Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

National Jet Systems - Recruiting.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

National Jet Systems - Recruiting.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2006, 09:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hawk777
It's the NEW pilots who accept this deal who are to blame. ........The people who take this sort of deal are the ones using jobs like this as a stepping stone to a bigger Airline.
Stepping stone? More like a mill stone. The deal I heard has a newbie sacrificing $5000 a year for 3 years from the already lowered wage plus a return of service bond for 3 years.
Bloody hard to step on those stones with that hanging around your neck!
ITCZ is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 10:22
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Age: 54
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who is to blame for the continued drop in pay and conditions? Who did the initial 717 contract? Are they still in the position? Why did they lose the AAE contract? Is the renewal going to be tighter? If so who else could do it and for how much?

NJS has always had top class pilots and it's a shame they are not respected as such. I doubt it's management as opposed to a lean mean industry that keeps pushing for more service while not giving anything back. People can blame the young mob coming through for taking conditions that are worse than theirs but what else can they do?
Whiskey Oscar Golf is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 10:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
ITCZ,
If you consider it a blessing to work under ex military pilot managers then you ain't been in NJS. This company is not what it was 8 years ago when KD and his WONDERFUL crew were running things.
illusion is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 10:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RENURPP. on both posts.
captain_cranky is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 10:57
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by illusion
If you consider it a blessing to work under ex military pilot managers then you ain't been in NJS.
Thankyou illusion for providing me with an example of how a Ppruner's mindset distorts what I am trying to say. I did not say a thing about management.

I said that NJS have always been able to recruit pilots with a lot of experience, quite often previous jet and RPT experience. They often picked up a lot of gold that had been discarded or overlooked by bigger companies with cumbersome recruitment processes. I think they are about to make themselves less competitive when it comes to attracting those sort of people in the future.
ITCZ is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 11:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: flyville
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point ITCZ and some of the other posts made on this thread are all quite valid. I doubt if any one disagrees that the proposed "B" scale for NJS is a further reduction in conditions or that job.

Whats even sadder is, whilst $ 60k a year for right seat of a 146 or B717 is crap, even for a new start. $57K for a Braz Captain or $ 37K for a braz F/O and do most of your own Baggage handling, refuelling, check-inn etc is even more crap. That is why the problem is self perpetuating with out leaving Australia. The NJS offer will still be attractive to some.
R.Cruizo is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 12:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apprentices

There will be hundreds knocking on their door. Mostly apprentices.
bushy is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 15:32
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Darwin
Age: 57
Posts: 17
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But Wait,there's more!!Not only do flight crew & cabin crew have to pay for their training,now engineers are expected to as well.Any LAME joining will have to salary sacrifice 50% of the type course and also be bonded for 100% of all costs incl travel & accom for a period of years.It is a take it or leave it offer with the threat of 400+ redundancies if rejected!!Of course the sherriff of Nottageham has offered to take a 2% paycut as well but he doesn't know what his pay is yet.Over the last 2 years the good staff have been leaving in droves apart from the puppets who dance to the new tune.This drive is all about flogging the lower end whilst achieving a set profit margin and fixing a nice lil bonus for the top end& it SUX!!OZ
OZFURYFAN is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 20:58
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: YBBN
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sherriff of Nottageham has offered to take a 2% paycut
um, I thought he was capping his rise at 2%, similar to what he has asked all the staff and managers to take.

Capping at 2% doesn't equal a 2% paycut.

I think it was said earlier, all new staff will be offered lower pay scales and bonding, right across all 4 business groups for endorsement/licence courses - this includes engineers, F/A's and observers, not just pilots it would be a first I believe?

It is all about preservation of the company as an entire going concern as some parts of the group are being overshadowed by others reference revenue earning. It doesn't particularly help when major clients are turning the screws and flexing their muscles either. Kind of holds the company to ransom. Reduce costs or not re-sign.

