Jet2 - 3
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Suggestion.........
Next time J2 have any kind of substantial delay...........we all pop down to his office and start banging on about delays, information, customer service etc to said CEO, his airline, his responsibility.......
Next time J2 have any kind of substantial delay...........we all pop down to his office and start banging on about delays, information, customer service etc to said CEO, his airline, his responsibility.......
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
al446
I am not twisting words - Neither am I guessing as to whether PM got a police caution or not. I would like some evidence.
Forget the altercation between PM and airport staff for a moment. you defend Facelookbovvered stating that Mr Meeson is a risk to the airline.
In the context of the above quote - It seems that Facelookbovvered is saying that Mr Meeson having a pop at pilots is making the airline unsafe for pax.
I don't agree with that, so how can I be twisting words.
Look since this came out on the thread about PM - We have had tirades about the state of Jet2 757 cabins, advice to fly Monarch on a JET2 thread, and even foul mouthed comments that added nothing to the debate.
"as reported" - That's what I have a problem with, no hard evidence he used foul language like some on this thread - **** does not hide the meaning of the word - Maybe twisting it a little.
I know JET2 are not perfect as you are implying I believe - In fact I am in dispute with them at the moment over how their booking engine works since the silly way they give a choice of airport or online check in.
Even (if) PM made obscene comments (unproven as yet), I don't think Jet2 can be held responsible for that as an airline, and a reason to sound of about their a/c and pointed in the direction of Monarch, and posts with language that Mr Meeson is being accused of using.
I am not twisting words - Neither am I guessing as to whether PM got a police caution or not. I would like some evidence.
Forget the altercation between PM and airport staff for a moment. you defend Facelookbovvered stating that Mr Meeson is a risk to the airline.
Originally Posted by Facelookbovvered
I have lost count of the number of times he has gone off on one with crews due to depart, he is not a pilot and is a risk to the safety of the airline
I don't agree with that, so how can I be twisting words.
Look since this came out on the thread about PM - We have had tirades about the state of Jet2 757 cabins, advice to fly Monarch on a JET2 thread, and even foul mouthed comments that added nothing to the debate.
Originally Posted by al446
Smudge gave his opinion of the man, I happen to agree, but it in no way equates to the behaviour of PM as reported.
I know JET2 are not perfect as you are implying I believe - In fact I am in dispute with them at the moment over how their booking engine works since the silly way they give a choice of airport or online check in.
Even (if) PM made obscene comments (unproven as yet), I don't think Jet2 can be held responsible for that as an airline, and a reason to sound of about their a/c and pointed in the direction of Monarch, and posts with language that Mr Meeson is being accused of using.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Manchester Evening News
Asked if he had been swearing during the incident, he said: “I think the odd swear word may have dropped out of my mouth. But I wasn’t swearing at anyone, just about life in general.”
Originally Posted by Manchester Evening News
He told the M.E.N.: “There was a great long queue, which is not what we want, and staff were sitting there doing nothing.
But again contrary to what posters on this thread have said. The Manchester Evening News says he launched a tirade at his OWN staff.
Originally Posted by Manchester Evening News
A BUDGET airline boss launched a tirade at his own staff when he saw customers in a long queue at Manchester Airport.
I also believe we have to allow for journalistic licence when reading the MEN, like with all the press.
This PM story is now time expired & tedious, give it a rest, same thing going over the same ground.
Who cares? Its his train set & he won't care what you think or say, likewise MOL with his train set.
Please move on..............................
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr A Tis
The PM part of this thread would have been over and done with eons ago had there not been so many deviations away from the facts,and away from PM for that matter.
I agree in full that some good comments about JET2 would be far more welcome that a minor tiff at MAN T1.
It's hard to believe that this is the JET2 thread.
The PM part of this thread would have been over and done with eons ago had there not been so many deviations away from the facts,and away from PM for that matter.
I agree in full that some good comments about JET2 would be far more welcome that a minor tiff at MAN T1.
It's hard to believe that this is the JET2 thread.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glasgow could really do with Jet2 moving in
I have found it strange that Jet 2 havent got even a few routes out of Glasgow. Wouldnt expect a base becuase of Edinburgh but they could a few routes
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Coastal
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Several recent posts have been moved here: http://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf...-question.html
Well im just gessing because somebody said there will be an announcement in the next 2 weeks and 2 weeks has gone by. Simple.
Id say that we could be waiting untill the begining of November to hear any announcement. Remember the two weeks time frame was just a rumour, as is the location of the next base at the moment.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: XUMAT
Age: 61
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had my first trip on an LS 757 the other week, and to be honest it wasn't bad!
Aircraft was G-LSAC out and back, the new seats are a bit hard for a long sector but otherwise everything was working and the aircraft wasn't in bad shape at all. A very enjoyable trip and the LS cabin crews are some of the hardest grafters I've seen, so if any are reading this well done to you. The only issues I had with the aircraft were smelly toilets which really do need a bit of a steam blasting.
I can see the point of the new lightweight frame seating though, it must save a lot of weight and therefore fuel. Over three hours and backache sets in, but for an average lowcost type sector they are perfectly adequate and look very easy to maintain. It will be interesting to see how a few years in service daily affects them but the red leather facing seems to be robust enough and looks like it can be changed on the line without major surgery.
Aircraft was G-LSAC out and back, the new seats are a bit hard for a long sector but otherwise everything was working and the aircraft wasn't in bad shape at all. A very enjoyable trip and the LS cabin crews are some of the hardest grafters I've seen, so if any are reading this well done to you. The only issues I had with the aircraft were smelly toilets which really do need a bit of a steam blasting.
I can see the point of the new lightweight frame seating though, it must save a lot of weight and therefore fuel. Over three hours and backache sets in, but for an average lowcost type sector they are perfectly adequate and look very easy to maintain. It will be interesting to see how a few years in service daily affects them but the red leather facing seems to be robust enough and looks like it can be changed on the line without major surgery.