Racing to the bottom.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of these so-called "leaders" have no true background in actual airline operations, and little interest in real aviation,
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's everyone gripping about?
This is happening in every other western country and now oz, only it's about 3 years late. Southwest started the fare war in the US, Easyjet and Ryan in Europe, JetsGo in Canada and now VirginBlue in Australia. Yeah conditions have gone down the gurgler but I don't think anyone is flying for 19K like they are here in the US.
Don't worry, it's gonna get a lot worse.
This is happening in every other western country and now oz, only it's about 3 years late. Southwest started the fare war in the US, Easyjet and Ryan in Europe, JetsGo in Canada and now VirginBlue in Australia. Yeah conditions have gone down the gurgler but I don't think anyone is flying for 19K like they are here in the US.
Don't worry, it's gonna get a lot worse.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: oz
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just like to throw this into the mix.
Doctors, lawyers, accountants etc. all have the potential to earn big $$$$ with extra study and a bit of hard yakka the earning potential is almost endless ie; lawyer to judge.
The figures that have been bandied around for interns, first year lawyers etc should not be compared to the pay of an airline pilot which is pretty well as far as we can go, it is more comparable to a GA pilot who, if he is real lucky, might get 40k a year for living in the middle of nowhere.
As airline pilots, we are ( arguably ) at the pinnacle of our profession, the only way up is into management.
So those of you who compare us to lawyers, doctors etc, compare our income to those that are at the top of their profession, I think you'll find it's not quite as favourable as you would like to think
Doctors, lawyers, accountants etc. all have the potential to earn big $$$$ with extra study and a bit of hard yakka the earning potential is almost endless ie; lawyer to judge.
The figures that have been bandied around for interns, first year lawyers etc should not be compared to the pay of an airline pilot which is pretty well as far as we can go, it is more comparable to a GA pilot who, if he is real lucky, might get 40k a year for living in the middle of nowhere.
As airline pilots, we are ( arguably ) at the pinnacle of our profession, the only way up is into management.
So those of you who compare us to lawyers, doctors etc, compare our income to those that are at the top of their profession, I think you'll find it's not quite as favourable as you would like to think
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the award.......
Captain-Fokker 28/CRJ-50 $89715
First Officer-Fokker 28/CRJ-50 $57518
Captain-BAe-146 / Fokker- 100 / Boeing- 717 $97600
First Officer-BAe-146 / Fokker- 100 / Boeing- 717 $62488
Captain-Boeing 737 / Boeing 727 $102600
First Officer-Boeing 737 / Boeing 727 $65600
Base salaries only.
Maybe the award is wrong ?
First Officer-Fokker 28/CRJ-50 $57518
Captain-BAe-146 / Fokker- 100 / Boeing- 717 $97600
First Officer-BAe-146 / Fokker- 100 / Boeing- 717 $62488
Captain-Boeing 737 / Boeing 727 $102600
First Officer-Boeing 737 / Boeing 727 $65600
Base salaries only.
Maybe the award is wrong ?
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: House
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Because they are always the ones who will gladly do anything to secure someone else's job.
They have always been, and will continue to be, their own worst enemies.
Those of you with any sense of intellect had better start looking for other skills and qualifications, because this job won't be worth having in a few years. Then when the lower gene pool takes over, and things start to go wrong, maybe the salaries will rise. Then again, they do build aeroplanes pretty crash proof these days, don't they?
They have always been, and will continue to be, their own worst enemies.
Those of you with any sense of intellect had better start looking for other skills and qualifications, because this job won't be worth having in a few years. Then when the lower gene pool takes over, and things start to go wrong, maybe the salaries will rise. Then again, they do build aeroplanes pretty crash proof these days, don't they?
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This topic of wages versus study versus responsibility versus lawyers versus doctors has been thrashed to death so many times that it's just not worth worrying about anymore. Time to move on isn't it?
But for my two cents - $230,000 a year is simply way too much to pay some slob to poke about Australia in the front of a jet. The job just isn't worth that sort of money. Regardless of how many "split second live saving" decisions that they think they make each year. This is all fantasy stuff, too many war comics in the flight bag methinks.
Besides, if they were making that many life saving decisons then they should be sacked for getting themselves into that situation anyway.
Secondly, argue as you do about the difference between $100 grand and $180 grand a year but the fact is that most of you wouldn't know what to do with that sort of money even if you were earning it so stop getting all heated about it.
Gin.
But for my two cents - $230,000 a year is simply way too much to pay some slob to poke about Australia in the front of a jet. The job just isn't worth that sort of money. Regardless of how many "split second live saving" decisions that they think they make each year. This is all fantasy stuff, too many war comics in the flight bag methinks.
