Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BOURNEMOUTH - 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 09:57
  #2041 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
May as well say airport charges are FREE for everyone - at least they will get some pax volumes in and can start to claw back some of the investment.
If you don't charge - how can you "claw back some of the investment"? Car parking?
Groundloop is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 10:14
  #2042 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pax spend in the terminal: Duty free, coffee shops, newsagents, restaurants, travel agents, foreign exchange facilities, entertainment centres.
Pax spend to//from airport: Car hire, bus, taxi, car-parking
Auxillary services spend: Servisair, Fuel, airport security, customs

The income & added prosperity from the above will be enough to support the passenger side of the airport through a short to mid-term tough period and allow the airport to pass on FREE landing fees and passenger departure charges directly to the airlines.

If the airport don't understand this [fine balance] then its no wonder they are facing a 'no flights a day' situation.

Airports like BOH (with poor infrastructure/access/catchment) cannot afford to charge landing/parking/passenger fees if they expect 3m passengers a year.
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 10:40
  #2043 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aer Lingus Regional

Surely they could at least have brought in Aer Arann (Aer Lingus Regional) to plug the gap left by the Ryanair withdrawal of the Dublin route. Dublin has been Bournemouth's longest running route and one of the busiest. If the likes of Aer Arann were tempted by Blackpool, Durham and Doncaster, why have Bournemouth not managed to also keep Dublin?

Is it Because Ryanair keeps coming out with statements like 'we remain committed to Bournemouth' thus scaring off the competition and meanwhile Ryanair have no intention of remaining committed to Bournemouth.
Nakata77 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2010, 12:43
  #2044 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Barton Upon Humber
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the likes of Aer Arann were tempted by Blackpool, Durham and Doncaster, why have Bournemouth not managed to also keep Dublin?
MME and DSA were hardly a success for RE/EI regional though. BLK probably does better thanks to stronger links with Ireland due to geography, being on the West Coast
airhumberside is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2010, 08:37
  #2045 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the statements "We're committed to Bournemouth than ever before!" are going to wear out soon! I would of thought MAG are trying to get Easyjet or another big name in there to kick start things! Clearly not...

I'd say Flybe might come in and offer some more "sun" routes to make way for some city routes from Southampton, but that could go the other way round! The potential for them is huge - they could capture a huge audience with flights going from both Bournemouth and Southampton.

Ryanair probably won't come back judging by the fact there are still no flights after March! Where ever other base has tickets for sale!
Mexotag is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2010, 10:15
  #2046 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: an expensive mansion
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Childish debate

We are not daft. We are here to make money. BOH, although good for us, can only work with ultra low fares. We remain interested in serving the people of BOH and the surrounding area. But is the airport interested in us?

The only airline that is viable for an airport like BOH is Ryanair. We have lower fares than Flybe, we have lower costs. We have a bigger 'pull' factor making BOH's catchment larger than it would otherwise be.

I challenge any other airline out there to make BOH work on as big a scale as we could - IT WILL NOT HAPPEN. Without Ryanair, BOH will plod along at 250,000 passengers a year.

The sooner the management team at BOH/MAG realize this the better. I have personally said this many times on this forum. It comes down to costs. Where else can we make more money. Until we see either the airport reducing fees or the government getting rid of the departure tax, the BOH routes will not be viable. BOH needs the passenger volumes, and we stand ready to provide them. Only we can deliver the 1.75m-2m passengers a year that BOH needs.
ryanair1 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2010, 11:36
  #2047 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pax spend in the terminal: Duty free, coffee shops, newsagents, restaurants, travel agents, foreign exchange facilities, entertainment centres.
Pax spend to//from airport: Car hire, bus, taxi, car-parking
Auxillary services spend: Servisair, Fuel, airport security, customs
But very little of that actually goes to the airport operator - nearly all of it goes to the franchisees. MAG does not run most of these trhemselves. So that approach would do VERY little to pay back MAG's investment.
Groundloop is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2010, 15:44
  #2048 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BOH
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ryanair1, I do have to take issue with some of what you are saying. Ryanair are not 'ready to serve the people of BOH' like some sort of superhero. They are in it for there own profit and nothing else!. The airport has bent over backwards at times to give ryanair whatever concession they want, sometimes to the detriment of the other operators at the airport! The airport charged them less, installed Cat3 at ryanairs insistence (although this benefits everyone, was it at a cost that the airport could truly afford?), has given them priority with the (free?) office accomodation (which even now ryanair refuse to move out of even though they have no crew/engineers using it), gave them priority stands over other operators, and even at times ryanair was given push back clearance from ATC even when they had doors open, steps attached and other a/c were ready to push! Even the handlers would give ryanair priority over other operators

I think it is only fair that the airport charges ryanair the same as all other operators and doesn't 'agree' or is held to ransom on another 'special deal'. I must agree though, the passenger tax is disgraceful. Also, in fairness, you are lower cost than Flybe.

