Potential impact of Scottish independence on flights from Scotland
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm no political follower really but this issue of Scotland and the EU.
As I understand it, in order for Scotland to join the EU, EVRY other member of the EU has to agree?
That includes Spain.
If Spain agree, then they give themselves a huge, I mean huge, problem with Catalonia, as if they allow Scotland to break away and join the EU, then they open the flood gates for an independent Catalonia and couldn't very well deny Catalonia access.
So, the simple solution to Spain's problem is to say no to Scotland …
I may well have mis read that, but I am sure that was the gist of the news a few weeks ago ...
As I understand it, in order for Scotland to join the EU, EVRY other member of the EU has to agree?
That includes Spain.
If Spain agree, then they give themselves a huge, I mean huge, problem with Catalonia, as if they allow Scotland to break away and join the EU, then they open the flood gates for an independent Catalonia and couldn't very well deny Catalonia access.
So, the simple solution to Spain's problem is to say no to Scotland …
I may well have mis read that, but I am sure that was the gist of the news a few weeks ago ...
Brunel to Concorde
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to a report in the Sunday Times last weekend the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats will offer Scotland greater tax powers, including setting air passenger duty and vehicle excise duty in the event of a No vote.
If that is the case air passenger duty will devolve to Scotland, and almost certainly significantly reduce, whether the electorate votes Yes or No to Independence.
If Scotland does remain in the UK it's very likely that the Wales government would then also be offered the same power re air passenger duty.
The result would be another slant on the West Lothian Question with Westminster, consisting of MPS from the entire UK, responsible for English airports' air passenger duty with possibly a chancellor representing a Welsh or Scottish constituency. There are recent precedents with Brown and Darling.
If that is the case air passenger duty will devolve to Scotland, and almost certainly significantly reduce, whether the electorate votes Yes or No to Independence.
If Scotland does remain in the UK it's very likely that the Wales government would then also be offered the same power re air passenger duty.
The result would be another slant on the West Lothian Question with Westminster, consisting of MPS from the entire UK, responsible for English airports' air passenger duty with possibly a chancellor representing a Welsh or Scottish constituency. There are recent precedents with Brown and Darling.
Fit like min?
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ...
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Plenty sticks and carrots from the UK Govt at the moment.
Problem for me is, if the vote is No (whether out of choice or coercion), you will likely find the carrots will be chucked on the compost without being distributed, and the sticks will become bigger sticks.
APD could be devolved NOW - but they won't do it...too much of a moneyspinner for Westminster.
Problem for me is, if the vote is No (whether out of choice or coercion), you will likely find the carrots will be chucked on the compost without being distributed, and the sticks will become bigger sticks.
APD could be devolved NOW - but they won't do it...too much of a moneyspinner for Westminster.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning
Age: 63
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MerchantVenturer; despite what the Sunday Times might have said, at the moment, Labour and the Conservatives have made no firm or unambiguous commitment to further devolution for Scotland. The LibDems published a paper last year discussing the possibility of further devolution but there is no consensus between that party and the other two main Westminster parties about further devolution. Quite the opposite in fact. Recent statements from Labour and the Conservatives suggest that no joint position will be proposed.
A significant number of Labour politicians are rumoured to be likely to boycott their annual Scottish conference this spring because they object to any further devolution. The Tory Leader in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, was asked on a TV debate recently what additional powers she proposed in the event of a no vote and she couldn't make any commitments. Johann Lamont was similarly unable to offer a single additional devolved power when she was quizzed on a TV debate earlier this week.
As support for a Yes vote continues to grow in Scotland, it is possible that the parties that make up the Better Together campaign might be forced into making some kind of formal commitment but it looks unlikely at this time.
I remember prior to the 1992 general election John Major indicated that he would look sympathetically at devolution for Scotland if the Tories were re-elected. They won the election, Major "took stock" and decided to do nothing. Scotland has lots of experience of vague hints and carrots from Westminster disappearing like snow off a dyke.
A significant number of Labour politicians are rumoured to be likely to boycott their annual Scottish conference this spring because they object to any further devolution. The Tory Leader in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, was asked on a TV debate recently what additional powers she proposed in the event of a no vote and she couldn't make any commitments. Johann Lamont was similarly unable to offer a single additional devolved power when she was quizzed on a TV debate earlier this week.
