IRELAND WEST AIRPORT KNOCK
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think they know only to well at Knock that they did particularly well out of SNN downturn and ryanair demise. Maybe now its time for SNN to win back its share.
The difference is NOC have spent 10 years building a lean low cost base and delivering efficiency to make that possible, self funding through it's passenger levy. They have built a solid network of sustainable routes against the odds and with relativly little state support, which has since been cut. It has to fund it's infrastructure program which is incomplete and will soon be unable to meet demand.
Their concern is that another airport is being handed a major competitive advantage by the Government in the form of writing off major infrastructure debts and proposals to provide operational funding and development grants in coming years as well as the resources of it's own development agency.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you saying that Ryanair would of opened the current routes from NOC if they still had 6 aircraft based at SNN serving the same ones. Think answer is no......you can't say NOC hasn't done well out of SNN over the last few years. It has done well on getting BE,LH,EI in but Ryaniar are there to make a point.
Realy? If the airprot stayed open longer this would not be a problem as all flights would not be arriving together, think you may need to check that one again as NOC was given funding for infrastrictire project.
So it was alright for Knock to receive operational funding and development grants but not for SNN when the tables are turned. End of the day NOC managment knew this was coming and no dought Ryanair will play each of the airprots aginst each other but will NOC be able to keep Ryanair when it boils down to it.
SNN debit is not writtin off, its being left with the DAA. What debit does NOC have. At the end of the day compitation is great for both airports.
If SNN carried the debit then NOC would have an advantage but then I guess you fell that alright as its NOC with the advantage and not SNN.
It has to fund it's own infrastructure program which is incomplete and will soon be unable to maintain demand
So it was alright for Knock to receive operational funding and development grants but not for SNN when the tables are turned. End of the day NOC managment knew this was coming and no dought Ryanair will play each of the airprots aginst each other but will NOC be able to keep Ryanair when it boils down to it.
SNN debit is not writtin off, its being left with the DAA. What debit does NOC have. At the end of the day compitation is great for both airports.
If SNN carried the debit then NOC would have an advantage but then I guess you fell that alright as its NOC with the advantage and not SNN.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's clear that knock has a good relationship with ryanair and they operate some routes from both airports .it's clear that the uk and holiday routes are very successful and remains to be seen how the euro routes will perform.
In my opinion I would say it would be just the euro routes bar maybe Frankfurt that fr would move to Shannon if any at all. If dusseldorf performs well for lufthansa I would be hopeful of a few other german cities being added for 2013.
If ryanair return to Shannon with all the uk regionals aer lingus regional would be screwed .
I hope we can get a Malaga and palma route for 2013 before Shannon does should ryanair start to expand again from snn.
In my opinion I would say it would be just the euro routes bar maybe Frankfurt that fr would move to Shannon if any at all. If dusseldorf performs well for lufthansa I would be hopeful of a few other german cities being added for 2013.
If ryanair return to Shannon with all the uk regionals aer lingus regional would be screwed .
I hope we can get a Malaga and palma route for 2013 before Shannon does should ryanair start to expand again from snn.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you saying that Ryanair would of opened the current routes from NOC if they still had 6 aircraft based at SNN serving the same ones. Think answer is no......you can't say NOC hasn't done well out of SNN over the last few years. It has done well on getting BE,LH,EI in but Ryaniar are there to make a point.
So Yes I think FR may have added many of the routes anyway, and of course at the same time used some as a stick to poke the DAA like you say.
So it was alright for Knock to receive operational funding and development grants but not for SNN when the tables are turned...
Yes NOC benefited from state support, but I don't think anything put it at a major competitive advantage. But I think it's reasonable to argue that NOC has had to work hard to get to this stage, and is being told there won't be future funding, where as it appears that SNN which had all the support and resources of the DAA and Shannon Development is getting a bailout.
Wether that gives it a major competitive advantage is another question. Anyway the public / private / semi-state / private trust aspect mean this is comparing apples and oranges and my head hurts so I'll leave it at that!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Expect Mayo's 4 FG TD's including An Taoiseach to come under pressure if the Shannon give away starts to undermine Knock! Already the opposition TD for the constituency has called for Knock to be given debt free status!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't see Knock suffering too much from this as long as the current government are in power at least. We'll have to see the full details of what's on offer for Shannon but they'll have to restructure in a big way to be able to match Knock's low cost base.
