Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

MAS 122

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2023, 08:35
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by jj232
Don’t hold your breath for that DROPS, The relocation project is currently flatlining and appears to be heading down the road of another ASA failed project.

As for 16L for arrivals only, with weather on final on many heavies in the mix I doubt a higher arrival rate could of been achieved, maybe 2 or 3 max. All these aircraft would then have to cross an active runway to get to the terminals as well as dealing with all the departures waiting to go off 25. 16L arrivals 25 Departures isn’t a mode ever used also, I think in the interest of safety what occurred was the safest given the situation.
sorry but I call bs…what weather on final? You mean a little cloud and a shower or two!! Common man it wasn’t even remotely close to LVP……

so aircraft can’t safely and quickly cross 25 between departures? Really? Maybe go to KSFO or KLAX for a reality check.

there were 2 nice black asphalt surfaces built for purpose and available for Aircraft to use………..USE THEM.

Australia happily allow multiple Jets into places like Harvey Bay uncontrolled mixing it with GA and you think this was too dangerous!!!
ACMS is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2023, 08:55
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: I would tell you, but my GPS keeps getting jammed
Posts: 168
Received 48 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by ACMS
sorry but I call bs…what weather on final? You mean a little cloud and a shower or two!! Common man it wasn’t even remotely close to LVP……

so aircraft can’t safely and quickly cross 25 between departures? Really? Maybe go to KSFO or KLAX for a reality check.

there were 2 nice black asphalt surfaces built for purpose and available for Aircraft to use………..USE THEM.

Australia happily allow multiple Jets into places like Harvey Bay uncontrolled mixing it with GA and you think this was too dangerous!!!
You use and configure your runways in whatever mode you are allowed to operate them in. That's the bottom line. 25 arrivals and 16L/R departures is one mode. You also adhere to the rules and regulations set by the regulator. You work with what you have.
VHOED191006 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2023, 09:52
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The third world
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ACMS
sorry but I call bs…what weather on final? You mean a little cloud and a shower or two!! Common man it wasn’t even remotely close to LVP……

so aircraft can’t safely and quickly cross 25 between departures? Really? Maybe go to KSFO or KLAX for a reality check.

there were 2 nice black asphalt surfaces built for purpose and available for Aircraft to use………..USE THEM.

Australia happily allow multiple Jets into places like Harvey Bay uncontrolled mixing it with GA and you think this was too dangerous!!!

the reference to weather ACMS is that a radar standard was required to be maintained between a departure and a missed approach as the tower couldn’t visually seperate, I wasn’t implying it was atrocious.

As for the comparison to KSFO and KLAX I am pretty certain those towers wouldn’t have rated half their tower staff since COVID, some straight out of the college.

When you say Australia is happy to let jets mix it up with GA in places like Harvey Bay I can assure you the air traffic controllers are anything but happy, if they had any say in the running of ASA you wouldn’t see another TIBA ever again, unfortunately their opinions are constantly ignored and in some cases they are even made out to be the problem.
jj232 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by jj232:
Old 16th Aug 2023, 12:09
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
Though it is surprising that they didn't do a rapid evacuation.
As in the MEL incident the important thing is to wait for the media to show the heroic, competent method of dealing with the situation. If a few people are killed so what

Just as is MEL as I said then



Deaf is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2023, 01:11
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Deaf
As in the MEL incident the important thing is to wait for the media to show the heroic, competent method of dealing with the situation. If a few people are killed so what

Just as is MEL as I said then
Yep, even though there may be only a very remote chance that the threat is real, the mere fact that they decide to park the aeroplane in an isolated area should be enough reason to get the pax off as quickly as possible. If there was zero risk, they would return to the terminal.
Not saying that they need to hurl passengers down the slides (which inevitably injures some) but surely policy shoud be to get them out immediately and move them away?
What happens when a bomb threat is received in an office, or shopping mall, or a passenger terminal? We evacuate first, often heading for a nominated assembly point.
In this case it appears that old mate the crazy one was not armed, so in no position to prevent pax leaving. In any case, surely among a couple of hundred anxious people, a few would have shoved him out of the way, had the order been given to leave.
Or was he threatening to pull the trigger on something unseen if they did leave?

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 17th Aug 2023 at 01:29. Reason: spelling
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2023, 01:52
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
What happens when a bomb threat is received in an office, or shopping mall, or a passenger terminal? We evacuate first, often heading for a nominated assembly point.
Except for the people in the same room as the one making the threat. The people in that room are his bargaining chip. He's not going to let them leave. Witness other hostage negotiations, because that's what this effectively is.
Unless people are getting hurt, the aim is to get everyone out safe, usually including the perpetrator, and however long that takes is how long it takes. If things start going south, that's when other options need to be explored, right up to the point where collateral damage becomes acceptable if it prevents further violence. In this case, it appeared that there was no immediate danger to the passengers and crew, so a low level peaceful resolution could be implemented. Which it appears is what happened. So it took 3 hours.....so what? Everyone walked away in one piece.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Traffic_Is_Er_Was:
Old 17th Aug 2023, 02:07
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Traffic_Is_Er_Was
Except for the people in the same room as the one making the threat. The people in that room are his bargaining chip. He's not going to let them leave. Witness other hostage negotiations, because that's what this effectively is.
Sure, that can sometimes be the case, though the baddy usually flashes a weapon or shows a bomb (sometimes later found to be fake). In that situation one can understand everyone treading softly, softly.
But this guy showed no weapons and not much aggression unless you count finger-wagging as threatening. At one stage he is head down bum up praying. Not exactly the way a serious terrorist acting alone would risk being overpowered.
I am surprised that no one jumped on him at that point. Are cabin crew no longer trained in basic restraint methods, or allowed to use restraint ties? Was there not one passenger in the crowd prepared to belt him when he got in their face?
Have we really become that passive? Reminds me of my chooks.
However, all may not be as it seems in the videos seen to date. I guess we will have to wait for more details of how it went down.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Aug 2023, 02:29
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
PR departments don’t want its aircrew on social media putting passengers in a headlock etc, especially if they are non violent, and just a nut job like this bloke. The cabin crew here obviously came to the conclusion that they were just dealing with a mental patient, they sat with him and just listened to his bull****. He did mention apparently that he was lying about having an explosive device, the authorities doing the intelligence work in the meantime wouldn’t be taking his word for that regardless, so the investigation would continue.

