Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

MAS 122

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Aug 2023, 07:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAS 122

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ed-runway.html
crikeys is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 07:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 285
Received 127 Likes on 36 Posts
16R is closed. Videos of some lunatic ranting about Allah from inside the cabin on social media. QF1 stuck at the gate. Police riot vehicles appear to be running around the airport. Just another day in paradise.
das Uber Soldat is online now  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 08:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Almost identical thing happened over 5 years ago in Melbourne, same airline, and same bomb threat. Male was given a 12 year prison term.

PoppaJo is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Aug 2023, 09:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
There’s a 15 kt southerly

So, 99% of a/c are using 16L whilst 25 has been used for a 747 and a A380….

why can’t they use 25 for ALL departures and 16L for ALL arrivals at the same time?

they've cancelled a truck load of services due to the single runway movement rate….

the mind boggles…..
ACMS is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Aug 2023, 09:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 700
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by ACMS
There’s a 15 kt southerly

So, 99% of a/c are using 16L whilst 25 has been used for a 747 and a A380….

why can’t they use 25 for ALL departures and 16L for ALL arrivals at the same time?

they've cancelled a truck load of services due to the single runway movement rate….

the mind boggles…..
100% agreed. I've seen 16L ARR and 25 DEP used in anger. 3 mile spacing RWY 16L, 1800m and airborne RWY 25. ATC could move a lot of traffic using this runway configuration.
missy is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Aug 2023, 10:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 282
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Not sure a fully laden 380 bound for Dubai could take off on 25.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 10:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to flight aware they were doing 692 mph at 36,000ft on their way back to Sydney. Isn't that super-sonic?
skotos is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 10:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 941
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ACMS
There’s a 15 kt southerly

So, 99% of a/c are using 16L whilst 25 has been used for a 747 and a A380….

why can’t they use 25 for ALL departures and 16L for ALL arrivals at the same time?

they've cancelled a truck load of services due to the single runway movement rate….

the mind boggles…..
Maybe if it boggled a little bit harder it might figure out other things might have been happening on the airfield at that time
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 11:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
One thing has been proven, all WB can use 16L so no need to require 16R in the future just because you don’t want to taxi that far.
SHVC is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by SHVC:
Old 14th Aug 2023, 21:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
It has to be said, this was very poorly handled by AFP and SY airport corporation. 4hrs to remove the person in question effectively stopping operations into Sydney airport at a peak period. Twitter post at the time it was clear he was a nutter with his rambling the probability of a device is minimal if any AFP should have just entered the aircraft but I guess it would of taken 4hrs for the approval of stairs to be towed on A and then finding swissport staff.
SY airport should have been able to manage a regular flow, it took them 5hrs to NOTAM the use of A5 could have NOTAM RWY closed past B8 turbo props and NB jets could have maintained their schedule instead of the displacement of thousands of ppl.
SHVC is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 22:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by SHVC
SY airport should have been able to manage a regular flow, it took them 5hrs to NOTAM the use of A5 could have NOTAM RWY closed past B8 turbo props and NB jets could have maintained their schedule instead of the displacement of thousands of ppl.
It wouldn't have been SYD Airport calling the shots. They'd just be following the directions of the police in regards to exclusion zones etc. I'm sure they wanted to get back to business just as quickly as everyone else did.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 23:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by skotos
According to flight aware they were doing 692 mph at 36,000ft on their way back to Sydney. Isn't that super-sonic?
No, it isn’t. True airspeed + wind component = groundspeed. (You’re not by any chance the passenger who got angry at a 767 crew for being ‘supersonic’ between Perth & Sydney a few years ago, are you?)
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Aug 2023, 23:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Traffic_Is_Er_Was
It wouldn't have been SYD Airport calling the shots. They'd just be following the directions of the police in regards to exclusion zones etc. I'm sure they wanted to get back to business just as quickly as everyone else did.

Fair enough. AFP alone handled it poorly. 4hrs to remove someone really?!
SHVC is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 23:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,292
Received 169 Likes on 86 Posts
Originally Posted by SHVC
AFP alone handled it poorly. 4hrs to remove someone really?!
And your reasoning is….?
Capt Fathom is online now  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 00:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
And your reasoning is….?
….4hrs is a LONG time to remove a pax from an aircraft.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 00:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Downunder
Posts: 431
Received 11 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
….4hrs is a LONG time to remove a pax from an aircraft.
Would it be worth considering the UK procedure under which security threats are sent to Stansted (to avoid disrupting LHR & LGW) where there is suitable remote parking and, I'm told, an on-call "welcoming committee" should the situation require?
Max Tow is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 15th Aug 2023, 00:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 4 seasons hotel
Posts: 268
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
To chase all passengers out of the international terminal building from midnight to 3am is also part of very poor management.
flightleader is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 15th Aug 2023, 01:26
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard
No, it isn’t. True airspeed + wind component = groundspeed. (You’re not by any chance the passenger who got angry at a 767 crew for being ‘supersonic’ between Perth & Sydney a few years ago, are you?)
Nope, not angry. Just a sky watcher curious at how quickly they got back.
skotos is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 04:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 700
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts
Normally AsA ATC would be requested to provide a representative to the Emergency Operations Centre to act as a Liaison Officer. Perhaps no-one was available due to Operational Requirements or perhaps the person available didn't have any ATC experience, or their input dismissed or overruled by the NSW Police.

Exclusion zones are published and scenarios would've been workshopped by all agencies, especially ATC and Sydney Airport based on the wind / weather. RWY 16L for ARR, RWY 25 for DEP seemed an obvious option but perhaps the 40 minute recall for RWY 07/25 was a factor.
missy is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by missy:
Old 15th Aug 2023, 05:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
What was the logic behind parking the aircraft at the end of the runway? What is wrong with a remote parking bay somewhere?
neville_nobody is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.