O'Leary couldn't make most of his routes work from Shannon before - he kept the profitable ones going there - I don't see what is changing at the moment to make the others viable now. If Shannon were to give him what he was asking for previously to maintain the multi aircraft base with their existing overheads then they are quite simply too stupid to be allowed to run an airport.
O'Leary couldn't make most of his routes work from Shannon before - he kept the profitable ones going there - I don't see what is changing at the moment to make the others viable now. If Shannon were to give him what he was asking for previously to maintain the multi aircraft base with their existing overheads then they are quite simply too stupid to be allowed to run an airport.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O'Leary couldn't make most of his routes work from Shannon before - he kept the profitable ones going there - I don't see what is changing at the moment to make the others viable now.
SNN debit write off to the DAA is not costing the tax payer a penny but if NOC got a debit write off it would cost the tax payer. I can't see NOC having any debits as they said the airprot was profitable in 2010 not sure about 2011 though.
Can't see Knock suffering too much from this as long as the current government are in power at least.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes becasue the NOC routes are so porfitable.....FR have fares for under €5 on the euro routes.
SNN debit write off to the DAA is not costing the tax payer a penny but if NOC got a debit write off it would cost the tax payer. I can't see NOC having any debits as they said the airprot was profitable in 2010 not sure about 2011 though.
Knock has a fairly rigorous regime in place and fair play to the management team up there they seem to have the most commercial sense aviation wise in this country.
Yes because our Goverment is running the country and make all the decions right!!!
business passengers unlike NOC
realy only opens for lunch during the winter and slighly longer in the summer.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EI-A330, you can dilute the €100m in semi-state nonsense or massage the figures any other way you want, but it doesn't change the reality that if Shannon hadn't run up these enormous debts, the Government would be €100m better off right now than it is, and we can ill-afford that kind of wastage at the moment. This IS costing the tax payer, no question about it.
Ryanair's existing UK and sun routes from Knock wouldn't still be running if they weren't doing the business for them, they are not a charity. The fares you quote are for some of the 2012 start up routes which will take time to bed in and may or may not be ultimately successful.
Also, limited winter opening hours is the kind of sensible business decision that results in massive debts not being run up. It might be something Shannon should consider if they want to avoid going back to the government 'cap in hand' in five years time looking for another tax payer bailout.
Ryanair's existing UK and sun routes from Knock wouldn't still be running if they weren't doing the business for them, they are not a charity. The fares you quote are for some of the 2012 start up routes which will take time to bed in and may or may not be ultimately successful.
Also, limited winter opening hours is the kind of sensible business decision that results in massive debts not being run up. It might be something Shannon should consider if they want to avoid going back to the government 'cap in hand' in five years time looking for another tax payer bailout.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: on the road...
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EI-A330, you can dilute the €100m in semi-state nonsense or massage the figures any other way you want, but it doesn't change the reality that if Shannon hadn't run up these enormous debts, the Government would be €100m better off right now than it is, and we can ill-afford that kind of wastage at the moment. This IS costing the tax payer, no question about it.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EI-A330, you can dilute the €100m in semi-state nonsense or massage the figures any other way you want, but it doesn't change the reality that if Shannon hadn't run up these enormous debts, the Government would be €100m better off right now than it is, and we can ill-afford that kind of wastage at the moment. This IS costing the tax payer, no question about it.
As far as I know the DAA have never payed part of there profit to Gov so would the Government be 100 million better off, I think the DAA would be. It the passengers using Dublin airport that would be better who are paying for SNN and ORK. The DUB debit is equal to the debit of ORK and SNN put together give or take a few million.
In other news NOC airport claim that almost 10,000 passengers have used the new Euro routes since they started. Not including the first few days in May this means that 83% of seats have being filled since they have started.
