Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th July 2020 | 21:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Amantido
Brain fart, sorry! I should have said you can be at or above the level segment depicted on the chart but the FAF shall be crossed at the mandatory altitude.
Banana Joe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2020 | 21:46
  #22 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Pilot should actually have 2000 at FAF. The "mandatory" label which instructs you to be exactly at 2000 for the full intermediate approach segment (pointed out by Vessbot) had been added by Jeppesen.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 8th July 2020 at 10:01.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2020 | 12:55
  #23 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 729
Likes: 1
From: Zulu Time Zone
According to the Jeppesen chart guide the bold altitude specifically refers to the altitude at FAF/FAP (as opposed to the colloquial platform altitude).

The Lido plate is more clear. The Jepp way of doing things is ambiguous in this case but the mandatory altitude at the FAF/FAP is not in doubt either way.



oggers is offline  
Reply
Old 8th July 2020 | 22:48
  #24 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 937
Likes: 67
From: USA
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
Pilot should actually have 2000 at FAF. The "mandatory" label which instructs you to be exactly at 2000 for the full intermediate approach segment (pointed out by Vessbot) had been added by Jeppesen.
The "mandatory" label doesn't instruct anything about the segment before the fix, it's about the fix itself. And it's not "added by Jeppesen" as in Jeppesen invented it, it's there because the source data says to, unless it's a charting error. It's simply Jeppesen's presentation of a mandatory (instead of minimum, which is the common one) altitude, equivalent to the 5500 here, from FAA AeroNav charts:



A Jepp altitude with no note (#4 in Oggers' post above) is equivalent to the 2500 here, and is the common one (minimum, aka "at or above")
Vessbot is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2020 | 06:30
  #25 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Thanks for correcting. I meant J. put it there on their own will (charting error), but that is also not true. The restriction is actually visible in the LIDO graphics too.

Had a look last night for the Egyptian AIP, despite some improvements in the Internet realm it is not accessible online.

Then I had it slip away, apologies.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 10th July 2020 | 21:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 2
From: Middle East
The only reason for having "mandatory" heights depicted on letdown chart is to free the space above..
Jeppesen is a copy company and does not design approach charts, the state does..
I suspect it is a design error by the state but you have to comply with it. You should cross 12d at 2500 ft & 7.4d at 2000 ft.....
Rocket3837 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.