Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

British Airways-2

Old 6th May 2022, 16:44
  #381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Darkest Lincs
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by nomilk View Post
Between 3 months and 3 hours at the moment..
Yes, I know it's like asking about the length of a piece of string, but I was hoping for some actual experiences.
wowzz is offline  
Old 6th May 2022, 16:47
  #382 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: glasgow
Posts: 363
You can try asking on Flyertalk BA Executive Club which has threads about this.
renfrew is online now  
Old 6th May 2022, 17:17
  #383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: jersey
Age: 72
Posts: 1,361
Six BA flights booked; three cancelled by BA. One lot cancelled at two days’ notice, the other at ten weeks’.
I suppose that I should be grateful that the cancellation rate was ONLY 50% !
I have family loyalty to BA ; but it is being seriously threatened !
It is not just a matter of the flights; there are other things going on in relation to the travel including arrangements made with other peoples’ travel. The whole issue makes it nigh on impossible to co-ordinate our holidays.
Not good enough !
kcockayne is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 09:02
  #384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,070
It is about time that the CAA got stuck into the cancellation issue, starting with comparisons between various operators of their cancellation rates. We can all understand the Lockdown issues from the last two years, were it not for the fact that other carriers, home and overseas, seem to be back to running full schedules. Hopefully the CAA still have enough nouse to identify the real reason for the differences, rather than accepting a one paragraph excuse from Sean Doyle's whitewash department. There also seems to be some hiding in the statistics of measuring cancellation rates against schedule at point of departure, so those dropped in advance are not measured. The CAA used to be very tough on airlines "having insufficient resources to operate their published schedule", to the extent that it could be necessary to charter in very expensively to cover a flight AOG or crewless which had few people booked on it anyway, so there must be procedures for this.
WHBM is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 09:09
  #385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,322
Originally Posted by kcockayne View Post
I have family loyalty to BA ; !
There's residual loyalty to BA in his household as well but was severely tested in the run up to Easter when one family members flights were "rejigged" so comprehensively that their travel proposed plan became completely unworkable...
wiggy is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 10:48
  #386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: BMA
Posts: 736
Originally Posted by vectisman View Post
Your comment is simply untrue. Hardly any carriers are running full schedules anywhere. There are issues at airports across the world. Perhaps you are a Daily Mail or Daily Express reader.
Plenty of carriers are not cancelling 50+ flights a day as BA are doing. Plus this BA line that its airport issues are frankly rubbish. The biggest problem for BA has been a shortage of crew and a shortage of ground staff both in their control not Heathrows.

Which Magazine also reported that it had complained to the CAA about BAs cancellations and their belief that BA was not following the correct rules regarding duty of care etc to passengers. https://www.which.co.uk/policy/trave...routing-policy
BA318 is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 11:28
  #387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,070
Originally Posted by vectisman View Post
Your comment is simply untrue. Hardly any carriers are running full schedules anywhere. There are issues at airports across the world. Perhaps you are a Daily Mail or Daily Express reader.
Just wrong. Even BA Cityflyer at London City are making a much better job of it.

Do you think that carriers like TUI or Jet2 are just dumping people's holidays, with cancellations at a few days' notice, leaving those in the resorts stuck there ?
WHBM is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 11:47
  #388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Age: 41
Posts: 991
Originally Posted by vectisman View Post
Your comment is simply untrue. Hardly any carriers are running full schedules anywhere. There are issues at airports across the world. Perhaps you are a Daily Mail or Daily Express reader.
Ouch. I like BA as you do but they've utterly dropped the ball in planning and operational resilience. 20+ A320 series parked because they can't crew them and money flying out the door to Finnair and Iberia Express to cover BA's own routes. Does any other UK airline have that many of their own aircraft unusable?
Then add creating a new low cost subsidiary at LGW as it was the "only way to turn a profit" but is clearly a stick to put pressure on mainline and you can see why the wheels are coming off.
Skipness One Foxtrot is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 11:48
  #389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,322
Originally Posted by vectisman View Post
Your comment is simply untrue. Hardly any carriers are running full schedules anywhere. There are issues at airports across the world. Perhaps you are a Daily Mail or Daily Express reader.
Well certainly at least one carrier has for some months now certainly been advertising and selling tickets for flights on what looks remarkably like their pre-Covid schedule on a couple of routes I'm very very familiar with..

The reality of what's operated on the day has however been consistently different from the plan, and the cancellations/consolidations have nothing to do with the airport(s).
wiggy is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 13:33
  #390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: London
Posts: 834
757