April traffic up 11%
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: ireland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the DAA did not run up all of this debt, then they would be paying back a divident to government and the tax payer for running profitable airports....so effectively the €100m write off of Shn's debt relieves that airport from that obligation to pay it back (interesting from an EU state aid perspective) and puts the burden fully back on the DAA ,and ultimatly us the tax payer at the end of the day. Fair do's to Shn for pulling this stroke, now its' up to the FG TD's , Minister and Taoiseach to deliver once and for all for the west of Ireland.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good news that the pax numbers are still going up, I'd be amazed if the loads for the new Euro routes are as high as 83% at this time of year though, that doesn't seem realistic.
A quick calculation suggests that there would have been around 19,000 seats available from commencement of the new routes to the end of April which would provide a more predictable load factor this early on in the services.
A quick calculation suggests that there would have been around 19,000 seats available from commencement of the new routes to the end of April which would provide a more predictable load factor this early on in the services.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The info provided by the airport saying close to 10,000 passengers have used the new European routes is from 25 March - 10 May. Ryanair provided 26,838 seats. Using the 10,000 figure quoted by the airport then the actual % of seats filled 37% however in reality I estimate it is between 32-34% as the figure is below 10,000 passengers.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of the 10,000 pax, 6,000 were inbound according to the airports Facebook page, so fairly evenly split. But it's only the first weeks of first time services, Barcelona was a popular last year so may account for a good portion.
Ireland West Airport Knock | Facebook
----
The EIR mid morning BHX rotation to DUB is bookable again from the 11th June.
Ireland West Airport Knock | Facebook
----
The EIR mid morning BHX rotation to DUB is bookable again from the 11th June.
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Antrim
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm guessing flybe is the most likely candidate then, they seem to have a good relationship with the airport. Also, having announced they are upgrading BHX-BHD to all jet services then it might free up some DASH 8 capacity to launch such a route. It needs daily really on that size aircraft.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was posted on this thread that EIR would announce the route on Monday or Tuesday, so that suggests that all didn't go to plan for them. A bit arrogant of them to assume that they would get the route to themselves if they wanted it, no?
On one side I like the idea of more of an EI presence at the airport, but on the other side neither EI or RE have shown much interest in developing routes at Knock in recent years, preferring instead to focus on Shannon & Galway respectively. Now that the airport is going well they want in - but only on routes where there is a proven demand such as Gatwick and Birmingham. Seemingly no interest in developing routes that are new to the airport. On that basis you'd prefer BE to get it, they are showing a genuine interest in developing niche routes at the airport and having dependable profitable routes like MAN and BHX on their schedule makes them more likely to try other new routes...maybe even base or overnight an aircraft at some point in the future.
On one side I like the idea of more of an EI presence at the airport, but on the other side neither EI or RE have shown much interest in developing routes at Knock in recent years, preferring instead to focus on Shannon & Galway respectively. Now that the airport is going well they want in - but only on routes where there is a proven demand such as Gatwick and Birmingham. Seemingly no interest in developing routes that are new to the airport. On that basis you'd prefer BE to get it, they are showing a genuine interest in developing niche routes at the airport and having dependable profitable routes like MAN and BHX on their schedule makes them more likely to try other new routes...maybe even base or overnight an aircraft at some point in the future.
Last edited by Kinocker; 11th May 2012 at 17:26.
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Antrim
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would say Ryanair would deliver most in the way of pax but relying too heavilly on them is a risky game. Flybe are quite a solid operation and it would offer loads of connections through Air France, Brussels airlines etc. I would say Aer Aranns history at Knock and tech issues will have been held against them, much as I'd like to see them. The only other carrier I could see as a long shot would be Monarch, replicating mytravellite A320 success.
Last edited by mart901; 11th May 2012 at 18:55.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On that basis you'd prefer BE to get it, they are showing a genuine interest in developing niche routes at the airport and having dependable profitable routes like MAN and BHX on their schedule makes them more likely to try other new routes...maybe even base or overnight an aircraft at some point in the future.
Then again there would be room for both on the route and prices would be kept low as a result. Bmibaby were carrying over 100 odd passegners per flight. (monthly stats on BHX page)
Last edited by PPRuNeUser0176; 11th May 2012 at 20:03.