Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

FlyBe - 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Nov 2013, 16:15
  #3401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does that mean no more of those routes or no more Embraers? If you can give away that info!
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 16:34
  #3402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when we have Embraers.
Yes but when its only Embraer pilots who are at risk AND the fact that the Embraer isn't right for Flybe isn't the writing on the wall?
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 20:58
  #3403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

shows how silly people are just because we are in 2013 prop aircraft must be
ancient and 20 years old
Thank you Nick Barnes, but call it silly or otherwise, I have expressed my view. Easy to dismiss somebody else's opinion. Yours is no more valid than mine.
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 22:40
  #3404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Diss, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree props may not be everyone's cup of tea I just get annoyed when people suggest just because it has propellers its old and horrible and loud even before they step on it, i was at the airport and heard people saying surely thats not our plane it must be 20 years old, when actually it was a 6 month old flybe Q400. Everyone has their opinion you prefer the jets which is fair enough I don't really mind if I were to get a jet or a prop if I was on a flight for less than an hour, as long as I get there safely and comfortabley that's the main thing.
NickBarnes is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 22:43
  #3405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Diss, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But I do agree on certain routes flybe are more expensive than there rivals with the jets
NickBarnes is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2013, 10:40
  #3406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They should have kept on to the 146's.... It seems to have all gone pear shaped since then
Vapor is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2013, 13:11
  #3407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: dublin
Age: 56
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
146's. Tosh its these new fangled land planes. What was wrong with an empire flying boat or the queen mary!
stab3.5up is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2013, 11:10
  #3408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 509
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clearly these redundancies affect all sections of the company, but, I am curious as to whether the pilot redundancies are being done on LIFO, can anyone comment? Is there a chance that various airports and suppliers will reduce their costs to make some of the 60+ unprofitable routes saveable and reduce the number of jobs at risk?

bb
bad bear is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2013, 11:19
  #3409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's more FIFO than LIFO.
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2013, 13:03
  #3410 (permalink)  

lazy fairweather PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Forres,Scotland
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BadBear

Don't quote me on this because I'm now 7 months out of the company, but Gatwick aside I think some of these supply and handling contracts had been slashed to the bone as it was. As I was leaving they were even talking about not carrying serviettes anymore to save costs. I believe thats not the case any more but I think they'll be hard pressed to reduce costs in that sector any further.
JimNich is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2013, 19:42
  #3411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The public perception of props...

It goes like this - Iam not going on that, Props dont look so good, they are unsafe, they are noisy, flights are more turbulent...

BUT the public want cheap flights.

Mr Commercial and Mr Finance at flybe should have see the cost efficiencies of a Dash vs Embraer.

Ok the dash does suffer from 'glitches' and 'gremlins' but its a machine... Its a tea-spoon of fuel-drinking machine.

Whilst the Embraer is a good aircraft in its own right, its looking more and more likely that its not the one for flybe (The 'big' Embraer anyway)

Props? Its all down to efficiency. Looks can be deceptive!
silverstreak is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2013, 11:19
  #3412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I feel safer on props, for some reason.
I don't have a fear of flying, but there's something strangely reassuring about a prop (for me anyway!)
SealinkBF is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2013, 13:31
  #3413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: solihull West Midlands
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silver streak,

Not sure about perception of props.

Fact they are slower, fact they are noisier, fact people like travelling on jets more.

You will find more people swapping to other carriers if they ditch jets for Dash 8s, thats of course if those airlines are flying the same routes.

The fact that so few airlines fly only props on a quite large route network like Fly Be surely speaks for itself.

Nigel
nigel osborne is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2013, 19:21
  #3414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not far from the airport
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats of course if those airlines are flying the same routes.
I think Flybe's strategic plan will be to ensure that they don't have much (if any) overlap on their routes, and so passengers will be flying what's available, i.e. the dash.
Boing7117 is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2013, 22:26
  #3415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel, come on - there are loads of airlines out there operating only a prop aircraft. Jazz, Porter, Aer Lingus Regional / Aer Arran to name a few.

Can we pleassseeee stop this jet vs prop nonsense! It is personal taste and no one person can speak on behalf of the entire worlds population. If we want to look at facts, the fact is people will still fly on a prop if it is an airlink from A to B - an airlink they need to use.

Now lets move on, for the love of god and whilst we are still young.

Anyway I heard that next week we shall hear which routes are remaining, which are going and any new routes. Has anyone any ideas which routes may fall in to each of these groups?
Cloud1 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2013, 13:34
  #3416 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Solihull
Age: 60
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Q400/175

I know flybe are hardly in purchasing mode at present but does anybody know if this option has been looked at.

Just two less seats than the 175 but it doesn't sound great for room but I suppose the beancounters would love it.

DUBAI: Thailand's Nok launches high capacity Q400

Pete
OltonPete is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2013, 14:48
  #3417 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless I'm missing a trick, how exactly are bombardier planning to add another 8 seats and a passenger door where hold five currently sits?

The door I can see, and maybe 4 seats, but 8?!?!
drivez is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2013, 22:20
  #3418 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: England, UK
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The key is reducing the seat pitch. Flybe currently has a seat pitch of 31in. The high capacity version has a pitch of 29in. By doing this you will be able to squeeze another row of 4 seats in before removing hold 5. Once that's out you would be able to get the other 4 seats in. Bloody cramped aircraft though!
Set 1013 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2013, 22:55
  #3419 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
schedule change

with the closure of the Aberdeen base imminent, am i to assume they may drop the early morning flights out of the city since no aircraft will be here overnight? Or will they change the schedule timing a bit so an aircraft can get up here in the morning. Mainly the ABZ-MAN routing
wesleyscott is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2013, 08:54
  #3420 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for that, guess we will just have to see what they say this week., let's hope they keep going
wesleyscott is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.