Anyone know if the Titan 757s are being used on specific routes this summer?
wallp is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 15:40
  #391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 23
Originally Posted by wowzz View Post
Yes, I know it's like asking about the length of a piece of string, but I was hoping for some actual experiences.
I have 4 flights booked with BA and 2 out of the 4 have been cancelled, both around 4/5 weeks before. As it stands I was able to select alternative flights which will not cause too much disruption but if there are further cancellations it may well cause problems.
JerseyAero is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 15:52
  #392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 413
This may give an indication of why there are delays and cancellations. I am told that this is for BA at LHR. 😳
HOVIS is offline  
Old 7th May 2022, 20:21
  #393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 498
Thanks for confirmation on Finnair assisting BA, a colleague said he was booked to travel as such shortly. Similar to boarding ANZ DC10 to the east of USA in the past.
Trinity 09L is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 08:10
  #394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,070
Originally Posted by Trinity 09L View Post
Thanks for confirmation on Finnair assisting BA, a colleague said he was booked to travel as such shortly. Similar to boarding ANZ DC10 to the east of USA in the past.
Not at all, those were crewed wholly by BA, who set up a DC-10 pilot pool at Heathrow to run them, for quite some years in the late 1970s. The crew used to go to KLM in Amsterdam for their periodic Sim sessions. There were aircraft utilisation reasons why they came to this arrangement with ANZ, which I was a regular on LHR-LAX in those years. There's a periodic poster on here who was one of the BA FOs on this at the time.
WHBM is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 08:53
  #395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,559
So, BA are leasing in capacity from Iberia Express, Finnair and Titan (at least, maybe others I'm not aware of), but have a whole fleet of 321ceo's (the G-EUXx aircraft, at least) that sit idle, apparently as they haven't the crews to operate them...brilliant!
Wycombe is online now  
Old 8th May 2022, 09:16
  #396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: London
Posts: 453
Originally Posted by Wycombe View Post
So, BA are leasing in capacity from Iberia Express, Finnair and Titan (at least, maybe others I'm not aware of), but have a whole fleet of 321ceo's (the G-EUXx aircraft, at least) that sit idle, apparently as they haven't the crews to operate them...brilliant!
This from my post before the recent news

Taking permanent staff at the moment is not such a good deal for employers or shareholder value , more rather managing the situation is the goal even it that impacts some revenues ( over yield) with cancellation some compensation payment risk, and a little customer disappointment in the process.

Pretty much as BA are doing through this summer. They really really don’t want to take on permanent contracted staff right now with training costs etc….. if come winter they need to be let them go again.

It a pure case of managing and sweating resources and as it happens Finnair been so damaged by the Ukraine military campaign and closure of neighbouring Russian airspace having availability immediately and at no doubt competitive rates !

These leases are clearly simply part of that management process.

Finnair are also operating the Helsinki - Barcelona route on behalf of Iberia ( have been doing so for some time)

Whilst equally hit by the current conflict Air Baltic are operating for both SAS and Lufthansa ( Eurowings) for similar reasons.

The industry is in crisis and the current economic trajectories aren’t exactly rosey right now!

Last edited by Rutan16; 8th May 2022 at 09:45.
Rutan16 is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 11:48
  #397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 13,920
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
Not at all, those were crewed wholly by BA, who set up a DC-10 pilot pool at Heathrow to run them, for quite some years in the late 1970s. The crew used to go to KLM in Amsterdam for their periodic Sim sessions. There were aircraft utilisation reasons why they came to this arrangement with ANZ, which I was a regular on LHR-LAX in those years. There's a periodic poster on here who was one of the BA FOs on this at the time.
Slightly OT, but BA used to do the engineering as well on those ANZ DC-10s at LHR. I remember an urgent search through the maintenance records as soon as the news came through about the Erebus crash, before it became clear that it was unlikely to have been a technical issue.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 8th May 2022, 13:04
  #398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 0ft
Posts: 154
Originally Posted by Rutan16 View Post
Pretty much as BA are doing through this summer. They really really dont want to take on permanent contracted staff right now with training costs etc.. if come winter they need to be let them go again.
!
Considering the fact they cut numbers substantially throughout the pandemic and operated a skeleton service I very much doubt this is the case. They actually need permanent staff/crew on the books if you've cut the numbers of crews as drastic as they have and plan to operate the flights they do. You make it sound that come October BA will go back to how they were operating throughout the pandemic, very few flights, mostly cargo runs and that's all. This is wrong - they didn't during the last economic downturn. People still want to travel and will travel.

Plus as we've learnt it's worth having them ready for the up turn which happens inevitably.
LBAflyer22 is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 13:17
  #399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,070
Originally Posted by Rutan16 View Post
Taking permanent staff at the moment is not such a good deal for employers or shareholder value, more rather managing the situation is the goal even it that impacts some revenues ( over yield) with cancellation some compensation payment risk, and a little customer disappointment in the process.
OK then, but don't schedule beyond your available resources. Which is what has been got wrong. If you don't want to take on and train permanent staff ... don't announce what you can't manage.
WHBM is offline  
Old 8th May 2022, 15:52
  #400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,559
Originally Posted by WHBM View Post
OK then, but don't schedule beyond your available resources. Which is what has been got wrong. If you don't want to take on and train permanent staff ... don't announce what you can't manage.
The point is that BA, as is well known, got rid of too many staff (or tried to fire and re-hire them on inferior contracts) to begin with. Looks like they underestimated the impact/reaction that strategy would have and are now struggling to recover.

As we have seen over many years at BA, the mantra to cut cost as the expense of almost everything else (except perhaps safety) has driven them to the point where they are taking the kind of measures that we are discussing, and although as you say these things are done with the aim that they enhance "shareholder value", those same shareholders surely can't like that assets are sat on the ground costing money rather then being "sweated" as you claim.
Wycombe is online now  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.