Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Aviation Survey Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th May 2012, 01:42
  #41 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did to their union but haven't heard back.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 22:36
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow Steve some of those results are an overwhelming indictment on the flying rat's current management. It would appear management are totally disengaged from their workforce...doesn't bode well for a human interface/service industry when your frontline staff feel aggrieved!


This is the most revealing statistic when you compare the two main players (groups) in the Oz market, normally you would expect one or two % points between the players and 10% in favour/against would be ringing alarm bells...political polls are a case in point..

Q40. Looking ahead to the next 12 months my company will

Qantas
Get Better - 3%
Stay the same - 6%
Get worse - 90%
No opinion - 1%

Qantaslink
Get Better - 16%
Stay the same - 33%
Get worse - 48%
No opinion - 3%

Jetstar
Get Better - 7%
Stay the same - 21%
Get worse - 68%
No opinion - 3%

Virgin Group
Get Better - 63%
Stay the same - 29%
Get worse - 8%
No opinion - 0%

....however a 54.34 % point (Get Better) difference between the groups is a terminal indicator, even allowing for the fact that your survey maybe only being completed by disgruntled frontline workers

How does it go again..."Happy wife, happy life!".....for Hospitality/Tourist industry..."Happy frontline staff, happy clients, happy management, happy shareholders!"

An ailing flying roo is a barometer in Oz for an ailing industry!

ps Steve have you thought about forwarding the results to Ben Sandilands?

Last edited by Sarcs; 31st May 2012 at 22:47.
Sarcs is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 23:35
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sector 7G
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

How is this. Colors can be changed.
TheWholeEnchilada is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 23:59
  #44 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the most revealing statistic when you compare the two main players (groups) in the Oz market, normally you would expect one or two % points between the players and 10% in favour/against would be ringing alarm bells...political polls are a case in point..
The split is quite large indeed.

The numbers of course are changing as more people submit and they are changing figures slightly based on factors such as the FAAA putting out an email. Obviously more Flight attendants answered on that day.

I'm not sure the "disgruntled employee" factor makes much difference. If it is assumed that "disgruntled employees" are more likely to be in a union or read Pprune or respond to a survey, would that not then be the case for all employers involved? By asking the same questions of all sample groups I think we at least will come up with very good cross comparison data.

The graphs I used were just the ones in Survey Monkey and as stated on other thread, they could be better. I may try upgrading the package or yes, someone smarter than I could do some better analysis and produce better graphs.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2012, 00:24
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Go west young man
Posts: 1,733
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure the "disgruntled employee" factor makes much difference. If it is assumed that "disgruntled employees" are more likely to be in a union or read Pprune or respond to a survey, would that not then be the case for all employers involved?
Steve I couldn't agree more, I was just putting fwd what the management stooges are likely to argue....

TWE excellent graph...perhaps add in a differences graph between the groups.
Sarcs is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2012, 00:29
  #46 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There has actually been quite a few managers respond as well. They are genuine because the responses or answers seem to reflect how I would think a middle level manager views their company.

Most are fairly favourable about the questions, particularly the pride for their organisation but clearly in some cases they reckon things could get better.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 05:58
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I am sure if the results get published the company will put some spin on it, such as - on a positive note although the figure is somewhat less than last survey, 10% of our employee's still think that the airline will do better in the next 12 months.

I wonder how much the company run survey cost in comparison to the ALAEA's.

(Sorry, I meant 3%!! a very ironic number!!!)

Last edited by Ngineer; 4th Jun 2012 at 05:59.
Ngineer is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 07:11
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steve, a serious question if I may.
Is there any program in place with this survey to prevent multiple attempts by the same URL to answer.
If not then Management will have a way out to say the results can/are corrupted by only a few disgruntled persons who have answered multiple times.

Last edited by blow.n.gasket; 4th Jun 2012 at 07:12.
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 07:30
  #49 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're just analyzing the data so far and preparing a report. Returns growing by the hour.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 08:33
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a report listing how many outstanding and unresolved issues there are with each company on the charts above.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 08:45
  #51 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We only have 20 pages for the report.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 09:00
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A PDF File would do.
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 07:06
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the news today of QF share price tanking & the profit downgrade.

Is the sample group large enough, credible enough to get it out to the media ASAP.

The survey was basically conducted prior to the profit downgrade.

Time to get the message out from the troops, we have the tanking share price to support our case to rid the Roo of these incompetents.

Last edited by Mstr Caution; 5th Jun 2012 at 07:07.
Mstr Caution is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 07:08
  #54 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We've got some professionals looking at the results so far. Presentation will come out in a couple of weeks.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 08:31
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Will things get worse? The QF staff had that one right.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 08:38
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christmas Island
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, seems the survey results have just been backed up as a true reflection of the state of affairs ,based on todays announcements.
hadagutfull is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 08:40
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is a nice little novelty but lets get real it will change nothing in the real world there are real issues to deal with.

Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 08:49
  #58 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You just never know what it may flush out. The big question would be - How much damage is being done to an airline by having a completely disengaged workforce?

How could you measure that damage?
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 09:17
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
Steve, I can't remember where I read it but there is an engagement figure below which staff are effectively actively working against a company's interests.

It would be interesting to find that figure and compare it to these results. The flight ops numbers, particularly amongst flight crew who control the company's biggest cost (fuel), were appalling.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 09:27
  #60 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anyone can find any interesting links to this stuff would be very handy.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.