Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

No AOC for Skyairworld, delay for Solomon Airlines

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

No AOC for Skyairworld, delay for Solomon Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th May 2007, 10:23
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you're both a couple of amateurs, and totally out of your depth!
amos2 is offline  
Old 16th May 2007, 10:25
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must congratulate you too as you have always had so much information about SAW you must have a top position there.

Pity the Eithad contract did not work out as SAW would have had a ready made crew for another Airbus Contract but hey SAW already has that don't they.
L1011 Nut is offline  
Old 16th May 2007, 22:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BigJet787... If you are closer to SAW than Strategic why are all your comments so negative against SAW and their management?
Cargo744 is offline  
Old 17th May 2007, 10:59
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: australia
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few personal conflicts seem to be appearing - best they are put aside and the thread concentrated upon.

It appears that the latest "proving flight" didn't go as well as people appear to believe. Maybe the diversion from Honiara without a current forecast for the alternate did little to impress the regulators. The contractor is not in a position to fulfil its contractual obligations, pure and simple, and the Solomons Airline passengers are the losers with ad-hoc charters being arranged to fill the void. Consequnces of baggage left behind, uncertain departure times, missed connections et-al hardly allows what was a reasonable operation to instill confidence in the travelling public.

Methinks the AOC is still more a dream than a short term reality.
witwiw is offline  
Old 17th May 2007, 11:10
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
???

so what now? sounds like there alot of people waiting for this to get off the ground !
Wingletts is offline  
Old 17th May 2007, 22:44
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by witwiw
It appears that the latest "proving flight" didn't go as well as people appear to believe. Maybe the diversion from Honiara without a current forecast for the alternate did little to impress the regulators. The contractor is not in a position to fulfil its contractual obligations, pure and simple, and the Solomons Airline passengers are the losers with ad-hoc charters being arranged to fill the void. Consequnces of baggage left behind, uncertain departure times, missed connections et-al hardly allows what was a reasonable operation to instill confidence in the travelling public.

Methinks the AOC is still more a dream than a short term reality.
Strange that, seeing as CASA told SAW after the flight that it was a "pass", the formal application debrief with CASA has been conducted, and they've been told the AOC will be forthcoming "within a few days."

And you wanted to take the "personal conflict" out of the thread???

Magoo
Magoodotcom is offline  
Old 17th May 2007, 22:45
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think you will find that CASA have 5 working days to sign off on the application after a successful proving flight... that would probably mean AOC issued in the next few days.
Cargo744 is offline  
Old 18th May 2007, 07:09
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cargo744
Think you will find that CASA have 5 working days to sign off on the application after a successful proving flight... that would probably mean AOC issued in the next few days.
AOC issued this afternoon!

Magoo
Magoodotcom is offline  
Old 18th May 2007, 07:19
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: www.e-jets.org
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
congratulations Skyairworld
P-air is offline  
Old 18th May 2007, 09:53
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A forgone conclusion...so why are we surprised?
amos2 is offline  
Old 18th May 2007, 22:09
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congrats to all the hard workers at SAW. Enjoy flying one of the nicest jets in Australian skies.

Its interesting to note that all the knockers seemed to disappeared for the time being. Perhaps they are regrouping to get on Airnorth, or Virgins case.
Dog One is offline  
Old 19th May 2007, 10:44
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,303
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Speaking of Virgin,

The EJ hype has gone very quiet?
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 19th May 2007, 20:33
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 116
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VB E-Jet courses start in Aug/Sept.
Break Right is offline  
Old 19th May 2007, 23:41
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All Over
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Before you pat yourself on the back and say how wonderful everything is, spare a thought for the pax who have been lied to and mucked around for almost two weeks now. Some waiting two days for a flight and having to report multiple times to the airport for another round of lies . As of today (Sunday) there is yet to be a revenue flight carried out by this aircraft. I'll believe it when i see it.
gn4p7 is offline  
Old 20th May 2007, 01:01
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 796
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
First flight was today
Going Nowhere is offline  
Old 20th May 2007, 02:12
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fantasyland
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Congratulations to all at SAW on the AOC.

Now lets hope you can sort out the 'regulatory probelms' with the Airbus jobs.

Cheers
DrunkenAir is offline  
Old 21st May 2007, 12:46
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DrunkenAir what do you mean by "Regulatory Problems" with the Airbus Jobs?

Are there "Regulatory Problems" because SAW doesn't have an Airbus Contract, or SAW is still trying very hard to pinch Airbus contracts from the 2 Australian Companies that hold Airbus Contracts?

Hey maybe SAW have "Regulatory Problems" with F100, F50, Boeing 737-200 and BAE 146 Jobs as well.
L1011 Nut is offline  
Old 22nd May 2007, 16:57
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pointy End
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well Done SAW!!

Well done to all the hardworking team in SAW for getting past the AOC hurdle. This sort of success can only be truly appreciated by those who have had any prolonged dealings with any regulatory aviation organisation anywhere in the world.
As the saying goes, the caravan keeps moving on while the dogs continue barking! So let the dogs bark....
You have an excellent aircraft, workable business plan and from the guys I have met, a great enthusiastic team. Looking forward to reading of more successes in the near future.
High 6 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2007, 07:52
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: new zealand
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ringbinder,
Some pretty harsh words against the Embraer. Particularly regarding a cabin that you've never flown in! Having flown and flown in both, I can tell you that the Embraer has the far more pleasant cabin. No middle seat, double bubble fuse for increased space at shoulder width, I'll take it any day thanks. Not sure where SAW get the 78 seats from though as I've only experienced 76 seat configuration. An extra two just doesn't make sense.

Phlaps 40

OK, I concede the point about extra shoulder width after the flight on Sunday, however it must be at the expense of the overhead locker size. A regulatory sized (international) carry-on bag finds it a bit of a squeeze unlike on the Spanish 737. Service much better than with the Spaniards (not hard to achieve) and I wasn't one of the passengers who had their checked-in bags (15 or so) left behind - and the flight wasn't exactly choc-a-bloc. What was the problem, lack of luggage space or lack of payload as the Embraer website suggested? If this is what regular travellers can expect then they will look to alternatives like OUR Airline (what sort of a name is that??) which also operates there. Big problem possibly is a lack of frequency which Solomon Airlines has all over them so they probably aren't really much of a threat.
ringbinder is offline  
Old 23rd May 2007, 08:14
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Ringbinder

You are obviously one of those pax that makes it a pleasure to fly freight

It should be obvious that the Islands are not the place to make money and any attempt to put aircraft that can make money is a good thing.
Dehavillanddriver is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.