As support for a Yes vote continues to grow in Scotland, it is possible that the parties that make up the Better Together campaign might be forced into making some kind of formal commitment but it looks unlikely at this time.
I remember prior to the 1992 general election John Major indicated that he would look sympathetically at devolution for Scotland if the Tories were re-elected. They won the election, Major "took stock" and decided to do nothing. Scotland has lots of experience of vague hints and carrots from Westminster disappearing like snow off a dyke.
Last edited by Porrohman; 1st Mar 2014 at 13:22.
I agree with Porrohman, absolutely correct. Scotland already complies with ALL EU requirements etc. The EU will not reject an existing enthusiastic member.
I hear Mr Salmon wants to set up passport control at Hadrian's Wall
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I hear Mr Salmon wants to set up passport control at Hadrian's Wall to check on all the right wingers wanting a slice of the action"
If he does then he is guilty of starting a war
Hadrian s Wall lies completely within England and at some points (eg Wallsend) is 67 kms south of the border..........
If he does then he is guilty of starting a war
Hadrian s Wall lies completely within England and at some points (eg Wallsend) is 67 kms south of the border..........
If Scotland votes Yes, there is no automatic entry into the EU but is it really conceivable that the EU would revoke the EU passports of 5.3 million people that live in an independent Scotland, revoke the rights of Scottish people who work in other EU countries from having the right to work there, revoke the rights of citizens of other EU countries (including from the rest of the UK) to work in Scotland, revoke the right of Spanish, French, Danish and other EU fishermen to fish in Scottish waters, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Persons living in Scotland hold British Passports, French passports, Irish Passports and passports from many many countries.
EU has NO say in what occurs in Scotland regarding passports and attempts to claim as such show a deep ignorance of the split between National and EU rules.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The real problem will come if the EU says that Scotland has to join both the euro and Schengen
In fact you'd expect MORE air travel into an independent Scotland - for a start every UN agency and NGO will set up an office in Edinburgh (no-one will go to Glasgow) and they'll all have to travel back and forth to London to get anywhere else outside Europe
Then there will be the IMF making regular visits to make sure that the Stabilisation Plan is working after the currency crashes.............
In fact you'd expect MORE air travel into an independent Scotland - for a start every UN agency and NGO will set up an office in Edinburgh (no-one will go to Glasgow) and they'll all have to travel back and forth to London to get anywhere else outside Europe
Then there will be the IMF making regular visits to make sure that the Stabilisation Plan is working after the currency crashes.............
The real problem will come if the EU says that Scotland has to join both the euro and Schengen
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 57
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Come now, HH, you're being ridiculous.
Why would anyone travel to London to go outside Europe when they can go to Amsterdam, Paris or Frankfurt?
And I don't see sterling crashing..
Why would anyone travel to London to go outside Europe when they can go to Amsterdam, Paris or Frankfurt?
And I don't see sterling crashing..
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: On a foreign shore trying a new wine diet. So far, I've lost 3days!
Age: 75
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why would anyone travel to London to go outside Europe when they can go to The US, Canada, UAE and soon Doha direct avoiding London and Europe. Oh, wait isn't that what independence is all about? 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle NI
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's entirely right that the good people of Scotland have been given the chance to say yea or no, personally I don't care which way they vote and I don't think it will make much difference to Scotland in the longer term, indeed they may well be much stronger because of it if they vote yes.
The impact on the UK will much more significant, with lost oil revenue taxes, ditto whiskey and of course the nuclear question.
The problem for Scotland will be currency using the pound is a no no, you cannot have a country who would likely have vastly different spending policies doing their own thing with others south of the border having to pick up the tab.
The Lothian question is still unresolved and Alex Salmond is a canny Scot and will do everything he can to drive that wedge further in the run up to R day
If they vote yes it's goodnight Labour in rUK if they vote no the 48% that voted yes will demand further powers so it's a nightmare for rUK either way, either way you'll still be able to fly between London & Scotland and it will probably be cheaper Southbound, but who pays, I think many know the answer to that question, actually on reflection by a tiny whisker I hope they vote yes and get into the EU
The impact on the UK will much more significant, with lost oil revenue taxes, ditto whiskey and of course the nuclear question.
