Flybe - 7
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Under Red One
Airportplanner1
I can see them displacing GR on the Stansted route just like they did on the Gatwick - GCI route and to BlueIslands on the Southampton - GCI service.......just a moment, wasn't it the other way round?
I can see them displacing GR on the Stansted route just like they did on the Gatwick - GCI route and to BlueIslands on the Southampton - GCI service.......just a moment, wasn't it the other way round?
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gateshead, UK
I'm not so sure, even with travelling to the airport, checking in and flying down, it's about an hour shorter than the train, and that sometimes includes a change in York. Not to mention fares can be £100+ return whereas Flybe fares are normally in the region of £40-100
For a random date in June the train is £140
For a random date in June the train is £140
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, Diss, UK
I doubt those Norwich Routes would actually be operated by Flybe themselves, considering the past like has been said with Dublin etc, with a smaller aircraft might just work, but we wait with baited breath on all of those applied for!

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 9
From: BHX LXR ASW
NCL-MAN would be a nice addition with the help of the fund I think

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 18
From: Beaumaris
For a while during the early 1980's Dan Air used Twin Otters I think the flights started in Bournemouth, I did the BHX-MAN-NCL sector a few times, indeed there was a period when you had to change a/c in MAN, with the northbound service originating in ABZ, the a/c arrived together at MAN and you had to go into the terminal and walk back out again. I remember one trip when I passed Dennis Waterman and Rula Lenska as we changed a/c. The Co-pilot used to hand round coffee in a flask and biscuits! Happy Days sitting watching the flight deck!

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 556
Likes: 94
From: Waters edge
Heritage
The Dan Air service was twice daily Monday-Friday BOH-NCL -BOH Via BHX & MAN M/W/FRI and at one time via CWL & LPL Tue/Thu all with 48 pax HS748. At CWL and BHX only one engine was shut down to on/off load pax... Very quick turn arounds! The route operated through the seventies until mid eighties. Latterly with Twin Otter, then post Dan Air with Metropolitan SD330. The Dan Air Nord 262 was MAN based I believe - G-AYFR.
The predecessor to Flybe on the South Coast trunk route was BCAL with a daily BA.111-200 on the SOU-GLA route which operated for many years in the middle of the afternoon.
FF
The predecessor to Flybe on the South Coast trunk route was BCAL with a daily BA.111-200 on the SOU-GLA route which operated for many years in the middle of the afternoon.
FF
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 2
From: UK
LPL- AMS 3 times a day announced from September which will compete with the existing EZY services.

Joined: Jun 2006
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 380
Likes: 19
From: London
If they put the KL code on it it may work, but otherwise, easyJet are so established on the route on a point to point basis I'm not sure I'd back Flybe ... especially putting a Q400 against an A319/320
Time will tell I guess ..
Time will tell I guess ..

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 13
From: North West UK
LPL AMS
easyJet frequencies are insufficient to meet demand, I have never been on that flight when it hasn't been rammed. There should be sufficient bread and butter available to fill a significant proportion of seats but it's the interlining possibilities which are more attractive. Flybe has already dipped a toe in the water on MAN AMS against competition from both KLM and easyJet so they know what they are up against and I'll guess they understand the demand as well.
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 1
From: Ireland
KLM only allow other airlines to codeshare on a maximum of two routes each (it's a long-standing restriction imposed by the Dutch pilots' union). Flybe already has a KL code on SOU-AMS and INV-AMS, if I recall correctly, so if they wanted to put a KL code on LPL-AMS (which would make sense, I agree with you), they'd have to pull the code off INV-AMS.



