Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10824338)
It’s not based on whether you agree, or whether they intend to keep the fleet. The EBA is quite clear on when stand down can occur. FWA are pretty clear that in the case of an EBA covering a situation, they won’t interfere with it.
Union won’t need to do much, if anything. The EBA that was recently voted upon during this pandemic, stands. Normanton, what QF would like to do, and what they can do, are very different things. Won’t stop them trying to cut a deal to pull the wool over your eyes where they can though! LH and SH EBAs are pretty tight - and not in QFs favour. Can’t speak for the other EBAs in the group. |
Originally Posted by C441
(Post 10824178)
As one of those staring at conceivably 3 years of stand-down I hope you're right, but one thing I am sure of is that Qantas demonstrated during the EA negotiations that they are far from a benevolent society. They will endeavour to keep us stood down as long as they can - by fair means or foul.
Thats because some of those ego driven sky gods amongst your A380 lot are total wank#rs and deserve what’s coming. Sadly, they might take the good guys down with them. Surely the government won’t keep giving these half a million dollar guys jobkeeper when there are so many others out there who are really finding it tough going and need the help. The gravy train is done and dusted! |
+1 for Ruvap on job keeper, means test on the way?
Anyone who thinks there will be some magic trigger or commercial epiphany forcing Qantas away from stand down provisions, is dreamin’. Covid effects will last for a long time and as was mentioned earlier by Ozbiggles, the greater good will trump the interests of the senior pilot cadre. Fat guy in coat, 100% correct. I doubt that will go to far. Industrially difficult and potentially a very negative outcome. |
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824800)
Thats because some of those ego driven sky gods amongst your A380 lot are total wank#rs and deserve what’s coming.
Every fleet in every airline has wankers among them, but nobody deserves “what’s coming”.... I've been through it before and I wouldn’t wish it on anybody. |
Disgraceful attitude guys. Those 'wank#rs' on the 380 gave you the conditions you now enjoy. I can scarcely believe such tripe comes from supposedly educated people.
|
Very poor comments from Ruvap & Iron Bar. It’s times like this that we should be supporting each other, not insulting & denigrating your peers.
|
Originally Posted by Fatguyinalittlecoat
(Post 10824809)
I do find it amusing how, after spending the last 30 years denigrating SH pilots, and telling all and sundry how crap the 737 is, there are now demands (both privately and even publicly, I’m told) from A380 crew to be given the right to displace a 737 position.
For one, it’s not legal (can’t displace someone working under another agreement), this was established and settled during the 2014 RIN. Secondly it’d be a massive expense to retrain all of your domestic pilots, and management have made it quite clear they want absolutely zero unnecessary expense. It will never happen. |
Shorthaul has been denigrated for years, nothing new about that, so I don’t think there is any gain abusing others in this current plight, ironically now the 737 is the senior fleet at least for the next couple of years, am told there will be very little training from LH to Shorthaul as it costs far too much in the short to medium term anyway. There may be some training longish term as Domestic gets back to normal levels and attrition slowly reduces the SH crew numbers. Displacements between different awards? Lol that’s the funniest thing I’ve read for ages, it goes against everything the whole RIN process is legally blinded by, try and ask FWA about that fairytale request..
|
Originally Posted by Fatguyinalittlecoat
(Post 10824809)
I do find it amusing how, after spending the last 30 years denigrating SH pilots, and telling all and sundry how crap the 737 is, there are now demands (both privately and even publicly, I’m told) from A380 crew to be given the right to displace a 737 position.
|
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824830)
hear hear.....The CEO is absolutely doing the right thing. Those senior A380/747 pilots only put a uniform on maybe 15 days every 56 day BP and for that they make a killing and still they complain. What they make in allowances alone would pay the mortgage for some of the battlers in society. There is no way they deserve any jobkeeper amount so that must be stopped ASAP!
|
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824830)
hear hear.....The CEO is absolutely doing the right thing. Those senior A380/747 pilots only put a uniform on maybe 15 days every 56 day BP and for that they make a killing and still they complain. What they make in allowances alone would pay the mortgage for some of the battlers in society. There is no way they deserve any jobkeeper amount so that must be stopped ASAP!