The problem for Scotland will be currency using the pound is a no no, you cannot have a country who would likely have vastly different spending policies doing their own thing with others south of the border having to pick up the tab.
The Lothian question is still unresolved and Alex Salmond is a canny Scot and will do everything he can to drive that wedge further in the run up to R day
If they vote yes it's goodnight Labour in rUK if they vote no the 48% that voted yes will demand further powers so it's a nightmare for rUK either way, either way you'll still be able to fly between London & Scotland and it will probably be cheaper Southbound, but who pays, I think many know the answer to that question, actually on reflection by a tiny whisker I hope they vote yes and get into the EU
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
too much of a moneyspinner for Westminster.
Why would anyone travel to London to go outside Europe when they can go to Amsterdam, Paris or Frankfurt?
Ooops sorry, I am using PPruNe as therapy, I'll stop now. The debate is now focussing on some real world problems and issues that can't be dodged any longer. I am not even allowed to vote whereas a recent resident Pole can take part in making me a foreign citizen in what is currently my own country.
Give it five minutes and someone will be along suggesting Scotland needs an airline, call it a flag carrier and go up against what will undoubtedly be referred to as "London Airways". I spend my days surrounded by people who come thousands of miles to be part of London as a world city and watch my own people stick their noses in the air and offer their support to the Germans, the Dutch and the French. Anyone so long as it's no thae English <censored before the Mods do>.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 57
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, Skipness, I meant exactly what I wrote. No more and no less. For travelling out of Europe each of these airports is a better option than Heathrow.
You've no idea who or what I am so please don't ascribe racial motives to me.
You've no idea who or what I am so please don't ascribe racial motives to me.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgive me, I phrased that badly.
However in terms of the wider debate I think there is an emdemic anti Englishness that the SNP is now, perhaps unintentionally, stoking.
LHR is a much better option than in recent years however it retains some major pain points.
However in terms of the wider debate I think there is an emdemic anti Englishness that the SNP is now, perhaps unintentionally, stoking.
LHR is a much better option than in recent years however it retains some major pain points.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on 'til morning
Age: 63
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
racedo: I had assumed that because my passport says "European Union" at the top that it was an EU passport but it turns out that, as you say, it is a British one. The EU just mandates aspects of the design of passports of EU member countries, they don't actually issue them.
Nevertheless, the rest of my points still remain valid. Why would it be in the EU's interests to revoke the rights of Scottish people who work in other EU countries from having the right to work there, revoke the rights of citizens of other EU countries (including from the rest of the UK) to work in Scotland, revoke the right of Spanish, French, Danish and other EU fishermen to fish in Scottish waters, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Many experts on EU membership agree that, although this situation has never arisen before, a way would be found to admit an independent Scotland into the EU in an expeditious manner and that Barroso's intervention was ill-informed to say the least. These experts say that there would be no need for Scotland to agree a border controls regime that is different from the UK's nor would the Euro be forced on Scotland.
Comparison with Sweden is relevant. Sweden had to agree to join the Euro as a condition of membership but only when the necessary economic convergence was complete. Subsequent to joining the EU, a referendum was held in September 2003 which saw 55.9 percent vote against membership of the eurozone. As a consequence, Sweden decided in 2003 not to adopt the euro for the time being. If they had voted in favour, Sweden would have adopted euro on 1 January 2006. Sweden maintains that joining the ERM II (a requirement for euro adoption) is voluntary, giving Sweden a de facto opt out. Eleven years after that referendum the EU has taken no action against Sweden for failing to join the Euro. Sweden and the euro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sweden's accession to the EU did not take 12 months as I had indicated. It actually took 13 months elapsed time although the negotiations themselves took 11 months. The process of demonstrating compliance with EU rules was however much more complex for Sweden than it would be for an independent Scotland since we have 40 years of experience complying with EU rules and regulations as part of the UK. Pragmatism will prevail because there is no reason for the EU to want to act in a vindictive and vexatious towards an independent Scotland since our referendum is being carried out with the agreement of the UK government.