Some crew get a little too involved at times also. That Virgin pilot getting into a fight with the pax was a good example, sometimes it’s better to say nothing and just wait. I can assure you as I have seen, they will sack or demote you should you get on the wrong side of being involved.
PoppaJo is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by PoppaJo:
Old 17th Aug 2023, 03:13
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Poppa Jo, fair comment.
Though if the authorities were not prepared to take him at face value about not really having a bomb, it doesn’t explain why the pax had to sit there for four hours, instead of disembarking pdq.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2023, 03:20
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
Poppa Jo, fair comment.
Though if the authorities were not prepared to take him at face value about not really having a bomb, it doesn’t explain why the pax had to sit there for four hours, instead of disembarking pdq.
We will likely never know. Even if they screwed up, Minns or Andrews, or whoever will never admit that. As seen down south, you can drag these things via some form of independent inquiry, old mate Andrews still wriggles out of any wrong doing.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2023, 03:43
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
Poppa Jo, fair comment.
Though if the authorities were not prepared to take him at face value about not really having a bomb, it doesn’t explain why the pax had to sit there for four hours, instead of disembarking pdq.
That's why. If they can't be sure, they're not going to antagonise him into doing something rash by taking away his toys. The pax were comfortable, they had food and drink. No one was getting hurt. Softly, softly.
It's amazing how passengers who paid to sit in a seat for nearly 9 hours were suddenly now "trapped" in them for 3 hours. FFS it's not like they were laying on their stomach with their hands on their head on a bank floor or anything.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Aug 2023, 08:34
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 87
Received 47 Likes on 24 Posts
Should have overpowered him immediately and restrained him. NO chance he had any device on him. Disgusting making all the pax and crew wait in fear for four hours. Cops need to grow a pair!
MalcolmReynolds is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2023, 01:27
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Should have overpowered him immediately and restrained him.
Who should have?
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2023, 03:35
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Sydney
Posts: 87
Received 47 Likes on 24 Posts
The crew, I would have.
MalcolmReynolds is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2023, 04:22
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
That's why. If they can't be sure, they're not going to antagonise him into doing something rash by taking away his toys. The pax were comfortable, they had food and drink. No one was getting hurt. Softly, softly.
But if the Police aren't sure why are they waiting there 4 hours?? Either get everyone off or get out of the way onto a remote bay, then take as long as you like.

Honestly if there is a credible bomb threat then it really should be a precautionary disembarkation.

If it's none of the above then really you have a hijack situation as the suspect is calling the shots. If that's the case then all bets are off and you do whatever it takes, including sitting there for hours.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2023, 07:12
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,291
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Hindsight, such a easy thing to comment on! Like all such incidents, no doubt there will be plenty of debriefs and discussion and lessons learned for future events.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2023, 08:19
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
The delay is likely due to counterterrosim teams and other intelligence agencies, digging deep into the manifest, and the male. It would appear that this male is just a mental patient, so likely not on any watch lists, which would cause some delay while those behind closed doors are trying to sort out who he is, not only that, any other connections he has on board. Not only that, digging into his past. Takes considerable time if he is not known. Have they missed an extremist who has gone un noticed, that becomes very problematic and concerning if true.

Operation Silves was a reminder around those who can slip through the cracks, huge alarm bells for the above teams if this male had managed to sneak through with an explosive device. Just another reminder about the continued risks this industry will always face, will always be extremists looking for opportunities.
PoppaJo is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 19th Aug 2023, 01:23
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,944
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
The delay is likely due to counterterrosim teams and other intelligence agencies, digging deep into the manifest, and the male. It would appear that this male is just a mental patient, so likely not on any watch lists, which would cause some delay while those behind closed doors are trying to sort out who he is, not only that, any other connections he has on board. Not only that, digging into his past. Takes considerable time if he is not known. Have they missed an extremist who has gone un noticed, that becomes very problematic and concerning if true
You have a firm grip on reality Poppa, prior preparation prevents piss poor performance, known as the six P's in some areas.
megan is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2023, 01:37
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 306
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
anito4a

you need to remove the above post my friend. Doesn’t matter if it is the same person you shouldn’t post something like that. What if it it isn’t him and his employer sees it, he could get fired. Pull your head in…………

No Idea Either is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2023, 08:24
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Anito
Posts: 48
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by No Idea Either
anito4a

you need to remove the above post my friend. Doesn’t matter if it is the same person you shouldn’t post something like that. What if it it isn’t him and his employer sees it, he could get fired. Pull your head in…………
Fair enough. Done.
anito4a is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.