Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st June 2018 | 15:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Middle East
Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Good Day All,
It's been a while a have this question in mind. I did my research on the Jepp manual but I didn't find anything conclusive.
Is a level off between 12D and 7,4D mandatory? or the constraint 2000 Ft only apply at the FAF 7,4D?
Awaiting for your comments and doc reference if you have one.
Cheers


Last edited by Feather44; 21st June 2018 at 15:07. Reason: spelling
Feather44 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 17:04
  #2 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Step 1: check the AIP ? It kinda opens the question, how quickly you'd need to descent to comply with the author's intent...
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 17:45
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 852
Likes: 6
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Feather44
Good Day All,
It's been a while a have this question in mind. I did my research on the Jepp manual but I didn't find anything conclusive.
Is a level off between 12D and 7,4D mandatory? or the constraint 2000 Ft only apply at the FAF 7,4D?
Awaiting for your comments and doc reference if you have one.
Cheers

You can decent to 2000 feet after passing D12.0, but you don't have to if you're following a profile (eg. you can be higher than 2000 feet), but you must not decent below the MANDATORY altitude depicted until after passing D7.4(FD33).
Klimax is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 18:45
  #4 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Isn't that the situation if the word MANDATORY had not been there?
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 18:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
Interesting that 'mandatory' is also published for the procedure turn at 2500'. I've never seen this before. Regarding the 2000' & 7.4nm, it is usual to show 2000' AT 7.4nm. If the same was true for the procedure turn it should show 2500' AT 12nm.

It is bizarre by it being an unusual display. I wonder what other chart manufacturers depict? After all, Jeppesen publishes only the information supplied to them by the state.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 19:01
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 35
From: UK
Originally Posted by RAT 5
Interesting that 'mandatory' is also published for the procedure turn at 2500'. I've never seen this before. Regarding the 2000' & 7.4nm, it is usual to show 2000' AT 7.4nm. If the same was true for the procedure turn it should show 2500' AT 12nm.

It is bizarre by it being an unusual display. I wonder what other chart manufacturers depict? After all, Jeppesen publishes only the information supplied to them by the state.
The AIP version only has the ‘at 2500’ at 12D inbound so the turn can be flown whilst descending
EGPFlyer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st June 2018 | 20:09
  #7 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home


Lido. Couldn't find the Egyptian AIP online.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2018 | 08:15
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 57
From: GPS L INVALID
Lido shows it a lot more clearly. Unfortunately this is another example of Jeppesen's lack of standardization when it comes to their charts, its like the magic phrase 'authorization required' on CAT II and III minimums (stating the obvious), but the same note on RNP-AR procedures (which are usually called only RNAV still on many of their charts).
STBYRUD is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd June 2018 | 12:53
  #9 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Jeppesen could show the same as Lido, but for some reason decided not to, and included the M word. Still curious.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2018 | 10:00
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Middle East
Lido make it crystal clear!!
Thanks for your answers guys.
Feather44 is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2018 | 13:19
  #11 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
Originally Posted by STBYRUD
Lido shows it a lot more clearly. Unfortunately this is another example of Jeppesen's lack of standardization when it comes to their charts, its like the magic phrase 'authorization required' on CAT II and III minimums (stating the obvious), but the same note on RNP-AR procedures (which are usually called only RNAV still on many of their charts).
Jeppesen title for RNP AR is RNAV (RNP) RWY XX and combined with "authorization required" in the briefing strip is the functional equivalent of "RNP AR."
aterpster is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2018 | 14:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA
hahaha...just remembered, the term 'briefing strip' is a Jepp trademark!

Jepp Definition:
MANDATORY ALTITUDE — An altitude depicted on an instrument approach procedure chart requiring the aircraft to maintain altitude at the depicted value

All altitudes depicted in the profile view are MINIMUM altitudes unless specifically labeled otherwise.
All altitudes are above mean sea level in feet (AMSL).
5 — Maximum altitudes: may be abbreviated "MAX".
6 — Mandatory altitudes: abbreviations are not used.
7 — Recommended altitudes: abbreviations are not used
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2018 | 13:04
  #13 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
Originally Posted by underfire
hahaha...just remembered, the term 'briefing strip' is a Jepp trademark!
Could be. But, FAA uses briefing strips on FAA IAP charts. The concept originated at Volpe:

https://www.volpe.dot.gov/

not at Jeppesen.
aterpster is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2018 | 13:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 353
From: UK
Does the ‘Mandatory’ labelling follow ICAO standards and recommended practices?
Does the USA/FAA follow ICAO in this matter; if not have they declared a deviation from ICAO?
Alternatively if the FAA and ICAO are in agreement, then are ‘volpe’ / Jepp, etc out of step, and are they, and what they publish subject to FAA oversight?




Last edited by safetypee; 25th June 2018 at 14:43.
safetypee is offline  
Reply
Old 25th June 2018 | 20:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: PA


Standards in charting?!?!?! Thats funny!

Last edited by underfire; 25th June 2018 at 20:42.
underfire is offline  
Reply
Old 26th June 2018 | 13:04
  #16 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
From: On the Beach
Originally Posted by underfire


Standards in charting?!?!?! Thats funny!
https://tinyurl.com/y85govyu
aterpster is offline  
Reply
Old 6th July 2020 | 16:24
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: dublin
Just wondering if we had made any further progress on this or if we have anything definitive.

It doesn’t appear to me to make any sense to be using stepdown attitudes nowadays with the systems we have on board and our ability to fly constant descent CDFA approaches.

Interested to hear peoples opinions 🤔
jondoyle is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2020 | 05:36
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 373
Likes: 13
From: Australia
I'd take it to mean that you must descend to 2000' once passed 12nm. Could it be due to traffic conflicts at another field? Or to separate departing traffic?
717tech is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2020 | 08:35
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
From: Amantido
Old topic this one, but I asked a similar questions not long ago. It's just a Jeppesen thing, it's mandatory to be at the FAF at or above 2000 ft, not below.
Banana Joe is offline  
Reply
Old 7th July 2020 | 20:34
  #20 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 937
Likes: 67
From: USA
Originally Posted by Banana Joe
Old topic this one, but I asked a similar questions not long ago. It's just a Jeppesen thing, it's mandatory to be at the FAF at or above 2000 ft, not below.
This is not true. It's mandatory to be AT 2000, not above or below.
​​​​
Vessbot is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.