Kids controlling at JFK
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@those who support kid speaking over the frequency > consider this > would you allow your kid to operate 10 ton truck if you were truck driver, or would you allow your kid to "have a taste of your job" if you were a male/female prostitute?
non-authorised personnel is not allowed to "work" in safety critical workplaces. Comparing ATCO trainee with 7 year-old child is immature. I hate to say this, but if the ATCO in question was realy sacked, it was with reason. Once we allow the safety standards to sink, we **** in our bowl. sorry.
non-authorised personnel is not allowed to "work" in safety critical workplaces. Comparing ATCO trainee with 7 year-old child is immature. I hate to say this, but if the ATCO in question was realy sacked, it was with reason. Once we allow the safety standards to sink, we **** in our bowl. sorry.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Age: 61
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many parents have had their kids say something on the radio at least once in the ATC business. How many, I don't know, but more than this one.
In my FAA ATC days, I was working at a facility where a fellow employee let his daughter talk on the radio in a tower. I was the union (NATCA) representative, and met with the manager who proposed a 3 day suspension.
I got it down to 1 day. Seemed like a good outcome.
But, like pilots overflying airports, that has happened many times before. But when two very unlucky Northwest pilots did it last year, they were not only fired, but their professional pilot licenses were revoked (not just suspended).
In my FAA ATC days, I was working at a facility where a fellow employee let his daughter talk on the radio in a tower. I was the union (NATCA) representative, and met with the manager who proposed a 3 day suspension.
I got it down to 1 day. Seemed like a good outcome.
But, like pilots overflying airports, that has happened many times before. But when two very unlucky Northwest pilots did it last year, they were not only fired, but their professional pilot licenses were revoked (not just suspended).
The Reverend
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
kontrolor;
With all due respect, I feel you could have chosen a more suitable example to shore up your views on this incident.
would you allow your kid to operate 10 ton truck if you were truck driver, or would you allow your kid to "have a taste of your job" if you were a male/female prostitute?
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
kontrolor, please. What this controller did was akin to letting a youngster operate the on/off button of the radio in a truck cab (so what?) and since when did prostitution constitute a valid profession in most of the civilised world?
And I would fire any controller who fell asleep at an operational position, Tony. Completely different scenario.
Again, as a trainer, I have been left high and dry by trainees who have supposedly earned the right to broadcast and have had to use all my skills to dig myself out of unsavoury situations. This controller did not let matters fall into a state of chaos; he WAS in control, albeit doing a bit of "remote" controlling.
And I would fire any controller who fell asleep at an operational position, Tony. Completely different scenario.
Again, as a trainer, I have been left high and dry by trainees who have supposedly earned the right to broadcast and have had to use all my skills to dig myself out of unsavoury situations. This controller did not let matters fall into a state of chaos; he WAS in control, albeit doing a bit of "remote" controlling.
With all due respect,...
the pilots were informed by the controller of the situation AND it was obvious by the back transmissions made by Dad wrt to ATIS info,...I'm a good pilot, who like told, read the pilot controller glossary the AIM,...yes I exit the active unless instructed......no pilot would accept a clearance with out consideration,...cleared for TO to me is not just a read back.... it's a whole long detailed procedure,...and lights, camera action,....and I even read the AFD so that I'm advised of arpt procedures and don't make unnecessary RT,...operation rain check complete
PA
the pilots were informed by the controller of the situation AND it was obvious by the back transmissions made by Dad wrt to ATIS info,...I'm a good pilot, who like told, read the pilot controller glossary the AIM,...yes I exit the active unless instructed......no pilot would accept a clearance with out consideration,...cleared for TO to me is not just a read back.... it's a whole long detailed procedure,...and lights, camera action,....and I even read the AFD so that I'm advised of arpt procedures and don't make unnecessary RT,...operation rain check complete
PA
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: WMKK/KUL
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Guys,
Wrote more here DISQUS Profile | Johan Farid Khairuddin ; but in summary -
I understand and respect everyone's thoughts, comments & concern especially re: aviation safety in this #kidcontroller case.
Personally, I do believe that the FAA and all other air transport governing bodies around the world are doing an excellent job to regulate amongst the many other points of course -- aviation safety.
Hence I do believe this should be made an example of, so that a possible negative escalation of such an act (bringing a kid to work) which WOULD begin to jeopardize safety -- be now prevented from ever happening.
I'd like to think that some day from now, when say someone/somewhere/somehow would believe that "its safe to do something somewhat harmless", they would remember this "dad and the kid controller at JFK" story, and refrain from doing anything stupid which could involve threatening safety.
I believe there are many other loop hopes in the industry which have yet to be discovered or in the media's thoughts "exploited" which would have a more devastating effect. You (and I even) could possibly not even know it yet!
