BA Cityflyer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Given that LCY is likely to have both A318s and some ERJ-170s / 190s on the deck at once, are the above types limited to Stands 21-24 only?
If the ERJ-190 is too big for the main apron, what happens if LH or LX want to fly them in?
If the ERJ-190 is too big for the main apron, what happens if LH or LX want to fly them in?
According to figures I have to hand, the 'standard' E190 would have a range of 500-600nm with a full pax load off the LCY runways in ISA conditions. The BA aircraft may have performance upgrades of course.
Prague would be a better destination out of LCY for CityJet/Air France, as they in turn could offer connections on fellow SkyTeam carrier CSA. Prague, for BA and for OneWorld, is effectively a dead end. As far as leisure traffic to Prague is concerned, much of this is more Stansted-pricing oriented, and the Stag Weekends there appear to have peaked - doubtless much to the relief of the Czechs !
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatspin_Fumble
virginblue,
I assume you know what an EMB 170/190 is, regarding your comment about a JATO.
I assume you know what an EMB 170/190 is, regarding your comment about a JATO.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the original comment was intended as humour. You know, a joke, something funny, which is not necessarily true...
Anyway, it appears that without some nice rockets bolted to the wings, the E190 cannot make it to places like FCO, MAD, ARN, HEL, WAW or VIE with a full load. That is if the 500-600nm perimeter is correct.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like 'AR' will be gone by either today or tomorrow. It's just her bare fuselage that's left and cranes were in place on saturday morning. Stands 21-24 were closed and link 'D' not available.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E190 LCY range
I have been trawling the internet to see if I can find in the way of info about BA's E-Jets.
I came across a news release from Embraer which says the E190's max range from LCY will be 800nm
Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.
The E170's range is 750nm with a full load
Embraer Commercial Jets
Which is much further than I expected.
I came across a news release from Embraer which says the E190's max range from LCY will be 800nm
Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.
The E170's range is 750nm with a full load
Embraer Commercial Jets
Which is much further than I expected.
The figures I quoted were for the AR version, for which Embraer quote a runway length required of 1,267m for a range of 500nm, while the BA order is for the SR variant. I cannot find any performance figures for the latter variant, but presumably this accounts for its greater range capability out of LCY.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What improvements does the "SR" model have relative to the baseline model - other than having a steep approach button combined with a low-density layout? The engines are the same, IIRC, the structure is the same, so what exactly is the story behind it? Even Embraer has little, if any details on the "SR" in the public domain.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what is the correct figures for these aircraft on range? the RJs do MAD now, and did WAW ok with a limited load on the routes but whats the point in replacing an airframe with an airframe with less ange?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The current MAD route is about 815 miles. We can do it with a full load (RJ85) if there's a bit of wind. Preferebly from 10. ISA it's restricted slightly.
Don't worry about the figures just yet. As marlow said, what's the point in getting new a/c when they have less range. So I'll bet once we get the proper numbers for the SR version we'll be fine.
Don't worry about the figures just yet. As marlow said, what's the point in getting new a/c when they have less range. So I'll bet once we get the proper numbers for the SR version we'll be fine.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's another question. Will we in whatever way adjust our timetable to fit the LCY-JFK-LCY times? I pressume they (BA) would like to have some of our flights arrive or depart to match the A318. To act as a sort of feeder?
Last edited by DutchBird-757; 29th Jun 2009 at 14:02.
For anywhere to connect through LCY to the new New York service you need cities with good business traffic, and relatively poor current connections to New York.
Unfortunately none of the current BA destinations fall into that category. The VLM points are a much better set, places like Luxembourg, Jersey, etc. But BA obviously can't do a tie-up with them any more.
Unfortunately none of the current BA destinations fall into that category. The VLM points are a much better set, places like Luxembourg, Jersey, etc. But BA obviously can't do a tie-up with them any more.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DB 757
Remember that the BA product is a 32 seat business class service, those clients who are high spending, if they wish to fly from JFK to Europe, why would they transit through LCY, they would simply fly with another carrier to their European destination, or transit through LHR T5 which is a very pleasant experience. I hope the LCY JFK route succeeds, but I am not convinced it will, after all the very market they are trying to atrract, most have gone bust or about to be locked up for a long time in the slammer.
FF
Remember that the BA product is a 32 seat business class service, those clients who are high spending, if they wish to fly from JFK to Europe, why would they transit through LCY, they would simply fly with another carrier to their European destination, or transit through LHR T5 which is a very pleasant experience. I hope the LCY JFK route succeeds, but I am not convinced it will, after all the very market they are trying to atrract, most have gone bust or about to be locked up for a long time in the slammer.
FF
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by marlowe
So what is the correct figures for these aircraft on range? the RJs do MAD now, and did WAW ok with a limited load on the routes but whats the point in replacing an airframe with an airframe with less ange?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand it's not designed to be a connecting service, it's a point to point service for the City and the Wharf and has been underwritten to an extent due to promised business from a large BA client, Barclay's.