What a goose you are, 15 days in 56 if only. |
It doesn’t help when you have a senior LH captain call into a webinar and demand a slot on the 737, then out himself on qrewroom telling everyone that he’s just looking after number 1, and disputing that “luck of draw, or right place, right time” has anything to do with this industry. It was embarrassing and probably solidified the belief from most on the 737 of the arrogance and superiority the guys at the top feel they are entitled to. Looking after number 1 can work both ways, so I wouldn’t expect too many on the 737 to much sympathy.
|
In that case he is a goose who doesn’t understand his contract and wants to have his cake and eat it to and that’s not going to happen. You take the good with the bad.
|
Originally Posted by Chad Gates
(Post 10824848)
It doesn’t help when you have a senior LH captain call into a webinar and demand a slot on the 737, then out himself on qrewroom telling everyone that he’s just looking after number 1, and disputing that “luck of draw, or right place, right time” has anything to do with this industry. It was embarrassing and probably solidified the belief from most on the 737 of the arrogance and superiority the guys at the top feel they are entitled to. Looking after number 1 can work both ways, so I wouldn’t expect too many on the 737 to much sympathy.
|
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824855)
Agreed!.....and to the moron above, let’s say a 10 day trip to EU is worth 55 hours, that’s 4 sectors or 4 days or 4 times to put your monkey suit on, so I would say, wearing a uniform on 15 occasions every 56 is no exaggeration, the rest of the time being spent as a paid tourist, and you still think you’re worth more!
|
Originally Posted by angryrat
(Post 10824871)
After all the good points you made in the Project Sunrise thread regarding sleep and hours worked, you go undo it all by criticising the LH award. The same award that you were holding up as the standard. Yes there are those amongst us who will make you shake your head, but don’t go tearing everything down because of a minority.
Not criticising the LH award, and we’d all be better off but for some of those on the A380 who think the sun shines out of their arses. We will all be better off with the grounding of the A380 and hopefully the gods will not be invited back. |
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10824338)
It’s not based on whether you agree, or whether they intend to keep the fleet. The EBA is quite clear on when stand down can occur. FWA are pretty clear that in the case of an EBA covering a situation, they won’t interfere with it.
Union won’t need to do much, if anything. The EBA that was recently voted upon during this pandemic, stands. Normanton, what QF would like to do, and what they can do, are very different things. Won’t stop them trying to cut a deal to pull the wool over your eyes where they can though! LH and SH EBAs are pretty tight - and not in QFs favour. Can’t speak for the other EBAs in the group. |
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824873)
Not criticising the LH award, and we’d all be better off but for some of those on the A380 who think the sun shines out of their arses. We will all be better off with the grounding of the A380 and hopefully the gods will not be invited back.
You’re starting to sound unhinged.:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Ruvap
(Post 10824855)
Agreed!.....and to the moron above, let’s say a 10 day trip to EU is worth 55 hours, that’s 4 sectors or 4 days or 4 times to put your monkey suit on, so I would say, wearing a uniform on 15 occasions every 56 is no exaggeration, the rest of the time being spent as a paid tourist, and you still think you’re worth more!
|
Gee there are some right clowns on this forum. There are a number of A380 crew who are amongst the best people on this planet. No one deserves what is occurring at the moment, whether they’re a declared ‘nice person’ or one of Ruvap’s ‘Sky gods’.
|
The vast majority of 380 pilots are great guys and gals! (but I have definitely run into some w@nkers on the crew bus - my captains words, not mine!)
The current world events and the circumstances we find our self in, has meant the 'gravy train bubble' has come to a swift halt. The new world order will come as a shock, and adapting is required for survival. It will only be temporary, and things will improve. 5 years down the track when 6 of the 380s are officially mothballed, and the 350s come in, you will all be grateful for listening to normantons wise wisdom about just how important it was to secure those 350's in LH10. ;) |
Originally Posted by Chad Gates
(Post 10824848)
It doesn’t help when you have a senior LH captain call into a webinar and demand a slot on the 737, then out himself on qrewroom telling everyone that he’s just looking after number 1, and disputing that “luck of draw, or right place, right time” has anything to do with this industry.
And for what it's worth, he's also usually considered one of the nicest blokes you could share a flight deck with…….
Originally Posted by normanton
(Post 10824891)
5 years down the track when 6 of the 380s are officially mothballed, and the 350s come in, you will all be grateful for listening to normantons wise wisdom about just how important it was to secure those 350's in LH10. ;)
|
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10824158)
Because stand down can’t be indefinite. At some point it becomes a commercial decision and the clause of stand down won’t apply. Ie When the government no longer has a travel ban / border closure in place.
|
Originally Posted by dragon man
(Post 10824853)
In that case he is a goose who doesn’t understand his contract and wants to have his cake and eat it to and that’s not going to happen. You take the good with the bad.
