Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANCHESTER 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Dec 2014, 11:43
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saudi increase for winter was only loaded 2 months ago, so, likely summer increase is not loaded yet.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2014, 12:47
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saudi increase for winter was only loaded 2 months ago, so, likely summer increase is not loaded yet
Can anyone confirm if the CAA provisional stats for SV in Nov are likely to be correct?

The pax figure shown for Jeddah is 1,488, which on 26 sectors (if all flights operated) equates to an average load of only 57. October was 3,417 which wasn't great and September 4,648 which was fairly decent.

I guess freight carried is also a significant factor but is there anything special why November pax should be so low?
MANFOD is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2014, 13:31
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jamiie,

MAN is definately at least 8 based next summer apparently. Ive not seen it myself but Coms in crew room at MAN said 8th based arrives in June.

I think it will be a case of wait and see, it wasnt that long ago some posters were full of doom and gloom that there was going to be next to no growth for S15, since then a fair few routes and extra based aircraft have been announced.
Could well happen but currently it's just August showing a requirement for 8 and at this stage the 8th has a lot of gaps for the month. Some non based flights move to based and other way around and then some increases are added.

If you were to include all non based flights MAN could easily be the equivalent of 10 based.
Jamie2k9 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 15:52
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody need to tell these *** we have a World class airport here in Manchester !

Airports Commission report says expanded Gatwick would deliver more competition, choice & lower airfares for consumers | London Gatwick: Obviously

...that said if they do go with expanding the "waiting room" rather than the "Doctors clinic" it will be construed by some London Fanboys as an utter disaster !

Certainly better for MAN than an expanded LHR where all OUR airlines operate !

Skippy will end up in resus if he sees this daft decison !
Bagso is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 16:09
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Skippy will end up in resus if he sees this daft decison !
Bagso there's no point in debating with you on this one as you happiliy ignore the commercial realities. Gatwick have been running an effective PR campaign but the real decision makers remain behind LHR. This is why not a single alliance from STAR / Oneworld / Skyteam has a focus at LGW outwith BA holidays.

Also this has next to nothing to do with MAN.

Certainly better for MAN than an expanded LHR where all OUR airlines operate !
"our" airlines? You mean like this lot?
Here's the list of recent major airlines having left LGW for LHR, some for the second time.

Delta
Continental
US Airways
American
Korean Air (again)
Air China (again)

Can you explain how expanding the place they choose not to fly from is a profit maker? I mean have a go. I'm curious to see what you know they don't. They're not "yours" anymore than they were Gatwick's.

In fairness Qatar are going back but like EK and EY, they're fairly exceptional in commercial terms. It's daft to keep flamebaiting a North/South argument, for all your words mate, there's not a whole lot stopping more legacy carriers flying out of LGW/MAN today, never mind after an enormous Mirabel like expansion plan.

So yeah, what's the commercial gain for the airlines of a bigger LGW given it occasionally sits half empty much of the time even in summer outwith the based waves. (No, it *really* does). This is the Manchester thread btw, you need to be in here : http://www.pprune.org/airlines-airpo...twick-122.html
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 16:44
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: manchester
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hainan

Any news on Hainan being announced?
sarah19981 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 16:49
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stockport
Age: 69
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought it was in new year

Ian
Ian Brooks is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 16:59
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to Charlie Cornish it should be announced Feb/March time, 5 weekly.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 18:01
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bagso there's no point in debating with you on this one as you happiliy ignore the commercial realities.
Skip, I think one of us is misunderstanding Bagso on this. Is he not saying with his reference to the waiting room / doctor's clinic that it would be a strange decision if they opted for LGW rather than LHR, but one that would actually suit MAN better. Surely his reference to "our airlines" was to those carriers that operate from MAN and that also operate from LHR but, except for EK and shortly QR, not from LGW.

If it's me that's got the wrong end of the stick, apologies.
MANFOD is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 18:46
  #230 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: manchester
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hainan

Thanks lax_lhr and Ian,

Also guys any pax figures for cathay Pacific ? How's it doing ?
sarah19981 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 19:12
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cathay has had around 250 in, full out due to students going home for xmas. Came in almost full today.

Cargo is overbooked by several accounts.
LAX_LHR is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 19:12
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stafford
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody need to tell these *** we have a World class airport here in Manchester!

