandyPalms 11th Jul 2020 02:50

Yes, from base operations yesterday morning.

normanton 11th Jul 2020 02:51

The company wants people to stop accruing leave entitlements by forcing us on LWOP. Don't do it and you run the risk of a CR notice landing in your inbox.

This isn't just targeted at the junior crew for what its worth. If the bottom 400 recently hired SO's all take LWOP (and you would be stupid not to take it), guess who they are coming after next.

Its a threat to everyone. Want a future at Qantas? You have 4 weeks to take LWOP.

Going Boeing 11th Jul 2020 02:55


Originally Posted by JamieMaree (Post 10833677)
More to the point, if they are as unhappy as they portray, they should do the honourable thing and resign.

Jamie, don't misinterpret my calling out the corruption of senior QF management as "being unhappy" - I have thoroughly enjoyed my career and feel privileged to have been selected quite a few years ago.

You don't have to be a naive "yes" man to enjoy your career.

SandyPalms 11th Jul 2020 02:58


Originally Posted by normanton (Post 10834288)
The company wants people to stop accruing leave entitlements by forcing us on LWOP. Don't do it and you run the risk of a CR notice landing in your inbox.

This isn't just targeted at the junior crew for what its worth. If the bottom 400 recently hired SO's all take LWOP (and you would be stupid not to take it), guess who they are coming after next.

Its a threat to everyone. Want a future at Qantas? You have 4 weeks to take LWOP.

Yep, the more people take LWOP, the higher up the ladder the crocodile can climb. All depending on how many stay comfortably on the top. A number we won't know until it's conceivably too late. Fark.

ruprecht 11th Jul 2020 03:12


Originally Posted by SandyPalms (Post 10834291)
Yep, the more people take LWOP, the higher up the ladder the crocodile can climb. All depending on how many stay comfortably on the top. A number we won't know until it's conceivably too late. Fark.

But the more LWOP taken, the fewer redundancies required.

LWOP is cheap, CR is expensive.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.