For air safety worldwide, primarily at JFK too, my prayers are for the dad to get his job back and to continue directing air traffic as he is undoubtedly one of the rare few who are skilled, competent & patient enough to deal with the 6th busiest airport in the United States.
God bless.
JFK
Wrote more here DISQUS Profile | Johan Farid Khairuddin ; but in summary -
I understand and respect everyone's thoughts, comments & concern especially re: aviation safety in this #kidcontroller case.
Personally, I do believe that the FAA and all other air transport governing bodies around the world are doing an excellent job to regulate amongst the many other points of course -- aviation safety.
Hence I do believe this should be made an example of, so that a possible negative escalation of such an act (bringing a kid to work) which WOULD begin to jeopardize safety -- be now prevented from ever happening.
I'd like to think that some day from now, when say someone/somewhere/somehow would believe that "its safe to do something somewhat harmless", they would remember this "dad and the kid controller at JFK" story, and refrain from doing anything stupid which could involve threatening safety.
I believe there are many other loop hopes in the industry which have yet to be discovered or in the media's thoughts "exploited" which would have a more devastating effect. You (and I even) could possibly not even know it yet!
For air safety worldwide, primarily at JFK too, my prayers are for the dad to get his job back and to continue directing air traffic as he is undoubtedly one of the rare few who are skilled, competent & patient enough to deal with the 6th busiest airport in the United States.
God bless.
JFK
More than just an ATCO
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it was not the best idea in the world. However it could have been dealt with quietly internally. It looks like these two people are being hung out to dry for a minor bad judgement call. This was not as serious as an Airprox, IMO, and, having seen nothing beyond brief press releases, I even wonder if the full story has been made known? I can recall something similar being done in the dim pre Elf and Safety days but pilots were advised on the previous freq. that it would happen. Who can state at the moment that this did not happen? If anybody had an objection then would have been the time to state it.
Where will the lines now be drawn? God forbid CC should ever make an R/T call again without receiving instructions to land at the nearest airfield, possibly with several f16s or similar in attendance.
Why only suspend the father and the Supervisor? Why not everybody in the TWR, as by not speaking up, they have condoned the action. Presumeably the child (singular, I believe, despite the leader here) had a permit to enter a Federal building. Who issued that? He/she has also made a bad call. Where does the buck stop? Obama? (I'm surprised nobody has blamed him yet)
A rap on their knuckles, a couple of days off to think about things and then back to normal. Time to bury this - as already stated it isn't the aviation story of the year.
Where will the lines now be drawn? God forbid CC should ever make an R/T call again without receiving instructions to land at the nearest airfield, possibly with several f16s or similar in attendance.
Why only suspend the father and the Supervisor? Why not everybody in the TWR, as by not speaking up, they have condoned the action. Presumeably the child (singular, I believe, despite the leader here) had a permit to enter a Federal building. Who issued that? He/she has also made a bad call. Where does the buck stop? Obama? (I'm surprised nobody has blamed him yet)
A rap on their knuckles, a couple of days off to think about things and then back to normal. Time to bury this - as already stated it isn't the aviation story of the year.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somwhere between 6 and 15 feet below ground level
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ditchdigger
Tell the Mrs. to ask those controllers that were around before your wife & see if anyone has a copy of the old MBI or bulletin that encouraged & allowed the controllers to exchange brief pleasantries with our customers, the flying public. I had a copy until August '09, when I downsized & purged unnecessary papers. It was never rescinded that I know of & had no expiration date. It's encouraged when time permit, but not mandatory. Used to love to show that to anyone following an "over-the-shoulder" or "tape talk review".
Tell the Mrs. to ask those controllers that were around before your wife & see if anyone has a copy of the old MBI or bulletin that encouraged & allowed the controllers to exchange brief pleasantries with our customers, the flying public. I had a copy until August '09, when I downsized & purged unnecessary papers. It was never rescinded that I know of & had no expiration date. It's encouraged when time permit, but not mandatory. Used to love to show that to anyone following an "over-the-shoulder" or "tape talk review".
@those who support kid speaking over the frequency > consider this > would you allow your kid to operate 10 ton truck if you were truck driver,
To those who think this was safety issue, or an example of lack of professionalism, I pose the following question--any given human endeavor contains elements of risk, and success or failure depends on how those risks are managed. Professionals, by virtue of their training, experience, and good judgement are given the responsibility of managing relatively great degrees of risk. Can anyone enumerate the risks involved here, and specify how the controller failed to manage those risks?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Landvetter, Sweden
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kid at JFK
It could seem harmless that a kid issues a take-off clearance or tells a pilot to switch to departure frequency BUT this has to do with licenses and training and even more with confidence in ATC from the pilot side.