Sux really.
Whitney is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 23:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ???
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the "sherriff" only takes a pay rise of 2% for 2007. What about the next 4 years after that like the rest of the employees???
When are they going to stop taking? There comes a point where you all have to say NO! Who cares if it is supposedly for new employees only? It is setting the scene for the rest of the industry. When your AWA is up next what's to say that they're not just going to put you all on the same conditions as the new starts? It's time to stop thinking of now, and instead, thinking ahead for the future.
Cart_tart is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 23:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Age: 54
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking about the current NJS situation last night and had a few thoughts, always a dangerous thing when you're not that smart.

If I was a large airline expanding into a low cost carrier offshoot. How could I reduce pay and conditions for staff? One way would be to get the industry used to those conditions by tendering contracts that had slim profit margins, causing the sub contracter to implement reduced conditions in order to survive and make money. That way I would be a more appealing option when it came time for me to expand domestically, that is after I had finished my international expansion.No one would blame me and I could point to industry standards. All the while making record profits and telling everyone to tighten their belts.

A smart man once told me if you have a choice between a conspiracy and stupidity, run with stupidity. Pity I'm dumb huh.

We could blame the newbie pilots for this, the union, or the federal government, we could even blame the consumer for wanting cheap air travel but how do we fix it?

Last edited by Whiskey Oscar Golf; 8th Dec 2006 at 23:42. Reason: stupidity
Whiskey Oscar Golf is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2006, 23:38
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,103
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
If you don't like a new AWA you can choose not to sign it in which case you remain on the old one.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2006, 00:30
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I think you're all wrong............nah, not really. Some very well thought out informative posts, I even have to agree with most of bloggsies stuff, which is a bit scary

I'd like to add something though.
I reckon Qf are just after the 717s being operated as efficiently as they were previously, and without computerised flight planning and RVSM just to name a couple of things, this is obviously not happening, and most of the blame lays fairly and squarely with BS castle ( CIA ).

Of course, the path of least resistance, as usual, is the employees.
So you guys pay for crap management
cunninglinguist is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2006, 00:52
  #34 (permalink)  
Whispering "T" Jet
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne.
Age: 68
Posts: 655
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you don't like a new AWA you can choose not to sign it in which case you remain on the old one.
Until the Company have the "old one" cancelled by the Office of the Employment Advocate. Then you revert to the G.A. Pilot's Award 1999.
3 Holer is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2006, 12:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: airside
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Johnny Howards "Work-for-the-Dole/ WorkChoices" in action.
max autobrakes is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2006, 22:03
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3, a couple of blokes have tried that theory out already, the outcome ( in the IRC ) was that they go back to the AWA they where originally on. They where both 71 effos, threatened with returning to the 146 and D8 respectively.
I believe one of them has seen the light and voted with his feet.

Therefore theoretically, the ones that signed the original 71 AWA, should stay on that.
cunninglinguist is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 07:48
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A$125 000 for a 717 Captain I'm an F/O on similar equipment overseas and earn about 8% less before tax. After the NJS skipper has been milked by the ATO I come out well ahead, after only six months on type.

Time to start looking at the contracts on offer overseas, show you are determined to get paid what you're worth even if it means a move. The financial penalty of living and working in Oz has become too great to justify the lifestyle.

While there are so many pilots who will put up with such poor conditions just to stay home things will never improve.
Metro man is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 08:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Well thats good. We look forward to you not applying for a job back in Aus.

you obiously wouldn't like Alliance 104K or OZjet 130K or Virgin E190 127K.

The less of you who want our jobs living in this good, used to be great country the better off we are.
Market forces.
RENURPP is online now  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 09:08
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah, it's a difficult decision.

Stay where I am clearing A$100 000/ year flying brand new aircraft with upgrade and a 50% payrise in another year or two.

Come back to Oz, to the right hand seat, A$70 000/year before tax. IF I can get a job.

Sometimes the grass really is greener on the other side.

Only worth flying in Oz now if you're a QF mainline Captain, and for how much longer with Dixons plans ?
Metro man is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2006, 09:09
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,103
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by 3 Holer
Until the Company have the "old one" cancelled by the Office of the Employment Advocate. Then you revert to the G.A. Pilot's Award 1999.
There's a bit involved in getting an old AWA canceled I believe. Enough time to go get another job anyway. In our company we have a group of employees on an old AWA, company doesn't seem to care.
AerocatS2A is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.