Besides, if they were making that many life saving decisons then they should be sacked for getting themselves into that situation anyway.
Secondly, argue as you do about the difference between $100 grand and $180 grand a year but the fact is that most of you wouldn't know what to do with that sort of money even if you were earning it so stop getting all heated about it.
Gin.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GJ
It is not all about the decisions that these pilots have to make, I am sure this sort of money takes to account a compensatory factor of being away from home alot. Sure these people make the decision to be airline pilots, but surely they need to be compensated properly considering not only their skill, hard work, but the impact it has on their private lives. They miss a fair bit of their kids growing up.
It is not all about the decisions that these pilots have to make, I am sure this sort of money takes to account a compensatory factor of being away from home alot. Sure these people make the decision to be airline pilots, but surely they need to be compensated properly considering not only their skill, hard work, but the impact it has on their private lives. They miss a fair bit of their kids growing up.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you have to realise the way the labour system works in capitalism. People pay the LOWEST amount they need to , to get the numbers of workers they require to make maximum profit.
If companies are short on pilots , they have to pay more -- up until the cost means that hiring another pilot doesn't help profit.
I don't think it is fair for people to throw mud at people for accepting less in pay&conditions (in substitute for losing their job). Basically what people are saying is "You take a hit for the team, and lose your job so that my pay won't decline".
Everyone has to make a living . If you can't accept the pay , don't accept it and find another job. It doesn't matter what you think you should be getting paid , unfortunately it only matters what people are going to pay you. Just look at the difference in pay between someone working on a cure for cancer, and someone who plays golf professionally.
Nothing will ever change. A stronger union may get hirer wages, but the net result would be fewer pilots.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love more money -- but ...
That's just the way it is.
If companies are short on pilots , they have to pay more -- up until the cost means that hiring another pilot doesn't help profit.
I don't think it is fair for people to throw mud at people for accepting less in pay&conditions (in substitute for losing their job). Basically what people are saying is "You take a hit for the team, and lose your job so that my pay won't decline".
Everyone has to make a living . If you can't accept the pay , don't accept it and find another job. It doesn't matter what you think you should be getting paid , unfortunately it only matters what people are going to pay you. Just look at the difference in pay between someone working on a cure for cancer, and someone who plays golf professionally.
Nothing will ever change. A stronger union may get hirer wages, but the net result would be fewer pilots.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love more money -- but ...
That's just the way it is.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jeez............here we go again.....Ginjockey, apart from showing your mentality level...(about on par with a rock)..in the choice of nickname, I have to take my hat off to your windup attempt, well done my lad!!!
The choice is simple...continue as is and earn what an interstate truck driver earns...or....unionise in a cohesive fashion and bring the airline industry to its knees. Until that happens, condiitons will go from bad to worse.
The rest of this subject has been done to death......Woomera, please give this almost dead horse a final belt!!!!!!
The choice is simple...continue as is and earn what an interstate truck driver earns...or....unionise in a cohesive fashion and bring the airline industry to its knees. Until that happens, condiitons will go from bad to worse.
The rest of this subject has been done to death......Woomera, please give this almost dead horse a final belt!!!!!!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah yeah attack ginjockey over his abstact online name and the fact he has an opinion different to yours. Attack him because his opinion goes against the common flow of cry baby muck that some of you "underpaid" sooks spew out. All done with....? Great.
What I'm saying to you is that if our particular skills were worth $250K a year to a company we would be getting it. They are not!
Personally, I make under 90 grand a year and I am pretty happy with that. Paying the mortgage, half decent car, a few toys, enough for a night out when it suits me. I don't need to make $300 grand a year to have a choice life so I don't dwell on the fact that someone is getting it somewhere else. Good on 'em, get a good accountant is my only advice.
I'm bloody happy with what I can do with my present cash and I'm not going to die in a ditch bleating for another fifty grand a year that I can happily live without.
If you blokes all NEED to make $200K a year then your problems go way beyond simple employment conditions.
I get paid fairly for what I am expected to produce, it's not hard work and most importantly...... I ENJOY IT.
I tell you what. If you feel so strongly about it then back yourself, walk in, ask for a payrise and put your indefensible case to the boss. Let me know how you go with it.
What I'm saying to you is that if our particular skills were worth $250K a year to a company we would be getting it. They are not!
Personally, I make under 90 grand a year and I am pretty happy with that. Paying the mortgage, half decent car, a few toys, enough for a night out when it suits me. I don't need to make $300 grand a year to have a choice life so I don't dwell on the fact that someone is getting it somewhere else. Good on 'em, get a good accountant is my only advice.
I'm bloody happy with what I can do with my present cash and I'm not going to die in a ditch bleating for another fifty grand a year that I can happily live without.
