BRISTOL - 3
Brunel to Concorde
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi W.
By coincidence my question about there being no such thing as bad publicity was put to the travel writer Simon Calder (he seems to have been as much in media evidence as Andrew Skipp in recent days) on today's BBC Bristol lunchtime tv news.
He came up with the idea that the whole country is now aware that Bristol is quite a busy airport with many flights which was not the national perception before all this happened. I take the point but does it mean any of these people living far from the west country would ever actually use BRS?
The way things are at the moment if a passenger falls down and twists his ankle getting off an aircraft the press will link it to the runway in some way -"Now passenger falls down near danger runway" sort of headline.
That cartoon reproduced in the R & N thread on the BRS situation is brilliant.
Today's Bristol Evening Post quotes 'industry sources' saying the airport will have lost around £500,000 as a result of the disruption. An easyJet spokeswoman said her airline will pay for the bussing of pax to the likes of CWL, BHX and LGW.
In the report Andrew Skipp admits, "Our communication with passengers has been bad. It should have been better". He also indicated that legal action was unlikely.
My considerable experience as a slf is that communication from airports/airlines in many places is often lacking; I would like to think that if nothing else this experience would concentrate the minds of those at BRS at least, but I won't hold my breath.
I have three rotations booked out of BRS in the next eight weeks. Fingers crossed the airport and its airlines have a smooth run for a while!!
By coincidence my question about there being no such thing as bad publicity was put to the travel writer Simon Calder (he seems to have been as much in media evidence as Andrew Skipp in recent days) on today's BBC Bristol lunchtime tv news.
He came up with the idea that the whole country is now aware that Bristol is quite a busy airport with many flights which was not the national perception before all this happened. I take the point but does it mean any of these people living far from the west country would ever actually use BRS?
The way things are at the moment if a passenger falls down and twists his ankle getting off an aircraft the press will link it to the runway in some way -"Now passenger falls down near danger runway" sort of headline.
That cartoon reproduced in the R & N thread on the BRS situation is brilliant.
Today's Bristol Evening Post quotes 'industry sources' saying the airport will have lost around £500,000 as a result of the disruption. An easyJet spokeswoman said her airline will pay for the bussing of pax to the likes of CWL, BHX and LGW.
In the report Andrew Skipp admits, "Our communication with passengers has been bad. It should have been better". He also indicated that legal action was unlikely.
My considerable experience as a slf is that communication from airports/airlines in many places is often lacking; I would like to think that if nothing else this experience would concentrate the minds of those at BRS at least, but I won't hold my breath.
I have three rotations booked out of BRS in the next eight weeks. Fingers crossed the airport and its airlines have a smooth run for a while!!
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speaking to one of my colleagues at Cardiff, he said he hadn't enjoyed being at work that much in ages. As much as we were a bit bereft of things to do, neither had we! Still, back to normal now, thank goodness.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BRISTOL
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see in the Newcastle thread that EK is starting DXB soon, good news for them but I'll be very suprised if the fill an A330 daily from there, would make a nice cheeky double drop with BRS I think 
sorry was dreaming there!With the works in the departure lounge to extend the business lounges and add more capacity I wonder if they're doing it in the hope it may attract airlines such as EK that have a large business cabin.
sorry was dreaming there!With the works in the departure lounge to extend the business lounges and add more capacity I wonder if they're doing it in the hope it may attract airlines such as EK that have a large business cabin.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh dear; that's a shame that DXB went to NCL. I would have thought that would be another flagship route to go alongside EWR.
I'm not sure how much of the terminal expansion is aimed at us "business travellers". We tend to be awfully bad at spending money in shops and cafes, generally preferring to turn up 10 minutes before gate closes (boarding pass already printed out at home) and race to the plane.
I understand that BA's Terraces lounge is getting the chop? With the future of Flybe's aspirations at Bristol still somewhat uncertain, I wouldn't be embarking on a lounge extension plan at the moment. You might find the only lounge passengers are from the EWR flight each day (12 of them) and a handful of KLM, SN and "Priority Pass". (Although I guess you can also book directly and add them to package tours).
