AF447 wreckage found
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Easy to forget that it is a very, very big ocean, and acoustic conditions have so many variables it is not a straightforward matter to determine why the boxes active sonar wasn't easily detectable.
Keep in mind the area size here; even 10sq miles is a massive area in subsea operations. Hats off to all involved for locating the site.
Keep in mind the area size here; even 10sq miles is a massive area in subsea operations. Hats off to all involved for locating the site.
Gamekeeper
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: South East
Age: 60
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Mickk. Found them through the Techlog thread on the BEA site. Interesting discussion over there, including whether that gear was in the extended position prior to impact - the origin of my query really. For ref that's a very good thread to be following for the technically minded.
Well done to the investigating team and its partners for getting to this stage.
Well done to the investigating team and its partners for getting to this stage.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psychophysiological entity
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 83
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are we seeing in the vertical scan . . . is terrain supporting the vertical displacement of specific metal objects?
I had thought it was flatter than that at the site.
I had thought it was flatter than that at the site.
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Side Scan Sonar
Even though this is a side scan sonar image, I believe the orientation is mainly one of looking down at the ocean bottom and showing the distribution of wreckage on the ocean floor as seen from above. Fairly tight cluster of wreckage to me means the aircraft was largely intact when it hit the ocean surface and sank.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MKE
Age: 67
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Past drift analysis
There used to be some excellent analysis in the old forum (MM43, Greatbear etal) on drift and potential final location. It would be interesting to know how accurate the analysis was.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: london
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I’m not a conspiracy theorist but those data recorders would have been putting out the equivalent of a heavy rock-concerts worth of sound to any sub-surface military listening device. And that relatively compact debris site would have been a magnetic sea-bed anomaly the size of a skyscraper, even to a looking satellite. This one does make me scratch my head (and few other parts of my anatomy). I really believe the technology exists to have found this wreckage before now. Which must beg the question ‘why wasn’t it found until now’ ? and the answer to that can only be because it wasn’t convenient. For what reason we don’t know, will never know !
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 67
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
memyself,
if you care to read the original thread in the tech log section you will find that your question too has been answered there.
What a name you have.... I smell a conspiracy just in that name!
if you care to read the original thread in the tech log section you will find that your question too has been answered there.
What a name you have.... I smell a conspiracy just in that name!
And that relatively compact debris site would have been a magnetic sea-bed anomaly the size of a skyscraper, even to a looking satellite. This one does make me scratch my head (and few other parts of my anatomy). I really believe the technology exists to have found this wreckage before now. Which must beg the question ‘why wasn’t it found until now’ ?
What is a modern airliner made of? Not magnetic stuff.
I think you want to see conspiracy where none likely exists. And that in itself speaks volumes.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by memyself
I’m not a conspiracy theorist but ...
If they had found the wreck immediately ...
... then they would have known beforehand that it would crash there
If they had found the wreck after a long search
... read above
If they hadn't found the wreck at all
... well, that explains itself
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Toulouse
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Salut les gars! Hi guys!
well, it may be time to wipe off the fog from your glasses
Of course, "they" do know where the wreckage is .... since long time.
Just remember the means deployed during the search phase 1, 2 & 3.
Now, just focused on search phase 3 and look at the searched areas on the following map (extract from BEA - Point of the situation) - sorry, it is in french - :
http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....phase.3.fr.jpg
By coïncidence, the abyssal plain where is sitting the wreckage has not being expored...
Remember again, just after the crash, a brazilian air patrouilleur found and oil puddle nearby the last known A330 point of report, and, still by coïncidence, no submarine search was conducted around this area....
Still in memory, a french submarine vessel was involved during the search phase 1 (just after crash). The job of the submarine is to LISTEN, with its sophisticated listenning device, any sound in a wide sound spectrum. The french navy has listened some thing..... and then a public communication said that there is mistake in the interpretation /localisation of the sound (mistaken with a beluga cry).
What's next? Easy to guess:
1. "we" do not know whether the CVR&SSFDR are within the wreckage or not;
2. if not--> end of the story
3. if yes : are they readable? Y or N
4. if Y ....
5. if N, go back to 2.
In any case, the BEA, officials, airline and AIB has an escape door to save, not only their face but also DZE BUSINESS.
Because this world is talking and doing business
What about the bodies? The remaining families? Who cares? and this is most likely the most important.
well, it may be time to wipe off the fog from your glasses
Of course, "they" do know where the wreckage is .... since long time.
Just remember the means deployed during the search phase 1, 2 & 3.
Now, just focused on search phase 3 and look at the searched areas on the following map (extract from BEA - Point of the situation) - sorry, it is in french - :
http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....phase.3.fr.jpg
By coïncidence, the abyssal plain where is sitting the wreckage has not being expored...
Remember again, just after the crash, a brazilian air patrouilleur found and oil puddle nearby the last known A330 point of report, and, still by coïncidence, no submarine search was conducted around this area....
Still in memory, a french submarine vessel was involved during the search phase 1 (just after crash). The job of the submarine is to LISTEN, with its sophisticated listenning device, any sound in a wide sound spectrum. The french navy has listened some thing..... and then a public communication said that there is mistake in the interpretation /localisation of the sound (mistaken with a beluga cry).
What's next? Easy to guess:
1. "we" do not know whether the CVR&SSFDR are within the wreckage or not;
2. if not--> end of the story
3. if yes : are they readable? Y or N
4. if Y ....
5. if N, go back to 2.
In any case, the BEA, officials, airline and AIB has an escape door to save, not only their face but also DZE BUSINESS.
Because this world is talking and doing business
What about the bodies? The remaining families? Who cares? and this is most likely the most important.
The job of the submarine is to LISTEN, with its sophisticated listenning device, any sound in a wide sound spectrum.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Corinth,Texas
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is gear extended?
From the photos, it certainly appears that the landing gear is extended. Any ideas why that would be? Years ago, a 727 in an uncontrollable dive, the crew lowered the gear to slow down and were able to successfully recover from the dive.
jj
jj
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Age: 62
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why keep searching?
They renewed the search because they were named in a civil lawsuit and are trying to find evidence that will prove they were not negligent in ways that contributed to the accident. I would say some degree of cynicism is warranted, however, with so many people involved (Woods Hole Institute) I don't think you can really keep the wraps on things. Now if you believe the Apollo moon landing was a hoax ...
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 66
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
You are completely wrong .. or you have a hidden agenda or you are misinformed 
The researches phase 4 was decided months ago and certainly with some pressure from the family associations
The lawsuites were made after the decision of phase 4
They renewed the search because they were named in a civil lawsuit and are trying to find evidence that will prove they were not negligent in ways that contributed to the accident
The researches phase 4 was decided months ago and certainly with some pressure from the family associations
The lawsuites were made after the decision of phase 4
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The job of the submarine is to LISTEN, with its sophisticated listenning device, any sound in a wide sound spectrum.
