Are contractors self-employed just like in the past or hired through an agency which then outsources them to Lauda? In both cases I don't understand how could they bond a pilot not directly employed by the airline...a contractor can't be bonded to anyone by definition... |
Employment
Employed via agency, then contracted to Lauda. Fortunately no LTDs or other forms of self-employment like in RYR.
|
I’m struggling to see any details for the DUB contract if anyone can help? What is their minimum P1 hours for DEC? Thanks |
Originally Posted by booze
(Post 10605442)
My thoughts exactly. When i lost my job back in March i didn't even look at Euroland: moved with the family to Asia for top dollar, and id travel. Work is still hard, though...
But the truth is (what Booze does not even mention huh?) : to move in asia, first, you need experience. For a young pilot , Lauda seems great option. and a good steptone to move anywhere else then you want. Many airlines, (emirates, asia, etc....) require at least hours on a plane more than 20t MTOM. To get this experience, the only way is to fly airbus or boeing at whatever cost. Even if I was paid minimum wage on airbus I would run. Because that's the ONLY way to get experience and to bet for a better future. Oh and by the way, I have been FI, really guys, you fly everyday, 5 to 6 hours, having 4 or 5 students each day, to repeat again and again the same boring stuff. You get really tired. No air conditioning on board, not enough room, small plane, and flying ****ty hours that ailrines do not even take into consideration. THIS is hard work compared to any low cost, which is a piece of cake when you had known harder job before. Conclusion, stop seeing the glass half empty, and get to work, stop complaining. Work and move then. It is like politics, don't expect anything from them, just be pro active and make your own path. My 2 cents. |
Originally Posted by stoneangel
(Post 10611243)
so funny here , to read negative comments.
But the truth is (what Booze does not even mention huh?) : to move in asia, first, you need experience. For a young pilot , Lauda seems great option. and a good steptone to move anywhere else then you want. Many airlines, (emirates, asia, etc....) require at least hours on a plane more than 20t MTOM. To get this experience, the only way is to fly airbus or boeing at whatever cost. Even if I was paid minimum wage on airbus I would run. Because that's the ONLY way to get experience and to bet for a better future. Oh and by the way, I have been FI, really guys, you fly everyday, 5 to 6 hours, having 4 or 5 students each day, to repeat again and again the same boring stuff. You get really tired. No air conditioning on board, not enough room, small plane, and flying ****ty hours that ailrines do not even take into consideration. THIS is hard work compared to any low cost, which is a piece of cake when you had known harder job before. Conclusion, stop seeing the glass half empty, and get to work, stop complaining. Work and move then. It is like politics, don't expect anything from them, just be pro active and make your own path. My 2 cents. Best of luck for the future and the whole growing up thing |
Originally Posted by stoneangel
(Post 10611243)
so funny here , to read negative comments.
But the truth is (what Booze does not even mention huh?) : to move in asia, first, you need experience. For a young pilot , Lauda seems great option. and a good steptone to move anywhere else then you want. Many airlines, (emirates, asia, etc....) require at least hours on a plane more than 20t MTOM. To get this experience, the only way is to fly airbus or boeing at whatever cost. Even if I was paid minimum wage on airbus I would run. Because that's the ONLY way to get experience and to bet for a better future. Oh and by the way, I have been FI, really guys, you fly everyday, 5 to 6 hours, having 4 or 5 students each day, to repeat again and again the same boring stuff. You get really tired. No air conditioning on board, not enough room, small plane, and flying ****ty hours that ailrines do not even take into consideration. THIS is hard work compared to any low cost, which is a piece of cake when you had known harder job before. Conclusion, stop seeing the glass half empty, and get to work, stop complaining. Work and move then. It is like politics, don't expect anything from them, just be pro active and make your own path. My 2 cents. |
Originally Posted by Thepirate
(Post 10611264)
mate i think you were supposed to post that on interview/job/sponsorship thread. This is for experienced pilots not one’s looking for their first job. Best of luck for the future and the whole growing up thing ok thanks for the remark |
Originally Posted by Daily Dalaman Dave
(Post 10609919)
I’m struggling to see any details for the DUB contract if anyone can help? What is their minimum P1 hours for DEC? Thanks
|
Did anyone receive any email for an interview in the last part of November? I applied at the end of July for the first officer position non Type-rated and I'm looking for some informations about the company and the assessment. Thank you!
|
Originally Posted by bulldog89
(Post 10611292)
I am a (not so much) young pilot and I totally disagree with your statement. Lauda is just another attempt to lower current and future T&C in Europe.
|
Originally Posted by stoneangel
(Post 10611243)
so funny here , to read negative comments.
