Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Air Southwest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Mar 2010, 20:30
  #501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does CATIII mean? I don't see why they want to expand but get smaller aircraft. Would be nice to see a dash 8-300 G-WOWF

I wonder if the dash 8-200 will be G-WOWF?
dalej123 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2010, 21:24
  #502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: close to NQY
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does CATIII mean?
CATIII essentially allows the the pilot to land the A/C in low visibility. I don't know the technical side of it but i'm sure someone will fill that in for us.

If ASW continue their trend then G-WOWF could very well be the registration of the 200.
RSOL is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2010, 11:40
  #503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An ILS is sub-divided into categories depending on it's accuracy. Factors affecting the category are aircraft equipment, airport equipment and crew training.

The higher the category the less restrictive are the landing minimums so the higher the chance of a successful approach.
  • CAT I - DH not lower than 200ft and RVR not less than 550m
  • CAT II - DH not lower than 100ft and RVR not less than 300m
  • CAT IIIA - DH lower than 100ft/no DH and RVR not less than 200m
  • CAT IIIB - DH lower than 50ft/no DH and RVR not less than 75m
  • CAT IIIC - No DH/RVR limitations (Not actually in use)
DH: Decision Height (height above aerodrome level at which a go around must be initiated if not visual)
RVR - Runway Visual Range

ASW currently operate to CAT II standards. The Q200 will have various equipment installed to make it CAT III enabled such as twin FMS and a HUD
Boeing 77W is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 06:39
  #504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So is plymouth getting CAT III A,B OR C?
dalej123 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 08:53
  #505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
I would personally be surprised if this is the last expansion we see from SZ, the tie up with T3 should allow them into markets that they dont currently serve, as others have said i would of thought that there are some routes out there to run into NQY/PLH year round, EDI would be one of them and it wouldnt surprise me to see them operate into BOH as stated in the other thread.
Instead of BOH how about OXF. As you are probably aware Varsity Express suspended operations yesterday. They had taken over 500 forward booking for the next few weeks on the EDI route and filled 135 seats with fare paying pax out of a total capacity of 190. Which is good for the first week of operations
.
There has been a gap in the market for a EDI to PLH flight since BACX/Brymon stopped operating. So I reckon if SZ did operate to EDI then they should try PLH/OXF/EDI.
BAladdy is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 09:52
  #506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plymouth won't be getting CAT III, they'll remain CAT I. It requires substantial investment in the facilities at the airport and it's certainly not justified...despite the poor weather record.
Boeing 77W is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2010, 11:41
  #507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PLH
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instead of BOH how about OXF. As you are probably aware Varsity Express suspended operations yesterday. They had taken over 500 forward booking for the next few weeks on the EDI route and filled 135 seats with fare paying pax out of a total capacity of 190. Which is good for the first week of operations
Their Dash-8s would fit the route well and wouldn't be payload restricted during the summer like a J-31 or Q400 would be. Still, I'm not sure it would warrant a double daily service from PLH - at least to start with, which would mean adding an additional aircraft with relatively little utilisation, unless further routes were commenced which increases the risk.
PlymSpotter is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 21:17
  #508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reg of the aircraft is mean't to be
N346PH

Here is a picture
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../6/0587619.jpg

I don't know if it will be this when it arrives but i doubt it, probley be G-WOWF

If air southwest follow their pattern of aircraft reg

Thanks
Dale
dalej123 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 10:28
  #509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the wisdom behind adding a Q200? No Q300 available on the market? Particularly the beefed-up Q200 cannot be much cheaper to operate than a Q300, so why sacrificing 13 seats that could potentially earn revenue?
virginblue is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 11:28
  #510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd imagine the lease rate for a Q200 is very appreciably below that of a Q300. May be as simple as that.
Cyrano is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 11:36
  #511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess you are right, particularl if the aircraft is used as a back-up plane the lease rates indeed should be driving force.

What is the average LF on WOW? Given that they are currently using a 29seater as a back-up plane for their Q300s, it cannot be too spectacular?
virginblue is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 15:56
  #512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: close to NQY
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the average LF on WOW? Given that they are currently using a 29seater as a back-up plane for their Q300s, it cannot be too spectacular?
The loads for SZ are starting to increase. Most flights are running at about three quarters plus at the moment. I don't think BE is reaching those levels regularly at the moment out of NQY.
RSOL is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 15:36
  #513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: plymouth
Age: 39
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air southwest axining london city route?

Just tried booking a flight to london city in June to london city but there seem to be no flights, have checked every month up until october and there are no flights, but they start again from november.
airsouthwestfan is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2010, 17:08
  #514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: E London and Plymouth
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is now appearing on their website....


Flights to or from London City are not available after 21 May. Please book Gatwick flights if you wish to travel to or from London after this date.
stolport is offline  
Old 1st May 2010, 09:43
  #515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: west of the tamar
Age: 75
Posts: 860
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did this run 12 months normally or was it historically a winter only route?
GROUNDHOG is online now  
Old 1st May 2010, 16:56
  #516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Nether Region
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its run continually since April 2009.
bravoromeosierra is offline  
Old 5th May 2010, 08:11
  #517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EDI, LHR, NQY
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Confirmed: LCY-NQY/PLH is scrapped

Airline scraps London City flights to Newquay, Plymouth - Telegraph

In some ways understandable, although in a choice between LCY or LGW I'd have gone for LCY where you wouldn't have to compete with Flybe on price. Perhaps getting more LCY slots was an issue?
ajamieson is offline  
Old 5th May 2010, 17:49
  #518 (permalink)  
Dash-7 lover
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
no 6th plane either

It's called progress......!
 
Old 5th May 2010, 20:07
  #519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Blighty
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LCY is a notoriously expensive airport to operate into, so whilst it's disappointing I can understand why ASW would want to put their resources into focusing on the LGW route which seems to do well for them. LCY has already lost a number of domestic flights (most noteably MAN which was something like 6 a day as I recall), which tells a tale regarding viability of domestic flights from there.
L G Double-Yew is offline  
Old 5th May 2010, 21:16
  #520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The move to LCY was the first change intoduced by the current CEO. Was a very expensive ego driven mistake, that was doomed from the outset.
iwhak is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.