Aviation Survey Discussion
Wow Steve some of those results are an overwhelming indictment on the flying rat's current management. It would appear management are totally disengaged from their workforce...doesn't bode well for a human interface/service industry when your frontline staff feel aggrieved!
This is the most revealing statistic when you compare the two main players (groups) in the Oz market, normally you would expect one or two % points between the players and 10% in favour/against would be ringing alarm bells...political polls are a case in point..
....however a 54.34 % point (Get Better) difference between the groups is a terminal indicator, even allowing for the fact that your survey maybe only being completed by disgruntled frontline workers
How does it go again..."Happy wife, happy life!".....for Hospitality/Tourist industry..."Happy frontline staff, happy clients, happy management, happy shareholders!"
An ailing flying roo is a barometer in Oz for an ailing industry!
ps Steve have you thought about forwarding the results to Ben Sandilands?
This is the most revealing statistic when you compare the two main players (groups) in the Oz market, normally you would expect one or two % points between the players and 10% in favour/against would be ringing alarm bells...political polls are a case in point..
Q40. Looking ahead to the next 12 months my company will
Qantas
Get Better - 3%
Stay the same - 6%
Get worse - 90%
No opinion - 1%
Qantaslink
Get Better - 16%
Stay the same - 33%
Get worse - 48%
No opinion - 3%
Jetstar
Get Better - 7%
Stay the same - 21%
Get worse - 68%
No opinion - 3%
Virgin Group
Get Better - 63%
Stay the same - 29%
Get worse - 8%
No opinion - 0%
Qantas
Get Better - 3%
Stay the same - 6%
Get worse - 90%
No opinion - 1%
Qantaslink
Get Better - 16%
Stay the same - 33%
Get worse - 48%
No opinion - 3%
Jetstar
Get Better - 7%
Stay the same - 21%
Get worse - 68%
No opinion - 3%
Virgin Group
Get Better - 63%
Stay the same - 29%
Get worse - 8%
No opinion - 0%
How does it go again..."Happy wife, happy life!".....for Hospitality/Tourist industry..."Happy frontline staff, happy clients, happy management, happy shareholders!"
An ailing flying roo is a barometer in Oz for an ailing industry!
ps Steve have you thought about forwarding the results to Ben Sandilands?
Last edited by Sarcs; 31st May 2012 at 22:47.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sector 7G
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the most revealing statistic when you compare the two main players (groups) in the Oz market, normally you would expect one or two % points between the players and 10% in favour/against would be ringing alarm bells...political polls are a case in point..
The numbers of course are changing as more people submit and they are changing figures slightly based on factors such as the FAAA putting out an email. Obviously more Flight attendants answered on that day.
I'm not sure the "disgruntled employee" factor makes much difference. If it is assumed that "disgruntled employees" are more likely to be in a union or read Pprune or respond to a survey, would that not then be the case for all employers involved? By asking the same questions of all sample groups I think we at least will come up with very good cross comparison data.
The graphs I used were just the ones in Survey Monkey and as stated on other thread, they could be better. I may try upgrading the package or yes, someone smarter than I could do some better analysis and produce better graphs.
I'm not sure the "disgruntled employee" factor makes much difference. If it is assumed that "disgruntled employees" are more likely to be in a union or read Pprune or respond to a survey, would that not then be the case for all employers involved?
TWE excellent graph...perhaps add in a differences graph between the groups.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There has actually been quite a few managers respond as well. They are genuine because the responses or answers seem to reflect how I would think a middle level manager views their company.
Most are fairly favourable about the questions, particularly the pride for their organisation but clearly in some cases they reckon things could get better.
Most are fairly favourable about the questions, particularly the pride for their organisation but clearly in some cases they reckon things could get better.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
I am sure if the results get published the company will put some spin on it, such as - on a positive note although the figure is somewhat less than last survey, 10% of our employee's still think that the airline will do better in the next 12 months.
I wonder how much the company run survey cost in comparison to the ALAEA's.
(Sorry, I meant 3%!! a very ironic number!!!)
I wonder how much the company run survey cost in comparison to the ALAEA's.
(Sorry, I meant 3%!! a very ironic number!!!)
Last edited by Ngineer; 4th Jun 2012 at 05:59.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve, a serious question if I may.
Is there any program in place with this survey to prevent multiple attempts by the same URL to answer.
If not then Management will have a way out to say the results can/are corrupted by only a few disgruntled persons who have answered multiple times.
Is there any program in place with this survey to prevent multiple attempts by the same URL to answer.
If not then Management will have a way out to say the results can/are corrupted by only a few disgruntled persons who have answered multiple times.
Last edited by blow.n.gasket; 4th Jun 2012 at 07:12.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the news today of QF share price tanking & the profit downgrade.
Is the sample group large enough, credible enough to get it out to the media ASAP.
The survey was basically conducted prior to the profit downgrade.
Time to get the message out from the troops, we have the tanking share price to support our case to rid the Roo of these incompetents.
Is the sample group large enough, credible enough to get it out to the media ASAP.
The survey was basically conducted prior to the profit downgrade.
Time to get the message out from the troops, we have the tanking share price to support our case to rid the Roo of these incompetents.
Last edited by Mstr Caution; 5th Jun 2012 at 07:07.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You just never know what it may flush out. The big question would be - How much damage is being done to an airline by having a completely disengaged workforce?
How could you measure that damage?
How could you measure that damage?
Steve, I can't remember where I read it but there is an engagement figure below which staff are effectively actively working against a company's interests.
It would be interesting to find that figure and compare it to these results. The flight ops numbers, particularly amongst flight crew who control the company's biggest cost (fuel), were appalling.
It would be interesting to find that figure and compare it to these results. The flight ops numbers, particularly amongst flight crew who control the company's biggest cost (fuel), were appalling.