I'm not sure how much of the terminal expansion is aimed at us "business travellers". We tend to be awfully bad at spending money in shops and cafes, generally preferring to turn up 10 minutes before gate closes (boarding pass already printed out at home) and race to the plane.
I understand that BA's Terraces lounge is getting the chop? With the future of Flybe's aspirations at Bristol still somewhat uncertain, I wouldn't be embarking on a lounge extension plan at the moment. You might find the only lounge passengers are from the EWR flight each day (12 of them) and a handful of KLM, SN and "Priority Pass". (Although I guess you can also book directly and add them to package tours).
Brunel to Concorde
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The master plan contains a forecast that a Dubai route (one of only four long-haul scheduled routes for which it is thought there would be demand from the Bristol catchment) would be carrying 120,000 pax per annum by 2015.
I suppose BRS would prove a problem at the moment as Emirates seem to be using A330 equipment which I assume could not make Dubai non-stop with a full payload (with any payload?) off the rolling hills of Broadfield Down.
It seems that before 2015 there will be flights to Dubai from many regional airports if its hedonistic outlets continue to spring up at the current rate of knots, let alone onward transfers from there with Emirates.
I’ve been reading with interest the debate on the CWL thread re rail connections.
Given that any rail link to BRS would be prohibitively expensive to build and would be a shuttle that required a change of train at Temple Meads, I wonder whether the Flyer service is not a better option anyway for a ‘rail-locked’ airport like BRS.
The Flyer service, operated by 50-seat First Coaches on behalf of the airport, runs every fifteen minutes from/to Temple Meads Station from early to late (although frequency drops to a 30-minute one from mid evening) and it is possible to book through-rail journeys direct to/from the airport using the coach for the last/first bit, a 25-minute journey.
As Temple Meads is on a main-line railway ‘crossroads’ with regular services in all directions it means access can be gained from many areas. Any arriving rail passengers at TM can be sure of an ongoing connection to the airport within a few minutes.
Bristol Airport is shown as a station in First Great Western’s list of stations on its web site and the Flyer appears on TM station’s arrival and departure screens.
It seems increasingly popular and frequency was increased a few months ago, with the next step being a ten-minute frequency for much of the day and evening.
The Flyer accounts for 5% of passengers (currently around 285,000) using the airport each year, and the airport’s stated aim is to get public transport use up to 13% by the time 9 million annual pax are reached, with the Flyer carrying the bulk.
I suppose BRS would prove a problem at the moment as Emirates seem to be using A330 equipment which I assume could not make Dubai non-stop with a full payload (with any payload?) off the rolling hills of Broadfield Down.
It seems that before 2015 there will be flights to Dubai from many regional airports if its hedonistic outlets continue to spring up at the current rate of knots, let alone onward transfers from there with Emirates.
I’ve been reading with interest the debate on the CWL thread re rail connections.
Given that any rail link to BRS would be prohibitively expensive to build and would be a shuttle that required a change of train at Temple Meads, I wonder whether the Flyer service is not a better option anyway for a ‘rail-locked’ airport like BRS.
The Flyer service, operated by 50-seat First Coaches on behalf of the airport, runs every fifteen minutes from/to Temple Meads Station from early to late (although frequency drops to a 30-minute one from mid evening) and it is possible to book through-rail journeys direct to/from the airport using the coach for the last/first bit, a 25-minute journey.
As Temple Meads is on a main-line railway ‘crossroads’ with regular services in all directions it means access can be gained from many areas. Any arriving rail passengers at TM can be sure of an ongoing connection to the airport within a few minutes.
Bristol Airport is shown as a station in First Great Western’s list of stations on its web site and the Flyer appears on TM station’s arrival and departure screens.
It seems increasingly popular and frequency was increased a few months ago, with the next step being a ten-minute frequency for much of the day and evening.
The Flyer accounts for 5% of passengers (currently around 285,000) using the airport each year, and the airport’s stated aim is to get public transport use up to 13% by the time 9 million annual pax are reached, with the Flyer carrying the bulk.
