Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BA Cityflyer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2009, 13:59
  #501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...you mean a full load with max fuel? So Embraer apparently has come up with a "Embraer 190 JATO"?
virginblue is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 14:31
  #502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given that LCY is likely to have both A318s and some ERJ-170s / 190s on the deck at once, are the above types limited to Stands 21-24 only?

If the ERJ-190 is too big for the main apron, what happens if LH or LX want to fly them in?
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 23:22
  #503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
virginblue,

I assume you know what an EMB 170/190 is, regarding your comment about a JATO.
Flatspin_Fumble is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 06:54
  #504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 75
Posts: 2,694
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to figures I have to hand, the 'standard' E190 would have a range of 500-600nm with a full pax load off the LCY runways in ISA conditions. The BA aircraft may have performance upgrades of course.
Expressflight is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 08:28
  #505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by BAladdy
Prague would be a good fit for the leisure market and would do well year round.
Prague would not be the best choice for BA in Central Europe out of LCY, as it does not offer any onward connectional opportunities for them. Budapest would be a much better choice as fellow OneWorld carrier Malev can then provide feed and connections to all across Eastern Europe. LCY already handles quite an amount of such traffic, but it is all scooped up by Lufthansa and Swiss through their own hubs.

Prague would be a better destination out of LCY for CityJet/Air France, as they in turn could offer connections on fellow SkyTeam carrier CSA. Prague, for BA and for OneWorld, is effectively a dead end. As far as leisure traffic to Prague is concerned, much of this is more Stansted-pricing oriented, and the Stag Weekends there appear to have peaked - doubtless much to the relief of the Czechs !
WHBM is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 08:35
  #506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatspin_Fumble
virginblue,

I assume you know what an EMB 170/190 is, regarding your comment about a JATO.
I think the original comment was intended as humour. You know, a joke, something funny, which is not necessarily true...
Cyrano is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 07:43
  #507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the original comment was intended as humour. You know, a joke, something funny, which is not necessarily true...
I think Flatspin_Fumble's remark was also lighthearted as he hinted at the fact that in a strict sense, a jet like the E170/190 is always jet-assisted at take-off I should have used "RATO" instead, but I thought "JATO" was better known (althought "JATO" is also used in the context of jets, not only props).

Anyway, it appears that without some nice rockets bolted to the wings, the E190 cannot make it to places like FCO, MAD, ARN, HEL, WAW or VIE with a full load. That is if the 500-600nm perimeter is correct.
virginblue is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 14:49
  #508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like 'AR' will be gone by either today or tomorrow. It's just her bare fuselage that's left and cranes were in place on saturday morning. Stands 21-24 were closed and link 'D' not available.
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 15:33
  #509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virginblue

pretty much spot on with your post.
FF
Flatspin_Fumble is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 18:49
  #510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E190 LCY range

I have been trawling the internet to see if I can find in the way of info about BA's E-Jets.

I came across a news release from Embraer which says the E190's max range from LCY will be 800nm

Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.

The E170's range is 750nm with a full load

Embraer Commercial Jets

Which is much further than I expected.
BAladdy is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 20:55
  #511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
750nm would still rule out destinations such as FCO and HEL. MAD, WAW or ARN would be quite a stretch and might be out of range as well.
virginblue is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2009, 07:15
  #512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Age: 75
Posts: 2,694
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The figures I quoted were for the AR version, for which Embraer quote a runway length required of 1,267m for a range of 500nm, while the BA order is for the SR variant. I cannot find any performance figures for the latter variant, but presumably this accounts for its greater range capability out of LCY.
Expressflight is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2009, 09:59
  #513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What improvements does the "SR" model have relative to the baseline model - other than having a steep approach button combined with a low-density layout? The engines are the same, IIRC, the structure is the same, so what exactly is the story behind it? Even Embraer has little, if any details on the "SR" in the public domain.
virginblue is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2009, 12:12
  #514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is the correct figures for these aircraft on range? the RJs do MAD now, and did WAW ok with a limited load on the routes but whats the point in replacing an airframe with an airframe with less ange?
marlowe is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2009, 12:32
  #515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The current MAD route is about 815 miles. We can do it with a full load (RJ85) if there's a bit of wind. Preferebly from 10. ISA it's restricted slightly.

Don't worry about the figures just yet. As marlow said, what's the point in getting new a/c when they have less range. So I'll bet once we get the proper numbers for the SR version we'll be fine.
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 11:49
  #516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's another question. Will we in whatever way adjust our timetable to fit the LCY-JFK-LCY times? I pressume they (BA) would like to have some of our flights arrive or depart to match the A318. To act as a sort of feeder?

Last edited by DutchBird-757; 29th Jun 2009 at 14:02.
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 12:11
  #517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
For anywhere to connect through LCY to the new New York service you need cities with good business traffic, and relatively poor current connections to New York.

Unfortunately none of the current BA destinations fall into that category. The VLM points are a much better set, places like Luxembourg, Jersey, etc. But BA obviously can't do a tie-up with them any more.
WHBM is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 19:59
  #518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DB 757

Remember that the BA product is a 32 seat business class service, those clients who are high spending, if they wish to fly from JFK to Europe, why would they transit through LCY, they would simply fly with another carrier to their European destination, or transit through LHR T5 which is a very pleasant experience. I hope the LCY JFK route succeeds, but I am not convinced it will, after all the very market they are trying to atrract, most have gone bust or about to be locked up for a long time in the slammer.
FF
Flatspin_Fumble is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 22:37
  #519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marlowe
So what is the correct figures for these aircraft on range? the RJs do MAD now, and did WAW ok with a limited load on the routes but whats the point in replacing an airframe with an airframe with less ange?
I'd assumed that the reason for buying a mixed fleet was simply so that there would be some aircraft (the 170s) with the range to do the long sectors like MAD/BCN etc. The operating-cost-per-seat equation doesn't really favour the smaller aircraft otherwise.
Cyrano is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2009, 22:39
  #520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand it's not designed to be a connecting service, it's a point to point service for the City and the Wharf and has been underwritten to an extent due to promised business from a large BA client, Barclay's.
Skipness One Echo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.