Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

British Airways-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd February 2025 | 12:11
  #1101 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 262
From: Blighty
Originally Posted by darren1
You can get safe and secure with just about every other airline and much better food. But each to their own.
Public perception is very different to that of industry professionals, especially when it seems like there's another crash every week. 2025 has been a terrible year so far.
HOVIS is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 08:05
  #1102 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,648
From: Ferrara
A writer in the Times last week was saying that Generation Whatever (the younger lot) aren't as frightened of flying as the older generations - that's because they know its very very rare to be in an serious accident.
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 08:50
  #1103 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 108
Likes: 64
From: winchester
Latest Noel Philips vid on YouTube talking about the decline of BA
andymartin is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 09:07
  #1104 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 56
From: UK
For every bad experience comes a good one!
stewyb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 10:57
  #1105 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,030
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by stewyb
For every bad experience comes a good one!
It's a comfort to know that fewer than 50% of flights end in disaster.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 11:12
  #1106 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
It's a comfort to know that fewer than 50% of flights end in disaster.
My view was purely from a customer experience perspective
stewyb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 11:51
  #1107 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 843
Likes: 16
From: London
I've never had a bad flight with BA, but I have no affection for them, they way I do for say, Virgin Atlantic.
It remains to be seen how the relaunched British Airways Club will affect loyalty.
As mentioned, Flyer Talk was on fire with complains - there's even a thread of people posting trips they've changed to other airlines in protest.
SealinkBF is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 14:21
  #1108 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 81
Likes: 53
From: Manchester
Originally Posted by andymartin
Latest Noel Philips vid on YouTube talking about the decline of BA
I take anything these youtube "professional" vloggers / travel experts say or produce with a pinch of salt. For people that seemingly now fly arround the world as their full time job, they come across as rather simple, dramatic and unrealistic. Not to mention the over drama for clickbait to secure those numbers.

I have to fly with BA about 6 times a year for work, not massively frequent I know. But everytime I have, I found them to be fine, ok at dealing with problems and both the product in the back and front to meet expectations for the price paid.

They seem to be making huge investment to improve cabins and the product overall, but this gets overshadowed by poor decision making in other areas. (Brunch gate / Exec club)

I dont think BA are anywhere near as bad as some would make out, they have had to adapt with the times so yes in that respect they are not the worldclass flag carrier of old
... very few are?

They had some very difficult years under the direction of former managers but you could argue some of those brutal decisions helped them trim the fat, survive tough times and still be around today. They are consistently returning good financial results these days and playing catch up using ME carriers as a benchmark.

For every negative video a better known vlogger puts up, you can find 20 positive ones on their BA experience...they just dont get the clicks or publicity.




ImagineIf is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2025 | 16:43
  #1109 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 704
Likes: 45
From: Stafford
Originally Posted by ImagineIf
I take anything these youtube "professional" vloggers / travel experts say or produce with a pinch of salt. For people that seemingly now fly arround the world as their full time job, they come across as rather simple, dramatic and unrealistic. Not to mention the over drama for clickbait to secure those numbers.
Definitely agree with this although in fairness I’ve always found Noel Phillips to be one of the more “genuine” vloggers out there. Josh Cahill on the other hand…I don’t know how his ego fits through the plane doors!
chinapattern is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2025 | 00:02
  #1110 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 158
From: Cornwall
Flown three long haul flights with BA in the last six months, currently in Grenada before my next one home next week.
Apart from the fact I really don't like the 777 every sector has been perfectly fine.
Haven't flown Virgin to compare since standing in a long queue at check in they pulled all the staff out of the line took them to the front and checked them in. By the time I checked in with my wife and two young children they wanted to split us up
Put me off them probably unfairly for life.
BA just feels at home to me.
GROUNDHOG is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2025 | 07:39
  #1111 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,877
Likes: 82
From: UK
Originally Posted by ImagineIf
I take anything these youtube "professional" vloggers / travel experts say or produce with a pinch of salt. For people that seemingly now fly arround the world as their full time job, they come across as rather simple, dramatic and unrealistic. Not to mention the over drama for clickbait to secure those numbers.

I have to fly with BA about 6 times a year for work, not massively frequent I know. But everytime I have, I found them to be fine, ok at dealing with problems and both the product in the back and front to meet expectations for the price paid.

They seem to be making huge investment to improve cabins and the product overall, but this gets overshadowed by poor decision making in other areas. (Brunch gate / Exec club)

I dont think BA are anywhere near as bad as some would make out, they have had to adapt with the times so yes in that respect they are not the worldclass flag carrier of old
... very few are?