The Analog Kid
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brecon Beacons National Park
Age: 57
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Flyer service, operated by 50-seat First Coaches on behalf of the airport, runs every fifteen minutes from/to Temple Meads Station from early to late (although frequency drops to a 30-minute one from mid evening) and it is possible to book through-rail journeys direct to/from the airport using the coach for the last/first bit, a 25-minute journey.
As Temple Meads is on a main-line railway ‘crossroads’ with regular services in all directions it means access can be gained from many areas. Any arriving rail passengers at TM can be sure of an ongoing connection to the airport within a few minutes.
As Temple Meads is on a main-line railway ‘crossroads’ with regular services in all directions it means access can be gained from many areas. Any arriving rail passengers at TM can be sure of an ongoing connection to the airport within a few minutes.
And I speak as very much a Flyer evangelist and regular long-term customer.
Brunel to Concorde
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fyrefli
I've seen pax left behind at the airport at busy times but never at the station and I'm there at least once a week.
There is invariably a group of anything from six to thirty people waiting at the TM Flyer stop for the next coach. Clearly from what you say, at other times there are far more than this.
I know what you are saying about First's bus and train services in and around Bristol but the Flyer service is supposed to be run for the airport so they should be cracking the whip to get things working properly.
I spoke to Mr Skipp about a previous general problem with the Flyer. He was very sympathetic and clearly anxious to sort it out with the coach operator.
I suppose the fact that the coach is sometimes full at the station end reinforces my view that the Flyer service is popular and viable as a means of getting rail pax to the airport, but it must operate efficiently or people will cease to use it.
I've seen pax left behind at the airport at busy times but never at the station and I'm there at least once a week.
There is invariably a group of anything from six to thirty people waiting at the TM Flyer stop for the next coach. Clearly from what you say, at other times there are far more than this.
I know what you are saying about First's bus and train services in and around Bristol but the Flyer service is supposed to be run for the airport so they should be cracking the whip to get things working properly.
I spoke to Mr Skipp about a previous general problem with the Flyer. He was very sympathetic and clearly anxious to sort it out with the coach operator.
I suppose the fact that the coach is sometimes full at the station end reinforces my view that the Flyer service is popular and viable as a means of getting rail pax to the airport, but it must operate efficiently or people will cease to use it.
The Analog Kid
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Brecon Beacons National Park
Age: 57
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The other thing that infuriates me is seeing new arrivals to Bristol habitually greeted by a harrassed driver with no change. I realise that they can't turn the coaches into Bureaux de Change but the now familiar experience of the other passengers rooting around for notes and coins so that some poor travelling soul can be spared the indignity of being sent back into the terminal to scavenge the correct money, sometimes to the tune of "You've got two minutes, my love" or similar, needs to be addressed.
This is normally at the airport end; I'm sure it wouldn't be beyond the wit of the company to come to some arrangement with the airport whereby a member of staff relieves the driver of his ticketing role at that end, or is simply on hand for each coach departure to bank some takings and refresh the "float".
As they also need to manage the queue better at busy times, as I've seen at least one substantial disagreement, selling the tickets in the terminal is perhaps going to be the way to kill several birds with one stone.
Indeed.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: weston
Age: 40
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
forgive me if I am wrong but the case used to be that you could buy tickets for the flyer at the airport information desk.
Moving on Weston MP John Penrose has now been asking for a flyer dervice between the airport and one of westons rail lines. I heard not to long ago that Worle Parkway station was going to be redeveloped as a major station for both Buses and Trains and there would be regular services to and from BIA.
Also must admit Im very dissapointed the NWI service has been dropped looks like ASW seem to be having a bit of a re think regarding using BRS as a large hub, god Knows why not with BE and BA disapearing there is a large gap to fill, maybe not big enough for EZY but ample for ASW. Also hearing that FC are throwing extra weight behind CWL. BRS management, although very talented need to pull there fingers out and stop sitting and living the past. I mean if they have anymore incedents like we saw a couple of weeks ago they may see a big orange bus fly into the distance and not return and we all know what that means.
