Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10825250)
from the EBA:
“…….other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible...” I have to disagree. If there aren’t enough bookings once borders are open, that’s a business / commercial problem. Otherwise, why would ANY company ever pay VR / CR if they could just stand down the employee indefinitely? The opening of borders may not be the trigger to relax stand-downs I'm afraid. |
Originally Posted by C441
(Post 10825890)
Again I hope you're right but the company will argue that demand has collapsed because of C-19 and thus they "cannot be held responsible".
The opening of borders may not be the trigger to relax stand-downs I'm afraid. When the borders go back to 2019 levels it won’t be done all at once. It’ll be a few neighbouring nations in travel bubbles first, then later other nations which have handled the outbreak well. Nations which haven’t done well at handling the outbreak (US, Brazil for example) will be delayed even further. And even when citizens of those nations are allowed to enter there could be conditions attached. An antibody test, a statement of vaccination, caps on flights and pax numbers from certain countries, a quarantine until a rapid test is performed, limits on the entry of aged or vulnerable populations, limitations on those travellers entering remote and indigenous communities. It may be years until full and free unrestricted travel is back. |
The border argument can be summarised by the domestic situation. When all domestic borders are opened unrestricted, will all domestic pilots be stood up? I think not.
NSW and VIC borders are open unrestricted. Does that mean all domestic SYD and MEL based pilots have been stood up? No. Hoping the situation will be different with International is Illogical. |
There’s a whole prop fleet stood down in SYD and BNE while the more expensive fleet is gaining routes.
I haven’t yet heard where the extended govt subsidies are being used, but that plus jobkeeper doesn’t make it hard to keep people stood down. |
Originally Posted by ExtraShot
(Post 10804410)
Erm. If you aren’t into speculation or the circulation of rumors I think you’re on the wrong website.
|
They are using larger aircraft because they get a larger government subsidy.
Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne. What a waste of taxpayer dollars. I mean just charter a freighter for the supplies. |
Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne. |
Originally Posted by wheels_down
(Post 10830088)
They are using larger aircraft because they get a larger government subsidy.
Jetstar flew one passenger into Sunshine Coast today on a flight from Melbourne. What a waste of taxpayer dollars. I mean just charter a freighter for the supplies. |
https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/...4f5d?width=650The extension of federal government aid will help keep Virgin Australia flying till it completes a sale. Picture: AFP |
The government subsidised domestic minimum viable network was extended in June till September, not sure what routes it covers though
|
Just saw a 380 full noise departures early right turn over the Harbour Bridge bound for the desert I guess...this ain’t over yet is it🙁
|
VR package is out:
> 15 years service 12 months base pay > 5 years service 9 months base pay < 5 years service 6 months base pay Take LWOP and you will be skipped over if CR is required. |
Which group has this been offered to?
And how long is the LWOP period? |
Originally Posted by CaptainInsaneO
(Post 10833604)
Which group has this been offered to?
And how long is the LWOP period? As little or as long as you’d like, all assessed on an individual basis. HOBO has seen LWOP over his time approved up to about 5 years. But the question I think you’re getting at, as per the EBA, minimum 12 months LWOP to be passed over for CR. |
Originally Posted by normanton
(Post 10833596)
VR package is out:
> 15 years service 12 months base pay > 5 years service 9 months base pay < 5 years service 6 months base pay Take LWOP and you will be skipped over if CR is required. buT tHe hOstIeS gEt 14 mOntHs |
No problem swap your 12 months VR with a 14 month Flight attendant payout. It’s not about weeks or months, it’s about the payout, and it’s entirely up to the Company what they offer, anyone saying anything else is full of it. Take it or leave it, it’s pretty bloody simple.
|
The FA's have it documented in the EBA what a VR payout is.
If you wanted the same amount of weeks that they got you should have negotiated it into EBA 10. It's a stupid argument when your wage is xxx higher. |
Originally Posted by normanton
(Post 10833651)
The FA's have it documented in the EBA what a VR payout is.
If you wanted the same amount of weeks that they got you should have negotiated it into EBA 10. It's a stupid argument when your wage is xxx higher. QF pilots didn’t have any redundancy provisions until the CWD. If it is voluntary it is voluntary. Stop whinging if the bait is not attractive enough. I’d be happy if it was good enough to get angryrat, going boeing, Vjet, et al. More to the point, if they are as unhappy as they portray, they should do the honourable thing and resign. |
Originally Posted by Angle of Attack
(Post 10833645)
No problem swap your 12 months VR with a 14 month Flight attendant payout. It’s not about weeks or months, it’s about the payout, and it’s entirely up to the Company what they offer, anyone saying anything else is full of it. Take it or leave it, it’s pretty bloody simple.
polling had found Qantas needed to offer a base salary figure of closer to 24 months - with 18 months as a minimum - to address its concerns of having surplus pilots. |
They will have no trouble getting enough takers. I predict it will be oversubscribed. As dr Dre says, they had enough when there was flying to be done.