If you blokes all NEED to make $200K a year then your problems go way beyond simple employment conditions.
I get paid fairly for what I am expected to produce, it's not hard work and most importantly...... I ENJOY IT.
I tell you what. If you feel so strongly about it then back yourself, walk in, ask for a payrise and put your indefensible case to the boss. Let me know how you go with it.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Southern Sun
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah! Unity?
Maybe this should have been said here?
Perhaps a few people should review. refresh & learn the history of pilot/ management relationships starting back to the 1930s. (not just here, read the excellent books & articles from ALPA)
And don't forget to pause for a thorough reading of Eastern Airlines, Continental, Pan Am, TWA, etc. with reference to the management practices taught in the `Frank Lorenzo School of Airline Management' where Strong & Dixon graduated with distinction. (Ansett management after Abeles failed miserably except those who went to QF)(Did I here someone mention an aged small paddock?)
Those who call for a strong, unified union need a monumental reality check as a union is only as stong as its memebers and their unity.
A union with weak members, a union without a united sense of direction, a union which within it has members who have demonstrated they care liitlle for their fellow man forming a cancer within, is doomed to failure.
Management recognising and understanding these weaknesses can, and will, exploit them ruthlessly.
It is little use whinging and whining about it if you are not prepared to pay.
Losers whine about the past and what could be, winners go home and fcuk the Prom Queen!
Perhaps a few people should review. refresh & learn the history of pilot/ management relationships starting back to the 1930s. (not just here, read the excellent books & articles from ALPA)
And don't forget to pause for a thorough reading of Eastern Airlines, Continental, Pan Am, TWA, etc. with reference to the management practices taught in the `Frank Lorenzo School of Airline Management' where Strong & Dixon graduated with distinction. (Ansett management after Abeles failed miserably except those who went to QF)(Did I here someone mention an aged small paddock?)
Those who call for a strong, unified union need a monumental reality check as a union is only as stong as its memebers and their unity.
A union with weak members, a union without a united sense of direction, a union which within it has members who have demonstrated they care liitlle for their fellow man forming a cancer within, is doomed to failure.
Management recognising and understanding these weaknesses can, and will, exploit them ruthlessly.
It is little use whinging and whining about it if you are not prepared to pay.
Losers whine about the past and what could be, winners go home and fcuk the Prom Queen!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hi Ginjocky!!
I like your post. I think you should post more often. When I read it, I realize that that you are dumber than me. This realization fills me with joy as it is further proof that I posess an intellect that places me in the top 3% of the world's population and that you are somewhere down below. It further enhances my ego that I disagree with you.
Let me put this succinctly, so that even you can understand; Your intellectual capacity is that of a slightly trained simian who has mastered the use of a keyboard, nothing more.
Because you have made it so crystal clear that you have failed to comprehend the issue, a B747-400 Captain sits on about $1,000,000,000 of liability, assuming a total hull loss with all lives on board. If you do not a pay a salary that is commensurate with the responsibility, then you will get a dummy who might f$#$%^ up at the moment of truth and then cost the community really big, BIG bucks. Smart people will cost money.
You are happy on less than $90, 000. PA.
Need I say more?
I like your post. I think you should post more often. When I read it, I realize that that you are dumber than me. This realization fills me with joy as it is further proof that I posess an intellect that places me in the top 3% of the world's population and that you are somewhere down below. It further enhances my ego that I disagree with you.
Let me put this succinctly, so that even you can understand; Your intellectual capacity is that of a slightly trained simian who has mastered the use of a keyboard, nothing more.
Because you have made it so crystal clear that you have failed to comprehend the issue, a B747-400 Captain sits on about $1,000,000,000 of liability, assuming a total hull loss with all lives on board. If you do not a pay a salary that is commensurate with the responsibility, then you will get a dummy who might f$#$%^ up at the moment of truth and then cost the community really big, BIG bucks. Smart people will cost money.
You are happy on less than $90, 000. PA.
Need I say more?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zer Gut Ya?
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A good post, Ralph, but I doubt that he will have understood it.
And it seems that Dark Knight is WK, the DCP of Qantas in disguise. Out for some more tyranny in management are we DK?
And it seems that Dark Knight is WK, the DCP of Qantas in disguise. Out for some more tyranny in management are we DK?
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back again.
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It might be an idea to take on and change Federal legislation first. Changes made there had far more effect in significantly reducing the bargaining power of unions. Ho hum...
ash_d at the risk of getting bagged for asking a really stoopid question - Do shipping companies have simulators or is it all hands-on?
ash_d at the risk of getting bagged for asking a really stoopid question - Do shipping companies have simulators or is it all hands-on?
Last edited by Lodown; 17th Feb 2005 at 18:53.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Southern Sun
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
schnauzer missed the point completely.