Moving on Weston MP John Penrose has now been asking for a flyer dervice between the airport and one of westons rail lines. I heard not to long ago that Worle Parkway station was going to be redeveloped as a major station for both Buses and Trains and there would be regular services to and from BIA.
Also must admit Im very dissapointed the NWI service has been dropped looks like ASW seem to be having a bit of a re think regarding using BRS as a large hub, god Knows why not with BE and BA disapearing there is a large gap to fill, maybe not big enough for EZY but ample for ASW. Also hearing that FC are throwing extra weight behind CWL. BRS management, although very talented need to pull there fingers out and stop sitting and living the past. I mean if they have anymore incedents like we saw a couple of weeks ago they may see a big orange bus fly into the distance and not return and we all know what that means.
Brunel to Concorde
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Virtute et Industria, et Sumorsaete Ealle
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi terrier,
The Weston Area Development Framework proposes major traffic infrastructure developments between Weston/Worle and the M5.
The Greater Bristol Strategic Transport Study has identified a new strategic road link between Weston and Bristol via BIA. However, this is a highly contentious issue and is one of several new road suggestions put forward in the GBSTS, a number of which concern access to BIA from various parts of the city-region (to use the latest government-speak).
Worle Station has been identified as a park and ride site and also a transport interchange.
The Area Development Framework suggests a high-quality 20-minute frequency bus service from Weston via Worle Station to BIA if these proposals come to fruition.
In its master plan the airport says that the strength of such a route would depend on the ability of Worle Station to take high-speed trains, with particular reference to platform lengths.
I emphasise that these proposals are nowhere near certain to happen and I have my doubts about Worle as a rail interchange for the airport anyway.
Whether main line train operators would stop there regularly must be open to doubt. I suggested Parson Street station to the airport for a similar role a year or two ago and they said no main line trains would stop there. It is on the same main line between Bristol and Exeter as Worle.
And if it did happen how many rail passengers would use it to access the airport? Only those coming from Bridgwater/Taunton and further west would reach Worle before Bristol TM.
All other rail passengers would reach TM first. Why would they stay on the train or, in many cases, change trains to board a Flyer at Worle when they could do so at TM where the road journey time would be about the same as that from Worle?
Of course, it may be that Weston people travelling to the airport would use a dedicated bus or Flyer service in reasonable numbers.
The airport master plan discusses Flyer-type options from other places in and around Bristol including Bath, Parkway, Clevedon/Portishead and Nailsea & Backwell station.
I note the Welsh Assembly leader is talking again about an M 4 link to CWL. An M 5 link to BRS would be no longer in length but I doubt there is the political will this side of the Channel.
BTW, I thought Penrose MP was against further BRS expansion.
On another matter, I came across this US newspaper link re the BRS-EWR service.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...s/4478763.html
It discusses the history and future of this route and CO’s strategy in serving smaller European airports.
The report also says that the airport has suspended landing fees for the first three years. Presumably this is the so-called ‘subsidy’ that others have spoken of in the past in connection with this route.
The Weston Area Development Framework proposes major traffic infrastructure developments between Weston/Worle and the M5.
The Greater Bristol Strategic Transport Study has identified a new strategic road link between Weston and Bristol via BIA. However, this is a highly contentious issue and is one of several new road suggestions put forward in the GBSTS, a number of which concern access to BIA from various parts of the city-region (to use the latest government-speak).
Worle Station has been identified as a park and ride site and also a transport interchange.
The Area Development Framework suggests a high-quality 20-minute frequency bus service from Weston via Worle Station to BIA if these proposals come to fruition.
In its master plan the airport says that the strength of such a route would depend on the ability of Worle Station to take high-speed trains, with particular reference to platform lengths.
I emphasise that these proposals are nowhere near certain to happen and I have my doubts about Worle as a rail interchange for the airport anyway.
Whether main line train operators would stop there regularly must be open to doubt. I suggested Parson Street station to the airport for a similar role a year or two ago and they said no main line trains would stop there. It is on the same main line between Bristol and Exeter as Worle.