All depends of your definition of World Class - from an aesthetic/facility point of view or by terms of destinations/carriers?
chinapattern is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 19:26
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Diss, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
some parts of Man are poorly designed, the cul de sac at terminal 3 for instance!
NickBarnes is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 20:27
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: manchester
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lax lhr

Well the loads are good then for cathay! Let's hope they stay that way x
sarah19981 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 20:37
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Actually the loads are better than that, apart from the first day, they've been full on most other flts, Tuesday and Thursday full both ways. Not good for staff travel! A few have not got on, staff that is. makes you wonder why CX waited so long!! And what impact it has on the LHR flts, I guess when the holiday season finishes there may be a bit of a change, will have to wait and see, then it'll be CNY!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 20:53
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saudia

Yes, SV pax loads did look a bit thin in November, but today they sent a -300ER and it went out with 353 on board! I don't know what, if any, seasonal trends there are on this route, it hasn't been running long enough to establish that. Most flights going East from MAN this week have been chock-a-block. Turkish sending A330s too.
roverman is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2014, 21:09
  #237 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Astute as ever Mr MANFOD, glad some of us are keeping up !

For avoidance of doubt on this one I actually agreed with you Skip, thats "agreed with you"

Did you "skim" read my last making assumptions prior to reading the text or jump the gun ?

You seemed to be contradicting the very points that I was making on your behalf !

And yes it has a lot to do with the Manchester thread when claims of this nature are made ,sorry I may be alone but I utterley begrudge this total arrogance held by LGW, dare I say their pomposity to suggest there are only two World class airports in UK.

And lest we forget LGW an airport which should perhaps be administered by the Environment Minister (re ...Flood Defences) rather than Aviation !

Was this not an airport whose terminal was under 3 feet of water 12 months back ?

Best they try to some accomodate A380s rather than some models of Stingray !

Last edited by Bagso; 18th Dec 2014 at 22:57.
Bagso is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2014, 01:03
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"our" airlines? You mean like this lot?
Here's the list of recent major airlines having left LGW for LHR, some for the second time.

Delta
Continental
US Airways
American
Korean Air (again)
Air China (again)

Can you explain how expanding the place they choose not to fly from is a profit maker? I mean have a go. I'm curious to see what you know they don't. They're not "yours" anymore than they were Gatwick's.
The plain and simple truth is that many would be "Heathrow's" if it wasn't for the capacity problem. GA and VN are probably after a berth at LHR-4, so also part of the LGW "waiting room".

In fairness Qatar are going back but like EK and EY, they're fairly exceptional in commercial terms. It's daft to keep flamebaiting a North/South argument, for all your words mate, there's not a whole lot stopping more legacy carriers flying out of LGW/MAN today, never mind after an enormous Mirabel like expansion plan.
It's not about north v south, it's about whether the UK keeps it status as the no. 1 hub in Europe, simple as that.


So yeah, what's the commercial gain for the airlines of a bigger LGW given it occasionally sits half empty much of the time even in summer outwith the based waves. (No, it *really* does). This is the Manchester thread btw, you need to be in here : GATWICK
On a recent trip to the West Indies, no queues to take off from LGW at 1000-ish and no queues to land at LGW at 0700-ish on the return. Would never be the case at LHR!



And yes it has a lot to do with the Manchester thread when claims of this nature are made ,sorry I may be alone but I utterley begrudge this total arrogance held by LGW, dare I say their pomposity to suggest there are only two World class airports in UK.
Yes it is a lot of nonsense. MAN is a fine airport, and if you compare the biggest UK non-capital airport (MAN) with its French equivelant (LYS), MAN is way ahead and doing well.




Fairdealfrank is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2014, 07:38
  #239 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 51
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The choice about the future of the UK's avaition should have bugger all to do with a willy waving competition between LHR, AMS, FRA, CDG etc.

It should be about what's best for the the entire UK, and I'd have a hard time accepting that the UK becoming even more Londoncentric would be best for the entire UK.
eggc is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2014, 08:13
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NickBarnes
some parts of Man are poorly designed, the cul de sac at terminal 3 for instance
I would love to be able to walk from T3 to The Station without the need to go outside !
lfc84 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.