Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

UK - NATS Pay negotiations - latest rumours

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

UK - NATS Pay negotiations - latest rumours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th August 2011 | 16:09
  #2281 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: UK
No real reasons given on NATSNET, all a bit ambiguous.

Were the three just gone all Baron appointees?
Roffa is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2011 | 18:50
  #2282 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Costa Packet
Quote from Barron in 2005



NATS chief technology and programmes officer steps down - 3/18/2005 - Computer Weekly

Barron, said, “The success of our company is inextricably linked to our ambitious £1bn modernisation plan and the 350 engineering projects that support it.
We will be moving swiftly to find the right capability for this task and I have every confidence in the ability of Nigel Horne and Ian Mills to manage this effectively in the interim.”
Air.Farce.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2011 | 19:38
  #2283 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
Originally Posted by Air.Farce.1
Quote from Barron in 2005
But then he was talking about programmes and the prophesy came true. Mills pwned programmes and made them his biatch. When he stepped up to CEO it was a slightly different story with the Ops Directors, he blinked first.
BDiONU is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2011 | 21:57
  #2284 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: 5116N00044W
NATS chief technology and programmes officer steps down
I seem to recall that the internal release could have been read as:
NATS chief technology and programmes officer stepped on!
PeltonLevel is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2011 | 11:49
  #2285 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: UK
Must have come as a shock to some of NATS's senior managers this morning when they realised they do actually need Engineers.
Frank Disclosure is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2011 | 16:48
  #2286 (permalink)  
Disappointed
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
And the assistants at PC did all of the flight plan inputting too.
Ceannairceach is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2011 | 21:31
  #2287 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere nice
Question (or two) for PCS Negotiators

Why are you falling for managements stalling tactics? Why has notice not yet been given to NATS of intention to ballot members on industrial action? At my unit, I can tell you the will to fight is definitely there. Yes, NATS say they cannot negotiate" with a gun to their head" but they're the one's who put the bullets in the gun with their insulting and divisive offer. I for one would be more than happy to see my union negotiate with NATS from such a position of strength. It will certainly focus a few minds!

I also hope there is no truth in the rumour that NATS cannot offer more because Prospect ATCOs were told there is no more money. Sorry NATS, that is a rod you have made for your own back! But incredibly (I believe) PCS seem to have bought the idea that we have to "sell" more of our T&Cs to fund any further offer. Do you not think we have been insulted enough already?

Please, PLEASE don't make the same mistake as Prospect ATSS and weaken our position by recommending a piddly little token increase of an offer and say this is best you're going to get. It will only demonstrate what can be achieved when the "gun" is not held to the head. And no, I'm not after as much as we can get. I just don't want a pay cut, just a fair RPI deal.

Surely, if we do not stand firm now then more of our T&Cs will be used to fund future pay rises (and not necessarily for PCS grades).
Rocket_Science is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2011 | 14:45
  #2288 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Bisley
'And the assistants at PC did all of the flight plan inputting too'

That is stretching the facts a tad
SwanFIS is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2011 | 17:12
  #2289 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Being from a smaller country in Europe it is interesting to see what is happening in the bigger ATC-countries.
I haven’t read the all posts but it seems like many countries providers have had an aggressive tone the last few years.
The one thing I have realized is that if we stay focused and united they will never be able to break us. Older ATCOS knows that but younger does has some difficulties to understand. Hopefully they learn after seeing what happens in countries that stay united.
Spain, Germany, England, Finland, Iceland and many other countries have had a very tough situation. I'm glad to read that some of you understand the importance of staying united.
There is always going to be those who think that we are paid too much and that we don’t deserve more, even among ourselves. They think that airlines will stop complaining about ATC-costs if we don’t get pay rise. They will never stop complaining! NEVER!
Maybe they (airlines) should charge their passengers more! Maybe the solution to the problems that airlines have isn’t always pay cut after pay cut for their staff and cutting ATC-costs. Maybe the problem can be found somewhere else! Maybe it has to cost more to fly!
And also providers must realize that an aggressive tone will NEVER be the answer to solving problems during negotiations! NEVER!
FLSV is offline  
Reply
Old 11th August 2011 | 21:07
  #2290 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 712
Likes: 17
From: SE England
FLSV welcome to PPRuNE
There is always going to be those who think that we are paid too much and that we don’t deserve more, even among ourselves. They think that airlines will stop complaining about ATC-costs if we don’t get pay rise. They will never stop complaining! NEVER!
Very sage words in your maiden speech. We MUST all rember this. It is not holding the travelling public to ransom, it is having respect for difficult tasks, which not everyone can do and not everyone wants to do. Tasks which must be done right every time - even when the equipment provided to us does not work (AGAIN!). I sometimes think that our problem is that we make the impossible look easy and observers go away believing that it actually is.
Dan Dare is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2011 | 09:13
  #2291 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
ATSA pay deal out now for consideration. 4.2% this year on pay and allowances + £400 bung. Next year capped at 4.8% on pay only.
BDiONU is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2011 | 17:33
  #2292 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere nice
Please, PLEASE don't make the same mistake as Prospect ATSS and weaken our position by recommending a piddly little token increase of an offer and say this is best you're going to get.
It would appear my Jedi powers were strong on Monday night!

Oh dear
Rocket_Science is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2011 | 19:45
  #2293 (permalink)  
Disappointed
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
If I was an ATSA I'd be disgusted with that tbh.
Ceannairceach is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2011 | 10:51
  #2294 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: in a cave
The PCS deal is better than the ATSS one.
SR71BlackBird is offline  
Reply
Old 19th August 2011 | 18:14
  #2295 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Prospect ATSS ballot paper arrived in the post today. Not too sure which way to vote, feel a bit let down by our union again. Same old same old.
Scot Cabin is offline  
Reply
Old 21st August 2011 | 21:17
  #2296 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere nice
My ballot paper and PCS newsletter arrived this weekend. I have to say I find the whole thing quite unpalatable.

In a nutshell, NATS have got nasty and threatened to withdraw from the agreement to avoid compulsory redundancy. Rather than stand up to this blatant bully boy tactics, PCS decided to negotiate with the gun now pointing firmly at their head.

The latest offer, somehow, feels inferior to the original one, with more terms being sold off. It also divides its own membership as VCA and PTAS contract staff will get less than those on standard contracts.

It's down to the members vote now. I've voted no, but I fear I will be in the minority.
Rocket_Science is offline  
Reply
Old 21st August 2011 | 21:22
  #2297 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Well that's two of us...a very big NO...!!
fisbangwollop is offline  
Reply
Old 21st August 2011 | 22:58
  #2298 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Winchester.Hants.England
Make that three.............................
Flybywyre is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd August 2011 | 05:14
  #2299 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Harrow
Four!!!!!!!
EGLL19791986 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd August 2011 | 16:54
  #2300 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere nice
Blimey! It's a mutiny!
Rocket_Science is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.