Once those eligible make peace with the fact that it’s not a reflection of what QF think you are worth, and simply a number QF think you will take, they will reflect on the alternative, and take what’s on offer. It’s a no brainer. |
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 10833767)
In 2014 the Union thought the Company’s offer was far less than what was needed to entice enough pilots to take it. They were wrong. And that was when there was an option to keep flying and earning a wage for those targeted for VR. Now there’s stand downs:
Pilots not happy with Qantas redundancy offer Those over 63.5 will get an offer soon I suspect. An ‘early retirement’ is taxed slightly differently to VR but still better than marginal tax rates- the ATO guidance on this is appalling! Even if the offer was for the leave they accrue between now and 65 and bundled in with their accrued leave (if they have any) they’re still likely to be better off than remaining on stand down between now and 65th birthday. |
So, if you take the 12 month LWOP to avoid being made redundant, what happens if after the 12 months you come back, intl is still dead in the water, and the company a month later makes you redundant “due to new review on impact of the virus” or whatever.. How long does the ‘amnesty’ on redundancy for those who take the LWOP option legally last? Anything other than a legal clarification surely wouldn’t be acceptable to opt into it?
|
Originally Posted by TimmyTee
(Post 10834236)
So, if you take the 12 month LWOP to avoid being made redundant, what happens if after the 12 months you come back, intl is still dead in the water, and the company a month later makes you redundant “due to new review on impact of the virus” or whatever.. How long does the ‘amnesty’ on redundancy for those who take the LWOP option legally last? Anything other than a legal clarification surely wouldn’t be acceptable to opt into it?
I hope the company is prepared for the onslaught of LWOP applications they are about to receive! |
What is the benefit of taking LWOP? Why not just stay stood down and accrue leave and get JK?
|
For the “super junior” in either LH or SH, taking LWOP will protect you from being made redundant. i think the way they have set this up is smart (from the company’s side). They will surely get hundreds of the senior guys to take VR, while at the same time, scaring juniour blokes into taking LWOP to try and not be made compulsorily redundant.
|
JK will not last forever KZK. If it’s extended, probably only another 3-6 months. After that standown is standown, ie, no useful work no pay. Bit different here than ENZED I believe. You could be stood-down for three years with no pay, but you will retain your spot in the list and accrue benefits such as annual, long service and personal leave. Still have the curly one of exactly how long can you be stood down.........3 months, 6 months......3 years!!!!! Surely someone would challenge it if it just goes on and on.
Genuine question people........how does the amnesty clause fit in with your EA?? |
Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 10834252)
For the “super junior” in either LH or SH, taking LWOP will protect you from being made redundant. i think the way they have set this up is smart (from the company’s side). They will surely get hundreds of the senior guys to take VR, while at the same time, scaring juniour blokes into taking LWOP to try and not be made compulsorily redundant.
|
Don't know surfer dude. I think the jury is still out on what happens in seniority when we get to a CR. Not tying to be alarmist, but have they said that they will not use the seniority list for CR? What does a "forecast surplus" mean with regard to CR?
|
Ah ok. In a webinair it was touched on, but QF consider LH and SH completely separate for redundancy. The integration agreement just says ‘new hire’ pilots go first in accordance with the Pilots Agreement (ie where the surplus is). I haven’t read the A/Q stuff in great detail but I believe the ‘Y’ starts somewhere around seniority 600....if it gets that far I’d say it’s game over anyway! Of course, I’d expect this to be challenged.
hopefully we never have to find out. |
You have less than 4 weeks to be on LWOP to avoid inclusion in a potential CR:
Good luck out there... |
Are you guys (and girls) saying that:
If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant? Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you? |
Originally Posted by ROH111
(Post 10834268)
Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you?
|
Originally Posted by ROH111
(Post 10834268)
Are you guys (and girls) saying that:
If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant? To provide you with further clarity regarding the LWOP offering, I can confirm that we will exercise our discretion to pass over any pilot on LWOP should it become necessary to enact a CR program, subject to the following conditions:
|
Originally Posted by ROH111
(Post 10834268)
Are you guys (and girls) saying that:
If you are on LWOP, you can not be made redundant? Upon your return you might be made redundant.... but then you’d just extend your LWOP wouldn’t you? Forewarned is forearmed, as they say. |
Is that a company email? I haven’t seen it
|
Yes, from base operations yesterday morning.
|
The company wants people to stop accruing leave entitlements by forcing us on LWOP. Don't do it and you run the risk of a CR notice landing in your inbox.
This isn't just targeted at the junior crew for what its worth. If the bottom 400 recently hired SO's all take LWOP (and you would be stupid not to take it), guess who they are coming after next. Its a threat to everyone. Want a future at Qantas? You have 4 weeks to take LWOP. |
Originally Posted by JamieMaree
(Post 10833677)
More to the point, if they are as unhappy as they portray, they should do the honourable thing and resign.
You don't have to be a naive "yes" man to enjoy your career. |
Originally Posted by normanton
(Post 10834288)
The company wants people to stop accruing leave entitlements by forcing us on LWOP. Don't do it and you run the risk of a CR notice landing in your inbox.
This isn't just targeted at the junior crew for what its worth. If the bottom 400 recently hired SO's all take LWOP (and you would be stupid not to take it), guess who they are coming after next. Its a threat to everyone. Want a future at Qantas? You have 4 weeks to take LWOP. |
Originally Posted by SandyPalms
(Post 10834291)
Yep, the more people take LWOP, the higher up the ladder the crocodile can climb. All depending on how many stay comfortably on the top. A number we won't know until it's conceivably too late. Fark.
LWOP is cheap, CR is expensive. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.