They had some very difficult years under the direction of former managers but you could argue some of those brutal decisions helped them trim the fat, survive tough times and still be around today. They are consistently returning good financial results these days and playing catch up using ME carriers as a benchmark.

For every negative video a better known vlogger puts up, you can find 20 positive ones on their BA experience...they just dont get the clicks or publicity.
I've watched this aswell and it seemed he was determined to stick to his clickbait headline about the "decline of BA" while actually not being able to find a lot wrong with the flight in question itself (which was in Business on a 787-10 with the Club Suites). Normally quite enjoy his vlogs but this one left me feeling he was just trying to chase likes.....and I told him that in my comments.
Wycombe is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2025 | 08:39
  #1112 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: UK
I quite agree. Although he was seated in the new Club Suite, he only referred to the old layout and its shortcomings. He had an agenda and stuck to it.
toon22 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th February 2025 | 20:53
  #1113 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 308
Likes: 20
From: London
Aside from the rest of the video’s contents, filming airline employees and other passengers on board an aircraft (presumably without permission) is not on.
nguba is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 07:09
  #1114 (permalink)  
USER0005
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by nguba
Aside from the rest of the video’s contents, filming airline employees and other passengers on board an aircraft (presumably without permission) is not on.
Filming is bad enough. Publishing the images without the express permission of each and every person who's face is visible is another.

Does he not understand anything about GDPR? Hopefully someone involved will take legal action.
 
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 07:58
  #1115 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 10,567
Likes: 798
From: Northumberland
Given the plethora of these video's and the lack of fuss, either he does and has it covered, or nobody is that bothered.
SWBKCB is online now  
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 14:32
  #1116 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
20 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,841
Likes: 328
From: Hertfordshire, UK.
There is only one such flyer/ traveller that I follow.
  • He pays his own tickets and tells you how much and how he bought them.
  • If he upgrades with points, he says how many.
  • If he gets a freebie - he says so.
  • Many times, he has travelled long haul in Y and compared with PE. Then C and F.
  • He is broad in appreciation and criticism.
  • He covers all modes of travel, planes, trains, coaches, ferries.
There are some who clearly take the airline freebies and are prima donnas.

This is not the place to send links, if you want to know who, then PM.

PAXboy is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 17:13
  #1117 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 293
From: London
Originally Posted by ATNotts
Filming is bad enough. Publishing the images without the express permission of each and every person who's face is visible is another.
Does he not understand anything about GDPR? Hopefully someone involved will take legal action.
Which part of the GDPR means I need to get everyone's permission if I take a photo and they happen to be in it? Legal action based on what?
What part of GDPR is applicable and has there ever been a successful court action in the UK on this?
It's that sort of nonsense over-reach meaning you have to click on cookie permissions for every single new website you visit in the EU.
Filming on board is technically forbidden on many (even Western) airlines terms and conditions to prevent wierdos filming cabin crew, and if you cross the line, they can stop you from flying with them. Do we really want to make lawyers rich to make that point?
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 17:39
  #1118 (permalink)  
USER0005
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot
Which part of the GDPR means I need to get everyone's permission if I take a photo and they happen to be in it? Legal action based on what?
What part of GDPR is applicable and has there ever been a successful court action in the UK on this?
It's that sort of nonsense over-reach meaning you have to click on cookie permissions for every single new website you visit in the EU.
Filming on board is technically forbidden on many (even Western) airlines terms and conditions to prevent wierdos filming cabin crew, and if you cross the line, they can stop you from flying with them. Do we really want to make lawyers rich to make that point?
Photographing someone isn't a GDPR issue. Publishing it is.

This is why you are very restricted how you use CCTV collected on domestic systems and doorbell cameras.
 
Reply
Old 26th February 2025 | 17:49
  #1119 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 293
From: London
Originally Posted by ATNotts
Photographing someone isn't a GDPR issue. Publishing it is.
This is why you are very restricted how you use CCTV collected on domestic systems and doorbell cameras.
Individuals can be subject to the GDPR, if their data processing is beyond the scope of “purely personal or household activity” as defined in Article 2 of the GDPR.
It's awfully wide and vague, point being it's open to challenge. Like when TV films in a public place, they have a (usually small) sign saying you consent to being on camera by simply being there. The GDPR is bureaucrats ****fest. Hoops and hurdles and often ambiguous with a stupid outcome, which is why you see criminal's faces being pixilated #endrant
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Reply
Old 27th February 2025 | 08:13
  #1120 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,648
From: Ferrara
GDPR is like copyright - it means well but it's from a different age - it's like the old Tudor rules when your social rank defined what you could wear - impossible to police

World wide we take over 5 billion pictures A DAY now

And taking photos has never been illegal except in some very subscribed (think Official Secrets Act) circumstances
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.