And if it did happen how many rail passengers would use it to access the airport? Only those coming from Bridgwater/Taunton and further west would reach Worle before Bristol TM.
All other rail passengers would reach TM first. Why would they stay on the train or, in many cases, change trains to board a Flyer at Worle when they could do so at TM where the road journey time would be about the same as that from Worle?
Of course, it may be that Weston people travelling to the airport would use a dedicated bus or Flyer service in reasonable numbers.
The airport master plan discusses Flyer-type options from other places in and around Bristol including Bath, Parkway, Clevedon/Portishead and Nailsea & Backwell station.
I note the Welsh Assembly leader is talking again about an M 4 link to CWL. An M 5 link to BRS would be no longer in length but I doubt there is the political will this side of the Channel.
BTW, I thought Penrose MP was against further BRS expansion.
On another matter, I came across this US newspaper link re the BRS-EWR service.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...s/4478763.html
It discusses the history and future of this route and CO’s strategy in serving smaller European airports.
The report also says that the airport has suspended landing fees for the first three years. Presumably this is the so-called ‘subsidy’ that others have spoken of in the past in connection with this route.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bristol
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where the buggery flip did you find that report MV??? Nice one though, a very interesting report strait(as it were) from the CO horses mouth, basically as i've read it, the BRS route is of high importance to them for their future strategy of serving smaller european cities with 757-200s to offer something the other US carriers dont, and the route has helped them immensly due to not being able to secure LHR slots, and is doing well for them, all sounds tickedy boo with CO to me 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BRISTOL
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FCA Longhaul
FCA Longhaul starts tomorrow!
FCA58 BRS-SFB(via MAN of course), G-OOAN B767 operating, STD 10:20. Not a bad start 222 pax booked up to yesterday, a/c holds 256.
Lets hope all 3 SFB/POP/VRA go well and become great routes for FCA, BRS and the south west as a whole, everybody has been wanting these routes for so long now, lets hope they get behind it and get booking, this old phrase comes to mind; "USE IT OR LOSE IT"
FCA58 BRS-SFB(via MAN of course), G-OOAN B767 operating, STD 10:20. Not a bad start 222 pax booked up to yesterday, a/c holds 256.
Lets hope all 3 SFB/POP/VRA go well and become great routes for FCA, BRS and the south west as a whole, everybody has been wanting these routes for so long now, lets hope they get behind it and get booking, this old phrase comes to mind; "USE IT OR LOSE IT"
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: down route
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
good luck to all at fca brs/man hope longhaul is a big sucess from brs and long may it continue cancun route next please!!! xl has their 767 popping in to say hello in april however it's bound for lourdes so nowhere exotic!
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if the eejits at XL ops don't stop fannying about, it'll be lucky to reach the end of the taxiway never mind bloody Lourdes! Tw*ts!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FCA Longhaul starts tomorrow!
FCA58 BRS-SFB(via MAN of course), G-OOAN B767 operating, STD 10:20. Not a bad start 222 pax booked up to yesterday, a/c holds 256.
FCA58 BRS-SFB(via MAN of course), G-OOAN B767 operating, STD 10:20. Not a bad start 222 pax booked up to yesterday, a/c holds 256.
How did it go? (Did it go???)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fca Sfb
Given the figs above that represents a Load Factor of only 86.7% which is poor for long haul given that flights costs are a greater % of total (especially if you have to pay for a tech stop in MAN).
Will need to do better going forward.....
Will need to do better going forward.....
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SOUTH WEST
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes it did operate, and went well. the same next week, then the return sectors kick in the following week. next month the cuba and dom rep series start up operations sat-sun-mon, i/b tues pos o/b to EMA
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Crawley
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'I have searched on google without luck so can some helpful fellow point me in the direction of a Bristol Airport movements site?
MTIA'
Try this mate. It has some MAYFLYS etc so maybe what you're looking for.
http://apron.bristolairport.com/
MTIA'
Try this mate. It has some MAYFLYS etc so maybe what you're looking for.
http://apron.bristolairport.com/