The sooner Ryanair make it public that they are washing there hands of BOH, the sooner other airlines will look at the airport as a viable option.
imaynosumat is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2010, 16:18
  #2049 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Groundloop
They may not own them but rest assured they are doing something very badly wrong if they do not make money out of them!!
I won't go into specifics but as landlords they will be doing OK on that front.
It stands to reason however, the more passengers you have, the better everyone will do financially.
commit aviation is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2010, 10:28
  #2050 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair1, I recently booked my summer flights and Flybe from Southampton was the same price (actually cheaper, as I paid by Visa and I am taking a bag) as you from London Stansted! For the majority of flights I have taken, STN is the cheapest option although that is now changing with some excellent fares from Easyjet at LGW!

I do agree, Ryanair are one of the big names and could bring in the passengers. I know many, myself included, who drive to Stansted to get a cheap flight and none of us would be described as in the catchment area, so yes the BOH area would be "bigger" But Ryanair have an empty airport and won't exploit this fact!

I hope something does get sorted as it would be a shame to see BOH just become a very expensive, modern, one-flight-a-day airport.
Mexotag is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 06:49
  #2051 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair 1 is right !

I never thought I would be saying this, but Ryanair is spot on.

If BOH / MAG can't attract other operators then they should back peddle faster than a polititcian and give Ryanair whatever it takes to get them bringing PAX back to Bournemouth.

Ryanair offer the only credible opposition to FlyBe and who are not going to move from SOU in a million years, ( except when an A/C is likely to crash then they divert to BOH )

Like Curry's pay your VAT, why don't BOH pay Ryanairs passenger air duty tax ( and the other operators as well, or that would be unfair ) ( like that's never happened before !! )

Let's face it the situation is desperate and calls for action now or BOH will be a Bigger white elephant than the spanking new one the put up on Montreal's doorstep that is now abandoned.
DILLTHEDOG is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 08:36
  #2052 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: somerset
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
''Like Curry's pay your VAT, why don't BOH pay Ryanairs passenger air duty tax ( and the other operators as well, or that would be unfair ) ( like that's never happened before !! )''

How much do you think the airport actually earns from each passenger?

Paying the duty on each passenger may well produce a loss. The airport only makes a profit from car parking and spend in the terminal. The airports passenger number projections were always way too optimistic, projected almost on a straight line from the late 90's, as if things could just expand forever using a credit economy. It has a small catchment, in a small country overrun with regional airports. It will never reach 3 million passengers, even if the economy does grow again there are too many factors against such growth in aviation- oil costs, environmental concerns, noise issues etc


A moderate growth with one or two low cost routes will keep it ticking over nicely.
possibleconsequences is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 19:16
  #2053 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The glasshouse, a stone's throw from you
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking on the brightside, Bournemouth took in a few diversions from the clearly unfit for purpose Southampton, who had a little bit of mist, thus rendering its uncategorised ILS useless.
Flybes were dropping passengers off, who were bussed to Eastleigh, before taking off for elsewhere.
pottwiddler is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 19:21
  #2054 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think 200 meters vis with RVR of 225m in freezing fog was "a little bit of mist". You will find that Bournemouth, at one point, had similar weather thereby rendering it's CATII ILS useless.

Stop being silly.

Last edited by Lord Spandex Masher; 5th Dec 2010 at 21:52.
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 19:24
  #2055 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London, Los Angeles and Las Vegas
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking on the brightside, Bournemouth took in a few diversions from the clearly unfit for purpose Southampton, who had a little bit of mist, thus rendering its uncategorised ILS useless.
Flybes were dropping passengers off, who were bussed to Eastleigh, before taking off for elsewhere.
Sereously; the constant put downs directed towards Southampton are giving this thread a very jealous and bitter vibe and are doing you guys absolutely no favours.
Random Flyer is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 22:38
  #2056 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bournemouth 1 Southampton 3

Borrowed time being played.
TSR2 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2010, 23:31
  #2057 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep it up you lot. It's all soo amusing!
Airlift21 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 10:12
  #2058 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Poole
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you will find it's CatIII not Cat11 and would have been able to take them!
opsman1 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 10:51
  #2059 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your point is moot.

It
would have been able to take them!
IF the crew and aircraft were certified as CATIII. Some of the diversions were from SOU which would indicate that it was Flybe who are currently, only certified to CATII.

So no, you would not have been able to "take them".
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2010, 18:05
  #2060 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The glasshouse, a stone's throw from you
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ooh hit a nerve! Just trolling the doomsayers!

What about a Dash 8 landing without flaps? For that you need length. Something else Southampton hasn't got.

It's all a temporary blip with recession etc, MAG wouldn't throw away money if they didn't think that Bournemouth wasn't viable. They did try to sell Humberside as they couldn't see that as viable for expansion. Bournemouth would have gone the same way years ago if it wasn't for MAG's belief.

Keeping the faith.

PT
pottwiddler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.