Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QANTAS - WHERE TO NOW?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2012, 17:42
  #1461 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
Folks, from a management perspective, this is about power!.

The Board and senior management cannot stand the current reality that a " little person" an engineer, can stop the company from flying an A380 by refusing to sign a fcuking piece of paper saying it is airworthy. I know you don't do that, but the mere possibility that the narcissistic management is not totally omnipotent in this regard makes them howl, froth at the mouth, roll on the ground and chew the carpet. I cannot overemphasize this.

The aircraft is towed into a hangar, the tyres are pumped up, the oil and filter is changed, and then the thing had better come out and fly. They don't give a fcuk if there are dead apprentices stuck in the retracted flaps, make that fcuking thing fly and be quick about it! You are regarded unfortunately as a necessary evil, to be ignored, starved and minimized, you are the boiler room stokers in the good ship Qantas, never to be seen or heard - the modern day black gang.

Your previous union management tried to hide this from you - the kept appealing to your " professionalism", as did the company. Now that thanks to SP you have grown some balls, you get to see the company in all it's nastiness. They wish to exterminate you, not because they don't need someone to change the oil, but because they cannot stand the thought that the little man in overalls has any power at all.

Management would do the same to pilots too, if they could, but the general public flies with them, sees them and demands that they be autonomous and professional. However the general public don't see the black gang, except for the bloke in overalls doing something incomprehensible under the aircraft. The only way that would ever change, in my fantasy, was if the passengers had to board an aircraft through a long plastic tube that snaked through an overhaul facility so that they could see exactly what was involved in making that aircraft clear for take off.

Approach your dealings from this perspective. Nothing you can do will mollify management, you could even work for free and it would make no difference. They want unchallenged power and will stop at nothing to get it. That is why they are destroying you as a profession.

Last edited by Sunfish; 17th Nov 2012 at 17:47.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2012, 18:51
  #1462 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bexley
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know I would be hanged for suggesting this, but don't you all in bexley think its time to offer Qantas a new EBA in line with industry standards in pay, super and entitlements?

I would love to be on the higher end of the LAME scale with bolt on payments but we are pricing Qantas LAMEs out of the business. This is my suggestion to improving cost savings for the airline and possibly saving the lives and jobs of hundreds.

Hey your suggestion is absolutely worth making here so I can explain this. I think Sunfish did in a very brief comment but I will talk about history a bit.

Nothing you can do will mollify management, you could even work for free and it would make no difference. They want unchallenged power and will stop at nothing to get it.
For a start the Qantas LAME wage structure does provide higher wages for those at the top end. Down the bottom though and in the middle levels you are behind the other LAME employment rates. Virgin are at about $120k. A Qantas Line LAME would take at least 16 years to earn that amount. Even places like Alliance have comparable wages to Qantas. The Qantas wages are not the problem.

If you thought it was the overall price for HM I say no also. The 744 reconfig went out to tender. Haeko bid $195M, Avalon bid $200M. We were 2.5% dearer but by the time you fly the aircraft up there, guess what. Each year they kept setting Mel HM impossible performance targets so they could tell them they were too expensive. Each year the blokes met the targets. In the end they stopped setting targets because they just wanted to shut the place down for the reasons Sunfish describes.

If you think we as a union should try and work with the company I would suggest we don't. It has all been tried before. We had union leadership who were for many years a little more conservative (some will say a lot). During this period of co-operation Syd HM was closed.

Back to your original "take a hit now to save jobs" concept. Our friends across the big pond at American Airlines did this. They took a 30% wage cut not long ago. the company then deliberately declared chapter 11 (by ensuring they ordered and paid for far more aircraft than they need to make sure they lost money) and want further wage cuts. For management it is never enough.
ALAEA Fed Sec is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2012, 20:20
  #1463 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The REAL world
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF 94

Quote QF94
Whether you believe Im an old Jack or a current hypocrite is of no relevance
to me whatsoever and has no bearing on what I do or dont do. Just keep on babbling.

QF94 I dont babble, Ive only written 3 lines. Your the one that babbles, Ill leave that up to you, your doing a pretty good job at it. Do you do it on single rates.

It may not have any relevance to you, but it does to a lot of other people, hence the Jack terminology.

Quote... QF94... When the door hits us in the rear end.

Well it may be you first, perhaps the OT will keep you off the dole queue a little longer than most. What is going to happen is going to happen, there is a freight train heading engineerings way, we are stuck in a tunnel there is no escape, the only slim chance is to derail the train, how many more times have you got to be slapped in the face before we ALL say.. enough is enough...

94... Dont make this OT thing a slinging match, as Steve said, we are all in it together. Take a long hard think about 2008, what was the influencing factor regarding the outcome, we should be revisiting the past unofficially of course even FWA agreed. Thats one of the reasons they terminated the PIA this time.
engine overspeed is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2012, 21:49
  #1464 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I totally agree,management sets target to reduced employees not cost,Singapore becoming aviation hub,QF becoming redundancy hub

Upon the conduct of each depends the fate of all.
Bagus is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2012, 02:07
  #1465 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where are the sparkies . Dont know it s all a mates deal done on the quite
Jethro Gibbs is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2012, 05:16
  #1466 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: in the jungle
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who ever is suggesting all Syd QF LAMES to be pooled
all in one bucket - you can jam that up your ASS
I'LL FIGHT THAT TILL THE END!!!
F..K YOU ALL!!!!!
soldier of fortune is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2012, 05:43
  #1467 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I would like to know is when are the long haul pilots to be made redundant?

With jumbos flying domestically with 3 captains, B747's and B767's literally flying out the door, and over 500 engineering staff leaving, are there now too many pilots manning too few aircraft?

I'm not trying to be rude, but with so many long haul aircraft leaving, there must now be a massive oversupply of crew. Or are you all being kept on for the return of the JQ A330's?

As we all know, if these aircraft can fix themselves, surely they can fly themselves as well.
Long Bay Mauler is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2012, 07:22
  #1468 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DSS-46 (Canberra Region)
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Do you all eat your young?

I think this thread has run its course
Tidbinbilla is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.