SkipnessOneEcho - I don't believe there is any anti-English sentiment driving the desire for Scottish independence. There is however a feeling among many people north of the border that the Westminster system is utterly corrupt and morally bankrupt, sentiments shared by many south of the border. In addition, Westminster quite naturally, takes little account of Scotland's priorities because we are seen to be a small and remote part of the country and it is far more important for the UK to make decisions based on what is best for the largest part of the economy which is London and the South East. I think most people north of the border accept that this will always happen and when you add to this the fact that people north of the border are, on average, more centre-left than the rest of the UK there is a longstanding feeling that we don't get the kind of governments that we would want and never will under the current United Kingdom. Speaking personally, I have a huge number of very good friends that are English and I expect that most people North of the border will too. Yes, there's some sporting rivalry but asking Scottish people to support England football team is a bit like asking Everton supporters to support Liverpool or Chelsea supporters to support Arsenal. It's a rivalry, not anything more malicious than that.
In summary, many people north of the border would rather that decisions are made in Holyrood rather than Westminster. Interestingly, many people in England would rather that decisions that effect them are made in Westminster rather than Brussels. It'll be interesting to see how both these debates progress in the coming months.
Nevertheless, the rest of my points still remain valid. Why would it be in the EU's interests to revoke the rights of Scottish people who work in other EU countries from having the right to work there, revoke the rights of citizens of other EU countries (including from the rest of the UK) to work in Scotland, revoke the right of Spanish, French, Danish and other EU fishermen to fish in Scottish waters, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc.
Many experts on EU membership agree that, although this situation has never arisen before, a way would be found to admit an independent Scotland into the EU in an expeditious manner and that Barroso's intervention was ill-informed to say the least. These experts say that there would be no need for Scotland to agree a border controls regime that is different from the UK's nor would the Euro be forced on Scotland.
Comparison with Sweden is relevant. Sweden had to agree to join the Euro as a condition of membership but only when the necessary economic convergence was complete. Subsequent to joining the EU, a referendum was held in September 2003 which saw 55.9 percent vote against membership of the eurozone. As a consequence, Sweden decided in 2003 not to adopt the euro for the time being. If they had voted in favour, Sweden would have adopted euro on 1 January 2006. Sweden maintains that joining the ERM II (a requirement for euro adoption) is voluntary, giving Sweden a de facto opt out. Eleven years after that referendum the EU has taken no action against Sweden for failing to join the Euro. Sweden and the euro - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sweden's accession to the EU did not take 12 months as I had indicated. It actually took 13 months elapsed time although the negotiations themselves took 11 months. The process of demonstrating compliance with EU rules was however much more complex for Sweden than it would be for an independent Scotland since we have 40 years of experience complying with EU rules and regulations as part of the UK. Pragmatism will prevail because there is no reason for the EU to want to act in a vindictive and vexatious towards an independent Scotland since our referendum is being carried out with the agreement of the UK government.
SkipnessOneEcho - I don't believe there is any anti-English sentiment driving the desire for Scottish independence. There is however a feeling among many people north of the border that the Westminster system is utterly corrupt and morally bankrupt, sentiments shared by many south of the border. In addition, Westminster quite naturally, takes little account of Scotland's priorities because we are seen to be a small and remote part of the country and it is far more important for the UK to make decisions based on what is best for the largest part of the economy which is London and the South East. I think most people north of the border accept that this will always happen and when you add to this the fact that people north of the border are, on average, more centre-left than the rest of the UK there is a longstanding feeling that we don't get the kind of governments that we would want and never will under the current United Kingdom. Speaking personally, I have a huge number of very good friends that are English and I expect that most people North of the border will too. Yes, there's some sporting rivalry but asking Scottish people to support England football team is a bit like asking Everton supporters to support Liverpool or Chelsea supporters to support Arsenal. It's a rivalry, not anything more malicious than that.
In summary, many people north of the border would rather that decisions are made in Holyrood rather than Westminster. Interestingly, many people in England would rather that decisions that effect them are made in Westminster rather than Brussels. It'll be interesting to see how both these debates progress in the coming months.