History shows Qantas management has been screwing their staff for ages having one of the worst industrial relations records of any airline.
There has only been one occasion, to my recollection, where the QF pilots had the intestinal fortitude to take any serious action to further & protect their profession.
Pilots in this country once had a professional union which was as strong as the members within it and did very, very well protecting and furthering pilots salary & conditiions; a union is only as strong as its members and unity of those members.
The QF pilots were first to leave for their own perceived selfish reasons & when the whatsit really hit the fan sat by on the sidelines blinded by the observations`it will not happen to us.'
And where is the industry now?
QF salaries & conditions always under serious attack; Aust airlines - lower pay & conditions, Jet* - we will fly for less and on QF mainland routes (would never happen?); and now, wherever the 717 is going we will fly it for less again? For the Ansett integration squabbles insert any airline within the QF group. One only has to read PPRune to observe tha answers.
I have no truck with airline management particularly QF; I ws only stating the bleeding obvious, airline management have the pilots measure, know the weaknesses within particularly the cancer within they created. They have the big stick and are using it very, very successfully.
It is of little use calling for a strong union if you are not prepared to stand up and be counted as one.
Reading the history mentioned illustrates pilots overall have failed to learn the lessons of the past.
The same old arguments about what a Dr. lawyer, tinker, taylor, sailor, crane, train or bus driver are worth have all been done to death before, prove nothing except detracting people from the main point to irrelevant drivel.
You are worth what you and your profession think you are worth and what you are prepred to stand up for and negotiate.
QF management obviously thingk you are worth peanuts and works assiduously towards reluctantly paying you this.
If you think you are worth more, then as ONE you have to stand up, stay standing up and say this is what you WILL pay us for our services! No IFS, no Buts!
Until such time as this happens most of what I am reading is whining which is distracting me from fcuking the prom queen.
DK
PS>> apologies to the guys from Braniff where, if memory serves me correctly, this is where modern airline management, pilot relationships all started. (was Braniff or Continental Lorenzo's originating port?)
History shows Qantas management has been screwing their staff for ages having one of the worst industrial relations records of any airline.
There has only been one occasion, to my recollection, where the QF pilots had the intestinal fortitude to take any serious action to further & protect their profession.
Pilots in this country once had a professional union which was as strong as the members within it and did very, very well protecting and furthering pilots salary & conditiions; a union is only as strong as its members and unity of those members.
The QF pilots were first to leave for their own perceived selfish reasons & when the whatsit really hit the fan sat by on the sidelines blinded by the observations`it will not happen to us.'
And where is the industry now?
QF salaries & conditions always under serious attack; Aust airlines - lower pay & conditions, Jet* - we will fly for less and on QF mainland routes (would never happen?); and now, wherever the 717 is going we will fly it for less again? For the Ansett integration squabbles insert any airline within the QF group. One only has to read PPRune to observe tha answers.
I have no truck with airline management particularly QF; I ws only stating the bleeding obvious, airline management have the pilots measure, know the weaknesses within particularly the cancer within they created. They have the big stick and are using it very, very successfully.
It is of little use calling for a strong union if you are not prepared to stand up and be counted as one.
Reading the history mentioned illustrates pilots overall have failed to learn the lessons of the past.
The same old arguments about what a Dr. lawyer, tinker, taylor, sailor, crane, train or bus driver are worth have all been done to death before, prove nothing except detracting people from the main point to irrelevant drivel.
You are worth what you and your profession think you are worth and what you are prepred to stand up for and negotiate.
QF management obviously thingk you are worth peanuts and works assiduously towards reluctantly paying you this.
If you think you are worth more, then as ONE you have to stand up, stay standing up and say this is what you WILL pay us for our services! No IFS, no Buts!
Until such time as this happens most of what I am reading is whining which is distracting me from fcuking the prom queen.
DK
PS>> apologies to the guys from Braniff where, if memory serves me correctly, this is where modern airline management, pilot relationships all started. (was Braniff or Continental Lorenzo's originating port?)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ralph, Here's your news flash......
*** If our piloting skills WERE as valuable as you imagine, we WOULD be getting paid accordingly. ****
Maybe cut back on the old bong a bit.
And what's with all the insults anyway?? Rushing in making personal attacks over a difference of opinion. Not an attractive quality. Try and keep it sensible or just sit quietly while the grown- ups talk OK.
*** If our piloting skills WERE as valuable as you imagine, we WOULD be getting paid accordingly. ****
Maybe cut back on the old bong a bit.
And what's with all the insults anyway?? Rushing in making personal attacks over a difference of opinion. Not an attractive quality. Try and keep it sensible or just sit quietly while the grown- ups talk OK.