It's true that there are trainees who are working the frequencies but they have been through intensive training in ATC academies before being allowed into position together with an instructor.
So, boring as it may be, this is far from OK. Anyone who lets an untrained person work the frequency is not the responsible person who should be in this type of profession.
It's true that there are trainees who are working the frequencies but they have been through intensive training in ATC academies before being allowed into position together with an instructor.
So, boring as it may be, this is far from OK. Anyone who lets an untrained person work the frequency is not the responsible person who should be in this type of profession.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madrid FIR
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ditchdigger,
Your comparisons about what your kids did is not valid. I notice you did not let your son operate excavating machinery at full power on a busy building site, or let your daughter drive the dump truck on a public road in the rush hour.
Your comment about managing the risk is not valid either - the risk should not have been there in the first place.
To those who think this was just a harmless bit of fun, can I ask where in fact you would draw the line? Would it be OK for the controller to have had a family day in atc and let the boy's brother switch the airfield lighting panel, while the sister is in radar handing off traffic to tower, with maybe the wife inputting data into the flight planning computer. All under strict supervision of course!
Having said that, suspension or revocation of licence does seem a bit harsh in this case. A public reading of the riot act would probably be more appropriate, followed by formal written instructions in the US equivalent of MATS Pt 1 and CAP413.
Your comparisons about what your kids did is not valid. I notice you did not let your son operate excavating machinery at full power on a busy building site, or let your daughter drive the dump truck on a public road in the rush hour.
Your comment about managing the risk is not valid either - the risk should not have been there in the first place.
To those who think this was just a harmless bit of fun, can I ask where in fact you would draw the line? Would it be OK for the controller to have had a family day in atc and let the boy's brother switch the airfield lighting panel, while the sister is in radar handing off traffic to tower, with maybe the wife inputting data into the flight planning computer. All under strict supervision of course!
Having said that, suspension or revocation of licence does seem a bit harsh in this case. A public reading of the riot act would probably be more appropriate, followed by formal written instructions in the US equivalent of MATS Pt 1 and CAP413.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somwhere between 6 and 15 feet below ground level
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ditchdigger,
Your comparisons about what your kids did is not valid. I notice you did not let your son operate excavating machinery at full power on a busy building site, or let your daughter drive the dump truck on a public road in the rush hour.
Your comparisons about what your kids did is not valid. I notice you did not let your son operate excavating machinery at full power on a busy building site, or let your daughter drive the dump truck on a public road in the rush hour.
Your comment about managing the risk is not valid either - the risk should not have been there in the first place.
To those who think this was just a harmless bit of fun, can I ask where in fact you would draw the line? Would it be OK for the controller to have had a family day in atc and let the boy's brother switch the airfield lighting panel, while the sister is in radar handing off traffic to tower, with maybe the wife inputting data into the flight planning computer. All under strict supervision of course!
Of course, now we're thoughtfully excercising judgement based on the merits of given sets of circumstances, not on what the media panders to the sensation hungry public. I'm afraid the way this is being handled leans more towards the latter than the former.
Last edited by Ditchdigger; 6th Mar 2010 at 15:16. Reason: corrected spelling
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the EU on a small Island
Age: 79
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come on, people. It was an unprofessional move at an International airport by a controller who should have thought a bit more about it.
We can discuss forever about "What If" ... that's not the point. Forget the detail, forget the trivia, it's simply not a good move at an International Airport. It makes the entire ATC operation look slack, and sloppy, and ... unprofessional.
With luck, the controller will have a job in a week' time.
Let's put it to bed, eh?
We can discuss forever about "What If" ... that's not the point. Forget the detail, forget the trivia, it's simply not a good move at an International Airport. It makes the entire ATC operation look slack, and sloppy, and ... unprofessional.
With luck, the controller will have a job in a week' time.
Let's put it to bed, eh?
It could seem harmless that a kid issues a take-off clearance or tells a pilot to switch to departure frequency BUT this has to do with licenses and training
More than just an ATCO
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My PC was left running with this page open. Curious neighbour, a professional, but not in aviation asks if she can read it. Some 15 minutes later a succinct summation. "It looks like no damage occurred except for some bruised egos who are afraid the mystery may be dispelled."
My PC was left running with this page open. Curious neighbour, a professional, but not in aviation asks if she can read it. Some 15 minutes later a succinct summation. "It looks like no damage occurred except for some bruised egos who are afraid the mystery may be dispelled."
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somwhere between 6 and 15 feet below ground level
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like you neighbour is involved in a profession where rules & regulations are something to negotiated over...
Management Consultant
Tell me I'm wrong: She comes from the direction that unless something is specifically forbidden it's permitted, whereas a controller comes from the direction that unless it's specifically permitted it's forbidden.
Obviously taking things to extremes but that's the underlying philosophy.