But the truth is (what Booze does not even mention huh?) : to move in asia, first, you need experience. For a young pilot , Lauda seems great option. and a good steptone to move anywhere else then you want. Many airlines, (emirates, asia, etc....) require at least hours on a plane more than 20t MTOM. To get this experience, the only way is to fly airbus or boeing at whatever cost. Even if I was paid minimum wage on airbus I would run. Because that's the ONLY way to get experience and to bet for a better future. Oh and by the way, I have been FI, really guys, you fly everyday, 5 to 6 hours, having 4 or 5 students each day, to repeat again and again the same boring stuff. You get really tired. No air conditioning on board, not enough room, small plane, and flying ****ty hours that ailrines do not even take into consideration. THIS is hard work compared to any low cost, which is a piece of cake when you had known harder job before. Conclusion, stop seeing the glass half empty, and get to work, stop complaining. Work and move then. It is like politics, don't expect anything from them, just be pro active and make your own path. My 2 cents. Unfortunately , it is because of people like you and the statement you just gave that airlines are able to exploit the pilots for lower conditions. Seeing Ryanair or Lauda, or any Low cost operator as a gateway airline is just pure wrong. There shouldn’t be any difference. But there is, because people are willing to do anything to get that first job, and possibly fly for free ( judging by previous Pay to fly schemes when there was no jobs) But from my experience, I see people like you that join, so so enthusiastic , positive, but then soon after they realise this is not what they hoped it was, so they soon turn to a negative side.. I see it every day of the week.. Endless moaning, but hey, they didnt think that when they signed up.. All they wanted to fly When you do join one of those airlines, you will see for yourself, and especially how much easier FI job was.... Its not all pressing buttons and sitting in A/C environment |
Originally Posted by Citationcj2
(Post 10618987)
But from my experience, I see people like you that join, so so enthusiastic , positive, but then soon after they realise this is not what they hoped it was, so they soon turn to a negative side.. I see it every day of the week.. Endless moaning, but hey, they didnt think that when they signed up.. All they wanted to fly
When you do join one of those airlines, you will see for yourself, and especially how much easier FI job was.... Its not all pressing buttons and sitting in A/C environment That said, I hear there are some factors with joining Lauda which are much better than Ryanair, such as much fewer up front, out of pocket costs such as uniform, licensing etc etc, and of course a much more desirable Airbus rating As for the rest of the lauda contract, I don't know, but Vienna or Palma would beat kaunas in my book. |
Anyone as a actual figure for take home net pay in PMI for captains.The gross salary all included is advertised as 109.000 Euro for 70 hours month.
Anyone with real time experience? |
And you are seriously considering this kind of salary for a Captain flying an A320?? This is an insult in comparison to what captains make on the same type in the neighbouring airlines.. |
Yeah but you know... “it’s a great opportunity for low hours pilots, the network is great, people are friendly, you build experience, and it is shiny-pokky with digital dials man”, and “it is just for couple of years till a career move”, and million over excuses... Anyway I guess it is a waste of time to try to convince people already going there. |
Originally Posted by Citationcj2
(Post 10628887)
And you are seriously considering this kind of salary for a Captain flying an A320?? This is an insult in comparison to what captains make on the same type in the neighbouring airlines.. |
Depends on many factors, also on where you actually pay your taxes, but in Spain with that sort of salary you'd be looking at around 40% tax, leaving you with around 65K net.
|
The figure I' m given is the total of basic and flight pay for 70 hours . Is flight pay taxed as basic salary is ?
|
Even if you're based in Spain Lauda will make you pay your taxes in Austria (where the tax rate is even higher, at 50%)
|
No..not anymore..tax are paid in Spain..and the contract is now Spanish..
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.