It's a rough time for everyone. Much as I'd love to get parachuted onto SH (or anything...) right now, climbing over the backs of colleagues isn't the way to do it. |
Originally Posted by C441
(Post 10824893)
Not that it matters, but actually he's not a LH Captain but a 744 F/O with a severely disabled son who was (obviously inadvisedly) voicing his concerns at the plight he has found himself in. If you too are going to denigrate yourself online, at least do some research to verify the accuracy of your statement and include all of the information lest you appear as great a goose as you suggest he is.
And for what it's worth, he's also usually considered one of the nicest blokes you could share a flight deck with……. Let's hope the 380s are still here so you can then use the 380 award conditions to offset Tino and Alan's next ultimatum! ;) too :) And for the record, I never called him a goose. No need to be rude. |
Originally Posted by Chad Gates
(Post 10824848)
It doesn’t help when you have a senior LH captain call into a webinar and demand a slot on the 737, then out himself on qrewroom telling everyone that he’s just looking after number 1,
Given he is on a now retired fleet his question is still somewhat relevant but more along the lines of ‘when can I expect to be RIN’d’ so that he can bid for a fleet with some ‘useful work’. |
Several days ago there were comments from the federal government indicating borders may be closed until mid to late 2021. Do you have a link? |
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/cor...ng-b881586415z
There is one link. This one indicates borders may be shut until we have a vaccine |
Then that will probably be never. There's no vaccine for every strain of Flu B, or all the bird flus, or all the other SARS strains.
|
This is embarrassing. Air NZ have actually had forced redundancies...hundreds of them...They have a thread too and somehow they managed to not denigrate the thread into a petty farce.
|
Pathetic cowardly behavior. Hard to believe that these people occupy control seats in aircraft.
|
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/cor...ng-b881586415z There is one link. This one indicates borders may be shut until we have a vaccine We are not supposed to be aiming for eradication, we are after flattening the curve, remember? I will be surprised if we cannot travel overseas by Christmas. |
Some thoughts from a survivor of ‘89.
- Its bad . Very bad. Accept it . And deal with it. - People under stress will say and do things under stress that they will regret for the rest of their lives. Don’t be one of them. - The worst possible outcome will be when you start eating your own. - Circumstances like these are great revealers of character. Behave in a way that you can look back on with pride. - This too will pass. |
^^^^ Well said.
|
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
(Post 10824978)
I will be surprised if we cannot travel overseas by Christmas.
|
Originally Posted by aviones
(Post 10824787)
Once the borders open, if there is still not sufficient forward bookings, Qantas will leave crew stood down as they were going to originally, due to lack of demand - not the closure of the borders. Unfortunately the EA does not address how long crew can remain stood down so arbitration will eventually be needed to determine when the stand down no longer applies.
“The Company may deduct payments from the pay of an Australian based pilot for any day the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible...” I have to disagree. If there aren’t enough bookings once borders are open, that’s a business / commercial problem. Otherwise, why would ANY company ever pay VR / CR if they could just stand down the employee indefinitely? |
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10825250)
from the EBA:
“The Company may deduct payments from the pay of an Australian based pilot for any day the pilot cannot be usefully employed because of any strike, stoppage or other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible...” I have to disagree. If there aren’t enough bookings once borders are open, that’s a business / commercial problem. Otherwise, why would ANY company ever pay VR / CR if they could just stand down the employee indefinitely? |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10825117)
Some thoughts from a survivor of ‘89.
- Its bad . Very bad. Accept it . And deal with it. - People under stress will say and do things under stress that they will regret for the rest of their lives. Don’t be one of them. - The worst possible outcome will be when you start eating your own. - Circumstances like these are great revealers of character. Behave in a way that you can look back on with pride. - This too will pass. |
Originally Posted by George Glass
(Post 10825117)
Circumstances like these are great revealers of character. Behave in a way that you can look back on with pride.
|
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
(Post 10825250)
from the EBA:
..... or other limitation of work for which the Company cannot be held responsible...” I recommend you call AIPA legal for further clarification :ok: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:56. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.