Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Lateral Seperation NAT MNPS/HLA 25nm? RLATSM

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Lateral Seperation NAT MNPS/HLA 25nm? RLATSM

Old 25th Feb 2016, 13:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: istanbul
Age: 33
Posts: 3
Lateral Seperation NAT MNPS/HLA 25nm? RLATSM

Hello everybody,
There is a question that i can't find an answer.I have just started to 777 from 737 and reading documents about NAT.
So new procedure called as "RLATSM" is in use for some of the OTS. And it says that lateral seperation is now reduced to 25nm between core tracks of OTS's for specific levels. The question is, how come the 1/2 degrees of latitudes become 25nm instead of 30nms? i think SLOP has nothing to do with it.

DOC 007 says that

In Section 1.10 – “Trials and Future Developments”, information is provided on the planned first phase of North Atlantic trials of reducing the lateral separation minimum to 25 NM. This is scheduled to commence in November 2015. In this “RLatSM” Phase 1, 25 NM lateral separation will be implemented by establishing ½ degree spacing between two specified core OTS tracks, for use by RNP4 Approved aircraft logged-on for ADS-C & CPDLC within the vertical limits applicable to the airspace associated with the NAT Region Data Link Mandate.

Which part i have been missing or wrong?

Thanks in advance.
sefaketen is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2016, 15:53
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 6
and what about the in-flight contingency procedure in RlatSM.????
andmus is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2016, 16:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 428

I don't have the document to hand but I think it's to do with where the tracks "slope" that is where they are inclined. I wondered the same thing re 25 vs 30 nm separation.


Re contingency a subject of much discussion currently. As I understand it turnbacks prior to getting approval need to be out of MNPS airspace. My take on that is below FL280 so down to FL275. I'm not sure if the appropriate ICAO doc is up to date. If anyone has a link please put it up here.

BBK is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2016, 16:31
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 91
Whilst the North-South separation is indeed 30 nm, the actual lateral spacing will be less than that depending on the angle of the track. Given the normal angles of the NAT tracks, they will always be a minimum of 25 nm apart. If they said 30, then someone here would probably complain that it wasn't.

Peter G-W is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2016, 21:18
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: istanbul
Age: 33
Posts: 3
Peter G-W
Thanks for the reply.

I just can't get it, i mean at which latitude/longitude, ½ degrees latitude distance can be low as 25NMs?

i.e. yesterday tracks were :

T 58/50 58/40 57/30 57/20
U 57/50 57/40 56/30 56/20
V 56/50 56/40 55/30 55/20
W 55/50 55/40 54/30 54/20

For the numbers above; it is all 60NMs we know.And for ½ degree's, it is all 30NMs for the 50ish longtitudes. OTS tracks are all for west-east bounds

Sorry, think i should go back to Geo classes in high school

As far as i know , the idea is to be offset 15NMs and 500FT descent or climb to a level different than normals.
If you can maintain your altitude, keep it until 10NMs offset, then descent 500FT below or above, then make it 15NMs offset.
If you can't maintain the altitude, with the possible lowest rate of descent,be offset from track, when clear of traffics and tracks, expedite descent to 500FT above or below of desired flight level

At 15NMs offset, go below FL280, then divert.
sefaketen is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2016, 22:33
  #6 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,007
If the tracks run perfectly E-W then 30nm is assured. But they don't. Taken to extreme, if the tracks run N-S then the spacing is 0nm! But for an average track that jinks a little norther south, thats enough to bring the 30 down so something approaching 25nm. Thats where it comes from.

But at the moment the track message contains...

So there aren't any RLatSM tracks.
Cough is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2016, 15:54
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: istanbul
Age: 33
Posts: 3
I think i understood now. My mistake is that i always think OTS runs perfectly E-W.So when they tend to be N-S , it may reduce below 30NMs.

Thanks for the info @Cough
sefaketen is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2016, 14:37
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: planet earth
Posts: 41
this is the last version of the NAT manual.
In effect it seems there is no change in the contingency procedures chapter regarding the RLAT. probably because it s considered safer to stay 15 NM out of the track, where the possibility that another aircraft in an adiacent track is experiencing a similar emergency, than flying closer to the own track where there may be more traffic and more risk of proximity.
Trimaranus is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 11:50
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,221
Suggest you Google, and down load the North Atlantic Resource Guide. It is for US operators, but it still is ICAO driven and compliant. Revised every 90 days so it's the most current document out there. Also AC91-70B is good resource. Don't let the FAA stamp of approval drive you off we are all working in the same airspace.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2016, 10:12
  #10 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Upwind
Posts: 4
Does anybody know when the trail phase for the RLatSM ends? Meaning, when you need to be RLatSM approved by local authority in order to continue to have access to the NAT HLA track system?
Thanks for info and links
EPR turbo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.